User talk:Mrfoogles

Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, Mrfoogles, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.



Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

vandalism

Hey, Mrfoogles. Here on WP we have a very specific definition of WP:Vandalism, and it doesn't include inserting a joke into a discussion. Please don't edit war with people over attempts to inject mild levity into policy discussions. Valereee (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I guess that was probably a bit unnecessary. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I noticed you have been editing some health-related articles, and I wanted to say that a bunch of us hang out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. You're welcome to join us if that's an area of editing that interests you. It's a good place to ask questions about finding good sources for medical content or writing style. Feel free to put the group's page on your watchlist, or stop by to say hello some time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brent Cotter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Mrfoogles. Thank you for your work on Slim Pezin. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey (clothing) fork

Hello, I saw that you have forked the jersey (clothing) article. Wouldn't it be better if the article remained as is and kept all types of jerseys on one article? they all fall under the umbrella term clothing. if it were a totally different thing, then i'd split. for example, if someone put jersey (the island) with jersey (clothing).

on the other hand sports jersey on its own could probably be expanded further. what do you think? Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) 08:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I split them because even though they’re referred to by the same term, they’re different kinds of clothing; very few sports jerseys are traditional knit jerseys like are shown on the jerseys (clothing) article. I was also planning to add some of the content from uniform, maybe, which I am also trying to split. I think it definitely could be expanded, like most articles Mrfoogles (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Balon (protein) (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgp28 was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Hibernation factor. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I liked this article a lot but I cannot currently find enough sources to convince me that it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. Given the protein is only recently discovered, I suspect it could meet the criteria in the future. In the meantime, I suggest you merge this text into Hibernation factor (which you also created), then split it off once there is enough coverage in reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mgp28 (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's pretty much what I thought also. I already have a section in Hibernation factor on Balon, only it's not as long because it's not its own article. Do you mind marking it as a promising draft? I figured I'd leave it there for when the protein does get some coverage (probably in several years, but I imagine it will eventually) Mrfoogles (talk) 16:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the promising draft template. I think you could still add more to the Hibernation factor article without it being too long. Mgp28 (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I maybe could, but I'll probably leave it condensed so that there's space. The important information is already in the article. Mrfoogles (talk) 16:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mrfoogles! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mgp28 (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment. You definitely should join WikiProject Wikipedia. FloridaMan21 01:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I try to review a couple articles when I put one in. It's pretty much just me occasionally, Ktkvtsh, and you, but it's surprisingly not-dead for all that. Probably not going to join any wikiprojects, though. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joël André Ornstein (2nd nomination), (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I do know, I just forgot. Thanks for telling me I missed one, though. Mrfoogles (talk) 14:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Livermore, California, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:09, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities and towns along the Tennessee River moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of cities and towns along the Tennessee River. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand spices being helpful, but I’m not sure you’re right here, because this is a list article. For example, List of cities and towns along the Potomac River also has no sources. Most list articles don’t have sources. You could say the grouping is less obvious because you can’t tautologically say an arbitrary city is along a river, but they can be easily verified by looking at a map: I could cite google maps, maybe? How would you feel if I added that source and then undraftified? (The AFC process takes months and I’d rather avoid it for a tiny article like this one).
I pretty much copy-pasted it from a list in the article, so I wasn’t worrying too much about sources. Mrfoogles (talk) 15:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Re: last comment: just realized you said you were ok if it was moved back, added apple maps as a source and spot-checked a random sample and did so. Mrfoogles (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nature tourism

Hi there. As part of New Page Review I've restored the redirect of Nature tourism to Ecotourism. I saw you cite a Vox.com article that points to differences, but enough sources (including ones you cited in your Nature tourism stub, such as this one, this one, and this one basically say they're overlapping or identical concepts. To avoid creating a WP:CONTENTFORK, the best place to explore this difference (to the extent there is one) is in the much-better-established Ecotourism article. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect, but know that if it is reverted I will nominate the page at Articles for Deletion to restore a stable redirect. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The second and third ones there don’t actually present them as identical; the 2nd says they “overlap” and the 3rd, if you scroll down a couple paragraphs, explains the difference. The 1st also has a section on ecotourism and explains the differences (basically, while ecotourism can just be a marketing term, it is supposed to include environmental education and conservation, not just nature). The two concepts definitely overlap, but all the sources you mentioned clearly distinguish them, except in the case where ecotourism is only used as a marketing term.
While they are similar, I think the key difference is ecotourism adds education. A lot of info that just applies to nature tourism in general is in the ecotourism article and would probably need to be moved (or maybe ecotourism should be a subsection), but that said I think the articles should be separate. Mrfoogles (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given the argument over the term (see Ecotourism#Definition), maybe it would be better to just have a nature tourism article with subsections. Mrfoogles (talk) 15:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neptini (disambiguation)

Apologies that my reversion was a little too speedy; will leave you to it :) Jonathan Deamer (talk) 17:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eddie Canales

On 26 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eddie Canales, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Eddie Canales set up nearly 200 water stations along an area of the US–Mexico border to save the lives of undocumented immigrants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eddie Canales. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eddie Canales), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Tynte

Regarding your feedback on Edward Tynte, I added some more information, but admittedly there seems to be a lack of sources regarding Tynte. Do you know any Wikipedians specializing in history who could perhaps help me find some more sources on him? Thanks, TarheelBornBred (talk) 17:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TarheelBornBred, I'm here because you put up the "help me" template. It looks like you actually just wanted to ask Mrfoogles this question, so I've turned the template off. (It's basically a wikipedian Bat Signal and will call in unrelated people from all over.) I am also a wikipedian who specializes in history, so I'll have a look for you in a moment. -- asilvering (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for someone who wasn't governor for very long, I don't think you're going to find a whole lot, since there simply isn't much to say. But I don't think you've exhausted the limits of basic web checks like google scholar and google books. (eg, gschol: [1]) Most of them seem to be talking about his death, but again, hardly surprising. If you're paywalled out of any of those sources, try WP:WPL or WP:RX. WP:RDH is a good place to ask if you have any specific questions about a historical fact. -- asilvering (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 08:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's important to have edit summaries, but in this case (rating large numbers of chemistry list articles as lists to try to clean them up) it'd slow down the process a lot to have to type out the edit summary every time, so I chose not to. It does make it more inconvenient if you're trying to figure out who rated the page, but when making that number of edits it's not worth it. It might be worth writing edit summaries for the higher (B,C) rated articles, I acknowledge. Mrfoogles (talk) 08:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I actually first became aware while looking at article-space via chloropyridine, where a factual mistake was introduced. That mistake itself is no big deal, easily fixed. Then a few of the talk-page edits were on my watchlist, and I agree that they are fine edits, but it wasted my time because I had to read to decide if there was a talkpage comment I wanted to respond to. That's not a potential inconvenience looking back later if someone is interested in ratings, but an actual inconvenience for everyone who has it on watchlist at the time you make each such edit. It seems like a main item is "add class=list to talkpage of articles in a setlist category", which sounds like an easy bot-task to request. DMacks (talk) 09:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Flagan

I saw you added an "Independent sources" tag to the Richard Flagan article which I created. Its notability is based on WP:NACADEMIC criteria #1, #2, #3, #5, and #8. Most academics don't have articles written about them in independent WP:RS which is why (based on my understanding of WP:NOTABILITY) that Notability (academics) has its own policy. Note the "Independent sources" tag states that "This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral." But I don't think there's anything in the article that isn't verifiable or neutral. Are there particular points you are concerned about? I'm inclined to remove the tag but wanted to hear from you first. Nnev66 (talk) 01:15, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the tag to say that it would be better to have sources independent of him (organizations he is not a board member of, i.e.), not that he wasn't notable. Looking at it the policy does say "Once the passage of one or more notability criteria has been verified through independent sources, or through the reliable sources listed explicitly for this purpose in the specific criteria notes, non-independent sources, such as official institutional and professional sources, are widely accepted as reliable sourcing for routine, uncontroversial details.", I guess. Still, I'm not seeing any sources on the article that go into detail on him that aren't bios written by organizations he has major influence in -- this can make articles have kind of a one-sided perspective when controversial issues are involved; it would be better to have independent sources. Given there aren't any concrete problems, though, and it's per policy, I'll remove the tag. I wonder if there really aren't any independent sources, though. Mrfoogles (talk) 01:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response and for removing the tag. I did look for sources using search engines, Proquest, and Newspapers.com. For academics, there just aren't mainstream publications that write in-depth articles about them for the most part. This article would fail WP:GNG because of this. I agree that universities/institutions are likely going to publish positive things about their professors, but I just tried to get information about this subject from these sources to include additional details, e.g. his relationship with his collaborators. I spent more time on this article than I intended because I was trying to write an article beyond the perfunctory. Nnev66 (talk) 02:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Mrfoogles! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 03:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mrfoogles (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


November 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Mrfoogles for collecting more than 56.0 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's NOV24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8,000 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer Alt (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Mrfoogles. Thank you for your work on William Mendenhall. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your help!

Hi Mrfoogles, I am very grateful for the various recent edits that improve clarity and formatting on the draft Rarefied Gas Dynamics page. Ingrid wysong (talk) 01:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just going around fixing typos and messing with things. Looking at the page again I think you should maybe put in more frequent citations -- on Wikipedia you generally want to be able to figure what most nontrivial sentences are cited to, and it's not as easy to go "oh, the last three sentences are clearly cited to <this ref at the end>", because not everyone means to say that the source at the end of the three sentences cites all three, so it creates ambiguity whether all of the info is cited unless you go and read through all the references to see what they say (plus, maybe there were originally two sentences, but someone added some new stuff in the middle not related to that source at all). Mrfoogles (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]