User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 30

Archives

#01  · (May 2005—December 2007) #02  · (January—June 2008) #03  · (June—November 2008) #04  · (December 2008—March 2009) #05  · (March—August 2009) #06  · (September—December 2009) #07  · (January—December 2010) #08  · (January—April 2011) #09  · (April—December 2011) #10  · (January—June 2012) #11  · (July—December 2012) #12  · (January—June 2013) #13  · (July—December 2013) #14  · (January—June 2014) #15  · (July—December 2014) #16  · (January—June 2015) #17  · (July—December 2015) #18  · (January—June 2016) #19  · (July—December 2016) #20  · (January—December 2017) #21  · (July—December 2018) #22  · (January—June 2018) #23  · (June—December 2018) #24  · (January—June 2019) #25  · (July—December 2019) #26  · (January—June 2020) #27  · (July—December 2020) #28  · (January—June 2021) #29  · (July—December 2021) #30  · (January—June 2022) #31  · (July—December 2022) #32  · (January—June 2023) #33  · (July—December 2023) #34  · (January—June 2024) #35  · (July—December 2024)

This is an archive of past discussions with User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 25

←

Archive 28

Archive 29

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

→

Archive 35

Time travelling

Not cluttering the AfD, but just wanted to say I love your comment here. Indeed, so much better uses of time travel powers if we're issued them. Star Mississippi 21:34, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

ANI issue

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thecleanerand (talk) 21:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Film grosses

With respect to Special:Diff/1070755336, I was just curious to whether you thought that cinemas show films out of a sense of charity and donate all the money they receive from selling tickets to the studios? Because if that's how the business works, I'm not really sure how the cinemas stay in business. In short, please don't subtract one random value from another random value and say, "The conclusion is obvious!" Because, chances are, your conclusion is wrong. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:08, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: With all due respect, reasonable people can disagree over what can be deemed obvious and a box office flop. I'm not sure why time needs to be taken to mention this matter, especially in this tone, to a person that I consider to be a fellow respected editor needs to be over something like this. -- Dolotta (talk) 03:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Espn4 and Fox Sports 2

Why u reverted all my edits when they were right like Fox Sports and Espn 4 the espn 4 article already talks about espn4 where as the fox sports article that i puted talks about the fox sports 1/2 brazil not espn 4 dont understand whats the issue there would like to know the issue of reverting the utv page when everything i have done was all put like the sources so dont understand the issue around those two subjects would like an answer thanks.Espyul (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes i am aware of that all over latin america is espn 4 but the reason i reverted was because fox sports still exists as fox sports 2 when i reverted i was refering to that no date back and not espn 4 that has place in the espn brazil article that dont understand the issue with that would like answer thanks.Espyul (talk)

Vme Kida

What about Peppa pig or super wings being aired on VME Kida? Cartergishere (talk) 15:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Vme Kids

I've full protected the article for 3 days. You really need to be careful. I understand that some editors are a pain in the butt, but you went over 3RR and I could have blocked you both, but chose protection instead. Again, please be careful. Had I instinctively blocked him, I would have had to block you as well. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Old category hoaxer

Hi Mr, I just ran across [1], whom you had warned last year about category hoaxing. Looks like they returned to editing cats again as soon as the block was up. I reverted their edit here, which is definitely a hoax/vandalism, but I don't know enough about the other shows to tell without doing more research now than I have time for. So I wanted to let you know of their return, and see what you thought. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 04:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Sourcewashing

What is "sourcewashing"? Thanks. BilCat (talk) 01:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I'm familiar with the tactic, having seen it in other types of articles but not the term. BilCat (talk) 02:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

WPTZ local presence in Plattsburgh?

Please don't make edits like this, in which you claimed (without citing reliable sources) that WPTZ was "leaving its former main studio as a news bureau and backup facility". There is a token WPTZ facility in Plattsburgh, but it's not the original "5 Television Drive" - the former main studio (which was put up for sale) - but some smaller facility in a former bank building elsewhere in the city. 308 Cornelia St. in Plattsburgh, per [2] [3] [4] [5]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.87.40 (talk) 04:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Concerning the wording in the PBS article about whether or not PBS would be considered a TV network...

So, since the RfC about PBS's status as not only a US TV network, but a major TV network as well, has the consensus that those two details about PBS are true, how should the wording in the PBS article be re-done to reflect the community consensus that PBS is considered not just a US TV network, but a major US TV network? 2600:1700:C960:2270:94A6:8FE6:3787:1A0D (talk) 05:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Logo alt tag/WACY-TV

Heads up: if you have to insert a pipe character (|) again in a |logo_alt= field like at WACY-TV, use {{!}}. This will prevent it from cutting off and reading as another parameter, throwing an error. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

An RfC about PBS's status as a TV network...

Because of your involvement in the RfC about PBS's status, not just as a US TV network, but as a major US TV network, I am inviting you to participate in a Request for comment about the status of the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) as a TV network. 2600:1700:C960:2270:79B0:F220:B8D8:7E65 (talk) 22:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)