User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 20

Archives

#01  · (May 2005—December 2007) #02  · (January—June 2008) #03  · (June—November 2008) #04  · (December 2008—March 2009) #05  · (March—August 2009) #06  · (September—December 2009) #07  · (January—December 2010) #08  · (January—April 2011) #09  · (April—December 2011) #10  · (January—June 2012) #11  · (July—December 2012) #12  · (January—June 2013) #13  · (July—December 2013) #14  · (January—June 2014) #15  · (July—December 2014) #16  · (January—June 2015) #17  · (July—December 2015) #18  · (January—June 2016) #19  · (July—December 2016) #20  · (January—December 2017) #21  · (July—December 2018) #22  · (January—June 2018) #23  · (June—December 2018) #24  · (January—June 2019) #25  · (July—December 2019) #26  · (January—June 2020) #27  · (July—December 2020) #28  · (January—June 2021) #29  · (July—December 2021) #30  · (January—June 2022) #31  · (July—December 2022) #32  · (January—June 2023) #33  · (July—December 2023) #34  · (January—June 2024) #35  · (July—December 2024)

This is an archive of past discussions with User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

←

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

→

Archive 25

Your hostile edit

Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is a collective process. Editing is to be done on a unilateral, not a single minded way with no other parties involved. I will pursue mediation and I will not let this drop. Again, you are being very aggressive. Your first move was to delete, rather than to have an open dialogue. I wonder if this is a pattern of yours. Why is your talk page history invisible. What are you trying to hide? Dogru144 (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Referring of course to Category:Classic TV channel

Please heed this statement on Wikipedia, referring to Wikipedia as a group effort, not a single person's project. Let's have dialogue before you destroy someone else's work. Dogru144 (talk)

Notice that I am pursuing this matter with Wikipedia authorities. It takes valuable time to create articles. You deprived me of my time by deleting "Classic TV channel" category without due process. Please note in the discussion page for the category that you deleted for the six point grounds for my contesting the action.Dogru144 (talk) 00:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

You wasted my time in deleting and taking a unilateral action. You have not addressed any of my points above. Because of the offense of wasting my time and because of your evasion of addressing any of the six points of due process and good faith discussion, I am continuing my appeal to Wikipedia authorities regarding your aggression.Dogru144 (talk)

This matter is not resolved until the original category title is restored and we can have an equal level discussion.Dogru144 (talk) 00:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

None of this was ever followed. From Wikipedia:Deletion process (process listed; truncated for readability Nate • (chatter) 00:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)) Dogru144 (talk) 00:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Noticed your TruTV edit -- Again, I am diligently following your actions on my work, especially destructive edits done with no explanation. If you have any courtesy or sense of the Golden Rule you will explain your actions as you do so.Dogru144 (talk) 01:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

"Stop editing to my talk page from hereon out; I've explained my side and I have apologized profusely; I'm moving on." Please explain why you do discussions on my page but you do not tolerate discussion on your page? Again, you demonstrate that you have no regard for Golden Rule. Just back off the aggressive edits.Dogru144 (talk) 01:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

You are formally being put on notice that you are definitely getting reported. You apologized earlier. Now you are grasping at straws. Stop the stalking and deleting of my edits. All of the Logo TV progamming is retro and non-original. "doesn't market as classic TV; inappropriate categorization" is inappropriate. Its actions: its programming show that it is retro. Dogru144 (talk) 02:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

AfD shenanigans

Hey,

I've seen you come across users such as Special:Contributions/Sdfghi and Special:Contributions/Oldemane. There has been a serial long-term vandal, known as User:Nsmutte who has been harassing particular users by creating childish AfD's for the articles that they have created. You may want to read Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte for more context. Accounts like these should be reported to the SPI linked above. Thanks. :-) 172.58.41.30 (talk) 04:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

KASA 2011 Logo.png file

Hi Mrschmipf,

I work for Ramar Communications, the new owner of KASA-TV. I am hoping you can help me remove this image from Wikipedia. Email programs are pulling this image into emails when we type in the URL and it is causing distractions between clients and Telemundo corporate.

I can verify my identity if needed.

Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Draven1978 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Cable placements for the Green Bay OTA stations

Hello there! I recently thanked you for the cable placement additions I had on WBAY, WFRV and WLUK's pages. I still want to include the cable placements (as it slightly differentiates from most OTA TV stations in other markets), but I wonder if there is a more simple way to do it. For example, on WHAS-TV's page: "On cable, WHAS-TV is available on Charter Spectrum channel 4 and in high definition on digital channel 908." I wonder if I mention just Spectrum's placements only on the Green Bay/Fox Cities system (of which I have family members who are Spectrum customers), it will make the pages more simpler without a bunch of unnecessary information and easier to read. I want to hear your thoughts on this. Thank you!

Alex jirgens (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

In Demand Wiki Page Edits

@MrSchimpf Regarding your recent reversion of my edits on In Demand, I would ask that you reconsider given the following information. In Demand no longer distributes College Extra. It is provided by ESPN3 and WatchESPN.com or the WatchESPN app as seen here: http://espnmediazone.com/us/press-releases/2015/08/espn-introduces-new-college-sports-service-espn-college-extra/. Additionally, according to my cable provider's guide, there is programming from 8-11AM weekday mornings on PPV from In Demand which contradicts this: signs off weekday mornings from 8AM to 11AM (Eastern Time) to feed promotions of upcoming movies and events of the next month to its headend affiliates. These are now sent digitally, though the channels continue to maintain maintenance periods in these low-purchased timeslots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evy6292 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit to TVTV

I see you edited the TVTV page a while ago and removed reference to WhereverTV with a comment that Wikipedia doesn't reference stock symbols - but I see the MSFT and APPL wikipedia pages (just two of many examples) both reference stock ticker symbols as the first possible definition of each. Can you please undo your change and add the TVTV <--> WhereverTV refernce back to the TVTV page. Thank you.2603:301F:1B05:1500:908E:18FC:B315:1AA5 (talk) 19:36, 26 April 2017 (UTC) -MC

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to all registered editors at RuPaul's Drag Race and Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race this year (2017) that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

TNT TV channel

Hi,
there have been some changes in the article of TNT (TV channel), which require attention. It will be a lot appreciated if you would take a look at it. I dont have any knowledge of that field. (You are one of the top contributors to the article.)
Thanks a lot. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:14, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Mrs. Chimp f! :-) —usernamekiran(talk) 00:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

What was wrong with my edits?. ANDREWs13

You must be mistaken

I do not understand there is a template to add a link to the main article. it is very common on Wikipedia to have a section then link the main article. I do not think this is a rule, if it is please link it to my. this is the first I have ever heard of it. You must be mistaken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ANDREWs13 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)