User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 14

Archives

#01  · (May 2005—December 2007) #02  · (January—June 2008) #03  · (June—November 2008) #04  · (December 2008—March 2009) #05  · (March—August 2009) #06  · (September—December 2009) #07  · (January—December 2010) #08  · (January—April 2011) #09  · (April—December 2011) #10  · (January—June 2012) #11  · (July—December 2012) #12  · (January—June 2013) #13  · (July—December 2013) #14  · (January—June 2014) #15  · (July—December 2014) #16  · (January—June 2015) #17  · (July—December 2015) #18  · (January—June 2016) #19  · (July—December 2016) #20  · (January—December 2017) #21  · (July—December 2018) #22  · (January—June 2018) #23  · (June—December 2018) #24  · (January—June 2019) #25  · (July—December 2019) #26  · (January—June 2020) #27  · (July—December 2020) #28  · (January—June 2021) #29  · (July—December 2021) #30  · (January—June 2022) #31  · (July—December 2022) #32  · (January—June 2023) #33  · (July—December 2023) #34  · (January—June 2024) #35  · (July—December 2024)

This is an archive of past discussions with User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 20

Nomination of The Monsters in the Morning for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Monsters in the Morning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Monsters in the Morning (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Levdr1lp / talk 09:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

troy doherty

its his he has directed people to go there from his official twitter page you fanboy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kittychew (talk • contribs) 03:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Songs of The Monsters in the Morning for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Songs of The Monsters in the Morning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs of The Monsters in the Morning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Levdr1lp / talk 20:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for taking care of the Finealt edits. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Sheboygan Armory

What the status of the Sheboygan Municipal Auditorium and Armory? I lost track of what's happening there since I moved away from Sheboygan almost a decade ago. Anons are editing the page but I don't trust what's going on the page. On a side note, I'm sad to see that the anon is fearing admin retribution from me - obviously they're generalizing and don't know me at all. Thanks, MrSchimpf. Royalbroil 15:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Nick UK

Fine then. Remove my hard work. See if I care. TDFan2006 (talk) 07:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Oh, Sky 1 has a logo gallery! Maybe you should remove that! Oh! And so does some Cartoon Network articles. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 11:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Stefan2 image tagging

I am really not sure why they think removing logos from television station articles (when the images clearly do not violate fair use guidelines). The logos are very simply identifying the stations and provide critical commentary. I point to another edit conflict I had with Stefan2 regarding the use of television logos (here). I also happen to notice other conflicts they are having with others users (here and here). They are clearly removing valid and correctly licensed images from articles since they are deciding to interpret the non-free logo policy to an extreme. Strafidlo (talk) 03:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

hanks for user undo editions Matheusoares, I thought that your edits were correct. regards.--GeorgeMilan (Talk) 20:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Infobox television episode

There are some issues with proposed parameters for {{Infobox television episode}}. I've left a message at WT:TV about this but unfortunately the templates used in the TV project draw little interest, even though they often cause us grief. Because of this I'm approaching experienced editors directly, with a view to getting some more input. The discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Infobox television episode provides an introduction to the issues. Your attention would be greatly appreciated. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Renaming a section

Hi.

I wanted to let you know that I reverted your section rename in Windows 8.1 because:

1. The section no longer talks about Windows 8.1 Update 1 only. "Update" is a better title.
2. There are inbound links that need to be fixed. Why the burden, especially because...
3. ..."Update 1" just a pseudonym. Let's wait and see what it'll be called. One rename burden, instead of two, right?

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 15:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

File:American Broadcasting Company 2013 Logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:American Broadcasting Company 2013 Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

nick studio 10

oh so you agree with me now took you long enough after all those changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kittychew (talk • contribs) 04:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, MrSchimpf/Archive. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

For having that name! Now that you know I watch the Wikipedia article on Girl Meets World, they're not ours, they're going to be old Disney, and not ours. I can tell. I think that's what they are. Ask Fatblock. The Italian electronica dance musician called Nick(elodeon). LonelyLaura (talk) 22:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Disney XD Australia

Hello Mrschimpf,

I have reverted you revert to the Disney XD (Australia) article and wanted to communicate with you directly as to why I have done so. I wrote the existing structure/format mirroring that of other Disney XD channels, namely Disney XD UK. I than started a discussion on the Disney XD Australia talk page which gave precise detail as to why I had done so and asked for editors to comment if they believed the other structure (the one which you reverted the page to) should be used. As there has been no comment/discussion as to changing the format, I did not see why that structure should be used and thus reverted your edit. Please see my discussion and if you believe the alternate structure should be used please detail why.

Thank you,

Forbesy 777 (talk) 01:14, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

That is no problem whatsoever and fully understand your rationale =). This article is just being a nightmare trying to keep in order, writing messages on IP talk pages (similar to the one I have written to you above) that many times it's starting to feel like groundhog day, but figured a high-ranking editor such as yourself must have done it for a specific reason and wanted to find out what that was. Turns out you were just unknowingly reverting the potentially only valid edit by that blocked user :P. Thanks for the quick reply, Forbesy 777 (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, MrSchimpf/Archive. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 15:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hello,

I have a question for you. Are there supposed to be time slots for the syndicated shows in TV station articles? I thought they weren't supposed to be there, but there is an IP address that likes to keep adding them, especially to the KRNV-DT article. I am pretty sure that it is the same user doing all of that editing, but it shows up under different IP addresses each day. He is also doing a lot of editing that I don't think should be done. I am looking forward to hearing what you think about them!

Thanks, Corkythehornetfan^(talk) 23:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

So, I am thinking this user is User:ZV1998, who is currently blocked, because he tried blaming me ([1]) for himself as another account. He is basically reverting all of my edits. What do you think?? Corkythehornetfan^(talk) 01:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Help!

Hello. I would like your thoughts on this please. It is about the WDAF-TV logo. Thanks! Corkythehornetfan^(talk) 21:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion

Hey homes, if you get a second, could you please take a look at this edit history: Special:Contributions/Sefcik. I'm getting a Finealt vibe but I wanted to get your input. The things to note: 1st edit is bad grammar, 2nd & 3rd edits are blanking while citing WP:TVINTL (suspicious for a new user), then multiple edits to user page (perhaps to get autoconfirmed quicker?) He later nominates List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network for AFD, citing how difficult such articles are to maintain, which seems to conflict with his "I started editing recently" statement on his talk page. Curious cat. Anyhow, I'm interested in your input. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey, there's something else that's kinda struck me as odd. If I can bug you again, take a look at this note that I posted on Shadowjams' talk page. I wonder if there's maybe not an older good-hand operator involved here. The Sefcik guy basically copied verbatim comments that Shadowjams left in AfD noms on a few "List of" articles, some of which were created by Billy Liakopoulos. Might be a coincidence, might be a different operator. I wonder if Sefcik wasn't taking a (super-passive-aggressive) dig at Shadowjams. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey, I forgot to thank you for opening that SPI--Thank you for opening that SPI! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Brewers

You added that Atlanta's baseball stadium is a high-altitude one. That doesn't sound right.Runner1928 (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

KMKE

Good work on mentioning it's the official climo station for the city. I've followed up on it and I think the designation of official climo station is the most important non-aviation aspect of an airport. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee ^welcome!" 06:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

The Amazing World of Gumball (season 3)

Hey m'man, I've noticed the back and forth at The Amazing World of Gumball (season 3) and I didn't want to step on your toes. I wonder though if "The season focuses on the misadventures of Gumball Watterson, a young blue cat," is better than calling him "a blue 12-year-old cat". I don't know if his age has ever been discussed, but as you know, age-cruft does happen a lot in these articles. On the other hand, if you're reverting the edits of disruptive IPs, I can dig that too. Lemme know. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, MrSchimpf/Archive. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

FYI

Just FYI, the deleted WGN logo from your userpage has come back from the dead: [2]—Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 17:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Kohler

Royalbroil mentioned that you may be able to help me with topical stuff in your area. I don't know if I could interest you in helping 'finish' the article Kohler Distinguished Guest Series. The on-line Newspaper Archive of the Sheboygan Press ends in 1976. I live about an 1.5 hour drive from Sheboygan and I would need to visit the Mead library to finish filling in the tables. They apparently have an index for the Sheboygan Press that would be useful. Sheboygan Press Index. I also would like to replace the fair use image I stuck in the Waelderhaus article but I don't know when I would get over there to shoot a photo myself. Nyth83 (talk) 02:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)