|
User talk:MorbidEntree/Archive/2016/July
04:54:11, 1 July 2016 review of submission by 208.80.71.223
I understand that my submission was not accepted due to not adequately demonstrating the subject's notability. Within the venture capital industry, awards such as being recognized in the Forbes Midas List and having been an early investor and board member of a $50B tech company qualifies as notable achievements. Additionally, I believe that I used objective and independent sources and language. Please advise on what you believe is lacking in my submission. I appreciate your feedback. Thank you. Disambiguation link notification for July 2Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milton Ezrati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC) 04:55:45, 5 July 2016 review of submission by 121.208.67.204
Hi there, would you be able to please help explain why the submission was denied? I've edited it a few times to make it quite objective now. A Spanish page already exist (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipchamp) which has been approved, so I dont know why an English one wouldnt be approved? Thank you! 10:13:19, 5 July 2016 review of submission by Fiath1808
I have updated the page with several more third party references. I hope it now ready to be accepted. Fiath1808 (talk) 10:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC) 02:58:40, 6 July 2016 review of submission by Xlinger
Hi MorbidEntree, I am wanting to ask you why this submission was declined on the grounds of reliable sources. There are eleven sources cited and all of them come from published academic books and peer-reviewed academic journals. The only only one not to, the first source of D. Kirsner, is an obituary that appeared in an Australian national newspaper. These sources all appear to be reliable as per the wikipedia needs. If you could let me know where you found fault with the sources that would be extremely helpful Thank you Max Charlesworth draftHey there morbidentree, hope all is well, hope the the rest of the meal is just as macabre. With my draft submission of Max Charlesworth that you declined the other day, you said the reason was for lack of reliable sources. I was just wanting some more information on this because I have worked quite hard to make sure that almost all of the 11 sources are either published academic books or articles published in academic peer reviewed journals. The only source not in an academic publication was an obituary published in an extremely well known Australian paper (and in fact edited from a previous obituary first published in an academic journal). So if you could let me know what more I could possibly do that would be much appreciated. And thanks for all the editing too Cheers,
Disambiguation link notification for July 13Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vivian Pellizari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PHD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Cishet for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cishet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cishet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Irakakiku (talk) 01:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC) 05:17:26, 18 July 2016 review of submission by Tirutirutiru
Dear MorbidEntree, Greetings. This is with regard to the article on Prof. R Nandakumar. The Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML), a memorial to Jawaharlal Nehru, the architect of modern India, is an autonomous institution under the Ministry of Culture (India) and is housed in the historic Teen Murti Bhavan campus located south of Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi, the capital city of India. The NMML offers fellowships to Scholars of eminence who have made a significant contribution to the knowledge in their respective fields. Prof. R. Nandakumar was granted a fellowship by the NNML as a recognition for his contribution. Besides, Prof. R. Nandakumar has received the prestigious Kesari Memorial Award, granted by the Department of Culture, Government of Kerala. I have now added a list of citations by other reputed Scholars to the likes of Christopher Pinney who was honoured by the Government of India with the Padma Shri, the fourth highest civilian award in the Republic of India,Government of India. The citations are given with proper publication details and page number. Hope this would suffice to prove the notability of Prof. R Nandakumar who has made significant contribution to Indian Art History. Thank you. ```` Clarification with importance scale regarding list articles
When assigning WikiProject banners to a list article's talk page, should I assign the importance as NA for all WikiProject banners besides the List WikiProject? --MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(Contribs)(please reply using
Disambiguation link notification for July 20Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Your signaturePlease consider shortening your signature. The pinging even on your talk page isn't a big deal, and there is no need to clarify what the ping is for, so how about "please {{ping}} when replying" ? Best — MusikAnimal talk 16:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 27Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RedCARE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC) Welcome to STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name. From IshanyidYou did not accept my edits to the page of Sam Mitchell for abstruse reasons since there was nothing ambiguous or bogus in my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishanyid (talk • contribs) 11:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Believe it or not, that actually is the principal's name. Check the school website. Took me aback too. John from Idegon (talk) 02:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Crash responseI saw your message, I don't think "Almost destroyed" makese sense because destroyed has only one metting and all articles relating to the crash all mention "implosion. Not to mention destruction is impossible, companies were still releasing games and consoles that were still selling to the market, regardless of how much the industry wasn't making as it did the years before. Those would bring in millions in revenue, when $100 million is your industries lowest limit in 1985 that's still better than multiple other industries (Atari reporting such things as 1 million consoles sold in 1985, while they tidings make much off it retailers did and also showed consumer interested by a hefty level) , especially for the time period. That industry was cemented, and the actual impact was greatly exaggerated. EdsonFarley (talk)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
