User talk:Mitzi.humphrey

Hello Mitzi.humphrey, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Mitzi.humphrey, good luck, and have fun. – TR536 (talk) 16:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Transclusion, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:14, Thursday, January 9, 2025 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Reference Errors on 4 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Joel Root page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

William Burke Belknap

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of William Burke Belknap, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.potiori.com/Belknap,_Louisville.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, the bot is confused. The referenced site is actually a copy and paste from the prior Wikipedia article for Belknap, Louisville. Stevie is the man! ^Talk • Work 13:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Burke Belknap for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Burke Belknap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Burke Belknap until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mitzi.humphrey, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to William Burke Belknap has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:41, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see that fairly new here and still finding your way around. Please be very careful not to copy content from outside Wikipedia into the encyclopaedia (that's what the text above is about). Also, if you happen to copy text from within Wikipedia, could you please make sure that you credit the source? There are explanations and instructions at WP:Copying within Wikipedia. If you need help or advice, please feel free to ask at any time, either here or on my talk page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Thomas M. Humphrey, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. I gather you are the spouse of Thomas Humphrey. If so, please read the policies about editing on articles related to your family. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 00:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". I see the "minor edit" on most of your changes. Please do not use this feature except for tpyos and the like. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 03:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Printmaking, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 12:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Artist's book, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

I need help with the requested lead box for William Burke Belknap. Is there an automatic clean-up of this? Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 16:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed by adding <br> and removing unneeded spaces. We call that box the "infobox". – S. Rich (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Srich32977. I'm having trouble with the infobox on Joel Root now, adding his mother. Will see if I can figure out where to put the <br>. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I just undid your edit at Brookgreen Gardens, " including Augustus St. Gaudens " because there really was no reason to pick him out of the perhaps 100 sculptors whose works are there. However I did notice that there is no list of sculptors in the article, so that would be a good project and a place to plop Mr. St. Gaudens. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Einar. I included Augustus St. Gaudens because he is probably the most notable of all the sculptors included at Brookgreen Gardens and I saw no listing of sculptors, as you mentioned. If you'd like to add that list, I'd be happy to contribute the link later to him in Wikipedia and also some external links. Thanks. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 00:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a list there but there is a chance that as it grows very long we'll want to create a separate article that will be the list with dates and titles and perhaps photos. Life is supposed to be interesting. Carptrash (talk) 15:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Einar. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 16:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Belknap Hardware and Manufacturing Company has been accepted

Belknap Hardware and Manufacturing Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for creating Belknap Hardware and Manufacturing Company. I am wondering if, through your research, you found sufficient material to start an article on Morris B. Belknap (the younger), who married Lily Buckner, the daughter of Simon Bolivar Buckner, and later ran as a Republican for Governor of Kentucky. Acdixon ^(talk · contribs) 18:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think I can find enough information to start an article on Morris B. Belknap, husband of Lily Buckner.

Where do you suggest I start? For Belknap Hardware and Manufacturing Company I worked on the draft for a while before submitting for review. Which is the most efficient way to enlist help from others? I understand that it is okay to start the article independently, but it seems to go more smoothly if I do a draft beforehand. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't found much the few times I've looked. If we could find basic info like vital dates, etc. it would give us a skeleton to work with. Then, we'd have a place to hang bits of info as we find them, like the date of his marriage to Lily Buckner and some details about his campaign for governor, which is the source of my interest. The search will be complicated by references to the elder Morris B. Belknap, so the vital dates could also help with that. There probably won't be much, but since the guy was a major party candidate for a significant office (not to mention a close relative of a major military and political figure in Kentucky), it would be nice to at least have enough to stub in an article.

FWIW, I also prefer doing a user space draft before moving to the main space. I think that would be a productive way to move forward if we can find enough to get started. Acdixon ^(talk · contribs) 20:30, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added Morris B. Belknap user page

I also added some info and dates for him and Lily (taken from my family tree in Ancestry.com) to the the article on Belknap Hardware and Manufacturing Company. My husband's great-great grandfather William Burke Belknap (1811-1889) and his wife Mary Richardson Belknap (1821-1912) were the parents of Col. Morris Burke Belknap who married Lily Buckner, so I should not have much trouble locating photos and other information about them.

I do, however, have difficulty uploading photos and establishing copyrights. I would appreciate any editing and writing help and hope this is what you wanted. The various Belknap families can be very confusing, and I have yet to define their exact roles within the hardware company. I tend to get wrapped up in their individual stories, which are fascinating to me. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 22:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morris B. Belknap has been accepted

Morris B. Belknap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hirolovesswords (talk) 04:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Richardson Belknap has been accepted

William Richardson Belknap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Morris B. Belknap

On 31 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Morris B. Belknap, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, during his 1903 campaign for Governor of Kentucky, Morris B. Belknap got to a speaking engagement on time by pumping a handcar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Morris B. Belknap. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Thomas M. Humphrey, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lewis Craig Humphrey has been accepted

Lewis Craig Humphrey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:05, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Things to fix at Lewis Craig Humphrey

Hello, a couple things to fix:

• You have a confusion about birth/death dates; see my notes at the top
• Please divide his life into WP:Sections for easier reading
• You could use more footnotes. Check for more mentions on GoogleBooks, and note http://reftag.appspot.com can turn any GoogleBooks link into a full footnote. Similarly, WP:Reflinks works for non-GoogleBooks footnotes, so you can save having to type them manually.
• Since he is deceased, you can upload one photo of him (regardless of copyright) using the WP:Upload wizard. If you have any photo of him that is inarguably prior to 1923 (and thus out of copyright in the US), it can be uploaded to WP:Wikimedia Commons.

If you have trouble with any of this, check in at WP:Teahouse to speak to volunteer mentors. Nice work! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Today I added some of this information to the talk page for Lewis Craig Humphrey: Lewis Craig Humphrey was the husband of Eleanor Belknap Humphrey, who was my husband Thomas M. Humphrey's grandmother. He died long before I was a member (through marriage) of their extended family. I met Lewis Craig Humphrey's widow Eleanor Belknap Humphrey only once in 1957, the year Tom and I were married. Thomas M. Humphrey himself did not ever know his grandfather Lewis Craig Humphrey due to the latter's early death. Thomas M. Humphrey has many notable ancestors about whom I have voluntarily written or edited for Wikipedia, including Joel Root, Elizabeth Pabodie, Benjamin Silliman, Benjamin Silliman, Jr., William Burke Belknap, William Richardson Belknap, and Rev. Dr. Edward Porter Humphrey. This relationship can be confirmed by the Belknap pedigree chart compiled by family genealogist Eleanor Belknap Humphrey, partially updated by me, and now in the collection of the Library of Virginia. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC) Added William Richardson Belknap to this list. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Anne Delong (talk) 22:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by   Bfpage |leave a message  19:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louise Odes Neaderland (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mitzi.humphrey/Louise Odes Neaderland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mitzi.humphrey, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Odes Neaderland

I have moved most of the content from your draft into the article with this edit. Feel free to continue editing at Louise Odes Neaderland, and don't further modify the draft. Thanks! EoRdE6^(Come Talk to Me!) 18:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you EoRdE6, for your strategic help with the Louise Odes Neaderland article. I'll refine it more as my time allows and am hoping for the survival of the article.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by EoRdE6^(Come Talk to Me!) 18:44, 16 March 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Category:Salmagundi Club Members

Category:Salmagundi Club Members, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. 23:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Salmagundi Club Members, which I created, should not be deleted. I have discussed the issue at Categories for discussion page. Without this category designation, readers may not realize the importance and influence of the Salmagundi membership and how it adds to the notability necessary for a member's article on Wikipedia. Thank you, DexDor (talk), for letting me know that the category was submitted for deletion. I think the category is important for encyclopedic cross-referencing. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 18:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you so much for contributing to Louise's article. It looks so thorough! Jmariet11 (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:2015-04-15 2239 Belknap Hardware envelope.png

Thanks for uploading File:2015-04-15 2239 Belknap Hardware envelope.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for info about tagging. I decided to abandon this image for now, since I probably have a similar envelope in my own collection of paper ephemera and at some later time may photograph it.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:2015-05-02 0912 William Burke Belknap the elder 1840.png

Thanks for uploading File:2015-05-02 0912 William Burke Belknap the elder 1840.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:2015-05-02 0835 Edward Mellon Architect.png

Thanks for uploading File:2015-05-02 0835 Edward Mellon Architect.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ImageTaggingBot (talk). Thank you for calling attention to the need for tags. I've already presented information about this image and thought that it could be uploaded directly because of its date. It feels strange "talking" to a bot. I will go to Wikipedia:Media copyright questions and see if I can get help in tagging this and other images.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward William Cornelius Humphrey has been accepted

Edward William Cornelius Humphrey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edward William Cornelius Humphrey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward William Cornelius Humphrey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward William Cornelius Humphrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EricEnfermero (Talk) 14:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creating User:Mitzi.humphrey/Edward William Cornelius Humphrey

I welcome additional references and research about E.W.C. Humphrey from other writers, editors, and users. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mitzi.humphrey! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:23, Sunday, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Bumgardner (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Bumgardner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:26, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C. Lowell Harriss (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C. Lowell Harriss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 21:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C. Lowell Harriss (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C. Lowell Harriss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• To (talk). RE: my proposed article on C. Lowell Harriss, who was and still is a world-renowned economist. At first you questioned the notability of this deceased, long-tenured, and influential professor emeritus of Columbia University and asked for more inline citations. And now you are saying that I have not used reliable sources. Would you please explain which of the many sources (some of which came from Wikipedia's Help suggestions) I have cited you consider unreliable? Do you consider it sufficient that the German version of Wikipedia has an entry for C. Lowell Harriss although the English version does not?Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 12:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Porter Humphrey (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Porter Humphrey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^TT me 13:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Fluxus

An article that you have been involved in editing—Fluxus —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Brian heim composer (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C. Lowell Harriss has been accepted

C. Lowell Harriss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^TT me 14:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== How to change typo in name? ==

I have recently submitted the article Dr. William Ferguson Reid. Probably due to my own typo, the article is showing up in Wikipedia search with Dr. Reid's first name spelled incorrectly with three l's, i.e. Willliam. I am asking for help in correcting the spelling. If you know how to do this, please reply either here on my talk page or on the talk page for the article. == Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 13:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mitzi - I saw this post because your talk page was on my Watchlist from before, so I moved your article to William Ferguson Reid. That's how we would fix a misspelling on an existing entry. The move also took out "Dr." from the page title; usually we omit titles like Doctor from the actual page name. If someone was to enter the old name of your article, there is a "redirect" that would automatically steer them to this new title. Have a good day! EricEnfermero (Talk) 14:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Artist's book page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aggie Zed (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aggie Zed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^TT me 13:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Porter Humphrey has been accepted

Edward Porter Humphrey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:2015-11-05 1558 Joel Root in Connecticut History Illustrated.png

Thanks for uploading File:2015-11-05 1558 Joel Root in Connecticut History Illustrated.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Louisville

WikiProject Louisville		Welcome to WikiProject Louisville!
		Thank you for joining WikiProject Louisville. Please take a few moments and become acquainted with our goal and scope as well as our list of tasks. We encourage every member to find their niche and work on the parts of the project they most enjoy. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask on our project talk page. Again, welcome!

I apologize for the belated welcome. I just finished revamping the membership page and welcome banner. Stevie is the man! ^Talk • Work 14:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's New in WikiProject Louisville (Nov 2015)

WikiProject Louisville		What's New in WikiProject Louisville? (Nov 2015)
		Thank you for your continued membership in WikiProject Louisville! Our project is still alive and mildly kicking after over 9 years in operation. If by chance you're not up-to-date with what's going on in the project, here's some of the more recent goings-on: We have over 6,100 articles included in the project and almost 17,000 pages (including talk pages) overall. Our list of project tasks have been moved to a project subpage. This was done because the project's main page was getting rather long and perhaps difficult to digest. "One-stop shopping" for our project's tasks! Our Membership department has been revamped. A lot of membership-related things have been clarified. Did you know: You can patrol recent changes to any page included in our project? Great for stopping vandalism and more! You can see which of our project's pages are the most popular? You can easily focus on and fix specific kinds of problems (such as cite date errors) within our project? If you would like to opt out of receiving WikiProject Louisville newsletters, please add your name to the "Opt out of newsletters" list on our Active participants page.

Stevie is the man! ^Talk • Work 17:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edward Cornelius Humphrey

Hello Mitzi.humphrey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Edward Cornelius Humphrey for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Air ♠ Combat _What's^up, dog? 23:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm AirCombat. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Edward Cornelius Humphrey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Air ♠ Combat _What's^up, dog? 23:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to add that references behind a paywall, such as Ancestry, are not necessarily bad, but it looks as if this article was copied and pasted from there, though I can't confirm this as I don't have a subscription. Please write articles yourself, by interpreting secondary sources, to create a new, unique article. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Air ♠ Combat _What's^up, dog? 23:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Edward Cornelius Humphrey

A tag has been placed on Edward Cornelius Humphrey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 15:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC) I will re-read this letter later and consider my options.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ethel Standiford-Mehlingan, (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ethel Standiford-Mehlingan, and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Publish or …

User space drafts are not allowed to exist for ever. What should I do with User:Mitzi.humphrey/Edward Cornelius Humphrey (your grandfather?):

• move it to draft space and put a {{submit}} tag on it
• delete it as use of Wikipedia as a free host?

— (talk · contribs) 16:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• To: RHaworth. This Edward Cornelius Humphrey was my husband's father. He was an extraordinary person and I don't want him to languish OR perish on Wikipedia. There is some danger that he will be confused with Edward William Cornelius Humphrey, so I'm trying to find lots of documentation before submitting. What do you recommend?Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend publish elsewhere. The article does not contain sufficient assertion of notability and I suspect you will not be able to offer any. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See [1], for one thing. I marvel at the aggressive tone used here, which grossly misrepresents the cited policy page. Nyttend (talk) 05:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Contacted (talk) about this discussion.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davi Det Hompson (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Davi Det Hompson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aggie Zed (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aggie Zed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James Bumgardner concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James Bumgardner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Bumgardner (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Bumgardner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^TT me 21:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davi Det Hompson has been accepted

Davi Det Hompson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^TT me 12:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: W.B.Belknap has been accepted

W.B.Belknap, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey has been accepted

Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greene-Jones War (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greene-Jones War and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... my article Marcia Resnick. How do I remove "Preview of references" and place references at the end where they belong? I also discuss problem on the talk page for the article. Would prefer that you respond and/or guide me there. This is a new article which was fine this morning. When I tried to add a new citation, I somehow goofed and have not been able to remedy the error(s).

Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of your referencing tags in the Photographic subjects section of text is missing the > off of </ref> also under the heading References you need to put {{reflist}}. Amortias (T)(C) 23:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinkney Near (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Insertcleverphrasehere was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinkney Near and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 InsertCleverPhraseHere  21:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinkney Near (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinkney Near and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^TT me 12:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greene-Jones War has been accepted

Greene-Jones War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinkney L. Near has been accepted

Pinkney L. Near, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 23:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Louisville, Kentucky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Demolition Man. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maud Humphrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forest Lawn Memorial Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Richmond Printmaking Workshop has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richmond Printmaking Workshop. Thanks! 333-blue 14:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richmond Printmaking Workshop (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richmond Printmaking Workshop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^TT me 12:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Best wikipedia editor ElsaTR (talk) 15:20, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ElsaTR. Don't quite understand what this is for, and Wikipedia says your user talk page doesn't exist. But I AM good at mopping up. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C-J access

I've been on vacation and just now saw your post at User talk:Stevietheman#C-J access. I am excited to find someone with this access. The particular information I am seeking is on the first marriage of Sara Walter Combs, which all the sources I have found only vaguely allude to, given her second, very notable marriage to former Governor Bert T. Combs. The research I've done seems to show a marriage between Sara Walter and a Monte D. Gross in Jefferson County in 1975, but I can't even necessarily confirm that this is the subject of the article. I would like to, at minimum, confirm (or disprove) that Monte D. Gross is the first husband of Sara Walter Combs. If this turns out to be the person I am looking for, I'd also like to be able to cite an exact marriage date and date of divorce in the article. The sources I have seem to indicate that Combs was still married to her first husband in 1982 but was divorced by at least 1988. If you'll use the "email this user" feature to contact me, I'll get you an email address where you can forward any relevant articles, assuming Newspapers.com has such a feature. I really appreciate your offer to help. I suspect I may call on you for more C-J articles in the future. Let me know if I can reciprocate with anything from NewsBank (most notably, the Lexington Herald-Leader and The Kentucky Post (Covington, KY). Acdixon ^(talk · contribs) 16:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know that I can share some Kentucky news sources. Please send the email address and I'll put it in my contacts. Is it the same address from which you sent me an email to look at this Talk message?Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't remember what address those notifications come from, but I just emailed you (and realized I should have just started by doing that). Thanks. Acdixon ^(talk · contribs) 18:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richmond Printmaking Workshop (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richmond Printmaking Workshop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333-blue 13:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:58, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humphrey-McMeekin House (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Humphrey-McMeekin House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richmond Printmaking Workshop (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richmond Printmaking Workshop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 23:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humphrey-McMeekin House has been accepted

Humphrey-McMeekin House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 22:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richmond Printmaking Workshop has been accepted

Richmond Printmaking Workshop, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am on the hunt

for a visual image of a Matthew Harris Jouett painting that may or may not still exist and noticed that you uploaded a photo of a book that listed Jouett's paintings to his article. I am trying to find if a painting of Nathaniel G.S. Hart is listed in that book. I know that Jouett painted a portrait of Hart from memory after the River Raisin Massacre and would dearly love to find out if the painting still exists. Could you please look in your book and see if there's a portrait listed there of some variation of the following name: "Nathaniel G.S. Hart", "Nathaniel Gray Smith Hart", "Captain Hart" or even possibly "Nathaniel G.T. Hart". Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 06:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found it I listed as "Miniature of Capt Nat. G. Hart" in "Old Masters of the Bluegrass" on Page 60 and also listed as such in a Filson Club publication. I sure wish I could find out where the portrait is now, would be wonderful to have a photo for the Hart article. Shearonink (talk) 06:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shearonink, I regret that the little book about Matthew Jouett is no longer in my possession. However, the SIRIS (Smithsonian Institution Research Information System art inventories) resource I listed re: Catherine Cornelia Prather in "Further Reading" in the article on Jouett may be a helpful link for you to pursue. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ethel Standiford-Mehlingan, concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ethel Standiford-Mehlingan,, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morris Burke Belknap (1780–1877) (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morris Burke Belknap (1780–1877) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ethel Standiford-Mehlingan, (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ethel Standiford-Mehlingan, and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 21:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016-05-06 1357 home of Judge Edward William Cornelius Humphrey and Jessamine Barclay in Louisville Kentucky.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2016-05-06 1357 home of Judge Edward William Cornelius Humphrey and Jessamine Barclay in Louisville Kentucky.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 19:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art6 (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Art6 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adrian Janes has been accepted

Adrian Janes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 15:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ethel Standiford-Mehlingan has been accepted

Ethel Standiford-Mehlingan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you, User:SwisterTwister. I took the liberty of removing the comma which was keeping the article from being a live link. Hope this was okay to do. Thank you so much for your editing assistance.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:41, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art6 (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Art6 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O (talk) 21:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art6 has been accepted

Art6, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Daniel kenneth (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lincoln Memorial at Waterfront Park has been accepted

Lincoln Memorial at Waterfront Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 21:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edward William Cornelius Humphrey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward William Cornelius Humphrey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward William Cornelius Humphrey (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:00, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Porter Humphrey

Hi, Mitzi! Just to let you know, I have deleted a sentence from this article claiming that E. P. Humphrey was instrumental in the reunification of the Presbyterian Church. That cannot possibly be true. The unification you specified (the merger of United Presbyterian Church in the United States of America and the Presbyterian Church in the United States to form the Presbyterian Church (USA)) took place in 1983, almost 100 years after E.P. Humphrey's death in 1886. There have been various other mergers of branches of the church, but I could not find any that happened in a likely time frame for him to have taken part in it. I think he is probably notable anyhow, due to other things like his writing and the cemetery he founded, but that claim as it stands is not believable. --MelanieN (talk) 03:36, 21 August 2016 (UTC) Melanie, the misleading factor may have been the ongoing reconciliation after the Civil War between the Northern and Southern U.S. churches. The book by Kleber cited by Stevie the Man has good information about the various schisms of the churches in Kentucky. Rev. Edward Porter Humphrey, I read somewhere, was strongly for the Union. His son E.W.C., I recall reading somewhere, would have joined the Confederate Army but in deference to his father did not. Cave Hill Cemetery made separate military cemeteries for the Union dead soldiers and the Confederate dead soldiers. Thank you for making the correction, which should stand for now.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 12:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Pope Humphrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Railway Company. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Cornelius Humphrey

Thanks for notifying me about the better version on your user space. I moved it to mainspace, replacing the much inferior version I had accepted. (it takes an admin to do that; I had to delete the existing page first). DGG ( talk ) 19:20, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

images on Commons

I noticed that you have uploaded various images to Commons and delineated them as your own work (as in this photo of a painted portrait of Catherine Cornelia Prather to Matthew Harris Jouett and this image added to Edward William Cornelius Humphrey which appears to be a photo of a vintage photo). From their appearance at least one of these images appears to be from previously-published work and the other is a photo of a photo with no crediting of the photographer. The permissions of many of your image-uploads appear to possibly be in error. Shearonink (talk) 21:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mitzi! The problem with the images you have uploaded is that you list them as "own work". But in many cases they are not your own work - that is, you did not create them.[2] They are photographs you took of a photograph or art work created by someone else. Apparently you have been doing this for some time. "Own work" is not accurate when you are uploading a picture or something that was created by someone else. For one thing, the statement you make during the upload process identifies you as the copyright holder of the work. That is not the case if you are uploading an image created by someone else. Wikipedia cares very much about copyright, and the purpose of that statement you agree to, is to make sure that we don't publish anything without the permission of the copyright holder.

Shearonink and MelanieN: I wrote a long description/reply last night giving reasons that I can claim copyright (or permission to use) for most--if not all--of the images I post. There is no one answer that applies to all the images I have uploaded. Unfortunately, after almost finishing my discussion, my computer "froze" and would not let me type or move the cursor to sign and save the comments. This morning I had to shut down the computer to start it again and consequently lost my comments. This morning, I'll start with the example that I can explain most directly. I own both the painting by Matthew Jouett of Catherine Cornelia Prather and the copyright to images of it. It has been published elsewhere (with my permission) and is registered with the Smithsonian's American portrait registry. But the Smithsonian does not own the copyright to it. I do. The other painting which you specifically mentioned is a painting by my daughter, living New York artist Sheryl Humphrey, of the girl with two puppets. She gave me permission by phone to use the photo which I already had and which had been posted on Facebook and I believe on ImageKind as well. We thought the puppet painting was a good image for the articles in Wikipedia on puppets/puppetry. As a visual artist and also as a writer, I am well aware of intellectual property issues and would be happy to clarify the copyright as best I can of any of the images I have uploaded to Wikimedia commons. However, I would prefer to do that one image at a time, because the situation varies from image to image.--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 12:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If one of the image-experts could chime in here on just this one image, that would be great, I don't want to give incorrect information.

Let's take a look at the Catherine Cornelia Prather painting's image. The photo of that painting that you are using in the Jouett article and that you uploaded to Commons is from File:2015-12-17 1025 Image of Catherine Cornelia Prather in an old book with partial list of portraits by Matthew Jouett.png which states it is from an old book in the public domain but then goes on to say it is your own work. I think it would be better to either have more information in the permissions (like title/publisher/author/editor of the old book) or possibly a photo of the actual painting with the appropriate permissions/copyrights attached. This is an aside and not really tangent to the permissions discussion, but in my opinion the photo from the old book is rather grainy - it would be nice to showcase Jouett's quality as a painter - many of the images of his work that I have come across are on the internet appear to me to be copies made by others. The different in quality from other known Jouett works (as compared to, say Joust's famous Jefferson portrait) is just too stark. Shearonink (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Thanks for the information, Mitzi. Yes, they will have to be handled one at a time, but anything that is not actually your own work (for example, a photo you took of a building or a gravestone is your own work) needs to have its upload status corrected. Re copyrighted material, it is not enough for somebody to give you verbal permission. Wikipedia requires an email from you (in the case of the C C Prather painting) or your daughter (in the case of her painting), verifying that you (she) are the copyright holder, and releasing it under Wikipedia's copyright terms. Before doing that, you (she) need to understand that anything published on Wikipedia is free for anyone to copy, reuse, or adapt; see Wikipedia:CC-BY-SA telling the world what they can do with Wikipedia material. That permission is also repeated at the bottom of every file page. If you (she) are willing to release the material that broadly, then send an email to Wikipedia using the link provided by Czar. If you are not willing to release it to the world like that, you should not put it on Wikipedia. And of course you will also need to change the upload information from "own work" to something that indicates the copyright status. I believe you can do that with a simple edit to the file at Commons. MelanieN (talk) 14:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I am confused about the painting of C C Prather; are you using an image from a pre-1923 book as Shearonink says (in which case it would be public domain), or are you using a photo of the actual painting, which you own and have managed to copyright even thought it is pre-1923 (in which case you need to send a copyright-owner permission to Commons via email)? --MelanieN (talk) 14:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In some cases, the images you have uploaded may be available for use through Public Domain. That applies to most images created before 1923. But they have to be identified during the upload process as public domain, not as something you created. An example of that might be File:Edward William Cornelius Humphrey.png. Even if you don't know the actual date of a photograph or image, if it shows someone who died before 1923 it may be assumed to be public domain. In at least one case, File:2015-07-26 1116 Girl with puppets by Sheryl Humphrey.png, you uploaded the image as your "own work" even when there is a current copyright belonging to someone else. That is a serious error. It may be necessary to review every image you have uploaded. I do realize you did this in good faith, not understanding the system, and I know you will do whatever is needed to fix things.

I am not an expert on images and files, and I am not active at WP:Commons. I think this needs to be looked at by someone who is an admin at both en-wiki and commons. @Czar, King of Hearts, and Materialscientist: Can one of you look at this situation and advise what needs to be done? Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 19:07, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The short version is that the photographer or artist owns the copyright to the images. At the very least, these recent uploads should be changed from "own work" to the name of the author/copyright holder. If they are family assets, you would need to have the copyright holders (those family members) send email verification of their licensing permission to Commons (OTRS). (By the way, the photos have to be published (like in a book) before 1923, not just taken.)  czar 20:42, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Please see my previous comment above about the Jouett portrait of Catherine Cornelia Prather and "The Girl with Two Puppets" by Sheryl Humphrey.--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 12:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) With regard to old photos: if what you have is an actual photo (not published in a book) of a person who died before 1923, I believe it can be cited as "public domain" - again, via an edit to the file to change it from "own work". If the photo has been published in a book, then as Czar says it is the publication date of the book that matters; it is public domain if published before 1923.--MelanieN (talk) 14:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I see that someone posted about this same "own work" issue on the Commons talk page for EWC Humphrey a couple of weeks ago. I think you will have your work cut out for you in dealing with this issue, but it does need to be addressed. You will probably need to review all of your uploads. --MelanieN (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:2016-05-06 1357 home of Judge Edward William Cornelius Humphrey and Jessamine Barclay in Louisville Kentucky.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2016-05-06 1357 home of Judge Edward William Cornelius Humphrey and Jessamine Barclay in Louisville Kentucky.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 17:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

czarWhen I first uploaded the image above, I was quite confident that it was the home of E.W.C. Humphrey and Jessamine Barclay. There was a discussion about whether the date was accurate, or if the top hats were just part of some re-enactment. I was never able to fully establish the date of the photo or the name of the photographer. So in this case, instead of continuing to do research on that particular image, I prefer just to let the image expire this month. Thank you for your assistance. I think part of my problem submitting to Wikimedia Commons may have been misunderstanding the question: "Is this file your own work?" Since I am the person submitting the file, I assumed the file was my own work. Based on the copyright issues which have arisen, the way I am beginning to interpret it now is: If the image in the file is not an image originally created by me--even though I may currently own the copyright to that image, and/or the image may even have been printed elsewhere with acknowledgement of my ownership or permission to print it, and even though my file may have been clipped or altered or have manipulated contrast, etc.--it is still not considered my file? Is that correct?--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2016-05-06 1357 home of Judge Edward William Cornelius Humphrey and Jessamine Barclay in Louisville Kentucky.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2016-05-06 1357 home of Judge Edward William Cornelius Humphrey and Jessamine Barclay in Louisville Kentucky.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VCU School of the Arts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disney Studios. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morris Burke Belknap (the elder) (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morris Burke Belknap (the elder) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^huh? what I'm been doing 23:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edward Cornelius Humphrey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Cornelius Humphrey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Cornelius Humphrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(@Clpo13:), Re: the military credentials . . . I was in the process of entering them when I received a notice of possible deletion. I had successfully entered the 5 Bronze Star Medal awards for Major Humphrey's service and was getting ready to add another authorized European African Middle Eastern Campaign Medal ribbon, an American Theatre ribbon, and a World War II Victory Medal (United States) ribbon. I knew most of this information but could find no newspaper documentation in Newspapers.com or other mention of it until I found some small photostatic copies of his certificate of service issued when his Army medical service ended February 1, 1946.. How should this be referenced? Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 16:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(@DGG:), you helped me with this article on Edward Cornelius Humphrey once before (see above on my talk page). Please advise on how I should handle this current deletion notice. Thank you so much for your assistance.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitzi.humphrey: Please read our notability guideline for military members. It has specific requirements and five Bronze Stars will not merit inclusion. You are welcome to improve the article however you like, though. Furthermore, we only accept published sources. This has been a problem in the past for researchers like you; an encyclopedia is a tertiary source and we lean on secondary sources. Primary source information is frowned upon and unpublished stuff is impermissable because we cannot independently verify it. There are many popular military history magazines out there where you could publish a monograph but that can't be done on Wikipedia despite how easy a wiki is. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you note the three additional awards I added today along with a mention of the source? They are: "As documented in a photostatic copy of his certificate of service (issued at the Separation Center at Camp Blanding, Florida, on February 1, 1946, and signed by Personnel Officer H. S. Mason, Captain AGD), he also received a European African Middle Eastern Campaign Medal ribbon, an American Theatre ribbon, and a World War II Victory Medal (United States) ribbon." Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't nor do I need to. Please read WP:MILPEOPLE. If you're unwilling to read guidelines then we have nothing to discuss. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the guidelines and replied on the discussion page.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 14:01, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey

The article Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no claim of notability. The sources cited tend to be family histories or drive-by local news coverage. Information from the "Library of Virginia" is material the subject herself donated, not independent scholarship. This is another of Mitzi.humphrey's genealogical projects.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:53, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice and explained why at the article's talk page. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Animalier school

Thanks for creating the important article Animalier school! --♥Golf (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute for Contemporary Art, Richmond has been accepted

Institute for Contemporary Art, Richmond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morris Burke Belknap (the elder) has been accepted

Morris Burke Belknap (the elder), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 14:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Joseph H. Seipel

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Mitzi.humphrey, thanks for creating Joseph H. Seipel!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. A lot of emphasis is placed on his teaching. I don't see anything in the references that would qualify as a critical assessment of the artist's work. Has anyone written something substantial about his art?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mduvekot (talk) 00:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bio cleanup

Hi, Mitzi! I cleaned up your new article, Frances Wessells. Nice work! The only glaring thing I saw were listing the full names of colleges—it may not be mandatory but someone on the other side of the world might not know "NYU" and "UCLA" even if linked. Also, you can abbreviate after one's first mention.

I also moved the "family of magicians" note to the talkpage, in case the article ever gets reworked further. Usually, for bios, I do background after the lead: birthplace, early schooling, etc., but this still flows nicely. I also read where she's from the Denver area but cannot confirm that to be her birthplace. Still, nice work! — Wyliepedia 07:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women's March on Washington

Hi,

I updated the article after you posted a bare link of a youtube video for a couple of reasons: 1) A youtube video is not an allowable source, 2) if the content comes from a reliable source, then that source information should be used and the youtube link not used in the citation.

So, I found the W Magazine article and updated it in this edit. See WP:YTREF. Since I saw that it came from the magazine, I was able to backtrack and just create a regular reference.—CaroleHenson (talk) 13:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas Ulmer

Hi! I reviewed your Douglas Ulmer article. It is a fun article. I removed the template. Bobby Jacobs (talk) 02:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Bobby Jacobs (talk), for your attention to the Douglas Ulmer article. I'm glad you enjoyed it. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 05:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator?

You are a great Wikipedia editor. You should be an administrator. Do you want to be an admin? Bobby Jacobs (talk) 17:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,Bobby Jacobs (talk) for your kind comment and suggestion that I would be a good administrator. I appreciate your encouragement. However, I enjoy exploring Wikipedia, learning from the research that I do on the articles--in other words following my own curiosity and interests. Perhaps some day after I know the ins-and-outs of the rules and procedures more clearly, I would feel ready to become an administrator.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.2

Newsletter Nr 2 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Progress report: In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well talking in chat mode about the potential new wiki, a new irc channel has been setup, and you are welcome to visit and try it out at: #wikimedia-genealogy ^connect (In case you are not familiar with IRC, or would prefer some info and intro, please see Wikipedias IRC tutorial) At m:Talk:Wikimedia_genealogy_project#Wikimedia_user_group is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia user group: please submit comments and suggestions, and whether you would like to be a member in such a group. Prime goal for the group is the creation of a new, free, genealogy wiki, but there is also a discussion weather we should propose a new project or support the adoption of an existing project? Read more at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project where you also can support the creation with your vote, in case you haven't done so already. Future: The future of the Genealogy project, and creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input. You can discuss on the projects talk page how the project should be developed sign as member or supporter at the projects member list put the User box on your user page by inserting the Template:User WikiProject Genealogy with the following code: {{User WikiProject Genealogy}}. develop or update the Portal:Genealogy? in case you haven't read Wikimedia genealogy project take a look support that project with your vote. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Genealogy project need your vote for creation of an email list

Newsletter Nr 3 for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Request: In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well as taking new, important steps towards a creation of a new project site, we need to make communication between the users easier and more effective. At Mail list on meta is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia email list. In order to request the creation of such a list, we need your voice and your vote. In order to create a new list, we need to put a request it in Phabricator, and add a link to reasoning/explanation of purpose, and link to community consensus. Therefore we need your vote for this now, so we can request the creation of the mail list. Read more about this email list at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project mail list where you can support the creation of the mail list with your vote, in case you haven't done so already. Future: in case you haven't read Wikimedia genealogy project take a look support that project with your vote. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zoe Romano, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Today Show and Boys & Girls Clubs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.4: Mail list created!

Newsletter Nr 4, 2017-03-24, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the fourth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Mail list is created: The project email list is now created and ready to use! Please feel free to subscribe at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-genealogy Future: Discuss the next step, the creation of a meta Genealogy user group, list yourself as m:interested participant and vote on which name should be used for the user group. in case you haven't read Wikimedia genealogy project take a look support that project with your vote. Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Your addition to Stephanie Brody-Lederman has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

• Please also stick to what the sources actually say. There were some statements in the article where you seem to have extended what the source says using your own personal knowledge. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 10:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About VCU School of the Arts page

Hello Mitzy!

Thank you for calling the Dean's Office today about our Wikipedia page. I am an alumnus myself and have been working diligently all week to create a new version of the article for publication. Because of the copyright take-down, we unfortunately cannot edit the article in realtime; instead, I have had to put my edits on a Talk page for review (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:VCU_School_of_the_Arts/Temp). I invite you to help me out if you like, as I've been working on this solo so far. My main goal was to give a comprehensive history of the school, as that is lacking in all forms both print and digital. As an art historian, I'm doing my best to be objective, fair, and truthful. I'm also citing my sources as much as possible.

My goal is to have this page ready by Monday so than an administrator or related body can look it over and allow us to finally have the VCUarts page back.

Thank you, Doopliss77 —Preceding undated comment added 16:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

==Hello, Doopliss77. Thank you so much for working on this. I'll take a look at the temporary page, and if there is anything I can do to help, please let me know. I have added a few citations to the already existing page for the new dean and will probably continue to add more references since the page asks for them. An obvious change to the School of the Arts page will be to put the name of the new dean on that page.--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doopliss77, do we have any administrators looking at the [alleged] copyright violation blanking of the article VCU School of the Arts and the changes made on the VCU School of the Arts temporary page? I think it is important that the article be restored quickly. I think the blanking may have originated with some of the unsubstantial bot reports cited on the blanking page. Is any progress being made in restoring the article, or is there anyone else at VCU who could help us expedite this? I will post this message on my talk page, too, just as a record of our current status on this issue. Thank you for all you have been doing on the temporary page, and I have tried to add a few things temporarily, as you can see in the page's history.--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:19, 22 May 2017 (UTC)--Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mitzi, no I have not contacted any administrators yet. I can try to handle that myself, but are you more familiar with the process? --Doopliss77 (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doopliss77, I just re-read your note here after posting an answer on your talk page in which I was urging a speedy resolution. I also noticed this info below which MAY be helpful and possibly call an administrator's attention to our plight. I copied this information for easy reference:

From another user (my talk page) from his talk page and reposted by Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC): "If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia..."[reply]

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

Category:Lake Washington Technical College faculty has been nominated for discussion

Category:Lake Washington Technical College faculty, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^T 17:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flying wheels interactive model of da Vinci design shown at the Science Museum of Virginia

Hi, I removed your addition of this image to three articles because that addition had several problems. Its not noted to be an invention, its not really a notable historical "wheel", and images in general should have a description explaining significance since Wikipedia is not an image host. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now, and thank you for calling my attention to this, Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk), I've added text and a footnote reference in the Leonardo da Vinci article about the da Vinci show currently on view at the Science Museum of Virginia and will post the photo file there later, along with some others.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I removed the content per WP:NOTNEWS - Wikipedia is not to be used to announce exhibitions. Also claims made that this iteration of a traveling exhibit in Richmond, Virginia has overall significance is not supported by reliable sources. I think previous editors above have explained to you the ins and outs of what Wikipedia requires in sourcing content. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douglas Ulmer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Ulmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.User-multi error: no username detected (help).Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Please look at the current 2020 history of the article on Douglas Ulmer and review the deletion rules which allow for exceptionalism of living notable academic mathematicians.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 20:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Ulmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 21:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rentier, I wrote the original article on Douglas Ulmer. However, subsequent editors have stripped the article of some of its meaningful content. I am adding new citations, and his notability will soon become evident again.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitzi.humphrey: I appreciate your efforts to improve the article. The issue is the lack of independent reliable sources that talk about the subject. Adding more primary sources does little to remedy that. I'm trying, but I just don't see how the subject meets any of the criteria. Rentier (talk) 03:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rentier:Rentier--I began writing the article on Douglas Ulmer on 7 January 2017.

I see today, 6/29/2017, that another writer created a draft-- see Draft:Douglas Ulmer: Revision history-- on 21 December 2016, before mine but has not pursued it. Does that have any significance to the deletion discussion? By the way, I've never pinged anyone before, please let me know if it worked for me following your precedent.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:42, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mitzi.humphrey: Yes, the ping worked :-) To me, it seems that Douglas Ulmer should be notable, but unfortunately there aren't any independent sources (that I'm aware of) that discuss him. The existence of the other draft does not affect the deletion discussion. Feel free to add a keep vote to the deletion discussion. The argument put forward by Xxanthippe is a good one, it would be interesting to see how DU's citations compare to others in the field. Rentier (talk) 15:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)User-multi error: no username detected (help).Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rentier:Rentier How long do you think it will be before the template message on the current Douglas Ulmer article is removed? I am not allowed to edit it directly.Mitzi.humphrey 14:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When there are sufficient in depth independent, reliable sources about him to establish notability? Theroadislong (talk) 15:10, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rentier:Rentier Someone should correct the comma splice in this sentence of the intro of the Ulmer article: "He is a professor, and chair of the School of Mathematics, at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia." Please remove the first and second commas.--Mitzi.humphrey 00:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xxanthippe:Xxanthippe Hope I'm doing this ping thing correctly. Sorry to bother you, but "independent, reliable sources" needed for mathematician Douglas Ulmer article in order to remove template message.--Mitzi.humphrey 15:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James Bumgardner concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James Bumgardner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

James Bumgardner is now in article space.Mitzi.humphrey 19:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Bumgardner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Bumgardner. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 20:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Laura Pharis, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:James Bumgardner, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:James Bumgardner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Bumgardner. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

=== @Theroadislong(talk), Where/how should that "COI" be placed? If on the Draft:James Bumgardner Talk page, which part? My nearest COI I guess would be that my daughter was an undergraduate art student of James Bumgardner at Virginia Commonwealth University. I have two degrees from VCU but was not in any of his classes. My daughter is primarily a painter and writer, whereas I am primarily a printmaker. She and I both have other degrees from other schools. I guess another connection might be that he was a member of Richmond Artists' Association, as was I, but I don't think our time with that group overlapped.Mitzi.humphrey 03:06, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arlene Gottfried (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToThAc was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arlene Gottfried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 17:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

= ToThAc (talk), At your suggestion, I moved some text and references from my draft for Arlene Gottfried to the existing article, and it has been reviewed and accepted. Thank you for helping to solve this problem. I began my draft on the day she died, and the existing article was posted before I attempted to move my draft to article space. I'm glad my research was not a wasted effort.--Mitzi.humphrey 13:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Craufurd Goodwin) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Craufurd Goodwin, Mitzi.humphrey!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice one!

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robert G. (talk) 09:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1708 Gallery) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1708 Gallery, Mitzi.humphrey!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Secretly Y'all, from its old location at User:Mitzi.humphrey/Secretly Y'all. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl ^(Wanna chat?) 02:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secretly Y'all (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Secretly Y'all and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Abraham Belknap) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Abraham Belknap, Mitzi.humphrey!

Wikipedia editor Lineslarge just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Links should be added from other articles to this one.

To reply, leave a comment on Lineslarge's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Lineslarge (talk) 19:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing

Hi Mitzi, I just reviewed Louis J. Budd and thought I should give you a quick reminder to avoid close paraphrasing when creating new articles - some of the text in your article, for example:

• He was born Louis Budrewicz in St Louis, Missouri, the son of a Polish immigrant father and Lithuanian mother. He completed his PhD under the GI Bill after serving in the US Army Air Force during World War II.

or

• Most of Dodd's academic career was spent at Duke University, North Carolina, where he taught from 1952 until retirement.

was awfully similar to the text of one of the cited sources:

• Born Louis Budrewicz in St Louis, Missouri, the son of a Polish immigrant father and Lithuanian mother, Lou completed his PhD under the GI Bill after serving in the US Army Air Force during the second world war. Most of his academic career was spent at Duke University, North Carolina, where he taught from 1952 until retirement.

This instance wasn't too bad and I have fixed it - but please remember to avoid this kind of close paraphrasing, wikipedia takes copyright issues very seriously and content which paraphrases too closely may get deleted. Fyddlestix (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Groser

Hi there. I'm working on the article John Groser and I noticed that you have access to Oxford University Press resources. I'm wondering if you might be able to help me get access to the article about Groser in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/66048). Thanks, 142.160.131.202 (talk) 03:36, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

== talk) I saw one John Groser entry but was unable to log in without a subscription. Sorry, but I guess the access granted me before by Wikipedia must have expired or requires a password I don't know.--Mitzi.humphrey 03:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the

OUP	This user has access to Oxford University Press through The Wikipedia Library.

--Mitzi.humphrey 04:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Ah, that's too bad. Thanks anyway. 142.160.131.202 (talk) 04:12, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aggie Zed (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aggie Zed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aggie Zed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.5 -2017

Newsletter Nr 5, 2017-12-30, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the fifth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) A demo wiki is up and running! Dear members of WikiProject Genealogy, this will be the last newsletter for 2017, but maybe the most important one! You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2018! Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Draft:Arlene Gottfried concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Arlene Gottfried, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 22:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Rao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnegie Foundation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Secretly Y'all concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Secretly Y'all, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Equal Rights Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chesterfield County

Virginia General Assembly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ERA

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arlene Gottfried (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arlene Gottfried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arlene Gottfried, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 19:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Lives Matter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Unitarian Universalist Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Secretly Y'all

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Secretly Y'all".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:46, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arlene Gottfried

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arlene Gottfried".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blue Wave 2018 (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mitzi.humphrey/Blue Wave 2018 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mitzi.humphrey/Blue Wave 2018, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering 16:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blue Wave 2018 (2) (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blue Wave 2018 (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blue Wave 2018 (2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hat, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scottish and Plaid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting move of Abigail Spanberger to article space.

There are mentions of congressional candidate Abigail Spanberg but no article about her. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia%27s_7th_congressional_district

I request move of Abigail Spanberger to article space before the 2018 midterm elections.Mitzi.humphrey 12:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

First, Mitzi, that's not how this works. If you want an article created, post at Wikipedia:Requested articles. Almost nobody is watching your talk page. Further, this AfD determined that the subject isn't notable. Finally, you admit a conflict of interest. I find it shameful that you so nakedly want to promote your candidate ahead of the election. For that reason alone you should be banned from editing. We block people hired to write articles every day. If you want help pushing your non-notable candidate, go see WP:RB although I think we'd all be better served if you just quit Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:58, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blue Wave 2018 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue Wave 2018 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Wave 2018 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --ZiaLater (talk) 04:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit at Global warming

I have hidden the paragraph you added to the Global warming article, and opened a discussion at Talk:Global warming#Comment about Trump's policy about how to incorporate the topic into the article. Please join the discussion there. - Donald Albury 16:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.6

Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta) Participation: This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Now 100 supporters At 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100! A demo wiki is up and running! You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019! Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! Hello Mitzi.humphrey, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greeneville Historic District (Greeneville, Tennessee), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scotch-Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gheens Foundation

Hello Mitzi.humphrey,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gheens Foundation for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Semtner (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Semtner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chris Semtner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi! I don't know if you're aware of it, but your custom signature does not comply with Wikipedia signature rules. See WP:SIGLINK. ("Signatures must include at least one direct internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page; this allows other editors easy access to your talk page and contributions log.") An example of your malformed signature is at [3].

If you've accidentally altered your signature and don't know how to fix it, see Help:How to fix your signature. TJRC (talk) 21:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Writers who blog has been nominated for discussion

Category:Writers who blog, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^T • go beyond • bad idea 17:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The New York Times, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Edward Porter Humphrey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. greatthoughtstreasury.com doesn't look like a reliable source, it looks self-published. furthermore, you have a CoI and shouldn't be editing there, at all. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob Keleher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Keleher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Keleher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (H. Scott Gordon) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating H. Scott Gordon.

User:Chris troutman while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Do you have a CoI here, too?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: To User: Chris troutman. I have no CoI here other than a long-held interest in economics. I know H. Scott Gordon by reputation only. Mitzi.humphrey 18:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve H. Scott Gordon

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey,

Thanks for creating H. Scott Gordon! I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

I see no evidence he passes NPROF. I checked the Royal Society of Canada website and they don't list him.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Silliman Belknap Humphrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of FBI controversies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin Kennedy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gavin Kennedy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. All but one of the sources (the obit) is a primary source. It's well written, and well structured, but it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 12:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blue Wave 2018 (2)

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blue Wave 2018".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gavin Kennedy (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gavin Kennedy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gavin Kennedy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chris Semtner concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chris Semtner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Semtner

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chris Semtner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Institute for Contemporary Art, Richmond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Helen Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Blacks

Raymond St. Jacques (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Blacks

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Joni Mabe

A tag has been placed on User:Joni Mabe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 15:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your speedy deletion of this article. I intended to begin the article as a draft, and was distracted at the time. I will begin it again when I can give it the attention it deserves.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roomy Pak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roomy Pak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.artspacegallery.org/2000/exhibits/roomypak/index.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joel Root, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Root (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Real bills doctrine (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Real bills doctrine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Real bills doctrine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1708 Gallery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1708 Gallery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1708 Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graywalls (talk) 01:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for clarification in relation to coi guideline

I see that a fairly large number of your edits relate to people named Humphrey. Can you confirm that you have no personal connection to them, so that your editing is not in conflict with the conflict of interest guideline? JBW (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Real bills doctrine has been accepted

Real bills doctrine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Real bills doctrine, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. I applied the tags to the article when I accepted it. You did not discuss the removal of the tags. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CoI?

Mitzi, if you have a conflict of interest regarding 1708 Gallery you not only must disclose that conflict, you certainly should not be participating in the respective AfD. You know what the rules are. At some point, you may end up in front of ANI if you continue to edit articles and continually fail to disclose. This isn't just Chris being pointed. This is the WMF Terms of Use. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

== I am not a member of 1708. However I am a local artist and have exhibited art in several of its exhibitions in its long history. I will add no further comments to the deletion discussion. However, if the 1708 Gallery article is deleted, it will be an unfortunate and unwarranted loss for Wikipedia. I think you must be aware that I created the article and that it is factual in its recognition of the gallery's notability. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 19:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have more than once been informed of Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. You should therefore have known without having to be told yet again that you should have declared you connection to the 1708 Gallery when editing in connection with it. Please make sure that in future you do disclose any personal connection with a topic you are editing about, without having to be explicitly asked to do so each time, and also that you comply with the other aspects of the conflict of interest guideline. JBW (talk) 20:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richmond Artists Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richmond Artists Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richmond Artists Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graywalls (talk) 08:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

== I am a former president of the Richmond Artists Association..Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 12:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Graywalls (talk) 07:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artspace in Richmond, Virginia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artspace in Richmond, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artspace in Richmond, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graywalls (talk) 18:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

As you have already been told multiple times on this page, you should not be directly editing articles about your family members. You are instead invited to use the talk page of any such articles to request any changes. I have re-added the COI template to Thomas M. Humphrey given that you have ignored this advice. Melcous (talk) 12:13, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated undisclosed conflict of interest editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  creffett (talk) 15:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Art6

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Art6, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Graywalls (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roomy Pak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roomy Pak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roomy Pak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meadowbrook Country Club (Chesterfield County, Virginia) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meadowbrook Country Club (Chesterfield County, Virginia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadowbrook Country Club (Chesterfield County, Virginia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Li Jian (art historian) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Li Jian (art historian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Jian (art historian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:22, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mitzi.humphrey/Sheryl L. Humphrey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Mitzi.humphrey/Sheryl L. Humphrey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page User:Mitzi.humphrey/Sheryl L. Humphrey, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 06:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Art6 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Art6 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graywalls (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frances Broaddus-Crutchfield for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frances Broaddus-Crutchfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frances Broaddus-Crutchfield until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laura Pharis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Pharis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Pharis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair speedy deletions of many well-established articles.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mitzi.humphrey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked from participating in deletion discussions, and many of the speedy deletion discussions are citing COI for articles where none exists Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 22:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:00, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Comment here is a link to COIN thread that ultimately led to the block. User's first COI edit was in June 2014, making this six years of COI editing. I counted seven COI warnings on this page. Undaunted by policy, she continued making COI edits, for example making this June 9 2020 edit to the first page she edited back in 2014, which happens to be that of her husband (disclosed on user page). This was also despite a really long and time-consuming 2015 discussion where her COI was pointed out to her extremely clearly on the talk page of the article. She also contributed a draft biography of her daughter that she was working on was recently G11'd. Several editors have been digging through her contributions, as is evident from the notifications above, in order to determine if there was COI or notability issues. Because many articles were apparently created out of camaraderie or "community spirit", let's say, that is taking up a lot of valuable editor time, as the user only occasionally disclosed their COI. When they did disclose, they would often edit the articles directly (example), rather than following the COI editor protocol. Since any editor can give an opinion on an unblock request, mine would be that this editor has fully demonstrated over seven years that they are prepared to ignore COI guidelines that get in the way of their COI and community promotion editing, and should remain blocked, forever. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

how can we fix this problem?

Hey, Mitzi. You've been around long enough to know that you're not going to get unblocked if you do anything other than kowtow. Your request to get unblocked is going to get refused automatically. Also, telling friends like Eileen that you've been treated unfairly isn't going to help you get unblocked, either, when she makes sad pleas in AfD on your behalf. I think your best bet is to find a different hobby for the next six months and then attempt the standard offer. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diego Sanchez (artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diego Sanchez (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Sanchez (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking denied

My (Mitzi Humphrey's) request for unblocking was denied. I can no longer write for or edit Wikipedia. I have no plans to make another request for unblocking. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mitchell Merling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitchell Merling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Merling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aline Mare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aline Mare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aline Mare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The American School Library for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The American School Library is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The American School Library until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richmond Road Runners Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richmond Road Runners Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richmond Road Runners Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:57, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suzi Gablik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suzi Gablik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzi Gablik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of One/Off Printmakers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One/Off Printmakers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One/Off Printmakers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gavin Kennedy

Hello, Mitzi.humphrey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gavin Kennedy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Proponents of solar energy has been nominated for deletion

Category:Proponents of solar energy has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Reywas92^Talk 16:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis

Upcoming Indianapolis event - June 21: Wiki Loves Pride Indy
	You are invited to join us at IUPUI University Library for a Wiki Loves Pride editathon—hosted by IUPUI University Library, and supported by the Central Indiana Community Foundation—where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme: Tuesday, June 21: Wikipedia:Meetup/Indianapolis/Wiki Loves Pride 2022 (RSVP), focusing on Indiana LGBT history and culture. 11am–4pm at IUPUI University Library, Ashby Browsing Room. We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic & Jere

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 19:19, 13 June 2022 (UTC).)

July 28: You're invited! Food Deserts & Food Policy in Indianapolis editathon

	Upcoming Indianapolis event - July 28: Food Deserts & Food Policy
	You are invited to join us at Ruth Lilly Law Library for an edit-a-thon on Food Deserts & Food Policy hosted by Ruth Lilly Law Library and United States National Agricultural Library. Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on food deserts, nutrition, and related local and federal food policy. Thursday, July 28th from 11am-4pm, in Room 235G, Inlow Hall, 530 West New York St. Indianapolis, IN 46202. Visit the Wikipedia/Meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more. We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic, Jere, & Jamie

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 08:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC).)

You're invited! Environmental Justice editathons in Indianapolis & Bloomington

Bloomington	Upcoming events around Indiana - Nov. 1: Environmental Justice editathons 2 locations: Indianapolis & Bloomington (and virtual option)	IUPUI
	You are invited to join us for a multi-site editathon organized by Indiana Wikimedians at IUPUI University Library in downtown Indianapolis and the Herman B Wells Library at IU Bloomington (with virtual option). Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors, with faculty subject matter experts, will collaboratively improve articles on environmental justice in Indiana and globally. Join us at either location or virtually! Tuesday, November 1st from 11am-4pm, at... Indianapolis: IUPUI University Library, Ashby Browsing Room (2nd floor) Bloomington: Indiana University Bloomington, Wells Library, Hazelbaker Hall, room E159 (1st Floor, East Tower) [Visitor Information] Virtual: Via Zoom (please register on Eventbrite for link) Visit the meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more. We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic & Jere

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC).)

You're invited! In-person WikiConference North America Meetup in Indianapolis!

	Nov. 11-13: WikiConference North American Meetup! IUPUI University Library (and around Indianapolis)
	Registration is now open for WikiConference North America 2022 (Nov. 11–13) held jointly with Mapping USA! If you would like to experience this virtual event in-person, you are welcome to join our meetup in Indianapolis! We will be meeting at IUPUI University Library for the weekend, with AV set up for conference streaming and presenting (for those who've submitted proposals). Anyone is welcome to join, we will have some light refreshments and are planning evening activities. Feel free to join us for an activity, a day, or the whole weekend. Please let us know you are coming via the meetup page and please register for the conference. We will share more about in-person activities on the meetup page as they are finalized. Visit the WikiConference North America site for the schedule and visit our meetup page to sign up and learn more. And don't forget to register for the conference! —From the Wikimedia Indiana team!

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 17:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC).)

March 17: You're invited! Indiana Women in the Arts editathon

	Upcoming Indianapolis event March 17: Indiana Women in the Arts
	You are invited to join us at Newfields for an edit-a-thon on Indiana women in the arts, co-hosted by Wikimedians of Indiana and IUPUI University Library. Together, both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on women artists and artworks of Indiana. Friday, March 17th from 10am-3pm, in Stout Reference Library, Newfields (Indianapolis Museum of Art), 4000 North Michigan Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46208 Visit the Wikipedia Meetup page or Eventbrite to sign up and learn more. We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Dominic & Jere

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 21:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Indiana Politics & Government Editathon on Saturday, May 13

Upcoming Indianapolis event - May 13: Indiana Politics & Government 2023
	It's been an eventful state legislative session in Indiana, and local elections took place this week, so we have lots to cover! You are invited to The AMP at 16 Tech in Indianapolis for a Politics & Government editathon to improve write articles about local political and government topics of interest and improve information about local officials, candidates, elections, and legislation. Come join us at this fun venue, with free parking and refreshments provided! Saturday, May 13: Indiana Politics & Government 2023 (RSVP), focusing on Indiana politics and government and the Indiana Spring 2023 session. 11am–4pm The AMP at 16 Tech in Indianapolis, IN. We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians in Indiana User Group

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 01:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Wiki Loves Pride in Indianapolis

Upcoming Indianapolis event - June 24, 2023: Wiki Loves Pride Indy
	You are invited to join us at Spades Park Branch Library for a Wiki Loves Pride editathon—hosted by the Wikimedians of Indiana User Group with support from the Central Indiana Community Foundation. Together, new and experienced Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on LGBTQ+ topics, individuals, organizations, and legislation in Indiana. Saturday, June 24: Wikipedia:Meetup/Indianapolis/Wiki Loves Pride 2023 (RSVP), focusing on Indiana LGBT history and culture. 2 pm to 5 pm at the Spades Park Branch of The Indianapolis Public Library. We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians of Indiana User Group

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 16:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC).)

You're invited! Indiana State Fair Wiknic on Sunday, July 30

Upcoming Indianapolis event - July 30, 2023: Indiana State Fair Wiknic
	We are partnering with the Indiana State Fair to offer FREE tickets to the fair for Wikipedians! We will be meeting on July 30th at 10am to pass out tickets and have a quick info session before we attend the fair (feel free to branch off and share your accomplishments on the Meetup page later!) Detailed instructions on how the day will go is available on the Meetup page! We hope you'll join us to edit about things related to fair (historic buildings, foods, animals, activities, and the fair itself). All levels of experience are welcome! Please RSVP so we know who is coming. We hope you'll join us! Sunday, June 30: Wikipedia:Meetup/Indianapolis/State Fair Wiknic (RSVP), focusing on topics related to the Indiana State Fair. 10 am to ? at the Indiana State Fairgrounds; meet at the Deaf School Gateway We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians of Indiana User Group

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. Sent on 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC).)