User talk:Tseung Kwan O

Draft:Robert Sonneman

Thank you for your points on Robert Sonneman. I am removing extra references. Can you take a look at it? Thank you. Draft:Robert Sonneman Adamreinman (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled, Art.

Hello,

Our team has been editing our Wikipedia page, Untitled, Art. for a few weeks now, and our sources have been a main issue. A previous reviewer informed us about separating our website has a source which we did before submitted the article you reviewed. Your main comment is that the sources had to be independent of the subject, but all the sources listed are from major publications. I was hoping you could clarify why these sources aren't acceptable. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffreyWalkowiak (talk • contribs) 17:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14:07:31, 3 August 2016 review of submission by Kjshaw


Hello. Would you be able to more specifically explain why the BACI article was declined? I am absolutely willing to reword sentences that might seem too positive in order to avoid the appearance of bias. I also found more news articles that mention BACI. Would adding information from these articles and citing them improve the article, or should I wait until even more independent sources have discussed the organization? Thank you for your help! Kjshaw (talk) 14:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)kjshaw[reply]

Request on 01:43:47, 4 August 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Pennypigtails


Hi, thanks for taking the time to review my article. Just wondering if you could please clarify what would constitute significant coverage? Pennypigtails (talk) 01:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pennypigtails (talk) 01:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:14:49, 6 August 2016 review of submission by Fredmcsanchez


I am requesting a re-review for the biographical entry "Ali Dibadj". Reviewer said he does not meet "notability". Wikipedia guidelines for "notability" say the person must be "worthy of notice" or "note" or "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention to be recorded." I respectfully submit that he does fit those criteria very well. Over the past 10 years, he has transformed companies in the generally entrenched consumer packaged goods industry with his objective, irreverent, bold analysis and writing (for instance, Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Energizer, etc.)--that is truly "remarkable" to push against the grain. "Worthy of note", being ranked the top analyst for 8 times in Institutional Investor is very "significant and unusual", especially from an underdog position of supporting shareholders versus large incumbent companies. Please reconsider him; he deserves to be recorded. Indeed, his track record stands much for what Wikipedia stands for--open, objective, accurate information dissemination. Thank you.

Fredmcsanchez I have replied on your talk page. Tseung Kwan O is currently not involved in AfD reviews. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your AFC advice

This instruction to "remove" non-independent but reliable sources is wrong. In the future, please advise new editors to include independent reliable sources in addition to reliable affiliated sources. For example, there is no particular reason why a business or organization's own website cannot be used to support a sentence about who the CEO is or what year it was founded. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:47:10, 8 August 2016 review of submission by Stuartlipo


Please may someone review this article. As pointed out when this article was declined the current re-direct is incorrect. GATCA is formed by part CRS and also includes AEoI, BEPS, TRACE and FATCA. GATCA is an acronym that has become common place within the financial industry and this is what our article is trying to show and inform people of. There will be of course some cross over from the re-direct due to CRS forming part of the overall GATCA acronym.

NPP

You have been sufficiently warned. Your AfC eviewing is a mess and people are having to clean up after you. NPP and AfD require even more knowledge and competence than AfC. If you continue to tag articles you will find your editing privileges greatly restricted. We won't tell you again. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been involved in AfCs for a very long period of time already. I haven't patrolled new pages and commented on AfCs unless they are coming on my talk page. It's just that people keep on asking about AfC on my talk page. Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 08:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So this wasn't you either? Please let us know who else is using your account. I think you should read this. We don't often point users to it but in some cases it helps.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your enquiry. I am the one and only one person working with this account. I uphold personal cyber info security to US Department of Defence standards, so it is literally impossible for somebody else to do anything wrong with my computers and my accounts, unless they've discovered an weakness in wikipedia's website instead of my computers and my networks. Please do not worry about my account's security issues unless it's a security issue of wikipedia as a whole.
Now, as for this page, Soros Fund Management has already moved out of that building. There are new tennants in that building now whose names are not included in that page. I think some other info are also outdated. That's why the outdated tag is placed. I hope you could understand why exactly the tag is placed. As for AfCs, I have not worked on AfCs for a month already. I currently do not have plans to resume work in that project.
Afterall, summer is the time when I need to intensely prepare new powerpoints and lecture notes for the next year and I'm quite busy to be honest. This could also be reflected by the drastic reduction in the amount of edits I do each day, no matter on my user page, wiki articles, or other wiki supporting pages. Thank you for your support! Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 13:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your tagging is becoming problematic

I see that other editors have asked that you stop tagging for the time being; advice which you seemingly have chosen to ignore. Please at least stop randomly putting context tags on pages- examples 1 and 2. jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:57:38, 18 August 2016 review of submission by 182.156.92.138


We have been trying to get EventTracker on Wikipedia, It is a well Known US company specializing in Security Products and Solutions, Our competitors who have no citations have been accepted on Wikipedia but still we are unable to create a page for EventTracker.

EventTracker is also a Major player in Gartner Magic Quadrant for SIEM Solutions (Security and Information Event Mangement Solutions).

References:

https://www.gartner.com/doc/3097022/magic-quadrant-security-information-event

https://www.google.co.in/search?q=EventTracker+Gartner+Magic+Quadrant+2015&num=100&safe=off&client=firefox-b&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiWtd673svOAhVBM48KHdSrBAIQsAQIOQ&biw=1366&bih=635#imgrc=KYWvKfHBm7Pt3M%3A

http://techbeacon.com/latest-gartner-magic-quadrant-siem-takeaways

http://solutionsreview.com/security-information-event-management/2015/10/05/whats-changed-gartners-2015-security-information-and-event-management-siem-magic-quadrant-report/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.156.92.138 (talk) 19:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:56:38, 10 September 2016 review of submission by Snehahurrain


Kindly review the article Farman Nawaz keeping in view the following pages that can be linked with it i.e. Border Times Pakistan, The Bannu Times ,Jirga Bannu, Daily Times (Pakistan), The Express Tribune, Hareem Farooq, Malala Yousafzai, Secularism in India, LGBT rights in Pakistan, Maulana Arshad Madani, Ubaidullah Sindhi, Mohabat Subh Ka Sitara Hai, Enhanced Partnership with Pakistan Act of 2009, Murder of Farkhunda and China–Pakistan Economic Corridor.Sneha Hurrain (talk) 07:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snehahurrain, first, you have to fix the issues presented by the previous reviewers. Second, you have to actually submit the draft for review. As a direct reply to your comments above: what pages are linked your draft (or are mentioned in it, or link to it, etc) are wholly irrelevant to whether a person is notable. It's about what has been said about the person in reliable sources. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Locky

Hello! I'm from WP:CSEC. I notice that you were the last reviewer to decline publication for Draft:Locky, and also that the draft is much more detailed than the co-existing stub Locky. Personally, I think the detail is sufficient for what this program was, and that it was a pretty notable and widespread piece of ransomware; it seems to me that it does meet WP:GNG and that the best course of action would be to merge the draft into the stub and be done with it. However, since I see it's been declined 3 times, I wanted to ask your opinion rather than ignore your review. Would it cause you pain if I were to merge the draft into the stub? --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 02:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Falcon Kirtaran, Locky was accepted via AFC, so the fact that (for some inexplicable reason) a second draft exists means any information in the draft should be merged into the existing article. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 02:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
Aah, OK, thanks! I'm just getting back into editing after many years away; this process is new to me. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 02:46, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Aye, no worries. Welcome back! Primefac (talk) 02:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

09:34:23, 14 October 2016 review of submission by Dori raco


Hello. The purpose of this page is to point out the functionalities of this virtual reality software and the way its currently being used in the market. No advertisement is included, and references to and from the Holobuilder team have been removed. Please reconsider publishing. Thank you in advance

Tseung Kwan O is currently not involved in AfD reviews. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Francesco Renna

Hello, thanks in advance for your help. May you explain which part of Renna's draft needs more references, please? Do you mean this part "During his spare time, he played the clubs and street corners of Campania and Emilia Romagna." or the whole one? Best regards,

Simon Flai (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Simonflai, Tseung Kwan O is no longer involved in the AFC process. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:12:21, 16 November 2016 review of submission by Stanford1993


Included the album's references that are independent of the album and the artist (for example, review from 'Bluegrass Situation' and radio charts). I do not know what else can substantiate independent references except for more reviews. Would it be helpful to include more reviews?

Stanford1993, Tseung Kwan O is no longer involved in the AFC process. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 17:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tseung Kwan O. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10:57:31, 25 November 2016 review of submission by Rhoegh


There has been uploaded a new text.

Lafc, Tseung Kwan O is no longer involved in the AFC process. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ben Manyenyeni

Hello, Tseung Kwan O. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ben Manyenyeni".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate article?

Hi. Stentorians / The Stentorians ? In ictu oculi (talk) 21:32, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Reviewing and Publishing

Hello, I'm a new editor. Just trying to edit the available drafts an learning how it works. Recently I came across Draft: Gokul Shrinivas , which was rejected by you. You had left a comment that you are in need of claims it seems. I have well edited that article now. But I can't include this particular link about Gokul Shrinivas- an article written by Reji Kumar Pillai who is the President of ISGF and well know industrialist in energy sector across globe for past 3 decades. I tried to whitelist, Got the whitelist page, But something is rejecting my request. Could you please whitelist this URL? yourstory.com/2016/11/66cba04624-smart-city-expert-meet-the-young-leader-from-india-gokul-shrinivas-made-his-way-innovations/ Jonathan629 (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)jonathan629[reply]

Jonathan629, first off, Tseung Kwan O is no longer a draft reviewer. Second, yourstory.com is nothing more than paid advertising, it is neither reliable nor independent (people pay yourstory money to get a biography on the site). It will not be whitelisted, and you'll have to find a different source. Primefac (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]


Hello, I have two more sources - The Hindu Newspaper & Times of India Newspaper. I have snapshotted both the newspaper where Gokul Shrinivas's name is mentioned. You can find those in these links https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B3Ifg9NqQswtWjBDVFFpcFBfQ2c - The Hindu dated December 15, 2016. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3Ifg9NqQswtX0hsVDNBajk1X0E/view?usp=sharing - Times of India dated February 17, 2016.

This is my first article I'm writing in Wikipedia, So please guide me and help me to finish it off successfully. Thanks, Jonathan629 (talk)jonathan629 —Preceding undated comment added 10:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Accra Institute of Technology

Hello Tseung Kwan O. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Accra Institute of Technology, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Valiants

Hi, could you take a look and see if the notability was addressed, the letter in note 18 from the mayor and Commissioner does not mention the Valiants, but Hairston was a prominent part of their legacy, and a member.CaptJayRuffins (talk) 14:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Jamie Smith's Mabon

You made some helpful suggestions for improvements to the below draft. I made these changes a few months ago and am not sure how to get them approved. Could you offer any help?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jamie_Smith%27s_MABON

Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlpressley (talk • contribs) 12:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tseung Kwan O. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tseung Kwan O. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Fuller

Information icon Hello, Tseung Kwan O. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Fuller, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]