User talk:MisterCSharp

Feel free to leave a message here. I will respond to it on this page.MisterCSharp (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Rachmaninoff

Hi,

when nullifying my edit to the Rachmaninoff article, I think you have misunderstood the Russian spelling. It is inconsistent and looks very strange to spell his last name Рахма́ниновъ with an ending ъ (the pre 1918 spelling), when his first name and patronymic Серге́й Васи́льевич are spelled according to post 1918 rules. You can't mix and match between the two spelling conventions. If you want to use the information to, for instance, look up Rachmaninoff in a Russian dictionary you would certainly use the modern spelling.

Cheers

That's very interesting. Please take this information to the article's talk page so it can be discussed before changing.MisterCSharp (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glenn Gould

Hello, MisterCSharp. You have new messages at Argolin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Argolin (talk) 05:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Artur Rubinstein

Hi, Thanks for removing the tag from Artur Rubinstein. I completely overlooked the ref and didn't see the reference about his Chopin playing. Sorry! RainCity471^talk 16:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help, although I don't necessarily agree with the reference!MisterCSharp (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Horowitz

Hello, Mr. CSharp,

With all due respect, what's the point of avoiding the use of infoboxes on Classical musicians' pages? And what 'consensus' has there been regarding this? I am not aware of any, although I'm aware this has been discussed numerous times...but I do not know that the general consensus would be to *not* add info boxes.

I have also encountered several classical musician pages where infoboxes are used...for instance this one.

I don't intend to be rude or challenging, but in my opinion there is nothing detrimental about adding info boxes to classical musician pages. Why should this differ from its use on non-classical pages?

-LoniousSphere (talk) 14:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see, Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music#Biographical infoboxes. Also, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes.MisterCSharp (talk) 13:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article states, "Infoboxes are neither required nor prohibited for any article.". Technically, no one is obliged to put, or not to put, infoboxes on Classical musician articles.

However, it also states, "Whether to include an infobox, which infobox to include, and which parts of the infobox to use, is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article." Does this mean I am not allowed to put infoboxes on articles unless other editors deem it necessary?

If I had placed an info box without the consent of majority of the editors in that article, what gives you more right to make sure that there is no info box on that same article?

-LoniousSphere (talk) 14:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Established procedure is to go to the article's Talk page, look for existing discussions on the topic, and see if there is a consensus. If none exists, you can start a discussion thread. Generally when there has been discussion of whether to add an infobox to Classical musician bios, the consensus has been to not add them. MisterCSharp (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

	The Invisible Barnstar
	I present The Invisible Barnstar to MisterCSharp for his/her* valuable contributions to this project. Despite editing well out of the limelight his/her* edits are extremely vital and much appreciated. * Just to be proper. RainCity471^useless banterlist of failures 18:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valentina Lisitsa

Hello MisterCSharp,

Re: Valentina Lisitsa

Please insert a link to the source, where citation needed about threats: https://www.facebook.com/ValentinaLisitsa/posts/623465447754643:0

Please insert the following articles on the subject of controversy:

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2015/april/06/toronto-symphony-orchestra-goes-full-stalin/#.VSNR3bFcEk4.twitter

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/07/big-brother-takes-toronto-symphony-orchestra/

This is about the tweet that was referred https://twitter.com/ValLisitsa/status/585297099241234432

Same to embed:

Euromaidanites actually quote Charlie Hebdo tweet -without showing it :) <a href="https://twitter.com/gbazov">@gbazov</a> <a

Truthwarrior55 (talk) 23:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, Truthwarrior55. I find it interesting that your first edit under this username is to request me to add links to sources. Point 1. If you want to insert a link as a reference, do it yourself. Point 2. Political instituts and blogs are not considered valid sources. Request denied.MisterCSharp (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MisterCSharp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MisterCSharp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Emanuel Ax

Hi, MisterCSharp. Re: this edit you said “Nationality is based on when subject became notable.” I wonder could you direct me to the relevant part of MoS? (I have no ax to grid here!) Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Sure thing. Here you go: [1] MisterCSharp (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I thought it might be relevant to the rather long and tiresome discussion at Talk:Arvo Pärt. But I'm pretty sure he was notable before he took Austrian citizenship. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MisterCSharp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)