This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mike Peel. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Clement's Church, Ordsall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galactic coordinate system, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages RA and Dec. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thanks for telling me, but the cities named are too far away from me. I might have gone to a Birmingham one a couple of years back, except that it clashed with another engagement. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Good to see you on board. I have been having a look at the background material-- particularly Manual of Style/mathematics and Help:Referencing for beginners. Not to put too finer point on it neither would pass Ofsted. Rather than cause an earthquake- I have put together a sandbox, where I have tried to gather a few threads together, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Mathematics/sandbox, I have left copius comments embedded in the page- if you have a few monments could you have a look and make a few surgical comments. The referencing issue is also interesting, there seems to be no consistent terminology for the different approved styles and a lot of confusion caused by this in the discussion. Many maths stubs are tagged for improvement- but seem too short to require inline refs. -- Clem Rutter (talk)09:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi @ClemRutter: working on the MoS isn't really my kind of thing, so I'll watch but probably won't contribute much. I'd generally recommend keeping things short, simple, and not over-prescriptive. And please encourage people to stick with the standard inline referencing system, rather than using one of the more bespoke ones. :-) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Grosvenor Picture Palace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bingo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I was amused as Patrick Moore had written there was nothing interesting in Microscopium, but there are some weird stars and things. However, I am a bit stumped trying to find out more and write about Microscopium Void as getting my head around large-scale universe stuff is a challenge...and I'd like to get it in somehow. All help appreciated. cheers Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 11:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
@Casliber: Hmm, it doesn't look like the microscopium void is particularly notable. The 'discovery' paper is only referenced 7 times, the latest in 1995 [1]. It might be better as a brief mention somewhere else rather than having its own article. I'll try to have a look at the constellation article later. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
On 26 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grosvenor Picture Palace, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Grosvenor Picture Palace(pictured), built in 1913–15 in Manchester, was once the largest cinema in the United Kingdom outside of London, and is now a student pub called The Footage? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
@Casliber: Sorry for the delay, I'll take a look now. I've also posted a message to a facebook group of professional astronomers asking whether any of them would like to review the article / have any comments: they might leave comments on the talk page, or I'll copy comments over to the talk page from facebook. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
UK report: Progress on an image release from the Bodleian; National Library of Scotland residency comes to an end; and Glasgow Museums develop a Wiki Working Group
USA report: Wikipedian at the Centers for Disease Control - NIOSH
Open Access report: New Topic Page; Open Access and the humanities; Wikimania & Wikidata
Hello Mike; I see you've taken a look at several of Casliber's constellation articles in the past and provided useful commentary. One I've been working on for around a year now, Serpens, is incredibly near FAC, I believe; would you mind having a look at it? StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
No, it's a dedicated template for The Times, with parameters that aren't normally used in other newspaper cites. Mjroots (talk) 19:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
The only parameter that seems to be different, according to the documentation, is 'day_of_week'. E.g., see the following template calls (the ordering is different, but the information displayed is the same):
Author (1 January 2000). "Title". Section. The Times. No. 1. London. col 1, p. 1. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)template uses deprecated parameter(s) (help)
Author (1 January 2000). "Title". Section. The Times. No. 1. London. col. 1, p. 1, pp. 1-2. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
Attending Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City right now, meeting awesome people that already use or want to know everything about Wikidata.
After the next deployment, redirects will be automatically created when merging items.
Special:UnconnectedPages can now be queried via the query API, thanks to Ladsgroup.
Migrating away from an older serializer to the DataModel Serialization component.
Worked on a new time parser that can parse formats like M/D/Y, Y M D and so on.
Fixed a bug where a value could not be edited when save failed.
Made the snak type, badge and rank selectors position themselves after resizing the browser window and introduced a possibility to collapse the sitelinks sections.
Worked on a change in editing to be able to edit a statement and it’s references in one step.
Made some small changes to the style of the edit warning and sitelinks so they are easier to notice and understand
Added error messages for Special:GoToLinkedPage and Special:ItemByTitle so you get a useful message in case no result is found
The Entity Selector now displays alias in brackets behind label
The number of entities loaded via the {{#property:…}} parser function and via Lua will be reported in the “Parser profiling data” (which can be found below a page preview or within the Html of a page)
Prepared for next rounds of arbitrary access rollout
Investigated growing lag of dispatching of changes to Wikipedia and co. We'll need to investigate further and change things so the lag between an edit on Wikidata and it being send to the Wikipedias and other projects is not too high.
Added the property ID to Special:ListProperties
Moved two extensions (Wikidata.org and WikimediaBadges) from Github to Gerrit. More will follow.
You have a bunch of names etc. and want to find Wikidata items with those labels/aliases? Try relabel!
SourcererBot is adding lots of references to existing statements on several thousand items.
Mix-n-Match has new catalogs including the National Library of Australia.
Deaths at Wikipedia are a series of reports comparing items at Wikidata with death-by-year-categories of Wikipedia. For the years since 2000, only about 15% of items at Wikidata lack d:Property:P570 (date of death).
Soon the edit summary for edits through the API will also contain the automatic edit summary that you are used to for edits done through the website. The summary given by the API user will be appended to the automatic summary. (phabricator:T97247)
Addressed performance issues in usage tracking updates and had to delay the latest round of rollouts because of it
Fixed a bug where suggestions would show up twice in item and property selectors (phabricator:T109697)
Improved performance of the mw.wikibase.sitelink Lua method
Made final changes so we can redirect mobile users to the mobile version by default
Evaluated the remaining steps to get the extension deployed that lets you do checks against 3rd party databases. Not much left it seems and we'll tackle that in one of the next sprints. Getting the new features deployed for the constraints checks will still take a bit longer.
More work on making the edit summaries in the watchlist on Wikipedia and co more meaningful