User talk:Mike1024

Mike1024 is currently internetless, and may not be able to respond swiftly to queries.

Welcome Message

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mike1024! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Acetic'^Acid 14:01, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

Gaston Lippitt

I'm afraid not, I came across the article purely by chance, and don't have any knowledge on the subject, much less reputable sources. Good luck in your search... Alai 14:58, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks. Dragons flight 21:57, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Geneva Mechanism

That is a FANTASTIC animation for Geneva Mechanism. Thanks! Ppe42 11:38, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree - it's amazing! Well done Mike. I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. - Gobeirne 19:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sparklers moving slow shutter speed.jpg

Please use Wikimedia Commons to upload you images. Thanks, Saperaud 02:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons I havn't done this in the past include:

• Don't like creating new accounts; would like single sign-on.
• Don't want my edit history, messages, user pages etc split over two servers; would like them unified.
• Don't like having files split over servers; would like a 'move all images to commons' tool.

When those things are present, I will happily use commons for all my image uploading. Until then, my images are all licensed such that you can use them anywhere without restriction - You can copy them yourself if you want to use them!

Cheers,

Mike1024 (t/c) 09:06, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Electrical substation

I noticed that you have been involved in transformers, I thought that you might be able to help out with the substation design / protection section. If you are an electrical eng. student then you might be able to ask one of your tutors if they have ever heard of an event called the luton flashover. It was a major substation failure in the UK which lead (many years ago) to a national power outage and a profound chnage in substation design. If you can help please contact me on my talk page Cadmium 12:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip on my talk page, please if possible could you give me more details. The event which you are describing sounds similar to the events during the oct 1987 storm which caused the power to go off in London.

BTW do you get taught much about power systems on your BEng ? Cadmium 21:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GIF animation

Hi Mike

I noticed that you were the one who had uploaded Image:Geneva mechanism 6spoke animation.gif to WP. What a great animation! The reason why I'm writing is because I am wondering who you have achieved such a smooth motion. I recently uploaded Image:3-phase flow.gif, and the performance is disappointingly jerky. The frames of this animation were created in Inkscape, converted to PNG, imported into Photoshop, and then built into a 36-frame animation (10° steps) in Adobe ImageReady. If you could give me any pointers as to how the Geneva mechanism GIF was created, I would be grateful. Incidently, I would give some thought to nominating the image as a Featured picture. --BillC 22:50, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. My original version was 824x526 pixels. The performance of this in Firefox was so poor that I didn't think of uploading it in that form and shrunk it by 50% before uploading it. Strangely, it runs a lot better in IE. What I surprising is that some animated GIFs that are larger (in terms of file size) that this animation run more smoothly. I've uploaded the full-size version: it's at Image:3-phase flow large.gif. It's running jerkily there, but better when you click on 'Download high-resolution version'. If you could spare the time to see if you can optimise it, I'd appreciate it. Many thanks, --BillC 18:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Vick image

Hi Mike... Arthur Vick 3 was my accomodation last year -- very nice photo, thank you. Lambyuk 22:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3D Studio Max

Do you still have the files you used in creating the gear animation? I haven't used 3D Studio Max before, but would like to create an animation. The easiest way to learn is probably to see working examples. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-01-27 08:02

• I've been looking at 3D Studio Max, and I know what I want to animate, I'm just not sure how to do a couple things: animating a string wrapped around a spindle, and animating a flexible diaphragm surface bending. I'm trying to do a 3D animation of this device (the first diagram). — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-6 04:20
  • Is it possible to create a circular plane object? — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-6 22:45
    • Thanks for your help! I find I'm having a lot of trouble getting things to line up perfectly. I remember having this problem when I used to mess around with Worldcraft, which is similar. Is there any easy way to get everything to line up nice and neat? — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-7 06:04

So far, so good. I've tried searching for a tutorial on wire wrapped around a pulley, but couldn't find anything. My situation is a spool with a wire wrapped once completely around it. As the wire is pulled, the spindle turns. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-8 02:47

• I made a line, applied the rope reactor modifier, then added the line to a "rope collection", then i turned the cylinder into a rigid body, and attached the line to the rigid body... but I can't figure out how to get it to wrap around the cylinder. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-8 03:21
• Nevermind, I think I figured out how to do it with a helix spline. I'll bug you if I need help :) — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-8 15:21

Featured Picture

An image you created, Image:Geneva mechanism 6spoke animation.gif, has just become a Featured Picture. Congratulations, and thankyou for making it for us. It truely is a deserving FP, and a great addition to the articles. Raven4x4x 06:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this on Signpost -- it's a very nice image, thanks for providing it! — Matt Crypto 00:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sweet picture man, it makes the article so much easier to understand Benji64 23:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Picture of the day/April 21, 2006

I've put a basic layout up for this image. I havn't come across the column versions etc much before - where are they normally used? Cheers, Mike1024 (t/c) 00:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are four versions, which can all be accessed from the archive pages Archive. POTD row is the version used on the Main Page. POTD column is the version used on most of the Main Page alternatives, including the classic Main Page. Picture of the day is the boxed version with caption, and is used on many user pages. POTD is the boxed picture without the caption, and is also used mostly on user pages. Thanks for the help. --Go for it! 00:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for your excellent summary of facts on the talk:Lolicon page. This is by far the best example of summarising a controversial discussion on Wikipedia that I've seen. Thryduulf 16:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Why thank you! --preschooler@heart my talk - contribs 15:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks too - always appreciated when, sometimes thankless, effort is recognised and appreciated :-) I might though transfer it to my user page, as talk-page shortly needing my 1st archiving. David Ruben ^Talk 00:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rosalind Franklin

You have contributed to the Rosalind Franklin article in the past. It has recently had a rewrite and had a request for peer review. Your comments would be appreciated. Alun 17:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About the WikiBreak enforcer.

Its extremely easy to bypass. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Javascript will figure it out. Maybe using an external time server would do the trick? Anyway, even if someone doesnt know anything about javascript, they can easily look in the past versions of the page, where a few users tell how to bypass it. I may be wrong, but I am pretty sure that there is a way for admins to delete or hide previous versions of pages. May want to ask an admin about that or something. Cheers! Wikipeedio 23:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged vandalism

Thanks for assuming bad faith. The reason i deleted that stuff is because it was over a year old and for the warwick proxy.

(The preceeding unsigned comment was made by 212.56.109.125, 19:47, 31 May 2006)

Belated thanks

Thanks for the barnstar from a while ago. You managed to post it just as I decided a break from the spam and vandal fighting was appropriate. As you can see, I'm back in action now. Thanks again. --GraemeL ^(talk) 15:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Color components (HSV, RGB)

Hi Mike. Nice work on the pictures you uploaded to HSV color space and RGB color model. I wanted to let you know that I edited the former as I felt it was a tad large. Feel free to revert the edit. Also, I played around with your concept in Borland Delphi for a few minutes... I came up with the following images after minor adjustments:

Image:Barn grand tetons hsv alternative.jpg Here the hue component is identical to your version, however I used the saturation and value components on a grayscale (black = 0, white = 1, as opposed to the white-red, black-red scales in your version).

Image:Barn_grand_tetons_rgb_alternative.jpg Here I used the color complements to represent 0, while you opted for black representing 0. I was hoping it would add a level of contrast.

Well, I am no artist so I leave it to you to decide if either image is more clear. No hard feelings if you decide yours should stay. (3ucky(3all 05:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Mike. Your points are well taken. I was viewing the page in a measly 1024x768 at the time =D. If you would prefer the components to be visible w/o scrolling, this can be achieved easily enough:

I also understand about keeping the math to the point. So far as showing the generator code is concerned, Delphi code does tend to be a little more long-winded than Mat-Lab code. The code for this program is 183 lines, although only about 10 of those are the program guts. I could probably upload a zipped executable & source code, but I am not entirely certain how to do so without a workaround (I uploaded File:(remove .ogg extension) HSVRGB.rar.ogg if you would like to try out the executable, but it doesn't have much substance beyond entertainment value).

I will certainly have a look at YCbCr - I find color spaces are fascinating.

My version of YCbCr components follows. I used a similar scale as on the RGB components. Your version uses Teal-Rose / Olive-Pale Blue scale while mine uses a Cyan-Red / Yellow-Blue scale. I think it may be a matter of preference, but the murkiness goes away on my scale (which may make it unrealistic). FYI, see the scale comparison.

Image:YCbCrout.jpg

Image:Scale Comparison.PNG

Hi once again. You might be interested in the images I uploaded to CMYK color model and YIQ. I also have one final suggestion to you: for the YCbCr components, you may consider standardizing the Y component to 0 (as opposed to 128) for the Cb and Cr outputs. Doing so would generate an image like the one on the right, which seems to follow more closely with the intention of all of these illustrations (to get rid of the background and focus in on one component at a time). Thanks for collaborating with me; I now have a delphi library with conversion routines for all 7 of the color spaces we have discussed. Regards, (3ucky(3all 05:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Webcam Dir

Hi Mike. I'm the person who was working on the collaborative webcam directory for WeatherBonk. It's a personal project that allows users to add and modify and geocode webcams and is now well over 8000 cams. I spent sometime looking for a comprehensive cam directory and couldn't find anything nearly as comprehensive or useful. I thought this would be a very useful resource for people and didn't seem to violate wikipedia standards. Thanks david (weathermaps at gmail)

Image:Sunday times front cover scanned low resolution.png

Hi Mike. I've replaced the wikipedia:fair use image Sunday times front cover scanned low resolution.png on your photo subpage with a link to the image page, since fair use images aren't supposed to appear outside of appropriate articles. Picaroon 04:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons POTY identity confirmation

With this message I confirm - 'cause I know we must be firm - I am known by the term commons:User:Mike1024

Mike1024 (t/c) 10:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Freenet screenshot the freedom engine jan06.png

Hello, Mike1024. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Freenet screenshot the freedom engine jan06.png) was found at the following location: User:Mike1024/gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could I buy your Canon XL H1?

contact me at y2crack4 at gmail dot com.

Sorry, not interested. Mike1024 (t/c) 21:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you only then tell me how you replaced the microphone that way?

http://videosystems.com/mag/511VS_s.review-Canon.jpg -->>>

I don't have the camera handy right now, but I'd imagine it could be (1) Just replacing the wind muffler on the standard microphone; (2) Replacing the standard microphone with a different one using the same connector (it looks removable); (3) replacing the standard microphone with one connecting to Canon's "Advanced Accessory Shoe"; (4) Connected via XLR; or (5) Connected through XLR to the Canon MA300 Microphone Adapter, which is then connected to the "Advanced Accessory Shoe". I guess (1) or (2) are most likely, looking at the photo; I'd expect to see in the photo if it was (3), (4) or (5). Does this help? Mike1024 (t/c) 07:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It helps alot, thanks!!

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MATLAB screenshot showing sobel filtering of bitmap graphics.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:MATLAB screenshot showing sobel filtering of bitmap graphics.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MATLAB screenshot showing sobel filtering of bitmap graphics.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MATLAB screenshot showing sobel filtering of bitmap graphics.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ^0001 02:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Steadicam and operator in front of crowd.jpg

Hi Mike1024,
Thank you for uploading Image:Steadicam and operator in front of crowd.jpg!
You didn't write who the uploader is. I expected that it was you who've taken the picture so I added you name to "author=".
Please tell me on my Commons talk page if my presupposition was/is right.
Thank you --D-Kuru (talk) 18:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information about the authorship

Related to your comment & changes:

1) No, I don't use a bot. I made the mistake [[:de:Mike1024|Mike1024]], because I uploaded Image:Steadi.jpg and Image:Steadycam.jpg from the german wikipedia to Commons. I just copied the text for all and I've forgotten to chenge it. On Image:Steadi.jpg I've added the :User but on Image:Steadycam.jpg, I've forgotten to add it. So thanks for remind me.

2) I made a mistake by creating a correct inter wikilink to your userpage, but I used the right template. I shouldn't use {{PD-self}} when I upload a picture, but I haven't shot it. Thats one reason why {{PD-user-en}} exists. That nobody could assume that the uploader is the author.

3) An admin on Commons told me some time before that "|other_versions=" is only if you have another version of that picture (for example a cut one or if you replace the man's face by Bush's face or something like that).

--D-Kuru (talk) 11:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to your edit

1) read the words I wrote above again 2) Again why {{PD-user-en}} and not {{PD-self}}: PD-self say "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide." I haven't taken the image. You, Mike1024, have taken the image! "I" means (at least in the majority of cases) that uploader, but not the author. So, because I've uploaded the image, I have to use {{PD-user-en}}. If you would have uploaded the image to commons, you could/should use PD-self instead, because you've also taken it. marry christmas and a happy new year --D-Kuru (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Wikipedia featured widescreen desktop backgrounds

I have nominated Category:Wikipedia featured widescreen desktop backgrounds (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. _→AzaToth 19:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:British coins showing milled and engraved edges.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:British coins showing milled and engraved edges.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in ...

I saw your name at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Photographers. I revised the pages at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Please consider adding your name to the top of the page at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in London? and to any of the other subpages for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 01:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sunday times front cover scanned low resolution.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sunday times front cover scanned low resolution.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ARM logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:ARM logo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Altera logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Altera logo.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:National union of students uk logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:National union of students uk logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Mechanical electricity meter 1965.jpg

Image:Mechanical electricity meter 1965.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Mechanical electricity meter 1965 (1).jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Mechanical electricity meter 1965 (1).jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barn grand tetons rgb separation.jpg

Which program did you use to make this? FMAFan1990 (talk) 11:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wire Wrap Tool

Hey Mike, where did you get that wire wrap tool you posted on the wire wrap page? I am looking for a inexpensive supplier.

Thanks for your help!

A1ronzo (talk) 15:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)A1ronzo[reply]

Geostationary Orbit

Mike,

Just a thought.

Since your orbit diagram illustrates geostationary orbit, isn't it better if the image of the earth is shown from a polar view, instead of a eurocentric?

Thanks for the wonderful contribution either way.

Gushi (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gray code

Thanks for the encoder photo - that fills in a big hole in the article.
Happy 2010! Andy Dingley (talk) 10:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Company that produces the hexapod positioners in your gallery - "Hexapod"

Hi Mike, may I know where those hexapod positioners can be bought from? The ones I'm referring to are the twin Steward platforms title "Hexapod" in your pictures. Thank you.

07:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeokaiwei (talk • contribs)

Direction of East in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ECEF_ENU_Longitude_Latitude_relationships.svg

Hi Mike,

I like your illustration of ENU in the referenced file. However, the direction of the green East axis seems to be parallel to the direction of the blue Y_ecef axis. Would you like to change the figure so that East is "more perpendicular" to North? Thanks for the contribution!

Lingji — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lambertch (talk • contribs) 00:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia featured widescreen desktop backgrounds

Category:Wikipedia featured widescreen desktop backgrounds, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hough transform image

Hi Mike,

I like to know how angle of normal to blue line 150, i guess it should be -30 or 330.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.44.23.9 (talk) 12:32, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Mike,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Geneva mechanism 6spoke animation.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 3, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-06-03. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am mesmerised by your geneva mechanism. Its beautiful.Aetheling1125 22:32, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mike1024. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Thanks for making GIFs A.a.m.tm (talk) 14:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]