This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Hello again. see my old requests first.18 months passed from this block that was not by confirm of spi or clerk. that's enough! i want to help wikipedia and have time to be here. it was for Behavioral evidence! i tried to proof that i am not that user but no one helped me for resolvation. user:Yamla not read my above messages and not checked my request carefully. i am not vandalism and have only this account. please read all of my speaks here. i know the policies and i didn't open account in last 18 months (checkusers can check this). this shows that i am good user and want to be here in correct way. please have wp:AFN and help me. Best regards.Miha2020 (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Yamla so why you closed my request? let one admin to check it carefully! didn't you see my old requests? i was closed because of not strong reasons (behavoiural edits is not certain and is mistake) ! i said that i don't have any account (Sock puppetry) because i know wikipedia's plicies. if so i can edit with my new account not wait 20 months for unblocking ! i want to help olympic 2024 pages. i am not vandalism, you can see my edits. i want to help again. thanks.Miha2020 (talk) 19:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a reason to close the request. You did the same thing last time. I don't understand why you are in such a hurry. If you are not able to check, leave it to others Miha2020 (talk) 20:38, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is a reason. There's no point leaving open an unblock request that has manifestly failed to convince anyone. This is common practice; indeed, it's common enough there's literally a template to do this. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would be happy if you don't have anything to do with my requests and this page. You are not the only admin here, so let others check and respond appropriately. Don't take other people's time by reworking (re-requesting).Miha2020 (talk) 21:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
