User talk:Michelmontreuil

Nonsense of CMX Virtual Airlines

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on CMX Virtual Airlines, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because CMX Virtual Airlines provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting CMX Virtual Airlines, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of CMX Virtual Airlines

A tag has been placed on CMX Virtual Airlines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Scapler (talk) 21:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Michelmontreuil. You have new messages at Jac16888's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Northern Ontario

Whether you understand and agree with it or not, Kapuskasing has the status of a town, not a city, and Dryden has the status of a city, not a town. "City" and "town" aren't interchangeable terms, and a town doesn't magically become a city once it passes a certain population figure, either — a place doesn't become a city until the provincial government specifically passes a law giving it the status of a city. A city can have a population of 10 if such a law has been passed, and a town can have a population of 300,000 if one hasn't, because it's the law that decides whether it's a city or a town, not just the number of people who live there. Bearcat (talk) 20:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]