|
User talk:Marcusmax/Archive 4
WP:CHICAGO rolesIt is not exactly clear to me what the best way to divide the responsibilities for the new coordinators who have volunteered. Here is what I think we need in terms of review coordinators:
Generally, discussion pages are removed immediately at WP:CHIR, but kept at WP:CHIDISCUSS for two weeks after closing. I have been attempting to do all of these things for the project myself as well as my other tasks. We have three volunteers who mentioned an interest in reviews so each of you should discuss among yourselves which coordinator you would like to be. Two of the review coordinator respondents also listed Assessments. Within the assessment department at WP:CHIASSESS we need a few tasks handled as well.
The following will be considered for promotion or we may call for another vote or we may discontinue promoting altogether: Soldier Field -19500 articles
New candidates for Top-importance should be continually brought forth. Alternative selection methods may be considered, but currently we support or oppose inclusion on a ballot and then vote on the ballot. We should keep discussion open on this issue. Again, please discuss the division of responsibility. I am hoping to have all responsibilities assigned and be a fairly fully functional project on September 1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Don't know if you've been keeping track of this afd since you made it, but it looks like a snowball keep to me. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Dassault OuraganHello, Thanks for the offer. I'd like to take a raincheck on that. You see several other folks were working on that article responding to my request. So I decided to move on to another article in the mean time. Currently I am working on [Jagdgeschwader 1|Jagdgeschwader 1 Oesau]. Once that's done, I will come back to this one. I don't think this article has enough material to justify GA review. My modest goal is to get a B at least. Thanks for the Offer. perseus71 (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC) Jagdgeschwader 1 (World War 2)Hi! This article is Rated B at this time. I would like to see it go to GA or A or FA Rating. Could you please give me comments on weather its ready for that level ? I'd really appreciate any detailed opinions on the areas lacking. Thanks. perseus71 (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes i was aware you do not have the power to make it GA or A or FA. All I am looking to find are points that it lacks in order to become one. Those you have already provided. I did have a hard time in getting Sources. But as of now I have 9 Cited sources that are reliable. Do you think it still needs more ? Also do you think the lead in is sufficient ? Please let me know. Thanks perseus71 (talk) 19:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate the offer of listing for a peer Review. I already listed it on Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history for peer review. Also whatever sources I have, were cited at least 3-4 times each. I will go look for more sources as suggested by you. Thanks perseus71 (talk) 20:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)  You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. 1998 PHS TFAThanks for asking me first. I have no strong preference, but I'm leaning slightly toward no, since we've been on the main page pretty often as of late. But if you wish to nominate it, you can. Thanks for the compliments, BTW! ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nc-logo.jpg)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Festival airlines.gif)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2008 (UTC) BarnstarThanks for the barnstar. It really means a lot to me. Hopefully one day we'll have a little golden star on Melbourne Airport. Cheers. Mvjs (talk) 04:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC) DelistingsYou may want to watch WP:CHIAA. It is a bot-administered page that keeps track of ongoing workflows for WP:CHICAGO. As delistings coordinator, you may want to watch and comment on the WP:AFDs at issue there.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dane County Airport Logo.gif)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC) In general, lighthouses have been held to be innately notable. Mangoe (talk) 02:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC) Marcusmax, in the future, please allow more than 9 minutes before nominating a page for deletion. Many people tend to produce content within the hours following the page creation, and nominating a page for deletion within the first hour can cause many problems. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Smile! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Sorry for labeling it vandalismI realized the moment I hit the revert link that you probably did make a mistake. I acted a bit too quickly myself. Echtoran (talk) 01:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC) AIV reportGreetings, the recent AIV report regarded an anonymous user who had one edit since June and no warnings this month. I thusly declined to block, as there is no way to confirm that the editor is the same person as previously. The user may be worth keeping an eye on and sufficiently warning if need be. Regards, Lazulilasher (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC) New article Thunder CityThanks for your response. I'd really like someone experienced in Aviation related articles to begin on improving my stub article, particularly in terms of things like infoboxes, templates etc. As I said I am a complete newbie at those aspects of articles. (I don't even know how to upload a new image.) Roger (talk) 21:11, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Marcusmax, I'd appreciate if you could take a look one more time. Right now it went through one round of Peer review and all comments are incorporated. I had put up request for a second round of Peer review. Didn't get any comments though. I appreciate your time and would really like to know your opinion on current state. Perseus71 (talk) 13:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
RE US 151 in IowaStrictly speaking, no, iowahighways.org is not a reliable source. See the discussion about AARoads and WP:SOURCES for more information. That being said, I have used and cited his website on some articles on WP. It's always a judgment call. --Fredddie™ 01:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for submitting the DYK hook. It's the first one I've verified, until now I only ever submitted there. Thanks for being patient with me. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC) DYK for U.S. Route 151 in Iowa
Keep up the good work! ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 04:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Main Page redesignThe Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, PretzelsTalk! 10:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC) RE:BarnstarThanks for the BarnStar, it's greatly appreciated. :) Also, thanks for helping with the Urlacher article too. Hopefully it will stay GA. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 04:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) I too thank you for mine! -- Biruitorul Talk 05:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
User: Jarrett O'HearnI would like the nomination for deletion to be removed, if it's okay with you. Jarrett O'Hearn (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the kind wordsWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nurasko/myminicity is another one of the copies. I think we would be better to save, then explain to the user that one is enough, and help them understand the policies. It is always better if the user themselves learns why it isn't notable on their own. DYK for Central Illinois
Cirt (talk) 06:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}