|
User talk:Malinaccier/September 2007
Reply to your comment on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/marklesOn the contrary: A) I won't relish it at all - it's just something I'll do from time-to-time. B) I wouldn't be crazy - it doesn't mean that much to me. C) Nobody could get in my way - there are no individual ways, just the Wikipedia policies. —Markles 02:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC) I thought you should be aware that you've had responses to your !vote. --Dweller 10:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
My RfAUmmm, I need all the help I can get, but... you already !voted. Thanks, though, for the original support, and giving me the benefit of the doubt. --barneca (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC) RFA Thanks Click there to open your card! → → →
Dearest Malinaccier, CreditsThis RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design. Dreadstar RfA Click there to open your card! → → →
Malinaccier, This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor's modification of Phaedriel's RFA thanks. Thanks for your support, I took the easy way out of thanking everyone by borrowing someone else's thank you card design...but know that I sincerely appreciate your support and confidence in me! I also greatly appreciated your staunch defense..! Dreadstar † 05:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Re: Weak Oppose for RfA for CaptmondoHello there: Before answering your opposition I just wanted to be sure that we are talking about the same thing: could you define what you mean by "wikispace edits"? I am assuming that this means working on procedural tasks (i.e. Feature Article and Good Article nominations, and discussions on same), right? Perhaps asking this question alone disqualifies me for Adminship, but I'd rather be an informed than blunder into a baseless response. Cheers! Captmondo 19:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
My knowledge of policyHi, Thanks for sounding off your opinion on my RFA. You asked to prove my knowledge of policy on your talk page. I don't exactly know how do you want me to prove it, but if you want to test me in any way, go ahead. As I said in the discussion there - I read the policy back and forth a long time before I nominated myself. Because the policy documents are so well written, I didn't need to ask for much help about them - I can read them myself. I don't think that I need to participate in a discussion of a policy document to be able to implement it correctly. If you still want tangible proof, take a look at the list of AFD's that I proposed. The list is not long, but I think that it's enough of a proof. Most of them were eventually deleted, which proves my good understanding of what Wikipedia is and what it is not. I also withdrew some of them in a friendly manner, which proves that I can learn from mistakes. If there is anything more that I can clarify, please tell me. Thanks in advance. --Amir E. Aharoni 07:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC) YARRR
Barneca RfA thank you spamMalinaccier, thank you for your support during my RfA, especially after the concerns that were brought up by other editors. I'll keep all of the comments in mind in the coming months, and will try again later (and I'll have more wikispace edits by then, too!). In the mean time, if you see me doing something stupid, please let me know. See you around. --barneca (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC) The now-traditional RFA thank-spam Click there to open your card! → → →
CreditsThis design was RFA Thanks!Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--JForget 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC) My RfAHi, I succeeded at my RfA nomination. I strongly believe in the "a discussion is not a vote" policy and the concerns that you raised were civil and challenging, so I thank you for that. --Amir E. Aharoni 23:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC) Nehrams2020 RfA ThanksEdokter RfA
Thanks!
Fabrictramp RFAThank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. --Fabrictramp 15:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Three RevertAre you honestly quoting policy at me? Come on, man, you know me. Whatever happened to giving established editors the benefit of the doubt? My reverts are exclusively to improve the article. I'm not going to apologize for violating the rule, as I did it in the best interest of the article and the project. I'll revert my edits, but someone else needs to clean up after me. GlassCobra 02:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Hex DeflectionAll done. Go for it. GlassCobra 02:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC) Hey Malinaccier, this is doublee1992... i really dunno what to do soo... talk to me sometime... ttyl Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
