User talk:Malinaccier/December 2007
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Multiple listings of schoolsI would strongly discourage this. Schools have each a different range of available sources and deserve individual consideration. If you multiple list then you risk a train smash. I would also suggest you should carry out a Google News check (including archives) before listing any school. TerriersFan (talk) 03:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you for your vote on my RfAReally, really bad haiku from a new adminSetting new lows in thank-you spam: Click there for my RfA spam haikus! → → →
Janitor's new tools New admin, new tools New mess all about A. B. so grateful A. B. wonders why Qatar is blocked
"Fine editor, will show good judgement"[1] ... let's hope so! So far the the Main Page is still there and I haven't yet blocked the nation of Qatar. Great success!Click that-a-way to open your card! → → →
Dear Malinaccier, Thank you for your participation in my request for adminship, which ended successfully with a final tally of (52/10/1). I was impressed by the thoughtful comments on both sides, and the RFA process in general. The extra buttons do look pretty snazzy, but I'll be careful not to overuse them. If you have advice to share or need assistance with anything, feel free to drop me a message or email. Thank you and good day! Cordially, Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Admin coachingI'm coaching User:JavaTenor right now, but it's perfectly okay with me. bibliomaniac15 03:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC) Re:Admin CoachingYour name is listed on Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status as fully available, and I was wondering if you were still available, and could coach me? I would understand if you couldn't. Thanks! Malinaccier (talk) 01:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks--Michael Greiner 19:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks for supporting my RFA
RfA (not saying thanks don't worry)Can you leave pointless questions just for a laugh? (occasionaly) F9T 20:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you!Hi there! Thanks very much for your support on my recent RfA, which was successful. I appreciate your comments and participation, and intend to use the tools carefully and for the betterment of the encyclopedia. Thanks again! Tony Fox (arf!) 05:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC) RfA thanksSignpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC) RfA thanksDear Malinaccier, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6). Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators. Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E talk 12:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC) I've asked more questions. I thought you may want to read his answers. The Transhumanist 00:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Still need a coach?Hello. I noticed your request for a coach over at Admin coaching, and I'm available. Keep in mind that I'm not an admin - I've been through 3 intense RfAs (so far), and therefore I understand the process well, though I have not yet overcome the stigma of conflicts I was engaged in early in my participation here (which occurred over a year ago, also, if you want to see what not to do in an RfA, see my first two). But I am an admin coach, and have co-coached 5 users who have become admins, 4 of whom I co-nominated for adminship in their successful RfAs, and strongly endorsed the other as her admin coach. I have experience over a wide range of activities, and I'd say my general approach is progressive and direct. If you do not currently have an admin coach, I would be glad to be your coach. I do have a few conditions though, and they are that you...
Please let me know if you agree, and we can get started. I look forward to your reply. The Transhumanist 05:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC) ThanksThanks for your support in my successful RFA. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 07:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC) RFAThanks for some suggestions for an admin. I have started work on articles for deletion, and sadly, the Auto-Wiki browser is not working. Thanks for your opinion! Ohmpandya (Talk) 00:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Vandal revertsIn the future, when someone is reverting multiple instances of vandalism to an article, as I was to Brett Papworth , you might consider allowing them sufficient time (at least a minute or two) to finish up the vandalism reversions before re-reverting the interim changes immediately. It would help quite a bit to keep the mess down. Thank you. -- Michael Devore (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Redwall templateYeah, publication order is definitely better. I can't believe I hadn't noticed that. Definitely go ahead and change it. GlassCobra 01:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia