User talk:LunaEclipse/Archive 1
Welcome!
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 05:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC) Edit warring on a TFA on an IB? Really?You have recently made edits related to discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. This is a standard message to inform you that discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. - SchroCat (talk) 16:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Welcome
I am sorry that you got into an edit-war inadvertently, and were treated to all these abbreviations. If you don't know an abbr, try to put "WP:" before, and if will often work: WP:TFA, WP:BRD. It's always safe not to touch a TFA unless reverting spelling mistakes and vandalism. As for the name in the infobox of an article I don't feel comfortable to touch, I think that while it's not ideal to have the same name above and below an image, without it above, how would I be informed that the name with the abbreviated middle initial is the WP:COMMONNAME, when the first bold mentioning is without abbreviation? Just from the article title? I'd rather have it double but clear. Just food for thought. My story today is The Company of Heaven ("company" with a double meaning, but angelic company in the end). Happy editing. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
See talk page before revertingThe one about the French guy Dronebogus (talk) 16:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
User adoption help
How do I get adopted by a staff member/experienced editor? EnbyPie08 (talk) 23:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Minor editsHi, I'd suggest reading Help:Minor edit and think about using the minor edit flag less often. In many of your recent edits that you have marked as minor, I'd say they are not "minor" under most editors' definitions. For example [1] and [2] both add significant amount of content that a reasonable editor may disagree with. Skynxnex (talk) 17:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
I added two sources from "Arizona Republic about her and her then-husband buying a house for $6.99 Million in 2021Wikipedia:Sssniperwolf sources overview (Diff ~1181391658) Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 19:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Underscore in your signatureYou might want to consider using
SpeciesHelperHey there. I'm the author of the SpeciesHelper script and I saw one of your edits pop up on my watchlist. Unfortunately I think the SpeciesHelper script is making some mistakes. For example it looks like my assumption that an article should only have a taxobar OR an authority control and not both was incorrect. I've updated the script to not remove authority controls anymore. Here's another example of a mistake. It added the Category:Sula but failed to see that this redirects to Category:Boobies, a category the article was already in. Anyway, I guess the moral of the story is, please be careful. Check each diff carefully and make sure you agree with the changes. Oh and also, SpeciesHelper is much more helpful on new species articles than old ones. Old ones are likely to already be correct so changes to them may be wrong. Whereas newer species articles still need a lot of work and changes to them are more likely to be correct. Hope this helps. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
-- 16:29, Thursday, October 12, 2023 (UTC)
Your archiving at ANIHi, Davest3r08. I don't think it was a good idea for you to archive the discussion "Darker Dreams and Witchcraft" literally minutes after I had closed it. As it says at the top of the page, "Closed discussions should not usually be archived for at least 24 hours." The Darker Dreams discussion had been long and lively, and I'm sure many people were interested in how it would eventually be closed. They shouldn't simply have found the whole thing had disappeared when they next looked at ANI. I have unarchived the discussion. (I've left the other, short, discussion archiving that you did alone, as that close wasn't so recent.) I understand that you wanted to help
A barnstar for you!
RSNIf you want to keep asking questions about sources at RSN, you have to follow the directions. They are simple and clear. Provide a link to the specific source, the specific statement that it is to support and the specific article. Follow this format: "Is X source reliable for Y statement in Z article?", providing links. Banks Irk (talk) 01:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Warnings for IPsA warning left for an IPv4 address (like 255.255.255.255) has limited odds of reaching its intended recipient, but leaving a warning for an IPv6 address is imho pretty much pointless. These tend to be phones and are highly unlikely to keep their IP for even a single day. Their IP more than likely gets reassigned within an hour so some random person may receive the warning instead. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 21:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Detrans (short film) has been accepted Detrans (short film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Incomplete DYK nominationHello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Detrans (short film) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 13:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC) About a history splitHey Davest3r08, I just wanted to let you know that I've requested a history split on Detrans (short film) because there are a lot of revisions that are unrelated to the current topic of the article. I wanted to leave this note to advise you not to blank and replace the contents of drafts — even in your own userspace — to avoid this kind of issue in the future. There's nothing wrong with simply creating a new page for the content, but if you'd like the old material removed from your userspace altogether, you can always nominate the page for speedy deletion under criterion U1 and then start a new page at that title. Both of these would help keep the page histories of otherwise unrelated topics separate, which helps to reduce confusion or mistakes from other editors down the line. Thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC) The Signpost: 6 November 2023
Your submission at Articles for creation: SSSniperWolf (November 7) Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Joe Roe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There is a broad consensus that SSSniperWolf does not currently meet Wikipedia's notability (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperWolf (5th nomination) for the latest of many discussions) and the repeated recreation of this article has proved disruptive enough that the title has been protected so that only administrators can create it. Given this history, any new draft needs to make a very compelling case that the available sourcing has substantially changed. I'm not seeing any evidence of that here.
Volunteer time on this project is limited; please do not resubmit this draft until some time has passed and there are significant new sources to present. – Joe (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Omegle homepage.pngThanks for uploading File:Omegle homepage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. LucasKannou (talk) 03:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
AI trashTalk:SSSniperWolf (Diff ~1184919635) Omegle videosI feel like the whole section is unnecessarily unspecific indirect and comes off as speculation rather than reporting from the source Would you be willing to rewrite it? Trade (talk) 20:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Replaceable non-free use File:Alia Shelesh.pngThanks for uploading File:Alia Shelesh.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 15:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: IRL streaming (November 16) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
IP block exemptionHi Davest3r08. I saw your question at the Teahouse regarding occasional issues with IP blocks preventing you from editing. You appear to be using a novel VPN service which rapidly reassigns your public IP address within several large blocks. We frequently block IP addresses used by anonymizing services (like open proxies and VPN providers) when they are used abusively by unrelated users, and that seems to be the case for many addresses used by your provider. The blocks are not because of anything you did, but from other people using the same provider. I am granting your account the IP block exemption (IPBE) flag for three months, which will mean you are not affected by these IP blocks. After three months, you will need to either make a new request, or stop using your VPN service when you edit Wikipedia. IPBE will not prevent your account from being blocked, and the flag can be removed if you abuse it. If you have any questions about this you can reply here or leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Killing of Wadea al-FayoumeHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Moazfargal -- Moazfargal (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add While I appreciate your suggestion for a peer review, I don't find it particularly necessary. The fact that the article is relatively new is somewhat irrelevant, it was split from Twitter recently, hence most of the content itself isn't actually new. Enough experienced users have already passed through and made subtle changes. It's not that I wanted the article to be rated "THAT badly" as you put it, given it often takes months for articles to be reviewed for such a standard, but more so that I would of preferred you not deleting the nomination that you don't appear to have legitimate reason for doing. Recommending an alternative approach isn't a legit reason. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Killing of Wadea al-FayoumeThe article Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume and Talk:Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Moazfargal -- Moazfargal (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2023 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Killing of Wadea al-FayoumeThe article Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume for comments about the article, and Talk:Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Moazfargal -- Moazfargal (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC) The Signpost: 4 December 2023
InputBox documentationmw:Extension:InputBox might interest you. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 11:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC) Your GA nomination of 2023 Union Square riotHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2023 Union Square riot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spintendo -- Spintendo (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Jaiden Animations YouTube Rewind 2018.gifThanks for uploading File:Jaiden Animations YouTube Rewind 2018.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC) Less specific stubcatA few months ago, in your edit to Tyrannochthonius norfolkensis, you changed {{pseudoscorpion-stub}} to the less specific {{arachnid-stub}}. Was this a mistake, or was it automatically carried out by SpeciesHelper? jlwoodwa (talk) 05:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2023 Union Square riotThe article 2023 Union Square riot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2023 Union Square riot for comments about the article, and Talk:2023 Union Square riot/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spintendo -- Spintendo (talk) 04:22, 23 December 2023 (UTC) ?Re this; is there some new policy I'm unaware of? jp×g🗯️ 10:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Detrans (short film)On 28 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Detrans (short film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that PragerU's hashtag #DETRANS, originally meant to promote their short film, was hijacked by Twitter users? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Detrans (short film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Detrans (short film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Welcome to the driveWelcome. One person cannot make a dent on the backlog, but together we can do more! A fair amount of pages in the backlog are lists of games and internet culture stuff (by typing in search bar
Have fun and wishing you good luck in the drive. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
Welcome to the drive!Welcome, welcome, welcome Davest3r08! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles. CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:37, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?) DeltaruneAre you sure you wanna nominate it right now? I feel like the timing is right for chapter 3, so I worry that might create a stability issue soon. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
Unreferenced tags?Hey, I was peeking through the backlog, saw that you added a ref to an article, but didn't remove the unreferenced tag. Do these get cleaned up by a bot eventually? I genuinely don't know. Either way I think we are empowered to remove them ourselves if we wish? Let me know :) ForksForks (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Geogaddi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 02:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC) The article Geogaddi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Geogaddi and Talk:Geogaddi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Women in RedHi there, Davest3r08, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to devote some of your editing time to improving our coverage of women. When you feel inspired to create your first woman's biography, you'll find some useful guidance in our Ten Simple Rules. If you would like others to see your interest in this project, you should sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC) Women in Red March 2024
--Ipigott (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC) February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award
Your GA nomination of Cross (Justice album)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cross (Justice album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maplestrip -- Maplestrip (talk) 09:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Deletion discussion about Evan Young (YouTuber)Hello, Davest3r08 Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Geardona and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Evan Young (YouTuber), created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § Evan Young (YouTuber). If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Geardona (talk to me?) 01:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC) The article Geogaddi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Geogaddi for comments about the article, and Talk:Geogaddi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 11:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC) DYK nomination of GeogaddiHello! Your submission of Geogaddi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Cross (Justice album)The article Cross (Justice album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cross (Justice album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maplestrip -- Maplestrip (talk) 10:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Selected Ambient Works 85–92Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Selected Ambient Works 85–92 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC) DYK for Dariacore (album)On 27 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dariacore (album), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the album Dariacore took inspiration from Internet memes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dariacore (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dariacore (album)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Z1720 (talk) 12:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls RewindHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 49p -- 49p (talk) 03:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls RewindThe article YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind and Talk:YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 49p -- 49p (talk) 08:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC) The Signpost: 29 March 2024
Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your GA nomination of Selected Ambient Works 85–92The article Selected Ambient Works 85–92 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Selected Ambient Works 85–92 for comments about the article, and Talk:Selected Ambient Works 85–92/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Troupeau BleuHello, Davest3r08. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Troupeau Bleu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC) GOCE requests pageHi Davest3r08, I've removed two of your copy-edit requests from the Guild of Copy Editors' requests page here (diff). I've removed these requests because the page currently has a limit of two requests per editor at any one time; we enforce this limit to ensure all requests can be dealt with in a reasonable time and because there aren't enough skilled copy-editors to go around. If you'd like Richard D. James Album and Slender Man stabbing to be dealt with before your two extant requests, feel free to replace those, otherwise please wait until one of your extant requests has been processed before adding any more requests to the requests page. Thanks for your patience and understanding. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Troupeau BleuHello, LunaEclipse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Troupeau Bleu". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls RewindThe article YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind for comments about the article, and Talk:YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 49p -- 49p (talk) 01:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 8Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Selected Ambient Works Volume IIHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Selected Ambient Works Volume II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Me at the zooHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Me at the zoo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 23:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Me at the zooThe article Me at the zoo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Me at the zoo for comments about the article, and Talk:Me at the zoo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC) DYK for GeogaddiOn 14 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Geogaddi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Geogaddi makes references to the Branch Davidians and their former leader, David Koresh? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Geogaddi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Geogaddi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Troupeau BleuHello, LunaEcplise. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Troupeau Bleu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC) DYK for Selected Ambient Works 85–92On 18 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Selected Ambient Works 85–92, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Selected Ambient Works 85–92's audio quality has been described as poor due to being recorded on a cassette damaged by a cat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Selected Ambient Works 85–92. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Selected Ambient Works 85–92), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Shubinator (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Selected Ambient Works Volume IIThe article Selected Ambient Works Volume II you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Selected Ambient Works Volume II for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zmbro -- Zmbro (talk) 02:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC) The Signpost: 25 April 2024
Concern regarding Draft:Sandbagging (Mario Kart)Hello, LunaEclipse. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sandbagging (Mario Kart), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your submission at Articles for creation: Delta (emulator) has been accepted Delta (emulator), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)DYK for YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls RewindOn 12 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that within a week of its upload, YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind became YouTube's most-disliked video of all time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pollosito -- Pollosito (talk) 02:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC) Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Your draft article, Draft:Sandbagging (Mario Kart)Hello, LunaEclipse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sandbagging". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Amen breakHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amen break you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC) DYK for Drake–Kendrick Lamar feudOn 26 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Drake–Kendrick Lamar feud, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the "beef" between Kendrick Lamar and Drake (both pictured) dates back to the 2013 song "Control"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Drake–Kendrick Lamar feud. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Drake–Kendrick Lamar feud), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Amen breakThe article Amen break you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Amen break for comments about the article, and Talk:Amen break/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 00:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC) The Completionist GAHey LunaEclipse, I saw that you nominated The Completionist for GA status. Although I appreciate the nomination, I'm a little unsure if it's the right time to nominate it at the moment. There are some crucial details still missing from the article, such as the fallout with charity and its resolution, plus the Elsie development and aspects of his personal life, that I feel would go against the "broad detail" criteria. I was actually hoping to wait a bit until we have more info about the charity situation to nominate for GA, seeing as how it's technically "ongoing." Otherwise, I fear that the article would radically change once that info is revealed which could affect its GA standing. If you still feel it's worth a GA nomination however, feel free, but IMO I'd recommend waiting a bit. Thanks, PantheonRadiance (talk) 00:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC) DYK for Delta (emulator)On 1 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Delta (emulator), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Riley Testut developed AltStore because he wanted to publish his emulator Delta? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Delta (emulator). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Delta (emulator)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Music Sounds Better with YouHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Music Sounds Better with You you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC) DYK for 6:16 in LAOn 2 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 6:16 in LA, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the diss track "6:16 in LA", directed at Drake, samples Al Green's "What a Wonderful Thing Love Is", a song that features Drake's guitarist uncle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/6:16 in LA. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 6:16 in LA), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC) LunaEclipse, will you be able to to return to your review here, or should we find a new reviewer to finish up? I did notice that you have a "busy" template up, but I do see some recent edits, so I don't want to jump to any conclusions. Please let me know (a ping here is fine) if you won't be returning. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC) GA reviewHi, @LunaEclipse. Just an advice. If you want you can use this template. Santi (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Music Sounds Better with YouThe article Music Sounds Better with You you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Music Sounds Better with You for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 18:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Track listings and credits don't need sourcesHello. Regarding your addition of a source to the track listing of In Waves, while I appreciate that you might want to be careful about sourcing on topics you're interested in, there's no need to source track listings or credits to external sources or liner notes per MOS:ALBUM, which states that the album itself is the source and it's expected credits come from the liner notes. Some editors like to stockpile sources on articles they create, but I usually don't see the need for any more than four when an album has just been announced. There are plenty more I could have added but I chose not to overcite. I don't think any editor will question where the track listing came from, as if they were to check literally any news article about it, they'd see the track list themselves, so there's really no need to add another source or use an existing one, especially given MOS:ALBUM saying there's no need for it as well. Of course there are exceptions, like if liner notes don't credit somebody but they do perform on a track, we would need an additional source for contentious details like that. I just don't think In Waves is one. Ss112 20:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC) Hi! I noticed that you nominated the article Akai MPC for Good article status. You do not appear to have made significant edits to the article prior to this, and there is no discussion about nominating the article on its talk page. Current practice is that only editors who have significantly contributed to the article are able to nominate it (see the nomination instructions). I have consequently removed the nomination for now. Consider discussing whether the article is ready to be nominated with the article's principal editors on the talk page. Thank you. ~~~~ B3251(talk) 20:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The article Akai MPC you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Akai MPC for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of B3251 -- B3251 (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia