User talk:Lova Falk
My box is just for me. Archive 1 - archive 2 - archive 3.
Since you have put some work into this one, please take a look on a terminological question. Thanks, 193.197.171.98 (talk) 07:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Your great psychology brain requiredHi, can you comment on the last two sections on the ADHD talk page. There is a guy there who raises some important points regarding some of our content which while reliably sourced may require our attention such as rewording or clarified or maybe deleted? If you are busy of course. No rush. :-)--MrADHD | T@1k? 21:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
WP Psychology in the SignpostThe WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Psychology for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 01:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback Tool updateHey Lova Falk. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles. We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article. Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC) hey lova, we just started a article about Michael Corballis. Maybe be you like to contribute! Sensory integrationHi Lova, not sure about some of your editing here, Sensory integration, seems to me to be a step backwards dolfrog (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Depth perceptionJust to say thanks for your recent edit on article "Depth perception". I am the editor who originally changed the section title to "Depth from optical expansion", but I agree that "Depth from motion" is easier to understand. I revised that section because the previous wording confused this cue with the Kinetic Depth Effect, which is an entirely different phenomenon. I used the technical term, but your solution (using both terms) is fine with me. Cheers. Brazzit (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC) You're very welcome.Hi, Lova, it's too bad you were away when the notice went out to participate in the Signpost interview about WikiProject Psychology. I'm glad you received the favorable mention you received from all the editors who did participate. I'm trying to step up my participation in actual edits of article text on articles within the scope of the project, and I'd be delighted if you check up on how I am doing. I'm seeking advice from local emeritus professors of psychology here who are still active researchers about what sources to consult as I do more edits. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 23:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Personal limitsJust wanted to bounce an idea to create a "personal limits" article. Seems like an interesting fundamental concept. We are constantly making decisions in relation to our own perceived limits in different capacities based on past experience. Seems related to, although not the same as, comfort zone. Im not expecting you to do any work on this just interested in knowing if there are any relevant psychological studies that you are aware of. --Penbat (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
== Sensory Processing Disorder == I hope this is the talk section thats what i hit,if not I apologize in advance, for that and any typos i have made. Hi as an early childhood educator but much more importantly a mom of an add/ SPD kiddo, I found then intro into SPD to be lacking. it doesn't give the reader the clear understanding that this is a disorder that deals with an overload of stimuli, and the meltdowns that happen because of them,. when I read the intro, i was actually really upset, you made it sound like it wasnt that bad of a situation get rid of some tags and you're golden when in fact, it affects the way a child sees not only hid world but himself it lowers self esteem. SMD,with SOR kiddos are in a constant state of fright,flight, freeze or fight.. I'm sorry but as a mother who has dealt with this for more years than id like to count, every day, feels this page leaves a lot out. transitions, how it can physically hurts a childs eyes and ears, its not just loud sounds. 'my child eats 2 items and throws up everything else,because it all smells like vomit, thats how SPD affects kids!The books you didn't want apart of the page, i wish you'd read and then you would see why i feel so much has been left out. thank you, respectfully 'dawn f dawn fillinger 05:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC) Thank you for sorting out a number of issues. I have just made a small copy edit, which is unusual for me, and i was wondering if you could check that it makes sense. dolfrog (talk) 16:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Small query on DSM5Moved to Talk:DSM-5#Personality_disorder_not_otherwise_specified.2C_Depressive_personality_disorder_.26_Passive-aggressive_personality_disorder_missing_in_DSM_V --Penbat (talk) 09:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC) ThanksThanks for fixing Psychological repression. My reversion of vandalism still resulted in a bad version. I usually remember to check that but I let it go because it reverted to a bot version. Unfortunately, the bots occasionally make the same mistake. I am glad you caught that. Donner60 (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Lateralization of brain functionI suppose I understand the bureaucratic nature and necessity of such a system, but how does one fit the facts into these goal posts which could seemly move depending on an individuals personal understanding of each bit of research? At which point is enough research enough to negate past research? The article you linked me was interesting - yet it seemingly supports my addition to the page because not only was the primary source peer-reviewed by experts in the field, but has been talked about in almost 20 or more secondary sources, and has been cited by quite a few papers. Such a subjective system seems quite contradictory to science and the pursuit of knowledge because one can claim that no valid scientific consensus has been reached how ever much they want, moving those posts as wide as they wish. Furthermore, the article linked also states that one should use the most up to date information - which is included in the study I cited. Secondly, the study itself shows directly that lateralization in both men and women does not bias either hemisphere - and in that it also shows that neither men or women are more lateralized than the other. There was only one study cited that claimed that men are more lateralized than women, which doesn't show any sort of "general consensus" when it comes to brain lateralization. The very fact that a new study has in fact challenged that leads to the conclusion that past ideas about lateralization have been wrong. To claim that it is still "generally accepted" is simply false. Countered (talk) 08:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Some researchHi Beland, and thank you for your contribution to Nature deficit disorder. Your text would be even better if you could specify which research has shown that lack of exposure to the bright light and local focal distances of the outdoors may contribute to myopia. Could you add your sources? Thank you! Lova Falk talk 09:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Editing body languageHow about this? The fact that women sit differently from men has to be taken into account: men tend to have a more open leg position while women do not ...
Apraxia of speech (AOS) and Developmental Verbal Dyspraxia (DVD)Hi Lova, I have been thinking for sometime now that that the Developmental Verbal Dyspraxia (also known as Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) and Developmental Apraxia of Speech (DAS) section of the Apraxia of speech should be made into a new article. Not really sure how to set about this. dolfrog (talk) 12:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Depth preception IIHi. Thanks for your recent edits in the Depth perception article. Both of the areas you edited had been concerning me, but I haven't taken action on them yet. The problem with the illustration at the top of the article seems to me to go beyond the caption. The "cue" that makes the difference is not one of the depth cues discussed in the article. It's the Gestalt principle of "good continuation" or "closure." In the upper diagram the open ends tend to be perceptually connected, and the result is a standard Necker cube. In the lower diagram, the terminators prevent the perceptual closure from taking place. I really think it would be better to illustrate the Depth article with another figure, one that more clearly typifies the role of traditional depth cues. I have been casually looking for an appropriate figure (one that would not pose copyright problems) but I haven't come across one yet. If you know of a suitable illustration, I'd support replacing the one that is now at the top of the article. I'm not sure the removal of 14 words from the "stereopsis" section was vandalism -- the IP editor's other contributions seem genuine. I suspect s/he was honestly trying to clarify a very confusing section, but the deletion made matters worse. I'm glad you restored the text, but I think the whole section needs to be rewritten. I have been working on a revised stereopsis section and have drawn a figure to illustrate it, but I haven't yet made the change. Although I have expertise about perception, I've only been editing for a few months, and I'm still a bit hesitant about making major changes. If you would be willing to preview a rewrite of the stereopsis section, I'd be delighted. The whole Depth perception article has a basic problem -- it confounds object-relative cues and subject-relative distance cues. There is a paragraph at thre end of the Binocular cues section that deals with this, but it seems to me that this distinction should be made early on in the article, so that the discussion of each cue can refer to it as giving information about the subject-relative distance of an object from the eyes -- such as accommodation -- or giving information about the three-dimensionality of an object (i.e. object-relative distance from its front edge to its back edge) -- such as stereopsis or the kinetic depth effect. I had been thinking about proposing such a rewrite on the Talk page and inviting you and a few other experienced contributors to comment. Do you think that would be a good idea? Brazzit (talk) 20:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
QuestionHi. Can you offer your opinion on this question I've posed? I could really use your thoughts on the matter. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC) We aren't on the same page...at Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_violations#Is_cutting_and_pasting_press_releases_a_copyright_violation.3F. --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Discussion at Template_talk:Bullying#RfC:_Template_linksYou are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Bullying#RfC:_Template_links. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Hi Lova, Could you have a look at the recent edits on Auditory verbal agnosia by what appears to be a group of students. They seem to be adding confusion and unrelated contant, which may belong in other article if at all. dolfrog (talk) 11:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Lova ... I see you are a frequent editor at Inferiority complex. You might want to watch out for this fellow, who has a history of logging out of his main account to edit war there. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Lova Falk, I've raised my concern over the recent revamping of this article at its talk page, and want to drop you a line as well. The subject is not my bailiwick, but if it were an article on art I'd probably revert to the previous version; my take is the rewriting is overly technical and doesn't furnish a simple overview of the subject. Enjoy the holiday, and thanks in advance for any clarity you can provide. Cheers, JNW (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Visual ScienceHi Lova, I noticed your request that I flesh out a page on Genetic Epistemology. Perhaps in time. On your user page, noted a link about visualization in science. Interests me a lot. Are you familiar with Santiago Ramon y Cajal? He was a Nobel winner, a contemporary of Freud, and one of the great neuroscientists of all time. Started as an artist, became an experimentalist, established that neurons exist. He drew, like no other scientist. The drawings were his science. http://neuroportraits.eu/portrait/santiago-ram%C3%B3n-y-cajal BrianMC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.80.117.214 (talk) 23:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Because SPD is no longer recognized by the DSM, it would be helpful for researchers who are interested in studying SPD to know that personality psychologists are currently studying similar tendencies. I would appreciate it if you took this into consideration before removing the "everyday sadism" section yet again. Thank you. Erin E. Buckels — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.206.25 (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC) I noticed that you were a supporter of the article above and may be interested in it being proposed for deletion in a few days time. The discussion is here >> Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal relationship skills . Geoffjw1978 T L C 00:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
nightmare disorderThanks for reviewing the standards of sources on nightmare disorder. There's only a few studies I can find on the topic (that aren't single case) [1] [2] [3] [4] but since there aren't many studies there is not enough information about it. I'm not a medical student so I don't know the review process on studies but there are some people out there who are interested in it and people are investigating it. It wouldn't hurt to mention a sentence in that people are researching if there's a possible solution with lucid dreaming. I'm sorry about just copying it into the article without looking into it better. --South19 (talk) 18:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Possible edits regarding DSM-5Hello Lova Falk; Your name on the DSM-5 edit page indicated you might have the actual manual available. On the Schizophrenia Talk page, there is a list of DSM-5 transition edits identified for upgrade from DMS-4 residual edits still on the old version of the Page being currently displayed. This is one of the few FA psychology pages and can use a little help or comment. Things have been slowed down in making the DSM-5 transition edits there since not all the editors at that wikipage actually have the DSM-5 in hand. Could you glance at this? BillMoyers (talk) 16:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
FOXP2 and human evolutionHi Lova, I have been editing the FOXP2 and human evolution article in recent days, I think it could do with some copy editing and restructuring, may be you could take a look if you have time. best wishes dolfrog (talk) 19:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Personality psychologyHey! I noticed you were watching personality psychology some time earlier this year, and was curious what you thought of the cleanup template, last updated in April 2012 under the following reasoning: "article needs referencing, general cleanup to follow the MoS and removal of original research. This article contains embedded lists that may be poorly defined, unverified or indiscriminate". As it stands, it seems many of the issues have been addressed in some way (and to some extent were exaggerated by that editor, with reference to the GA review). As I am intending on working on the page with copyediting, I was curious what you thought of the state of the article, especially the criticisms of content verifiability. If you had any advice, I would be very grateful for it. Thanks in advance, Techhead7890 (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Personality psychology/to doA tag has been placed on Personality psychology/to do, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Please don't refer to "serious" errors before you check the reference that the editor has actually referred toLova Falk, you make it difficult to understand which edit you are referring to on my talk page - I made 2 edits. In any event, there was no error, no "illusion" and certainly no serious error that you reference in PTSD. What I inserted is asserted in the very same reference, as I noted in my comment. You can check (and should have) before you made what I regard as an unduly inflammatory editing note. As for the part of the passage I omitted, once again, the statement left behind was still supported by the reference. The statement "more likely to experience more high impact trauma" is incomprehensible, but I'd like to hear what YOU think it means before I revert. QuintBy (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
ThanksYes, I didn't mean to wipe the PSTD article, was making a minor hatnote edit, connectivity problem did the rest. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Emotional Intelligence editsPlease do not change my stuff without asking. My edits are well researched and double checked. Please restore my edits to the way they were. The content I removed was bunk and rightly should not be there. paulsheer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulsheer (talk • contribs) 15:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Bipolar II #Society and cultureI'm only a gnome, Lova Falk, so I'm very grateful for your many contributions to pages in my interests—e.g. psychiatry and mental illness. Your recent edit to the Bipolar II page was quite justified for the poor sourcing, but Cobain and Reznor are two very popular figures generally known/accepted as bipolar. (Or at least Cobain is very popular, and Albert Laskar is whatever.) It's helpful to know of public figures—bigger than Demi Lovato—with a diagnosis, if only to contextualize the personal. So I've restored them for now and thrown up some [citation needed]s as a stopgap, which admittedly look ridiculous for the Reznor claim especially. I'll look for authoritative sources presently. Thanks! --StringRay (talk) 17:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks!Thanks for the kind words to the group from my class who worked on the Equipotentiality article. James Council (talk) 22:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to conduct peer reviewHi, Lova Falk. My posts on WTMED and WTPSYCH have gone unanswered for over a week =/ I am wondering if you would be interested in giving some feedback on olfactory reference syndrome prior to GAN? Failing this, would you be interested in directing me to someone who might be interested in this task (regarding the busy notification on your talk page). Kind regards, Lesion (talk) 02:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Sycophant AFDI noticed that you worked on Sycophancy. An article pertaining to this, Sycophant has been nominated for AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sycophant. A discussion is also taking place at Talk:Sycophant#Deletion of content. Your thoughts on this would be appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Discussion at Talk:Sycophancy#Merge with Sycophant?You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sycophancy#Merge with Sycophant?. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC) user pagethanks 4 your user page. it's neat!--rp70.57.88.158 (talk) 07:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks <== but kleptos around here seem to have stolen this title...Thanks for cleaning up that facticity I pointed out. Cheers, -dlj. David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 08:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 February 2014
(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014
Top medical editors
The Signpost: 12 March 2014
The Signpost: 19 March 2014
The Signpost: 26 March 2014
Questions on Attachment TheoryThanks for your words of encouragement. Questions-- Why does attachment seem to appear so suddenly around or after 6 months? Can attachment develop if an infant doesn't begin to bond to caregivers after birth? Or is the sudden, intense protest of separation an indication of the brain having reached a tipping point of development? The term pre-attachment seems to suggest that the first months are not crucially important in developing secure attachment. Have you seen my recent comments on the Attachment Theory talk page? Margaret9mary (can't remember my original password)205.167.120.201 (talk) 22:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 02 April 2014
The Signpost: 09 April 2014
Sexual differentiation articles under WP:ANATOMY - request for commentHello Lova Falk! I pinged you recently on WP:ANATOMY because of the work I've seen you do on the Sex Differences suite of articles. In summary, there is a stack of articles about sexual differentiation that are under WP:ANATOMY and I feel that this means that a lot of information is duplicated, and also that I don't think readers can easily find what they're looking for, which isn't ideal. I provided a list on the thread. I really like the clear structure of the Sex Differences articles you've worked on, and also feel they're quite well-written and easy to understand. Sexual Differentiation isn't exactly the same topic, but close enough that I think you'd have some good ideas about how to improve the structure. I'd be grateful if you could leave a comment or participate in the discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anatomy#Sexual_differentiation_articles Cheers, --LT910001 (talk) 07:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 23 April 2014
Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.
Hoping for your cooperation! DiptanshuTalk 12:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 30 April 2014
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award) Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation Disambiguation link notification for May 5Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 07 May 2014
Can I tempt you to chip in at Talk:Emotional intelligence#Undue negative weight .3F ? Thanks.--Penbat (talk) 13:10, 17 May 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 14 May 2014
The Signpost: 21 May 2014
Talk:Emotional dysregulationYou are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Emotional dysregulation. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 28 May 2014
The Signpost: 04 June 2014
The Signpost: 11 June 2014
The Signpost: 18 June 2014
The Signpost: 25 June 2014
The Signpost: 02 July 2014
The Signpost: 09 July 2014
The Signpost: 16 July 2014
Invitation: WikiProject AutismGreetings! Since I found your name on the Notice board for autism-related topics, I figured you might be interested in the recently created WikiProject Autism. Muffinator (talk) 21:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 July 2014
The Signpost: 30 July 2014
The Signpost: 06 August 2014
The Signpost: 13 August 2014
The Signpost: 20 August 2014
The Signpost: 27 August 2014
The Signpost: 03 September 2014
The Signpost: 10 September 2014
The Signpost: 17 September 2014
The Signpost: 24 September 2014
The Signpost: 01 October 2014
The Signpost: 08 October 2014
The Signpost: 15 October 2014
The Signpost: 22 October 2014
The Signpost: 29 October 2014
The Signpost: 05 November 2014
The Signpost: 12 November 2014
The Signpost: 26 November 2014
The Signpost: 03 December 2014
The Signpost: 10 December 2014
The Signpost: 17 December 2014
Unusual file deletion discussionA unique image file deletion discussion is currently being conducted at this page, which may be of interest to you, and others with an interest in disabilities. (In particular, please see 2nd paragraph). CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 08:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC) The Signpost: 24 December 2014
The Signpost: 31 December 2014
The Signpost: 07 January 2015
The Signpost: 14 January 2015
The Signpost: 21 January 2015
The Signpost: 28 January 2015
The Signpost: 04 February 2015
The Signpost: 11 February 2015
The Signpost: 18 February 2015
The Signpost: 25 February 2015
The Signpost: 25 February 2015
The Signpost: 04 March 2015
The Signpost: 11 March 2015
The Signpost: 18 March 2015
. The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
The Signpost, 1 April 2015
The Signpost: 01 April 2015
The Signpost: 01 April 2015
The Signpost: 08 April 2015
The Signpost: 15 April 2015
The Signpost: 22 April 2015
TWL Questia check-inHello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer. Thanks! The Signpost: 29 April 2015
The Signpost: 06 May 2015
TWL Questia check-inHello! You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer. Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 13 May 2015
The Signpost: 20 May 2015
The Signpost: 03 June 2015
The Signpost: 10 June 2015
The Signpost: 17 June 2015
The Signpost: 24 June 2015
The Signpost: 01 July 2015
The Signpost: 08 July 2015
The Signpost: 15 July 2015
The Signpost: 22 July 2015
The Signpost: 29 July 2015
The Signpost: 05 August 2015
The Signpost: 12 August 2015
The Signpost: 19 August 2015
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
The Signpost: 02 September 2015
The Signpost: 09 September 2015
The Signpost: 16 September 2015
The Signpost: 23 September 2015
The Signpost: 30 September 2015
The Signpost: 07 October 2015
The Signpost: 14 October 2015
The Signpost: 21 October 2015
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
The Signpost: 04 November 2015
The Signpost: 11 November 2015
The Signpost: 18 November 2015
Hi, The Signpost: 25 November 2015
The Signpost: 02 December 2015
The Signpost: 09 December 2015
The Signpost: 16 December 2015
The Signpost: 30 December 2015
The Signpost: 06 January 2016
The Signpost: 13 January 2016
The Signpost: 20 January 2016
The Signpost: 27 January 2016
The Signpost: 03 February 2016
Life-signTHat's been quite a while; good to see a life-sign from you! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 21:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 10 February 2016
The Signpost: 17 February 2016
The Signpost: 24 February 2016
The Signpost: 02 March 2016
The Signpost: 09 March 2016
The Signpost: 16 March 2016
The Signpost: 23 March 2016
The Signpost: 1 April 2016
The Signpost: 14 April 2016
The Signpost: 24 April 2016
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
The Signpost: 17 May 2016
Unitary model of memoryLova, you may wish to comment on my post here. That article needs serious work, don't you think? Tony (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 28 May 2016
The Signpost: 05 June 2016
The Signpost: 15 June 2016
The Signpost: 04 July 2016
The Signpost: 21 July 2016
The Signpost: 04 August 2016
The Signpost: 18 August 2016
The Signpost: 06 September 2016
The Signpost: 29 September 2016
New newsletter for NotificationsHello You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia. That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements. Please subscribe! All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 14 October 2016
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Lova Falk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) The Signpost: 4 November 2016
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
Neurologic Music Therapy (NMT)Dear Lova Falk, I hope are doing well. My name is Kyurim Kang. On the behalf of the Academy of Neurologic Music Therapy, I am posting this message. First, we appreciate your contribution to the NMT Wikipedia page. We are now trying to develop and revise the NMT Wikipedia page under the NMT Advisory Council to ensure that we provide accurate information about NMT to the public. We recognized that there is some ambiguous information on the page, so we are considering editing the entire page. However, we would like to kindly ask your permission before we delete your information. We are also happy to have your suggestions for editing the NMT page. If you have any questions, please email to kyurim.kang@mail.utoronto.ca. Again, we really appreciate your contribution. Best Regards, Kyurim Kang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyurim1 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC) Dear Kyurim! Thank you for your kind message, and please be informed that you can make all edits you wish! With friendly regards, Lova Falk talk 18:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC) BlimeyStill alive then :-) --Penbat (talk) 19:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC) The Signpost: 15 July 2017
The Signpost: 5 August 2017
The Signpost: 6 September 2017
The Signpost: 25 September 2017
The Signpost: 23 October 2017
The Signpost: 24 November 2017
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Lova Falk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) The Signpost: 18 December 2017
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Lova Falk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) The Signpost: 1 December 2018
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative!Hi Lova Falk, Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative with your signature! Maybe you know another Wikipedian who'd like to sign as well? :-) --Gnom (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC) The Signpost: 28 February 2019
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
The June 2019 Signpost is out!
The file File:Lovafalkuser.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC) The Signpost: 31 July 2019
The Signpost: 30 August 2019
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
The file File:User Lova Falk in giveaway tshirt.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing The Signpost: 26 April 2020
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
some questions.1). what is the difference between Neuropsychology and Cognitive neuroscience ?
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
The Signpost: 28 February 2021
The Signpost: 28 March 2021
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
The Signpost: 29 November 2021
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
The Signpost: 30 January 2022
The Signpost: 27 February 2022
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
The Signpost: 24 April 2022
Thank youI've been looking at contributors to WikiProject Psychology and I was impressed and thankful for your many contributions in fighting vandalism, ADHD, and so many other important psychology topics. For this I will happily give you an orchid. I hope to be as successful an editor as you have been. Darcyisverycute (talk) 23:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC) The Signpost: 29 May 2022
The Signpost: 26 June 2022
The Signpost: 1 August 2022
The file File:Lova falk.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing The Signpost: 31 August 2022
The Signpost: 30 September 2022
The Signpost: 31 October 2022
"The good breast" listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The good breast and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The good breast until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC) The Signpost: 28 November 2022
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
The Signpost: 1 August 2023
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add The Signpost: 4 December 2023
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
The Signpost: 18 November 2024The Signpost: 12 December 2024
The Signpost: 24 December 2024
|