User talk:South19


April 2013

Hello, I'm MaskedHero. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Persepolis 2.0 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MaskedHero (talk) 00:24, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed

your recent edit at Talk:Men's rights movement. Where I have been banned for (among things) my vendetta against users who are red links. Editors such as yourself. The reason for my attitude is that many editors spend many hours looking for vandalism, most of which seems to come from either unregistered editors or from red linked ones. As a sign of respect to these editors I suggest that you put something, anything on your user page, which will turn you into a blue link. Now, about your posting. (1) In order to be considered more seriously I recommend that you avoid the word "dude like the plague. (2) It sounds as if you are suggesting that someone else do something about that Tom Moore (if that was his name?) situation. On wikipedia we do these things our selves. Give it a shot. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 23:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've been around since 2011 and am aware I can be singled out for just posting there. The person in question is Thomas Ball. I know it is probably a bad idea to use the word "dude" but that is how I speak in real life. I will not be intimidated to change my speech style. I would edit the article myself but for some reason it is locked until April 15th. Also, it doesn't matter if someone has a red link or not, if you're discriminating that's your problem. --South19 (talk) 23:10, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for going blue. I had no intention in intimidating you, and choosing to write as you speak on talk pages is fine, as long as you keep in mind that it might cause some editors to not take you seriously. Of course many editors don't take me seriously and my writing is pretty standard. Thanks also for correcting the name "Ball", I was just too lazy to go back and see what you'd written in the first place. Since being banned from the MRM page for a month I did not know that it was locked. Ah... a change. Your recent edit. Well discriminating against red link users is about the least of my problems. Carptrash (talk) 23:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Classified as hate group by SPLC

I've edited your comment on Talk:Men's rights movement because it was in violation of WP:BDP. Calling a man who committed suicide a domestic terrorist is not only a violation of wikipedia policy, but is objectively offensive and you should be ashamed of yourself. People like you disgust me. Rgambord (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lawlz, even though you are gone and "retired" let it be known that a man who publishes a 15 page manifesto [1] urging people to burn down courts and police offices is considered a domestic terrorist. For the modern men's movement to adopt this man's viewpoint as relevant is harmful to the intended outreach that I believe the movement might be looking for. --South19 (talk) 05:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notified

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgambord (talk • contribs) 15:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Although you did not create the new article Adana Science and Technology University, I am leaving this message because you have contributed to its improvement with your edits. Thank you! Please keep up the good work and consider making even more improvements if you can.

Best Regards,
bpage (talk) 00:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aw, thank you, you're welcome ^^ Goin' South ☼ 08:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kunstmuseum Bayreuth may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The '''Kunstmuseum Bayreuth''' is the Museum for [[modern art]] of the city of [[Bayreuth]], [[Bavaria, [[Germany]]. The historic rooms of the baroque town hall present exhibitions with

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thutha Rai Bahadar
added links pointing to Lehri and Hassam
Champa Village
added a link pointing to Ramnagar
Kharian
added a link pointing to Mair

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, South19. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tearsofgriefbayonne.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Tearsofgriefbayonne.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Art Renewal Center

There have been a couple editors who have been mass deleting sourced content from the Art Renewal Center WP page. Please help protect this page from disruptive editing. ArtMajor (talk) 23:59, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Meibomian gland dysfunction" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Meibomian gland dysfunction. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 10#Meibomian gland dysfunction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Neo139 (talk) 02:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]