User talk:Lordoliver/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lordoliver. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lupin/Filter_recent_changes

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/American Civil War task force/Requested biographies Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/American Civil War task force/New articles

DYK nomination of John Creed Moore

Hello! Your submission of John Creed Moore at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jappalang (talk) 16:50, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for John Creed Moore

On January 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Creed Moore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 05:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

RE:WPMILHIST edit

Plip!

No problem, don't worry about it. I checked your contribs after you did it and presumed you got mixed up. We all do it from time to time. Just give the page title a glance next time ;) Regards, Woody (talk) 21:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Good thing he's not an admin, or else he'd get slapped by a trout. However, I do have a minnow handy.--King Bedford I ^Seek his grace 22:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Gregg Industrial Insulators Inc..jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Gregg Industrial Insulators Inc..jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Gregg Industrial Insulators Inc..jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Gregg Industrial Insulators Inc..jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for all of the Help that you have given to me over the past few weeks to help me to return to Wikipedia I commend you on your great boldness. --General Lafayette (talk) 18:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Mark Perrin Lowrey

Where did the old article go, and what happened to the history of the article? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

There is one edit to a fully formed article, and it was on my watchlist which meant I had edited it in the past. How can a fully formed article appear out of this air. Did you cut and paste it from elsewhere in Wikipedia? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Conclusion of the American Civil War

Your input would be appreciated at the article I started yesterday of the Conclusion of the American Civil War.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 20:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I would love to help you with the article, what would you like me to add to the article? Lord R. Oliver I ^His Lordship's Court 20:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Moved your answer over here so all parts are in the same place. You seem to contribute a lot to American Civil War articles - so I thought maybe you might know of some key Confederate surrenders or captures or disbandments in 1865 that could/should be added to the article I started. Perhaps you could add a paragraph summary with a hatnote to the main article involved. Does what I wrote so far look accurate to you. I am NOT generally a Civil War buff. Just stumbled into writing this a few days ago - probably because I recenty wrote 16 articles on Appomattox (16 article DYK hook). See my talk page for titles of these articles from the DYK accolades. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 20:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I will try and find some key Surrenders or disbandments that will work good for your article. It looks pretty accurate to me. Lord R. Oliver I ^His Lordship's Court 21:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Appreciation

I appreciate the Thank You, but I don't think I've done all that much. I haven't actually written an article. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 23:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay thanks, it's the first time anyone has done that. Much appreciated. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 23:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

NameOfNewArticle

Noticing the talk page of your last article, I recommend your next one you work on it at User:Lordoliver/NameOfNewArticle, and then do a page move into mainspace instead of copy/paste. That way the edit history is preserved in the new article, and it doesn't look like you did everything in one edit.--King Bedford I ^Seek his grace 23:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Mark Perrin Lowrey

Good day Lordoliver! I put in another pic of Lowrey, and I can add all sorts of details to the page if you like. Just let me know when your done with it! Kresock (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Adoption

Hi, Lordoliver, i am Ladyofwidsom and i thought maybe that you could be come my adoptee. --Ladyofwisdom (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Questions

Well i dont want to learn to much right now as i will not be on very often but i would like to know how to make my signature all cool like yours. --Ladyofwisdom (talk) 00:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

i made my own signature and tweaked it up a little bit to make it my own! --Lady of Wisdom ^Want to talk Wisdom 00:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you it is because of you that the signature has become what it is if that makes any since at all, he he. --Lady of Wisdom ^Want to talk Wisdom 00:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

im sorry, i was just trying to help, now i know not to do that anymore. --Lady of Wisdom ^Want to talk Wisdom 00:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Awesome

that is soooooo cool i cant believe it well i guess i dont have to tell you that you have my vote! this is awesome i cant wait, just to think...my adoptee could become a coordinator on a wikiproject! Lady of Wisdom ^Want to talk Wisdom 21:10, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I know it is very cool to think about! Lord R. Oliver I ^His Lordship's Court 21:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Tommy Merritt

Hi! I assessed the article and left a comment on the talk page. I also went over the article a bit. Best wishes! Hekerui (talk) 23:04, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Mark Perrin Lowrey

On February 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mark Perrin Lowrey, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 02:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Tommy Merritt

On February 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tommy Merritt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 20:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)