|
User talk:LogX/Archive 1
Welcome!
Thank youHi thank you for the worm welcoming words, i am happy that i found the gut to start making amendments around, thank you for your patient in advance and appreciate your assistance and comments, regards --Hofman20 —Preceding undated comment added 22:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC) ThanksDear LogX, Thanks for your appreciation and award --Neechalkaran (talk) 08:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC) Hello User:LogX. I invite you to revisit the article and then perhaps return to the AFD discussion in the hopes that you might agree that your concerns have been addressed. Schmidt, Michael Q. 11:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
ReHello. I am working on these articles and they definitely need to stay. The references and the bibliography will be added by time.georgianJORJADZE 15:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!
I am declining speedy as I see g-hits and youtube page supporting this. Please reply here if there is a reasone I missed to call this vandalism. Dloh cierekim 19:49, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedy declined as there is plenty of context. 20:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC) August 2013
Speedy deletion declined: Franz NietoHello LogX. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Franz Nieto, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC) Deleting page outcomes systemHi I don't know why you deleted the page outcome system which I put up. It is the name for any kind of performance management system -strategic planning, performance management, evaluation, monitoring system - within outcomes theory. It is a technical term which people could look for on wikipedia. Can you tell me what I can do to get it undeleted please and what else you think needs to go on it so that you don't want to delete it any more. Maybe you want it to refer back to the outcomes theory page more, or maybe you want more detail. I can't see the page outcomes system now so I can't look at it to work out what needs to be changed. Any guidance appreciated. Thanks Albert Speedy deletion declined: The Christians (Norway)Hello LogX, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Christians (Norway), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Would you please explain how this is vandalism. I am very concerned that you are driving away new editors with the inappropriate CSD tags, especially the vandalism tags. Dloh cierekim 23:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC) Where You Are(Jay Sean Song) speedy deletion declinedA7 does not apply to songs. A9 would, but artist has article. I believe it is time for you to stop tagging articles for CSD and work on article building. I do not believe you have sufficient grasp of WP:CSD to continue reviewing articles with the purpose of tagging for deletion. It would be better to look at the new articles from the standpoint of sourcing, familiarizing yourself with the topic at hand and expansion of articles. I am very concerned at the overall effect your inappropriate taggings are having on new editors. I can tell you from personal experience that tagging a new editor's work for deletion feels like a slap in the face. Unfortunately, your deletion notices are the only notes on their talk pages. I believe it is better to lay a welcome on a new editor's talk page as well as a sincere offer of assistance. To tag for deletion inappropriately makes matters so much worse. Dloh cierekim 23:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
New Page PatrolHi LogX. Thank you for patrolling new pages. Of all the voluntary work editors do, NPP is among the most important because not only is it the the first firewall against unwanted pages in mainspace, but equally important, it is the earliest opportunity to provide a welcome to users who are not sure about, or who are not even aware of our policies at this stage. I think it would be a good idea for you to stop patrolling pages for a while, at least until you have read and fully understood WP:NPP andWP:DELETION. I know it's a lot to read, but if you do, you would be on the way to being a great patroller. If ever you need any help, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Regards, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC) Deletion of 6 in (152 mm)/47 cal guns acceptedLogX, I am the one who created the previously mentioned page. I understand why you would mark the page mentioned page above for deletion. Please, by all means, delete it. I am relatively new to this and I was somewhat confused. Point being, I wish to apologize for my foolish mistake. Take any necessary steps to fix this issue. --Dreadnaught262 (talk) 06:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC) I have unreviewed a page you curatedHi, I'm Fylbecatulous. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Love to my cobain, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Fylbecatulous talk 00:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC) Whisperback
I feel that Blubberella Lush is a movie and a bad one at that. That's why I wrote a review on it. I didn't think it was a hoax or vandalism. I would like it re instated. Let me know. I am very new to this page to write. Bye..Norman Bloom . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norman Bloom(talk • contribs) 21:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Page movingCan u pls tell me whether there is any other film named Amarkallam, such that u had to move it? The same applies withVeeram and Kaadhal Mannan. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
