User talk:Lisha2037Your submission at Articles for creation: Ritu Khullar has been accepted Ritu Khullar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! Jamiebuba (talk) 22:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Devlin has been accepted Nicholas Devlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! ~Liancetalk 01:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Kathleen Roussel moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Kathleen Roussel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 21:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Ritu KhullarHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ritu Khullar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Ritu KhullarThe article Ritu Khullar you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ritu Khullar and Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Ritu KhullarThe article Ritu Khullar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ritu Khullar for comments about the article, and Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Susanne CraigHi Lisha, I saw you renominated -- I'm going to remove your renomination but just for a half an hour or an hour then it'll go back up. It's to avoid confusing the bot that maintains the GA pages -- Reidgreg is going to put in the fail and I don't want the bot to get confused about there being two simultaneous nominations. Don't worry about the nomination apparently disappearing -- it'll come right back. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Susanne CraigHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Susanne Craig you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in RedHi there, Lisha2037, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have a dynamic Canadian journalist interested in improving our coverage of women. Given your GA success with Ritu Khullar and your nomination of Susanne Craig, not to mention all the improvements you have made to several other biographies of women, it certainly looks as if you will be a useful member of the project. I realize you are already a highly competent editor but when writing about women you might find it useful to look through our Primer. You might also like to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to see your interest in the project. As you have been working on improving articles up to GA, you might like to take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC) Women in Red October 2024
--Ipigott (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Susanne CraigThe article Susanne Craig you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Susanne Craig and Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2Â for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Susanne CraigThe article Susanne Craig you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Susanne Craig for comments about the article, and Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Women in Red November 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Concern regarding Draft:Kathleen RousselHello, Lisha2037. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kathleen Roussel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC) DYK for Susanne CraigOn 26 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Susanne Craig, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Susanne Craig won the Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting for her reporting on Donald Trump's taxes after receiving a copy of his tax records in her mailbox? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Susanne Craig. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Susanne Craig), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC) Women in Red December 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Nomination of Sanjay Kumar Verma for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjay Kumar Verma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Kumar Verma (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 11:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Kathleen RousselHello, Lisha2037. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kathleen Roussel". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC) Women in Red January 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging |