Hello Lightspeedchick! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jim Douglas(talk)(contribs)23:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the message. A few questions:
- Is it sufficient when reverting to leave the Edit Summary box as is? There is already information automatically filled in.
- Similarly, when I'm logged in, don't my changes get signed automatically? (i.e. without including the Tildes). Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lightspeedchick (talk • contribs).
No, the system never signs your changes automatically; you have to do that yourself with ~~~~. It looks like you're doing fine with the edit summaries. When you're reverting simple/obvious vandalism, it's not necessary to fill in any details. For content changes, or when the reason for the edit isn't necessarily clear, you should try to explain it in the summary. If you want the system to remind you to always fill in a summary, you can go to "My preferences", click the "Editing" tab, and check on "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". -- Jim Douglas(talk)(contribs)00:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again...one more suggestion. When you post to talk pages, new comments should go to the bottom of the page, not the top. The easiest way to do that is to add a new message by clicking the "+" button at the top of the page. You can find more talk page suggestions here: WP:TALK. -- Jim Douglas(talk)(contribs)03:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Noticed your extremely impressive edit count from looking at Minda's Inky World's history - and a number of them seem to have come from new page patrol/speedy deletion. I recently discovered NPWatcher, and for any NP patroller, it's definitely worth a look. Since you have over 250 edits, you could try it out - you might be interested. Anyway, nice to see some more people keeping up the fight. Regards, --WootyWoot?contribs04:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that someone who marks the "Edward Catich" page for deletion due to "notability" has failed to do even a cursory due diligence check on any one of the numerous search engines available to the public, and perhaps ought to take her finger off the bot-trigger and actually do work. → (AllanBz✍) 14:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Schools
Hi LSC -- fyi, articles about schools are not eligible for speedy deletion per db-group. Basically the policy is to put up with a lot of lameness there, for educational purposes. Regards, looie496 (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I put in a notability maintenance tag by mistake. I meant to put in an "unsourced" maintenance tag. Tagging now. --lightspeedchick (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nick Lewis, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nick Lewis is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nick Lewis, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click hereCSDWarnBot (talk) 01:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
{{helpme}}
Questions
I have two questions, both for curiosity's sake:
1) About the above comment regarding the Nick Lewis page: why would this comment have been put here? I didn't create the page or ever edit as far as I remember.
2) For my own information: It seems the new page Handedness and Mathematical Ability doesn't belong on Wikipedia, or should be changed in some way in order to be appropriate for the encyclopedia. However, I can't figure out what guideline it violates. It's essay-like in tone, but it's not really an essay as it doesn't convey an opinion. Can an experienced editor shed some light please? Thanks.lightspeedchick (talk) 00:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As for the first, I don't know why it told you if you didn't create the page. Goofup maybe? As for the second, I'll probably nominate that for deletion. It isn't article material (WP:OR is the biggest violation). never mind, it was deleted. it doesn't seem to have ever existed. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)00:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
With Nick Lewis, it seems you tagged it using npwatcher, then it was deleted while you tried to tag it again, resulting in you accidentally recreating it.--Jac16888 (talk) 00:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I was wondering why the article List of Australian Army Cadet units across Australia was deleted. Even though the British one is still going why was this one deleted. As I believe that the article should be up not only for reference but even for people to see and find out.
The article shows the diverse locations of Australia
It can help people finding a unit they would like to join
