User talk:Libby norman/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Libby norman. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

THIS ARCHIVE IS FOR 2013

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Forgot to put name 04:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Joseph (fashion brand), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. I pasted the correct link for the PBS and I'm updating the rest of the article soon to include more citations and more specific biographical information. Stephanie Monty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.179.180.2 (talk) 21:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Norton, Suffolk

Hey! Thanks for adding references and so on to the Norton, Suffolk article. I've turned a couple of them into more complete citations for you rather than bare urls - which is a quite useful thing to be able to do. I wasn't sure if you knew how to do it or not? If you've not tried before why don't you give it a go, using the style I've demonstrated for you, and see how you get on - feel free to ask if you need to. Whilst I'm mentioning it, it might be worth trying to find third party sources where you can for things. Good job though - a big improvement to see some refs in the article. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Blue Square Thing. Yes I'll follow the complete citations idea using your style guide. As to third party sources, I did search, but struggled on a few (especially the school - possibly partly because it's so new). Will keep hunting, and I know where to locate/borrow a Pevsner guide to Suffolk, which may be helpful in providing more background and details for older buildings in Norton and beyond. Thanks again and will ask if I get stuck on citations.Libby norman 19:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

No worries - third party sources can be tricky and it's not as if there's stuff that can't be verified. Try Edubase for the school - usually a year or two on the drag. The various English Heritage websites can be quite handy for historical stuff - and Suffolk Churches if ever so helpful. I meant to say earlier that I usually name my refs - that way you can reuse a ref later in the article or if you need to at some point in the future. A good trick I find. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Or you might find the Suffolk SOR stuff helpful on the school - I think I sorted the Ixworth primary school reffing out with that the other day - check that article maybe? Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Joseph Ettedgui, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

tausif(talk) 13:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Stephen Marks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your work on The Brenizer Method! Da5nsy (talk) 21:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Jack Stefanowski

Hi, I see you had some problems filling in the references at Jack Stefanowski. I have fixed these for you. Please make sure the title is showing the title of the page or article and not the accessdate, which has a separate field. Thank you, C679 19:34, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar

Hi my name's Nicholas and first and foremost I would like to thank you for changing the format and editing my article 'Liam Hackett' , I really love how it is now and also thanks alot for accepting it ! I appreciate it very much and I think you deserve this Barnstar ! I'm still working with that recently created article, especially the image of Liam Hackett, he sent me his image but when I e-mailed him again to ask for copyright release & permission, he (or the organisation) dint reply, so I'm really looking forward for your help if you wish and please do feel free to contribute to that article! Looking forward keeping in touch with you! Once again, thanks =) ! Nicholance (talk) 16:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mcor Technologies Ltd

Hi, just a reminder that you left this marked as under review. —rybec 11:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Signature

You appear to have confused at least one user by including a signature which did not include a link to your user talk page (or to your user page or contribution summary). May I suggest that you read WP:Signatures? - David Biddulph (talk) 22:24, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Julia Park whatsit

Thanks for tidying up that lifeboat article Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Julia_Park_Barry_of_Glasgow. I added some links to it a while back, and been meaning to look back at that for ages, good job! --_nonsense ferret 17:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Nieuwesteeg Heritage Rose Garden

Libby, your improvements are much appreciated.

You may not know that rose naming conventions distinguish between single and double quotes. "Dettmann No. 6" means the name is a temporary one for study purposes. 'Dettmann No. 6' means the name is historically the original and valid one. Many of the Nieuwesteeg roses have temporary names pending correct identification. Erictimewell (talk) 21:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Improved references for Drunk Tank Pink

Hi Libby,

Thanks for reviewing my Drunk Tank Pink submission. You're right that it needed a few more outside sources. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Drunk_Tank_Pink_(book)

I'm pretty new to this, so I've beefed things up with a reference to NPR and some other links.

Let me know if there's anything else I can do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregdetre (talk • contribs) 12:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

H.C. Tonking Organist

I do not understand what you are getting at. Ref: refers to Musical Books, written by musicians you have written their personal knowledge of H. C. Tonking in their books. The input I have made, has come verbally by his son's to me when they were alive, as well as other organists who personally knew him or was taught by him. My tutor was taught by H.C. Tonking, Capt C.F. Nicholas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonking (talk • contribs) 08:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Responded to on Tonking talk page on 16 April 2013. Libby norman (talk) 09:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gemba Walk

Thanks for your comments on Articles for creation/Gemba Walk. I added the parts as you suggested to gemba, but I believe "gemba walk" is a different term and should have a separate page, because it talks about a totally different concept in lean management field. I tried to explain it in the Articles for creation/Gemba Walk extensively with proper referencing to gemba page. Can you please double check it?ChazzI73 (talk) 06:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Responded on ChazzI73's Talk page.Libby norman (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

VeteranBandit

Thank You for your edits. Seeing these in the online editor is a massive help towards the construction of future contributions. If you can make any further suggestions to this topic that are valuable for a beginner and future submissions, that would be appreciated.Veteranbandit (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I will check out those links : Thank You again for the information and your help Veteranbandit (talk) 18:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

pewdiepie

You stated in your review that"There is also superfluous information, such as repetition about girlfriend, a tediously long list of games played, etc. A serious trim and inline citations may help to get this article up to standard. See WP:REF for referencing advice."

My submission only included 1 mention of his girlfriend, and the only game mentioned in my submission was Amnesia: The Dark Descent. Previous PewDiePie submissions by other users were written to include unnecessary and trivial information such as all of the games he played. If you would like to look at my submission separately from the other submission then please click here. Soulbust (talk) 05:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Soulbust Talk page.Libby norman (talk) 19:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your help~~Lee H. Letts article

Dear Libby norman, Thanks again for your help with my article––it is much better now and has been approved. I look forward to improving it further and adding photos as well. In the meantime I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate the work you do. Best wishes, Marion Simons (talk) 20:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Marion Simons

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your editing suggestions on the Paul Kraus article. I have had one of my doctoral students perform the research and add citations. I have checked it over and it is well supported now. Thank you again! Dr. Ann Drannstarling (talk) 14:04, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Paul Kraus Article

Dear Libby,

Thank you for your comment on my Talk page. Still learning my way around the Wiki navigation so I apologize if this is the wrong way/place to ask - Do we wait to see if the Paul Kraus article is approved now? Is there anything else we need to do? Thank you for your help!!! Best, Dr. Ann — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drannstarling (talk • contribs) 22:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stephen Marks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rickling, Essex may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Public Speaking revert of Speakers Ranked

I apologize for the confusion, I was actually referring to the editor before you who had just reverted me and was asking them to discuss the issue before reverting me again. Your edit was perfectly fine, of course. SQGibbon (talk) 00:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Why?

Hi, i've just checked this and curious to know why you didn't message me regarding that. Can i continue my username? Thanks!--TheWikipreditor (talk) 14:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Related matter

Libby norman: You may want to look at my recent edits to User talk:TheWikipreditor#Your message re: user name. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:48, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Libby norman. You have new messages at Dodger67's talk page.
Message added 15:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Graham Stuart Thomas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

June 8 review

Hi Libby, I'm new and learning -- slowly -- about the submission/review process. A couple days ago I think you deleted an article I mistakenly had submitted twice. But does that mean the other article is still in the queue waiting to be reviewed? If yes, then should I just sit tight and continue to wait? If no, then what do I do? So confused.

Here's what I think has been submitted, but I'm just not sure: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Steven_Montgomery_(2)

FreePress48 (talk) 00:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your email FreePress48. Yes, your other Steven Montgomery article is still awaiting review, so you don't need to do anything. There is quite a high backlog of articles to be reviewed at the moment so it might take a bit of time to be reviewed. Hope that helps. Libby norman (talk) 08:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Help with article

Hi Libby! You recently declined an article I created, [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lumension Security], and I was seeing if you had any further suggestions for me.

I posted in the help desk section and was replied back to, but I'm still a little unclear of where to start. I have independent sources for my reviews and awards sections but I more so have press releases for a lot of other sections since I could not find anything independent. Those that have press releases listed are in my timeline and acquisitions & mergers section.

So if I can't find any independent sources and can only find a press release, I have to remove it completely? Or can I keep that section? I don't know how trimmed down this article needs to be is essentially what I am saying. Thanks for your help! Kendraelise0 (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Kendraelise0's Talk page. Libby norman (talk) 12:56, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/5rooms.com

Hi Libby,

I fixed the problems that you highlighted on my article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/5rooms.com

Can you please have a look at it again?

Thank you

Pioneercpt (talk) 09:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Pioneercpt's Talk page. Libby norman (talk) 12:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Approval of an article

Dear Libby norman,

I've reworked this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Heimtextil based on your last comments.

Can you please tell me what would be next steps to publish the article? Is there anything more I should/could add?

Many thanks in advance Steffffm2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steffffm2 (talk • contribs) 14:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Stefffm2's talk page. Libby norman (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Concering Red Text

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I've added references to my article, Kooky Klicker Pens. However, next to the links, there appears some red texts referring to the links. What is the cause of this problem? Can you fix it? PinkTruffles123 (talk) 01:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)PinkTruffles123

That red text tells you that the citation template you use, {{cite web}}, requires the linked page's title via the "title=" parameter to work properly. I've tidied up one of your references with this edit; however, a toy store is not a reliable source in the first place, and you should probably remove these sources completely and instead cite newspaper articles or reputable trade magazines. Thus I haven't bothered with tidying up all of them. See also WP:Referencing for beginners on how to easily create footnotes. Huon (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles for creation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Sick_Seconds

Hiya Libby Please could I have some help with this submission? :-) I think the page is definitely worthy of submission due to the band's links with several other successful projects, but because they are a very new band there is very little source material on the Internet (aside from their official website). It was their frontman Barry Harris who asked me to put the page together. Many thanks, Servitor Vek (talk) 10:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Servitor Vek's talk page. Libby norman (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for the prompt reply, Libby - very helpful

Servitor Vek (talk) 12:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Request an account process

Hi Libby. I've been watching your work on Wikipedia for some time, and I thought given your work with usernames and new users you might be interested in getting involved with Wikipedia's request an account process. You can find more information about it at WP:ACC and WP:ACC/G. If you'd like more information before applying or deciding not to, feel free to ask a question here (but if you could mention me or drop me a note on my talk page that'd be great. If you want to apply feel free to follow the steps listed here, the first being identifying to the Wikimedia Foundation. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you Libby for the feedback. A resubmission is in the works. Sincerely, Gloria Colon-Buzatu USAGStuttgart (talk) 11:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Responded. Libby norman (talk) 11:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Help please

Hi Libby, thanks very much for your feedback on [1]. I have added additional independent, reliable sources, namely:

• CNN Money ([2] )

• Washington Post ([3])

• Jackson, Peter; Moulinier, Isabelle (2002). Natural Language Processing for Online Applications: Text Retrieval, Extraction, and Categorization, Philadelphia: John Benjamins B.V., p. 117, ISBN 90-272-4989-X. ([4])

• Indurkhya, Nitin et al. (2005). Text Mining: Predictive Methods for Analyzing Unstructured Information, New York: Springer, p. 154-155, ISBN 0-387-95433-3. ([5])

• Maybury, Mark (2012). Multimedia Information Extraction, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 18. ([6])

• “Notes from the GEOINT 2007 Symposium.” GISCafe (29 Oct 2007) ([7])

Also, the Wikipedia link about reliable sources (Wikipedia:Verifiability) states that “Where available, academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources, such as in history, medicine, and science.” The information in the NetOwl article is verifiable in various publications in prestigious, highly-competitive academic conferences such as the Message Understanding Conference, in the peer-reviewed National Conference of Artificial Intelligence (American Association for Artificial Intelligence), and in the peer-reviewed scientific journal BMC Bioinformatics. I kept those as they were.

Please let me know whether I have addressed your concerns. Thank you very much for your time! Astigitana (talk) 15:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC) astigitana

Responded on astigitana's talk page. Libby norman (talk) 11:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Could you Help please?

Hi. Theres an article that I have been working on. It was rejected on the basis that the citations needed to be fixed. I don't know what that means as it is rather vague termanology. I was wondering if you could please fix the citations and submit the article for me. I would greatly appreciate it. the article is located here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Revenge_of_the_Sunfish Thanks.

Responded on this requester's talk page with some advice on how to. Libby norman (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Crofton Park entry

Dear Libby,

Thank you for your constructive comments on 29 July.

I work as an editor and have lived in Crofton Park since 2007, where my partner and I both have strong community links. I have researched the local history from primary sources and have experience in writing/editing/publishing history/heritage titles.

I am confident that the information provides an accurate picture of the area.

We can knock the references into shape by going through them systematically and will have time to do this over the weekend (as well as adding further references in the correct format, mostly relating to archive newspaper refs). We will endeavour to find sources for the 'eating and drinking' section: as you can see this is a minor paragraph but the reason we included it is that it reflects the character of the area.

I will let you know if we get stuck and once we've finished updating.

Thanks again

Best wishes Ed

Brockleygrover (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Article on Dinorah Varsi rejection

Hello Libby, Thanks for your comments on my attempt to create an article on Uruguayan pianist Dinorah Varsi. I will include a link to the online obituary from El Pais, as you suggest. About the concert reviews cited, there are a few that name the critic, publication and date. If those newspapers do not have online archives, what else do I need to include for the review to be traceable? Isn't the reference adequate enough? I see in the "music" guidelines that recordings on recognized classical labels are also sufficient to establish the notable character of a person. Dinorah Varsi has recordings on Phillips, EMI (Deutsche Harmonia Mundi) and Mediaphone, all considered major labels in Europe. I think that this alone, more than any article about her in the press, should be sufficient to see that we are talking about a acknowledged notable pianist. What do I need to include in these cases? Date of publication? Catalogue number of the recording? Being a pianist myself, I know that any colleague that won first prize in the Clara Haskil competition (www.clara-haskil.ch) and recorded for Phillips has done more than enough to be considered a major pianist, a notable figure in her field and worthy of an entry in WP . Just take note of some of the other Haskel winners: Christophe Eschenbach, Richard Goode, Michel Dalberto, Till Fellner, Mihaela Ursuleasa, all of them major pianists with major careers. I will try to improve the article, but somehow I have the feeling that a classical musician has to be a household name to be deemed "notable", and surely if it were so, WP would have no "raison d'etre" Albertoreyes (talk) 13:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Albertoreyes talk page. Libby norman (talk) 17:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Polytrichum alpinum

How do you want to handle Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Polytrichum alpinum? It's been almost 2 weeks since it or the IP-editor's talk page was touched. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 21:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

My submission at AfC dagay (August 17)

At least you sent a message. I was previously told it needed sources, even though a source is given.

I don't understand. This guy was well known in his particular niche. He composed several piano pieces that all young pianists must learn. What is so terrible about identifying who he was? Isn't that what an encyclopedia should do?

Cecilieaux — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cecilieaux (talk • contribs) 14:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Cecilieaux's Talk page. 15:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding my submission

Hi,

Please let us know how to process this submission. I am the producer of the movie and would like to post it soon.

Thanks, Sunil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srauniya (talk • contribs) 16:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Srauniya talk page. Libby norman (talk) 00:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Check article

Can you check my article? Article's name is Veron (Software). Is this article satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faisal6545 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Check article

Can you check my article? Article's name is Veron (Software). Is this article satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines ? Faisal6545 (talk) 22:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Faisal 6545 talk page. Libby norman (talk) 00:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Recheck article

Can you again check my article? Article's name is Veron(Software). Is this article now satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines ? Faisal6545 (talk) 09:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Recheck article

Can you again check my article? Article's name "Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne sp. z o.o.". I added ref links. Hope it would be ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.128.74.254 (talk) 12:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

I added some independent sources in english. Hope it would be ok now! Please check it if you can. 14:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.128.74.254 (talk)

Note from Desirae Barkan

I have given permission to use the content of Tom Balding Bits & Spurs website on the Tom Balding Bits & Spurs wikipedia page. I have wrote this content and would like it to be used on this page.

Desirae Barkan Marketing and Employee Relations Specialist Tom Balding Bits and Spurs 655 Riverside Sheridan, WY 82801 (307)-672-8459 [e-mail] Visit our website!

{{OTRS pending}}

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials

{{OTRS pending}}

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials

Desirae Barkan Marketing and Employee Relations Specialist Tom Balding Bits and Spurs 655 Riverside Sheridan, WY 82801 (307)-672-8459 [e-mail] Visit our website!

Desiraebarkan (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Desiraebarkan talk page. Libby norman (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

check article

Can you check my article? Article's name is Veron_(Media_Player). Is this article satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nipun6545 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

check article

Can you check my article? Article's name is Veron_(Media_Player). Is this article satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines ? Nipun6545 (talk) 17:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

5rooms Article

Hi Libby norman,

You declined my article a while back and gave some tips on how to improve it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/5rooms.com

Can you please have a look at it?

Thank you Pioneercpt (talk) 07:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Article creation: Aid on the Edge of Chaos - check changes?

Hi Libby, I have just edited the article 'Aid on the Edge of Chaos' by changing all the references so that they are not from wikipedia (thanks for the tip!) and bringing in three quotes from reviews by the Nobel Laureates, all of which highlight the notable nature of the work. Do let me know what you think, and if more quotes would be useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jellander (talk • contribs) 18:41, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

About Ignacio Solano Article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ignacio_Solano_Cabello

Good morning and greetings from Spain!

I cannot agree with the comment about correction

1) The article is in Spanish Wikipedia

2) About verification... All the projects are explained in the website, some of them are public.

3) Think the article is notable as they have some of the biggest vertical ecosystems in the world... everything is pattented. In this sector (vertical gardens) Paisajismo Urbano is revolutionary.

Please check it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlejandroOrmad (talk • contribs) 07:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Responded on AlejandroOrmad Talk page.Libby norman (talk) 08:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi again

Hi again Libby, thanks for your kind reply, but it dont understand.

How can you verify "external and neutral references that can be verified" something that is already there?

This is not a theory, is something that really exists. How can you verify something that already exists, is phisical and you can touch it?

Sorry, i dont understand such and ambigue term.

Thanks

Libby, thanks.

Much better with the examples.

Going to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlejandroOrmad (talk • contribs) 14:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Correction Ignacio Solano

Libby, take a look now.

You were right, much propper now.

Edit: I do create aswell "vertical ecosystem" wiki article. Libby if you think this should be attached to "Ignacio Solano" article, tell me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_ecosystem

Alex

Tell me if I should change something.

Regards, Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlejandroOrmad (talk • contribs) 09:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Final changes Ignacio Solano

Libby,

decided to erase: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_ecosystem and make a longer article about Ignacio Solano, more complete now.

Can you delete "Vertical ecosystems" article and give me your OK??

Thanks for this guide again and wise advises

Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlejandroOrmad (talk • contribs) 06:58, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Emmanuel Séjourné article declined

Hello, Thank you for your opinion. I'm sad to see that my article, which is a translation of the same article in French accepted by the French Wikipedia community, has been rejected. I understand though that the rules might differ from country to country. I'll review the article following your guidelines. I have a small objection though, as far as your example is concerned ("his music, rhythmic, romantic, and energetic...") Looking at it from the point of view of musical vocabulary and styles, "rhythmic" means that his music is strongly based on numerous rhythmic patterns visible in all his works, as opposed for exemple to "ambient music". "Romantic" indicates the style used in the romanticism period, with the particular way of conducting the melody, and with a harmony particular to the romantic style in music. And then, "energetic" is perfectly objectif as far as we speak about music played and composed at a certain tempo, in a certain tonality, which give it this particular "energetic" character, often written by the composer himself at the very beginning of every musical composition to explain the character of the music to play (par exemple, in musical terms: vivo, vivace). One just can't describe a ballad or a passacaglia as energetic, given their tempo, and their tone, but one can easily say so about most of the marches, or about first and last parts of most of the symphonies. I didn't intend to classify Séjourné's music in a subjective way, but tried to refer to the character of each of his compositions. I hope you get my point, do tell me, please, if it convinces you. I'll be glad if you give me as well a hint about some other parts of the text which bothered you, it'll help me improve the article to make it fit the English-speaking Wikipedia. Thank you for your help,--Escrivendi (talk) 17:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Escrivendi's Talk page. Libby norman (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Neutrality at Articles_for_creation/Shift4 Corporation

Libby, Thanks for the critiques on Articles for creation/Shift4 Corporation Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shift4 Corporation. I have made the changes you recommended (updated one source, changed the text to better match the source on another, and eliminated the non-neutral language you mentioned). I am hoping you might take one more look before I resubmit the page. Feel free to make any neutrality changes you deem necessary and let me know if we need additional references or additional material. Thanks, Casper n (talk) 21:25, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Casper's talk page.Libby norman (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

————————

Hi Libby. Hope you be well.

Can you review those articles please?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlejandroOrmad (talk • contribs) 07:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Alejandros's talk page. Libby norman (talk) 12:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

—————————

Libby,

Thanks for your help. Before I resubmit as you suggested, should I remove your comment on sources and that pink "reliable sources" box that's currently at the top of the page? Or is it better to leave that in place so the next editor can see what we worked on? Sorry, I'm new to this and I just want to make sure I follow the rules. Thanks, Casper n (talk) 19:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Casper's talk page. Libby norman (talk) 19:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Keep an eye on Stephen Bienko

You declined the AfC about a month ago, and I re-declined it just now. It seems to be a high risk BLP article because the subject may have significant negative information out there that isn't being included in the article. I warned the submitter that once the article goes main, all bets are off with regard to maintaining the glowing positive spin they are trying to create. We should keep an eye on it. Gigs (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Responded on Talk page.Libby norman (talk) 20:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Hi, Libby. Thanks for your reply. Yes, the initial draft, in an effort not to cross the line on neutrality, was weak on notability. I made some revisions to the second version that should help with now the neutrality, and have resubmitted. Many thanks. Doctor Hauschka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor Hauschka (talk • contribs) 18:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello, Libby norman:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)