User talk:Lewisskinner/Archive Feb 2007

Template:Sheffield United F.C. Squad

Template:Sheffield United F.C. Squad has 2 stray symbols - |} - I can't see why. roundhouse 18:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded document deletion proposal notice

Speedy deletion of Image:Sheffield inner ring road.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Sheffield inner ring road.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

document contains copyrighted data

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Sheffield inner ring road.png|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

• This document contains copyrighted copy pasted data from Scheme Plan (pdf, 3.3Mb). Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 18:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Ring road.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Ring road.JPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Document is a screenshot of the copyrighted and licensed document unfit for use

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Ring road.JPG|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

• Original document may be found Scheme Plan (pdf, 3.3Mb) Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 18:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cuckoo in the nest!

At least you can see my point! All the others on the Cat page list I am rabbiting on about are 'dedicated' refs (well, maybe not the dead ones - short-sighted B*st*rd, Herbert Bamlett, etc. - I believe they could have a semi-pro go at management and reffing in the same lifetime in them days, but not now). Professional Match Board officials go through a rigorous process to get them to the very top in the modern era.

And there's also an ironic aspect to this subject (Neil and his record of 'mateyness' with today's Prem refs? And invading their Wiki list to boot? Priceless!). Cheers. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat) 23:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Bramall lane

It wasn't to do with references, those sentences are kind of confusing and unclear. M3tal H3ad 07:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I meant to ask what is confusing about the sentence "The ground has been all seated since 1994" or "The oldest present stand". The referencing was a separate point - I asked why you thought that "most boisterous home fans sit..." was WP:OR. If you could explain what you mean so I can fix the article, and then I'd appreciate your advice. L.J.Skinner^WOT?|I did 17:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article needs a map/diagram, showing the orientation of the ground, the goals, the 4 roads which are its boundaries etc, with the various corners and stands labelled. Perhaps this would reduce some of the confusion apparent to M3tal H3ad. -- roundhouse 10:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Bramall Lane plan.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Bramall Lane plan.JPG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This image's background is copyrighted and licensed media

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Bramall Lane plan.JPG|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

• I have had to place a delete notification on your plan recently uploaded on Wikipedia as it seems that the image's background is copyrighted and licensed content from Google maps taken at the largest zoom rating. When creating images and claiming the own work license please make sure the content is entirely made by you and does not contain usuable parts, cheers. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 08:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it was predictable that the Mysterons would intervene. The plan was a valuable addition. -- roundhouse 10:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic Pc1dmn, the plan idea is excellent, but ripping off Google Maps is not. Rules apply, no discrimination. However, targetted remarks such as yours above have no place here, i suggest you polish your understanding of Wikipedia policies before intervening. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 11:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, there is a place for this kind of shit, and my talk page is not it. L.J.Skinner^WOT?|I did 15:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]