Please assume good faith. If any of my edits have seemed unconstructive, please keep a cool head and notify me of my mistakes promptly. I try to be helpful and if I cause a problem, it is purely accidental; in no way are my edits meant to be offensive to anyone. Besides myself.
Please sign your posts. Sign with four tildes to record your username and timestamp. Sinebot is watching, you know.
Respond to all messages at the place where the discussion began. Meaning, if I post a message on your talk page, respond to it there, and if you post on my talk page, I will respond to it here, unless you specify otherwise.
Nonsense gladly accepted. I like receiving messages, and I promise not to bite. Even if you think your questions are trivial, they may not be, at least to me. :)
Place all new messages at the bottom of the page. Clicking on the link below will do this automatically for you.
My page is constantly being monitored by dedicated talk page stalkers. Some of them (I probably don't know them all) are The ed17, IceUnshattered, Juliancolton, Nutiketaiel, Sonia, and Little Mountain 5 off the top of my head. Most of the time they lurk in the dark, but some of them might respond to your comments before I do. Don't be alarmed though; they might provide you with better responses than I can.
Email me if the matter is confidential. But please include the word "Wikipedia" in the e-mail title so that I won't inadvertently delete it or have my spam-eater destroy it.
But it felt great! Fun aside, I've always thought the wiki needed a little room to breathe...hope that scared the 'crat out of him! :D :D :D —LaPianista(T•C•S)04:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(oh, the colons, they shall destroy me in the end...) Shall I bang my head against my (school) computer again and die of of internal bleeding yet again? Oh, oh...the pain...I shall throw myself into the paradise of Heaven... -laughs- Anyways, when I started reading it, I totally didn't understand it...I wish I never did under stand it. -vomits- ♫ IceUnshattered[ t ]19:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That would be a "Lol!" moment. Meh, health class already did that >.>, but I have a habit of erasing painful memories...such as the ones created in health class... >.> ♫ IceUnshattered[ t ]23:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'Tis simply the cycle of life, my friend - we were all created somehow...
This will sound blunt, and I really mean it nicer than it sounds, but...
...PR's are supposed to give the article's major contributors constructive criticism. Telling them that the article is great is helpful, but only telling them that does not help. Are there any MoS errors in it? Any refs that are not formatted right? Are there any statements that are lacking references? Etc., etc., etc...—Ed17(Talk / Contribs)04:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Eddie, that was very helpful. Weird...
Yes, WWW, Ed's right. I think your peer reviews have to be more detailed, getting into the small things like the amount/validity of references, overall style, and others. Perhaps I should have let you read WP:MOS and WP:FA?. Could you read them now, or at least skim through them?
Also, it would be better if you listed the peer review at the peer review page, here. There is a link to it on the talk page, which I think you've missed. —LaPianista(T•C•S)05:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chamaltalk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
