This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Due to some unforseen real-life cirucmstances involving college, I'm going to be unable to devout enough time and energy to be able to fully source WM23. If you don't mind, I'd like to take you up on your earlier offer of sourcing it. I'll still be active. but I don't think I'll ever really have enough time at once to take on a large project like that again, so expect to see me in my normal vandalism-reverting, redirect-avoiding mode. Sorry for the inconvenience. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 23:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
From my perspective, the sources are reliable, and per the RFC, it was sort of agreed, you want to wait for more opinions or you want to submit another FAC?--
Whilst I'm sure that your small but greatly appreciated edit of the Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad article was a purely innocent, routine gesture, I was wondering whether you, as an administrator who's taken an interest in the piece, could please GA review the article. I'm sure that you get requests from newbs like me for attention all the time, but I've done a helluva lot of work to the page recently and I genuinely feel that it's ready for inspection. It's not very long anyway, so it shouldn't take up too much of your time. Despite that, thanks for your help in cleaning the article up. Oh, and I stole a little code from your userpage. Hope that you don't mind! grarap (talk) 17:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)grarap[reply]
SummerSlam question
Are you going to try and renominate SummerSlam (2007) as a Featured Article again at some point? I was wondering because I had the bright idea not too long ago that SummerSlam might make an excellent Featured Topic. A couple of the SummerSlam articles are already Good Articles, so we'd just have to get the rest of them to that point. Also, for it to be a FT, at least five of the articles have to be Featured Articles or Lists. I was thinking about it, and SS '07 has a shot, SummerSlam (1988) has a shot, and I think I might be able to get the general SummerSlam article to be a FL (similar to what I did for Royal Rumble). Then we'd only need two more. What do you think? Do you want to get a few people together and see if we can make this happen? Nikki31120:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All 22 of the SummerSlam-related articles have to be at least GAs, so we'd have a bit of work ahead of us to get the rest of the articles expanded. Out of the 22, at least five have to be Featured. Anybody who is willing to help can...the more the merrier and the faster we can get the work completed! Nikki31120:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would, but my editing time is gonna be seriously cut over the next three weeks due to exams/studying/pretending to study. If you still need help afterwards, than yea sure!! Apologies! ;( ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if you've read my thread WT:PW#SummerSlam (1988), but I'm thinking of skipping the GA process and taking SS '88 straight to FA. I'd love your opinion. Also, if I do end up taking it straight to FA, I want to make it fair to you. Do you want me to nominate my article before or after yours? In after, do you want me to wait a certain amount of days? That sort of thing. Nikki31120:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think they probably are, but to be perfectly honest, I'm not sure. The first one says that most of its info comes from WWE publications, so that gives me hope. For WrestleView, I think it may have began as a self-published site, but is now beyond that. IDK. Nikki31121:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, still in the PPV scene. ;) Well, I've been trying to get away from wrestling articles and work on other stuff, I just nominated Brad Pitt's article for GA. I've been trying to work on some villain articles, to see if they can be GA and stuff. So, I hear you want to nominate SS '07 for FA again. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry about it, I know how enthusiastic you are with the work you've done with the articles. Well, I do hope that SS passes, since IMO, should have passed in the first place. Anyways, I'm not "leaving" PW articles, I just want to take a break and edit other stuff that interests me, like the Joker, who happens to be appearing in The Dark Knight. But, after all the articles you nominate pass, you want to work on a PPV? -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)02:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, this is a message to inform you about the creation of an IRC channel for the Wiki World Cup. In this channel, such things disscussed will be; future developments in the cup, disscussion about points awarded, and other general WikiCup related things. You can access this channel via IRC and joining #Wikicup. A more derict link is irc://irc.freenode.net/wikicup .
This user edits my post and called Nici a prick and is making personal attacks. Can you look into it? Here is some evidence:
[1][2][3][4][5]
It's alot, but hey, you are an admin ;)SimonKSK23:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Night of Champions Image
The Night of Champions on the article is not showing up as it should. The image file itself should probably be reloaded so it shows up correctly on Night of Champions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.165.237.169 (talk) 04:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would love to work on Undertaker's article, but a whole lot of stuff is needed, the sourcing and stuff. But, Mr. Kennedy's article should be fine. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)19:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was pretty sure that you would be unable to find a source for Long/Bischoff, but it's okay that you didn't. I would prefer to see these PPV articles have some kind of reception section but most project members disagree (According to some members, any time you put somebody's opinion, it's weasel words). Anyway, the article looks pretty good to me, so I'll promote it. If you have any other GACs you'd like reviewed, feel free to ask (and while we're at it, if you could take a look at Kang and Kodos, it would be appreciated). -- Scorpion042223:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take care of him. Continue acting like an admin, holding him to the same standards as everyone else, being patient beyond reason, etc. Hopefully I'll be able to save the guy from himself before he stains his block log. Cheers, -The Hybrid-04:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-The Hybrid- has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
BROWNIES
KingiMatthew2008 has given you Brownies! Brownies promote WikiLove and hopefully this plate has made your day better, and made you less hungry! Spread the WikiLove to others, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Have a nice, delicious plate of chocolate brownies. I though you deserved a treat. Enjoy! KingiMatthew200821:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
IDK, cause to be honest, you didn't get the pre-GA stuff. But, if the reviewer states that there's some stuff needed and you get them, then yeah you would get credited. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)00:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, cause I remember commenting on the Goldust and Robert Conway match and he somehow removed my name and "added" a comment of his own and I remember you commented something about the lead. -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE)01:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Guys that was all an edit conflict. When I get into an edit conflict, I generally copy my work, go back, and paste it. I didn't realized that the edit conflict was caused by your guy's comments on the talk page. It was all completely my mistake, so if you will, please go back to the page and take credit for what you did. I did/answered those comments in the article as well, but again, the edit conflict, and I didn't realize we both did things. Please take your credit! Sorry! KingiMatthew200801:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I was planning on doing it this weekend, since for me its a four day weekend, but Matt has done most of it. So I can't do anything really anymore, plus I feel that SummerSlam 2000 doesn't have GA-potential at the moment, but I plan on working on it in the summer (my summer break). ;) Just a heads up me and Blue will work on List of WCW World Tag Team Champions to make it an FL, but question, the title was last known as the WCW Tag Team Championship under the WWF, should it be renamed that, or should it be kept the same way?--SRX15:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way Judgment Day's theme song didn't have a source and we all knew that was the song, so why do you keep deleting the One Night Stand theme song? DeadmanUndertaker18:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you always get rid of my information?. I am trying to expand/improve articles and your just getting rid of it. Why do you do that for. I never do that to you, so why do you do that to me. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 12:19, 25 May (UTC)
If I get adopted, can you be the person that will help me with editing and stuff like that, because you seem like a really cool person and a person who knows alot about Wikipedia. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 6:40, 26 May (UTC)
I want you to be my adopter because you know alot about Wikipedia. I sent a message to SRX saying to drop himself as my adopter. So when that is done, I'll send you another message to tell you when you can be my adopter. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 8:20 31 May (UTC)
Can you adopt me? Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 8:25 31 May (UTC)
Ok. Thanks for adpoting me. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 7:32 1 June (UTC)
Hey, you said before that I had to ask questions, so I'm going to do that. How do I put sources and references on a wrestling article? Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 7:36 1 June (UTC)
I don't really understand, but I dont need to know because people can do that for me. So how do I promote a article to Good Article status, becuase on your user page you have promoted alot of articles to Good Article status. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:24 1 June (UTC)
What articles are you currently working on? Whatever ones your working on I'll help you with them. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:37 1 June (UTC)
Can you still expand/improve articles that have been elevated to Good Article status? I am just curious to know. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:24 1 June (UTC)
I would really like to work on Backlash (2007), because it looks like it needs to have a bit more information before it can be elevated to Good Article status. What do you think? Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:47 1 June (UTC)
Relevant
You deleted my comment due to it being irrelevant. It was relevant, I was trying to point out that because Undertaker was 16-0 doesn't mean he will stick around. I was using Ric Flair as an example with 16 World Championships. -GuffasBorgz7-04:41, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good work so far. I've made some comments on it, which are useful in the development of the article. Please see them here. Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's impossible to find the exact superstars that were suspended. However, Sports Illustrated had a list of 14 that were tied to drug ring.
Chris Benoit
Eddie Guerrero
Chavo Guerrero
Shane Helms
Randy Orton
John Hennigan
Ken Anderson
Shoichi Funaki
Brian Adams
Charles Haas
Edward Fatu
Darren Matthews
Adam Copeland
Sylvain Grenier
Out of those, three are deceased, bringing it down to 11; and Grenier wasn't with WWE by the end of August 2007, bringing you the ten. It may be to a certain degree OR, but if you can back it up by saying that angles were played out to remove superstars from TV (for instance; Chavo had to say I Quit against Rey; Triple H literally destroyed Umaga with the slegehammer; Morrison lost the ECW title) it should be OK. D.M.N. (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Benoit, Eddie, and Adams are dead. Helms and Copeland were already out injured. Like D.M.N. said, Umaga was destroyed by Triple H, Chavo lost the I Quit match, and Morrison lost the title. Sylvain was gone already. I believe that Mathews, Haas, Funaki, and Anderson just disappeared. Orton was not suspended, but I believe he lost a month of pay, and didn't appear at house shows. KingiMatthew200818:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. you really deserved it. Can I help you out with anything. Woohoo855 23:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
You sure. Maybe a new signiture or something?Woohoo85523:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
... and when you do, please just relax and not worry about it. Let's not overreact here, please, until we have further information - Alison❤09:22, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey!
Hey, I think Backlash (2007) needs to be expanded/improved. Do you want to help me with the expanding/improving?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:57 1 June (UTC)
Ok. I'll look for a different article. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:57 1 June (UTC)
I can't find one to expand/improve. What do you recommended that I should work on with you?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 10:30 1 June (UTC)
Will you help me with WrestleMania 22?, because it needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 10:44 1 June (UTC)
Of course. Do you want to rewrite it by yourself or with me? It's clearly up to you. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 10:53 1 June (UTC)
On WrestleMania 22 the aftermath needs to be expanded/improved. I'll expand it and you can just put the sources and references were they have to be. but if it aint good enough for you, you can just rewrite the way you want it to be written. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 10:58 1 June (UTC)
Ok. Sounds good to me to. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 11:01 1 June (UTC)
Since your working on the Background and lead for WrestleMania 22, what do you recommend that I should work on for Wrestlemania 22?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 12:45 1 June (UTC)
After we have finished working on WrestleMania 22, do you want to nominate it so it can be elevated to Good Article status? Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 4:45 1 June (UTC)
Have you finished working on the Background and Lead for Wrestlemania 22. I've finished working on the Aftermath and I fixed up the event a little bit. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 7:12 2 June (UTC)
What else do you reckon we have to work on for WrestleMania 22, I fixed up the event and aftermath and you fixed up the lead and background. What else do we have to do? After we have finished working on Wrestlemania 22 do you want to work on another article with me? Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 8:18 2 June (UTC)
Hey, I think that we should nominate WrestleMania 22 for a Good Article, because I think we have finished working on it. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 8:42 7 June (UTC)
On Wrestlemania 22, I didnt write those extra notes, someone else did not me. Just letting you know, I'm not angry at you or nothing its just that I didnt write those notes. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 4:34 7 June (UTC)
You said that you would rewrite the lead. Ok, I'll try to shorten and/or reworded the event and aftermath. And i thought you were taking a wikibreak. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 12:59, 8 June (UTC)
Why, I dont know alot about Wikipedia. Well if you insist then go ahead. Cimmo (talk) 4:11, 8 June (UTC)
And by the way, I am trying to learn about how to write a good article, with people who are helping me, but you have to be the one that is a genius dont you?. Cimmo (talk) 4:16, 8 June (UTC)
How do I write a good wrestling article? Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 7:40, 9 June (UTC)
Pay-per view, by the way whats a biography?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 7:46, 9 June (UTC)
Would you be able to move my discussions into another talk page. Because it looks a bit to long. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 7:57, 9 June (UTC)
Recent edits
In the last few minutes, I have been making additions to the WrestleMania articles. The information is accurate, due to the fact that the majority of information can be found in either the events themselves (easily findable on DVD (and originally VHS), or in magazines and magazine suppliments sch as PWI and it's spin-off magazines or the WWE's own magazine. As such, the information I have supplied is as factual as possible, and when I make any mistakes in an edit, I make a point to make the corrections myself.
Furthermore, the 'fancruft' tag strikes me as redundant. As does 'Original research.' All research is at some point 'original'. As such, if 'original research' is not allowed on Wikipedia, why does Wikipedia exist at all? As new information becomes available, and is almost immediately made available on wikipedia, that informastion is at some point original research no matter where or what the source of the information is. This strikes me as running counter to wikipedia's very purpose. Either Wikipedia IS something that anyone can edit and make changes to so long as the information is accurate regardless of who provides the information, or it is NOT. And from what I've been seeing by the constant undoing of information I have made efforts to include, since the articles seem to vary between whether or not notes are included in the WrestleMania articles or aren't, it seems to be leaning towards the idea that Wikipedia is NOT something anyone can add information to if the information is accurate.
In other words, I would request that the Wikipedia staff please reconsider it's stance on 'original research' because it seems to impede the very idea behind allowing people to add information to an article simply because of who might have done the research to find this information. It is both unfair and pointless. Such an impediment makes Wikipedia seem like it shouldn't even be around if 'original research' is grounds for the removal of an edit.
Hi! and sorry to bother you but I just got done yesterday with doing the report on TNA Lockdown 2008 and I just want to make sure I did it right. So if you have the time could you read the Background, Event, and Aftermath on the page and tell me what I did wrong and how I can fix it. Thank you for your time.--WillC (talk) 23:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 17:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When you write a good article do you have to have sources and references or whatever they are? Yeah, I want my talk page archived. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 8:05 9 June (UTC)
Ok. Do you want to work on an article with me, If I look for one. But If you help me, I'll help you. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 8:14 9 June (UTC)
I didnt really have an article in mind, but If you want to work on Vengeance (2004) thats fine. I wrote some information on that article, but If you want to work on Vengeance, then I will. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 8:31 9 June (UTC)
Do you mind if I not work on Vengeance (2004) with you, because I want to look for another article to work on with you. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 4:20 10 June (UTC)
I can't find one. What do you think I should work on with you. I dont want to work on Vengeance. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:18 11 June (UTC)
I want to work on Vengeance now with you, because I can't find an article to work on. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:55 11 June (UTC)
How do I become an administrator?, because I want to be one. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 6:07 13 June (UTC)
Well was else do you want to move on with?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 10:38 23 June (UTC)
Ok. I dont want to be one right now. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 12:20 June 17 (UTC)
How do I nominate a Good Article?, because I want to nominate one. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 12:27 18 June (UTC)
Do you think that there is anything more that I need to know about writing a Good Article?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 1:47 18 June (UTC)
Well was else do you want to move on with?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 10:42 23 June (UTC)
I still need to learn the basics of Wikipedia. Can you teach me?. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 8:26 24 June (UTC)
Remember how you said that if I want to nominante an article so it can try to get to Good Article status, I went to the page but I don't know where to go to let them notice. Can you show me where I have to go so I can give them a notice. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 9:51 25 June (UTC)
I mean how to write words like bold in a different kind of fashion and stuff like that. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 4:24 25 June (UTC)
Would you mind if you can nominate me to be an administator, because it says that you have to let someone nominante you or you can do it yourself, but I dont know how to. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 4:01 28 June (UTC)
Hey, I am going on vacation tonight and hows was your vacation. Cimmo (talk) 6:55 8 July (UTC)
There are currently 4,266 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 157 unreviewed articles. Out of 215 total nominations, 44 are on hold, 13 are under review, and one is seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film and drama (31), Sports and recreation (31), Transport (24), Music (13), and Art and architecture (11)
The GA Sweeps process is progressing nicely! During the month of May, a total of 82 articles were reviewed. Of that total, 71 were found to continue to meet the GA criteria, and 11 were delisted. There are currently 15 articles that are still on hold in this process, awaiting revisions.
We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details.
GAN Reviewer of the Month
Giggy (talk·contribs) (a.k.a. Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk·contribs)) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for May, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Giggy had a whopping 45 reviews during the month of May! Congratulations to Giggy (talk·contribs) on being May's GAN Reviewer of the Month!
Other outstanding reviewers during the month of May include:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
New GA Review Process - Review Subpages
In case you haven't noticed, we initiated a new process for GA Reviews at the end of last month. The {{GA nominee}} template was modified to direct new reviews initiated on an article to begin on a subpage of article talkspace (e.g. [[Talk:Article/GA#]], where '#' is the current number of GA reviews conducted for the article, incremented automatically, starting with 1). The primary reason for this change is to address some concerns made by several Wikipedians that previous GA reviews are not easily accessible in archives, the way that featured article reviews and peer reviews are, since the review is conducted on the article's talkspace, instead of in a subpage of the featured article space or peer review space. The reason we opted to move GA reviews to article talkspace (instead of GA space) is to better maintain the personal relationship between editor(s) and reviewer(s) by keeping reviews done in an area where editors can easily access it. Nonetheless, we still desired to have better archiving and maintenance of past reviews, so that GA ultimately becomes more accountable.
When an article is nominated, the nominator adds the template using a substitution, by adding {{subst:GAN|subtopic=<name of subtopic for article at GAN>}}, as well as lists the article (as usual) at WP:GAN in the appropriate category.
When a reviewer initiates a review of an article, all that needs to be done is to read the template on the article's {{GA nominee}} template on its talk page, and click on the link to start the review. When the reviewer clicks on that link, they will also see some instructions on how to start a review of a GAN. For new reviewers, there's also a link to the Good Article criteria, as well as to the Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles page and the mentors list. Once an article is reviewed, the GA review page should be transcluded onto the main article talk page, by adding {{Talk:Article/GA#}} to the bottom of the talk page. This is to ensure maintain the transparency of the GA process, as well as to make editors of the article in question aware that the review is taking place. When an article is either passed or failed, there's really nothing different to do in the process, although reviewers are encouraged to utilize the {{ArticleHistory}} template, linking to the GA review subpage with the 'action#link' parameter.
Yeah I have no reason for that poster anymore. The other poster is going to be used on the page. So mine has no meaning now. I don't know how to delete it. I was just going to leave it on my page so it didn't get orphaned and wait to find a newer version but I have no reason now.--WillC21:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WWEs1Fan
I'm trying to revert an edit war for Night of Champions while keeping the information factual. As an admin (I believe you are one, correct?) are you able to put any more weight behind some warnings? Hazardous Matt16:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
I know we kinda had a Rated RKO vs D-X thing between us in recent history... But I would like to ask you this: How are you doing? I am good and would like to say, you are a good admin and contribute very well to Wikipedia. I am sorry for the trouble my ignorance may have caused you in may. Altenhofen (talk) 22:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
wallpapers
LAX you are a good admin but i want some walllpapers from wwe in this resolution 1280x1024...please send this
Unforgiven 2001-2006
Vengeance 2001-2006
Summerslam 1988-2007
Royal Rumble 1988-2006
Survivor Series 1988-2005
No Mercy 2001-2005
No way Out-2001-2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.102.25.46 (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No Surrender image
Yeah that image, I was uploading a newer version because I was told it was better quality which I didn't see but the editor knew more than me so I didn't question him. I meant for it to be a newer version upload but I accidentally made a new one instead. Sorry about that.--WillC10:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is actually what I did. I hit upload a new version of this image. But when I was uploading it I accidentally changed the destination file name and it made a new file. It was purely a accident. I didn't know how to delete it so I just thought to place it in the article and be done with it. I know how to upload a new version.--WillC19:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have a favor to ask. I've been trying to get Lockdown (2008) to look and sound right. I was perfecting it in my sandbox and I was wondering if you will take a look at what I've done so far and tell me how it sounds so far. It is seen here.--WillC01:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For our 2007 project, Backlash has passed, what do you think about next adding Cyber Sunday and No Mercy to the waiting lists? -- iMatthewT.C.11:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Diva Championship
You currently have the WWE Diva Championship linking to the WWE Womens Championship page, They are two different titles, There is a WWE Diva Championship title page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diva_Championship
I was wondering and now that I've done it I'm not sure if I was allowed to or not. Look at my past 42 or so Contributions and tell me if I was allowed to those edits, please.--WillC23:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hope you don't mind
I nominated SummerSlam (2004) for GAC, but I listed you and Blue as the main contributors. However, I will not take credit for it if it passes. I nominated it because there is a backlog on our waiting list (which I find redundant that we even have one). Is it ok?--SRX--LatinoHeat19:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
