|
User talk:Kww/12072013Good article reassessmentI mentioned your name here as a possible closer and no one objected so am hoping you would consider it. I imagine you are familiar with the article and have been following the debate. AIRcorn (talk) 04:53, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Some questions to the singlechart templateI just wanted to try to understand the kind of technical things you are using in Template:Singlechart for maybe being able to edit it later by disassembling all parts of the template, but I finally failed. Template:Singlechart/chartnote for example is a macro that made me get really confused as I totally understand nothing what a macro contains. I also got confused trying to edit the sandbox as my changes were not saved and it instead showed an error which I could not understand. So, I tried to copy the template into my userspace (User:Ali1610/Template:Singlechart to edit it but it just displays nothing, what depends on some missing other linked templates, I suppose? So how to get into this template or at least how to understand it? :S --Ali1610 (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Block restrictionsHi kww, just wondering if it is time for my restrictions to be lifted yet? I think I have made significant progress and matured/learned over roughly six months. Thanks. Iluvrihanna24 (talk) 10:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC) Hey, I want to add AIR Charts to {{Singlechart}}, can you add it? I don't know but I think it's not a bad chart right?Ggdlmnt (talk) 13:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC) Broken BillboardDanceElectronic album templateI have found a broken template, but I do not know how to fix this myself, I suggest that this is just one or two letters :D Example:
Please fix that or show me how to do. --Ali1610 (talk) 17:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
The table is broken again although I did nothing in this part of the template? I am confused... Please fix if you can. Additionally, is there a possibility to send you my proposals for new charts getting added to the template with example links and the parameters that would be needed? I am not able to add them myself as for example I cannot add any notes. And I do not want to send you this on your talkpage... --Ali1610 (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
QueryHi. I just came across User:HeidiHalliwell and their contributions, particularly the way they create and move their userspace drafts and the edits to music related articles, reminded me of User:Lizzy Green, who you blocked in January for vandalism. I was just wondering if the two accounts looked similar to you or am I barking up the wrong tree? - JuneGloom Talk 20:50, 4 May 2013 (UTC) Back to BasicsAh, our old friend Mathiassandell. Thanks for dealing with that, Kww; I had seen you make a few blocks of Mathiassandell's other socks but was I hesitant to give out any blocks myself due to my involvement. Thank you. Acalamari 17:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC) Mariah is backPer My Bra, s/he has returned as 86.165.48.75 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
OpinionCould you opine on this matter? Regards — Robin (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC) Whats the problem(ray of light)?Hi, thanks for unbloked me!!! Ray of Light sold most than 20 milions http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/150058.stm%7Ctítulo=Madonna http://www.vh1.com/music/tuner/2012-03-30/madonnas-top-11-controversies-and-how-they-helped-her-succeed-commercially/%7Ctítulo=Madonna’s I cant undestand because RL sold 20M,but some people insist on 16M My dream is one day all people agree that Ray of Light sold 20 MILLION Reporting User:LoginnigolHi Kww. The user linked has been removing a picture of Christina Aguilera unnecessarily on "Birthday Cake (song)". (The difference is: before and after). I have reverted him twice: the first time my edit summary/reason was that it was unexplained, the second time I reverted and posted on his talk page here with a warning explaining why it should not be removed. He has reverted me three times, and says that the picture is spamming the article, and thus is on the 3RR borderline. He doesn't understand that the mention of a singer, or anyone/anything, means that it is allowed to be included and is allowed to stay. It was heavily reported that Aguilera was on the remix, fuelled by Rihanna's actions. Instead of me reverting him for a third time, I am asking you to put the picture back in the article and take whatever action you feel necessary on User:Loginnigol. — AARON • TALK 18:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC) Reporting User:Calvin999This person is trying to insert picture of a person in Birthday Cake (song) page even though the picture has no factual relevance to the subject. --Loginnigol (talk) 23:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
US charts and certificationsHey Kevin. Since you are obviously pretty invested in the charting of songs, I was wondering how you feel about what the US has been doing... Recap: The Hot 100 now includes streaming, as well as the RIAA. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 22:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
The Bodyguardthe bodyguard wasnot certificed by ABPD with 750,but with 100M.Check the history of certificed in ABPD.Im from brazil i know the history //www.abpd.org.br/certificados.asp — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoreMoneyGomes (talk • contribs) 23:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC) LOOK http://www.abpd.org.br/certificados_interna.asp and http://www.abpd.org.br/niveis_de_certificacao.asp — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoreMoneyGomes (talk • contribs) 23:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC) BelindaTop 40 and news articles!!!!!!! xoxoxo177.97.141.254 (talk) 21:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC) discographysorry but in Anggun discography, the Malaysian and Indonesian chart is already there before i edit itGgdlmnt (talk) 01:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC) VilifyIn the article for Vilify (song), chartbot made this edit, but it provided a link to an incorrect page. The issue could be that there are two bands named Device listed in Billboard, one with artist id 300837 and one with 1556810. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The Return of TheREALCableGuyJust reopened the user's sockpuppet case, as Macbookpro1990 (talk · contribs) seems to have a few hallmarks that match up perfectly to TRCG's editing MO, if you would like to comment. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 03:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Nelly is Portuguesehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/music/nelly-furtado http://www.spiritartists.com/nelly-furtado.html http://www.mtv.co.uk/artists/nelly-furtado Do you need any more references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phuytt (talk • contribs) 09:52, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Can you revert your changes?
MathiasHe has been changing multiple genres the last few days. Comparing the geolocation of Aguilera's socks and this IP: 91.154.103.158 (talk · contribs), which is the lattest, I have no doubt he is he. Also, can you protect/watchlist Insomnia (Faithless song)? An editor from Argentina has been disrupting various pages. Although he is right and Tiësto remixed the song, it is not a single and as such it is not his song or he is featured (and the article includes no information). I left a RPP report BTW. This nonsense started with True Love (Pink song) and moved to Blue (Da Ba Dee), Boot, Leggings, and others. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Regarding MuhammadThanks for referring me there. I'll move the new section there.Truth-seeker2004 (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC) billboardi got a source from a forum. sorry you'll never accept that as a source but it will be published by billboard 173.218.4.77The IP makes the same edits as Billim1 did, mainly involving Arkansas and western Missisippi and Tennessee television stations by changing branding and weblinks that do not meet sourcing or MOS standards, uploading images without sourcing (something unable to be done with an IP, obviously) and also to subjects involving Cabot Public Schools, where is how I can tell if it is a Billim1 sock or not. Billim1 has been giving many opportunities in the past to explain their editing behavior and work with us, but has consistently refused to do so, and thus works now on IPs to avoid scrutiny. Nate • (chatter) 05:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Please block User talk:ZietebáHi, can you please block User talk:Zietebá with no expiry set (indefinite), because if Zietebá may changing genres again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.179.79 (talk) 06:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Thanks for blocking 96.4.156.41Thanks for blocking this user.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glenzo999 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC) MariaJayPer 86.165.48.93 (talk · contribs), s/he is disrupting Why? (Mis-Teeq song) and Roll On (Mis-Teeq song). Can you protect them? Thanks. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Your AfD closure - OVPsimYou just closed this discussion whilst I was typing out an additional comment I wished to make, which ended up edit conflicting and now I can't add it as as the AfD has been closed. I don't think there was any consensus ( WP:NOCONSENSUS ) to delete the article, indeed I posted the only delete vote and that was "weak delete", and I have since agreed (as stated in the AfD) with Widefox's proposal to userify the article rather than simply deleting it. So could we do that please if are going to close it? --wintonian talk 02:47, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
If someone actually requests userfication, I'd probably be cooperative. Right now, people are only suggesting that it be userfied in someone else's userspace.—Kww(talk) 17:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, been away from wikipedia for a few weeks and come back to see the OVPsim page has gone. Can I get that page back, I think you suggest into my user area, so that I can try and improve on its content to something acceptable to all?Duncgrah (talk) 13:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
About last messageOkay I get it. I just don't like it when users on this site defy me or pressure me with irritating relentless comments on stuff that is wrong and not supposed to be.MandarinVengeance (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC) TRCG again...This time with 12.152.0.173 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), added to the sock investigation. This time I would like a CheckUser to go forward. Nate • (chatter) 03:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Talkback Message added 17:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. I assume it may be someone caught in an autoblock but I'd appreciate some input from you as I am leaving and cannot fully investigate. Thanks! :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 16:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Charlie (2)He has returned as 86.145.68.27 (talk · contribs) per this. He's disrupting anyway. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Let There Be Love (Christina Aguilera song) [To save edit warring...]How is it "completely" detailed?? It's one short sentence saying when it broke into the top 10, and one sentence about how when it charted at number 5, it spent each of the next four weeks rising by one position. Hardly a trajectory. I haven't written "The following week, it rose by one position to X" four times over. It's not like I have given a trajectory of the entire 3 months that it has been charting, I could understand I had (Not that I would do that anyway...) Look at the section, it's tiny. All I talk about is the debut, the top 10, the top 5 and the number one position. Nowhere does it say on WP:CHARTTRAJ that you can't mention these things. I'm surprised you're making an issue out of something as small as this... If anything, you've made it worse, because now all there is is the debut in mid Feb, and the peak at the end of May. There is nothing in between, it gives no insight to what happened in the time between mid Feb and end of May. — AARON • TALK 23:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Why do we need someone to write it when I provided the week by week archive?? And no. — AARON • TALK 00:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC) Brexx, perhaps? — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC) MandarinVengeanceAs per this request, see here, here, and here. --GSK ● ✉ ✓ 01:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC) Hello, Kevin. I see it took you long enough to figure out who I was. So the trick is to edit while you are asleep. I'll see you in July. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.27.18.100 (talk • contribs)
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
Changing the Pending Changes on Emmelie de Forest without consulting me, besides being pretty damn rude, has left the article open to some rather serious BLP violations. See article talk, the recent history of my talkpage, and this guy, just coming off his week-long block tomorrow if you wish to inform yourself further. I used PC2 per talkbackYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Bishonen | talk 21:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC). UTRS request on holdHey Kww - Could you take a look at UTRS request #7609 when you have a chance? You sent it to the OPP queue, but I don't see that you ever listed it at WP:OPP to be checked. Thanks, --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Kevin, just to let you know that I disagree with your semi-protection of the article, particularly your comment in the protection log. If the IP (currently blocked along with the registered editor) had come back and reinstated their version, then I would have reverted it as a resumption of the edit war and semi'ed the article, but I would not have done it preemptively, accusing the IP of something that doesn't seem to be true on the face of it.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:58, 26 May 2013 (UTC) ChartbotIs there any way to prevent Chartbot from replacing archived Billboard links? SnapSnap 23:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Edit war with User:SuperVirtualHi, I am in the middle of an edit war with another editor and I need an admin to intervene. Firstly with the article Walk (Foo Fighters song). User:SuperVirtual keeps on adding information that is not directly supported by the source he is using. He is stating that the song was only released in Germany and quoting a linked source to the German iTunes page for the song. Apart from the fact that the song is available to down load pretty much in any country in the world, the source he is quoting does not specifically say that the song was released exclusively in Germany - and is therefore in breach of Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position. I only speak a little German myself but can tell that the source does not give this information. Just to make sure I have requested, as per Wikipedia:Verifiability#Citing non-English sources, that the said user give a quotation of relevant portions of the original source be provided, either in text, in a footnote, or on the article talk page. OK, the next article, also a song by the same rock band is Arlandria (song), in which the same user is stating that the song was the second single from the affiliated album, in the United Kingdom. Again he quotes the UK iTunes page as a source, but again there is nothing in the source that says that the song was released as the second single in the UK, and is therefore again in breach of Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position. Further more I have given reliable news sources that say that the song is infact the third single: [1] and [2]. I have tried discussing this with the said user on both of the articles talk pages, yet he wants to turn it into an edit war. The user also appears to be Italian and has a poor grasp of the English language when attempting to discuss the issue. Please can you intervene. Many thanks.QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Screaming Brexx to me... — Statυs (talk, contribs) 22:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Hilary DuffHi, the addition of an extra credit is not really a contentious addition. The rest of her filmography isn't sourced either and likely just based on IMDB. For instance I don't see any reference for her work in True Woman but I don't think it should be removed from the article (although a {{fact}} tag might be helpful. Garion96 (talk) 20:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Vevo AwardsThese are actual awards. See this billboard article. For further proof see: video of given awards being received (only one week ago). With this in mind, surely these can be included in a page titled: List of awards and nominations received by...? 333cale (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Wow, I had no idea Chace Watson and that IP (I'm assuming that is topsecret over at Commons?) were one and the same person (Oz steps also?). Anyway, I had intended on putting the 2013 image in the article except I had a busy weekend and MyCanon beat me to it. Just letting you know, I ain't MyCanon :P Cheers! – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 19:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC) REHi. I write that "Edge of the Earth" is a promotional single (reported also by Discogs, the biggest database of music) and Earthh undid my edits because according to him there is also a digital single, but that version was never released. --SuperVirtual (talk) 19:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Re: SuperVirtualI meant to just undo the edit, but I accidentally clicked the silly thank button. The1337gamer (talk) 21:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Problems with upload of File:Badthanks.PNGThanks for uploading File:Badthanks.PNG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Can you please check up on it? It constantly adds Scott Storch as a producer on "Cry Me a River" and per the official booklet of Justified, Storch is only credited as the songwriter and not producer. Tried to explain somethings to him but... — Tomíca(T2ME) 08:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Promotional/buzz singlesAlthough promotional/buzz singles are usually not included in the singles chronology template of album articles (Born This Way, Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded and Red (Taylor Swift album) come to mind), certain editors believe it's okay to include them. Is there any particular guideline addressing the inclusion (or non-inclusion) of such singles? Template:Infobox album#Template:Singles isn't very enlightening either. SnapSnap 00:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 20:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Image edit conflictsI had no idea that was even possible: File:We Can't Stop.jpg. Learn something new every day! Theopolisme (talk) 18:35, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Ok :)Thanks for that advice! sorry! --Raúl Romero (talk) 20:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Nicki Minaj discographySome of the info you updated on the page are incorrect. Your additional info was added manually in an edit of the last recent edit. Note: Tonight I'm getting over you remix was not released as a single. It is also best to state the releases in one paragraph in the beginning of the intro. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JACUBANHELADO (talk • contribs) 22:56, 6 June 2013 (UTC) File:Badthanks.PNG missing description detailsDear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers. If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Having unfairly maligned you, now I'll ask for helpCould I get you to look at the edit requests (and especially, ahem, mine) at Talk:India Against Corruption? Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC) StoosheMariah returned as 86.165.48.180 (talk · contribs) per this compared with this. I don't know when Amazon.com became reliable for genres. Can you block the IP. Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
TRCGOn WMLW-TV and WFTS-TV, it looks like they're playing with their Sprint 3G connection tonight; a rangeblock looks impossible as it bounces higher with each reset. Put in a RFP for WMLW. Nate • (chatter) 05:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC) Nelly FurtadoHi. Thanks for your correction about Nelly Furtado. I am kind of a newbie here, and I am trying to understand how things work. You were right about last.fm. But you completely neglected the second reference placed (there two), which was from a newspaper, and signed by a journalist (in Portuguese), specifically stating she had Portuguese nationality (not just that she was Luso-Canadian). An official news in a 143 years old newspaper is not reliable and acceptable under wikipedia rules? I would like to add that actually she is coming to Portugal right now to participate in the country´s Nationality and Expatriate Communities Day celebrations, this 10th of June. It´s all over the news. If you want, I can send you the newspaper references to that as well. Thanks once again. Zee5050
NathanHi, I'm sending this to Bwilkins, Kww, and Spinningspark. I've just seen Nathan's explanation of why he reacted as he did. I was shocked when I saw his response to Spinningspark, but given his circumstances it's completely understandable that he'd be operating on a short fuse. Would one of you reconsider his unblock request? If editing in a coffee shop is the only time things feel normal, a week is a long time to lose that. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2013 (UTC) Marc MysterioI'm his photographer. I heard the quotes last night on the wrestling. I already know its going to be reported in the morning. Whereas he has a huge charity collaboration being released tomorrow, I'd respectfully ask you to refrain from edits until Tuesday on that page. I see your a good editor, and mean well. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knicksnyc (talk • contribs) 02:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC) You have been reported. Please Cease & Desist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Darkness_Shines_reported_by_User:Mrt3366_.28Result:_No_action.29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knicksnyc (talk • contribs) 03:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
French singles chart archivesHey. Out of interest, do you happen to know if there's a French singles chart archive for positions prior to 1994? Although lescharts.com is very accurate and of proven reliabilty, it only goes back to this 1994, and the archive on the SNEP website only goes back to July 2001: I've been trying to search for Pink Floyd single positions to add here, and most of them occurred before '94. I spotted this at InfoDisc, which isn't listed here, claiming to list the single positions from August 1955 to December 2009, in a similar layout to their albums archive. However, whilst the accuracy of InfoDisc's albums archive seems to be perfect when the positions it lists for certain albums are identical at both InfoDisc and lescharts.com (see Nelly for an example) the singles positions do not match at all in many cases in both archives (in Pink Floyd's case, compare "Take It Back" and "High Hopes"), and even seem to list positions for songs not released as singles at all, in the days before digital downloads made this possible (see "Shine on You Crazy Diamond" and "Pigs on the Wing", as well as their chart dates). As a result, I seriously doubt its reliability. If you know if InfoDisc's singles information is reliable or not, or if there is a better archive for positions before 1994 that I have missed, I'd greatly appreciate your help. If not, I'm sorry to have bothered you. Keep up the fine work! I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 16:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
American Dad!Thank you for getting involved in the edit dispute there. I'd welcome your input at the ensuing Talk page discussion, especially given that AD86 has been engaging in personal attacks since they opened the topic (and apparently are singling me out), but understand if you don't wish to get involved. Thanks again. Doniago (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Explaining rules to adminKww, evidently, you're unclear on Wikipedia policy despite being an administrator. But when another editor has some suspicion that a revert will lead to edit warring (as was clear here [4] where I reverted the information as factual with a source because it was removed as untrue), it is up to that individual who knows full well his actions are contentious to initiate the discussion on the talk page and refrain from reverting otherwise it is belligerent and acting in opposition to policy. Doniago has engaged in similar behaviors of this nature in the past on American Dad related articles, one of which he even had to revert himself on his own edit because it was unconstructive (as shown here [5] and here [6] ). Since you seem to be unclear on Wikipedia, despite being an administrator, I've copy and pasted the following and bolded it for you, located here:
User:Nathan JohnsonIn light of the continued discussion on Nathan Johnson's talkpage, I have posted to ANI requesting review on the unblock request. Please feel free to comment on the thread, here. Thank you. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC) A beer for you!
77.31.71.153Hello kww, you reverted several editions by the ip user, but i don't think the image themselves added by him are copyvio. --Puramyun31 (talk) 05:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC) So what can I do to add the celebrity images? actually their original versions are legitimately taken and uploaded by this commons user, also some of the celebrity articles what you reverted such as this currently have no alternative images of them. --Puramyun31 (talk) 07:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC) OK, Thanks for your answer. Goodbye. --Puramyun31 (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Chace is probably back as Special:Contributions/Vevofan. Nymf talk to me 15:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Singular / PluralUmmm, general usage is "they reside" and, in the same way, "the couple reside". In this case "the couple resides" seems clumsy, English rules are complex and subject to so many exceptions. DesmondW (talk) 15:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Your revertThere was no "removal" and an explantion was given. Please be careful about your wording in edit summaries. YRC's post was posted twice to the thread. Since he asked for it to be in a separate section on his talk page, all I did was move the answers to the duplicate to the appropriate section. I would like to move them again. OK? Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 19:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
The image qualifies for fair use as it meets all fair use criteria. Addressing each one individually:
I hope this is enough to get the image back into the article. Thanks for taking the time to read this! PantherLeapord (talk) 06:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Jesse R. WaughHi Kww, I suspect that all of the IPs participating in Jesse R. Waugh are socks. Should I formally report them? None have ever participated in an AfDs before all simply claim obvious notably and surprise or outrage at the nomination. Cheers--I am One of Many (talk) 16:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
AssistanceAre you able to fix a little mess I've made? I've nominated ...And Justice for All (album) for GA article, but accidentally I've put myself as a reviewer. Thanks.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Jesse R. Waugh AfDI suspect that those IPs who are not SPAs are the same person using proxy servers. Is there any way to check for that? The style of their comments is pretty blatantly similar. Voceditenore (talk) 19:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Care to show your math?[9]. I'm sorry but counting up the votes I get 18 "unblock" and 19 "opposes". I might be off a vote or two, but that's no where near 2:1 and could have very well turned around. Am I missing something? Volunteer Marek 22:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Lift ban:
...and what happened to:
? Did they just not show up on your version of Wikipedia? Perhaps in the future you should refrain from closing those discussions which involve complex math, like being able to count to more than 10. Volunteer Marek 00:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Kevin, we have this article Italo disco which I strongly believe should be about a term rather than a genre. The main editor of the article insists on believing that it's a genre, not a term. This term was invented to refer to Italian based (mostly English sung) synthpop/new wave dance projects of the '80s. I was wondering if you'd have any knowledge about the topic and would like to comment in this thread that I opened up. By the way, most of the article is unsourced, and has been tagged as unreferenced since 2011.--Harout72 (talk) 06:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC) SinglechartCan you take a look at the singlechart usage on Sweater Weather and tell me what's wrong? It's saying that the band's name is illegal. NYSMy talk page 22:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
questionA SaudiNet IP has returned. I remember this one, 77.31.127.82 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and wasn't sure how you guys knew who it is. I don't want to accuse anyone of anything though, but *coughseemytalkpagecough* the poor english just seems really familiar. Should I not worry about it? If someone's too lazy to log in, is that still sock puppetry? – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 03:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Temp unblockPlease note that I've unblocked ImtheNeonLight (talk · contribs) to allow him to rename. Intent is to re-block to your same settings 1) when the rename request is submitted 2) 24 hours passes with no action, or 3) he does anything other than request an unblock. Will monitor. Kuru (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:American Dad!". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 13:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Rusted Auto PartsI do admit that he has a weakness against the third-revert rule and sometimes being civil. I told him off that personally. But I do feel like pointing out that he is not always a bad contributor though. He's a good updater on articles related to notable death etc. It's sad to see him go because he really does love to contribute. I feel that a weekly block or something to just let him cool off might be better. Also I am hoping that he would promise something that he hopefully will keep (that I recommended to him). I might just need to be there to probably warn him that he goes too far. He might just listen to me and I am willing to do that. Jhenderson 777 14:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC) TalkbackYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. I am proposing a change. Please read the description of the RFC, I changed it to show the change clearly. I was proposing to change "or could be created" to "or could be created reasonably". Surfer43 (talk) 00:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Not sure of who this is... but it's a sock of someone who was previously blocked. I know there was one user who kept coming back with a username that contained a song lyric. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
RFC HelpI am trying to set up a request for comment on the notability of schools. I use the GNG for WP:ORG which states "No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is" we also require WP:RS to verify this. Unfortunately often at AFD ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Moresby International High School ) is a good example of the types of arguments made. I personally think this is crap and I want to get more discussion on it. the RFC page is a little confusing so I was wondering if you could help me or point me to someone who can help me set it up? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I appreciate your thoughts and it may well just be a moral victory but if we can use that discussion to at least prod an admin to think about the substance of the article rather then the number of keeps or deletes we will have at least gained a little. I couldn't see the sarcasm btw which means it was cleverly disguised or I was just too dense lol. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
First, work on the text for me.
Once you get those done, we can fold it into RFC format.—Kww(talk) 16:45, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
List of songs recorded by Drake BellHi there. I noticed that you recently made a major edit on List of songs recorded by Drake Bell. I think what you did was great (removing all unsourced material), but I personally think that was just a little too big, because most of the unsourced songs that are not on any album actually do exist. Would you like to maybe reconsider reverting your edit and help out adding references to those songs that you removed? Thanks! JaciFan 00:44, 20 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaciFan (talk • contribs) Blocking Is IneffectiveI was going to post this at AN/I, but I have been trying to avoid drama as much as I can. Perhaps you forget how blocking him goes...
As Yogi Berra said: "It's like déjà vú all over again." So please don't block. Because it is futile. Doc talk 08:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
You, Kww, are likely a monster that has been safely caged. You are not a vested contributor with a one-way pass. So why not just piss off, and never consider any of this? You have been strongly warned. Doc talk 07:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Excuse me! Spitfire (LeAnn Rimes album)I have been working MY A** off on that page not Walter Görlitz and you're going to block ME from editing it? I don't think so! He needs to be blocked from coming onto the page and starting the crap not an IP address that has done pretty much all the work on the page. THAT IS UNFAIR AND WHY CAUSE I WAS DOING THE RIGHT THING AND MAKING THE PAGE LOOK GOOD AND HE WANTED TO TAKE OVER OH HELL NO! THE WORLD DON'T WORK LIKE THAT SO GET WALTER Görlitz AND BLOCK HIM FROM EDITING NOT THE ONE WHO DOES ALL THE WORK ON THE PAGE! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Re Self Control other versionsFine - when time permits I will restore the list with the versions for which sources are available. It's not a question of my "wanting it back": comprehensive information on various versions should as much as reasonably possible be featured in any article on a song, and is more likely to interest interested parties than the minutia of the formats of release for the versions discussed in the body of this article. And I honestly fail to see why the lack of sources justifies deletion rather than tagging with the "unreferenced secton" template - if that template shouldn't be used in this instance then what is it for? The "Dealing with unsourced material" section of WP:CITE states: "If an article is unreferenced, you can tag it with the unreferenced template, so long as it is not nonsensical or a biography of a living person, in which case request admin assistance. If a claim is doubtful but not harmful, use the citation needed template, which will add an inline tag, but remember to go back and remove the claim if no source is produced within a reasonable time. If a claim is doubtful and harmful, remove it from the article. You may want to move it to the talk page and ask for a source, unless it is very harmful or absurd, in which case it should not be posted to the talk page either. Use your common sense. All unsourced and poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed from articles and talk pages immediately." That's Wikipedia's stated policy on "Dealing with unsourced material". And there's nothing to support instant deletion of material such as the Other versions section of the Self Control article.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 03:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC) I don't dispute that "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed": however as WP:CITE explains in a case such as the Other versions section of the Self Control article - which is not the biography of a living person - not being sourced, resolving the issue via tagging as unreferenced section should have been attempted prior to removal. Again - if that template shouldn't be used in this instance then what is it for?--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 03:40, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Ghost ProtocolAgain. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 17:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC) Images questionHi Kww, why can't we readd the pictures that were added before by a 'block evading editor'? I mean if the images are of good quality and under a good license, what's the problem? ;) Cheers, Sofffie7 (talk) 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
List of songs recorded by Drake BellHello Why You corrupting? Most of the songs of Drake Bell is not recorded (yet) But that does not mean we have to erase everything. If you switch the recent edits, you will see that my version (13:12, 24 June 2013) is a precise and clean from unnecessary additions. I would like you to return it. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.120.189.242 (talk)
my edit warring?! You really looked at recent edits? I'm the one who deleted the unnecessary additions (and sometimes erroneous) of JaciFan Feel free to look at my User talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.120.189.242 (talk) 16:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
whatever dude.. I'm not going to argue with a 50 years old how edited playlists of forgotten child stars I just tried to improve the list because i was fan of this singer as a kid (what you cant say..) But if you dont want to I really dont care... I have better things to do46.120.189.242 (talk) 17:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC) ARUBA Page: like I said, van der Sloot was a DUTCH LOCAL........why delete? Dennyboy34 (talk) 19:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Apparent mistake>>Don't know what you were trying to do, but I'm pretty sure this wasn't it.—Kww(talk) 22:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)<< Of course - do forgive me: as far as I was aware I was just updating the Other Versions section & couldn't figure out why every time I previewed I got an error over there being no Reflist. I honestly have no idea how virtually the entire page got blanked: as far as I'm aware I only accessed that one section for editing & never even looked at the balance of the article. But I don't mean to abdicate responsibility. Is my face red!--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 22:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Some assistance pleaseHi there. I noticed you blocked User:Bordoxx as a sock of User:Boljom, both edit warriors at Unification Church and related articles. Please also do something about User:Borovv. The similar editing style and user name gives me the impression this is the same editor. If that is not enough, see this topic ban that the user is constantly violating.--Atlan (talk) 21:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC) Re: Socks at AIVHi Kww. I don't remember which report this was and I went through my recent contributions and I don't think I commented anything related to "Refer to SPI" at AIV recently. Can you give me the user/IP name of the person reported so I can look over what I did again? Thanks, SpencerT♦C 02:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Protection of Vertigo (Olivia Lewis song)Hi Kww, You protected Vertigo (Olivia Lewis song) in 2010 due to an SPI on Xtinadbest. The archive shows that the last SPI report was April of 2012, I was wondering if you would consider lifting the protection as the need appears to be stale. Regards, Crazynas t 18:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Carey 14th albumHi Kww, Why do you refuse to let people change the title of Mariah's new album back to Fourteenth Studio Album? She herself confirmed that "The Art of Letting Go" is only a song title and not the album name, as did Roger Friedman with her label Island Def Jam. [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.13.5.144 (talk) 00:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Article at AfCI saw on Matt723star's talk page about the issue with the article that he keeps recreating which you were involved in. He created Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/The Most Popular Girls in School if it still an issue. SL93 (talk) 11:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC) /* Elizabeth Grant correct D.O.B */Correction made to D.O.B Elizabeth Grant was born June 21, 1985. She logged three copyrights with the United States copyright office. Two made in 2005 and one made in 2012. You have to submit your D.O.B as a copyright claim is a legal government document and Elizabeth Grant submitted her date of birth: go to http://cocatalog.loc.gov and search for; grant elizabeth woolridge select 'search by' option of name. Wikipedia is source for accurate and factual information and the source is a copyright government agreement. Deneuve15 (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC) I stated that 20 years old sounds a bit old for Lana to have in fact started her career since 2005 was her beginning of her active career, although I'm well aware of the fact that she started writing at 18 years of age, there is no set year for this so it's possible it could have been 2004 but it seems no one knows for sure, however there is now an updated info saying "she signed her first recording contract when she was 22 years old with 5 Points Records in 2007", these references here were made in 2012, although the age from 2007 is not mentioned there but in one of the articles her age at the time still states as 25, do you know whether the birth date is 1985 as Deneuve15 keeps insisting or as recently mentioned in most articles these days 1986? I see the reason you blocked him is because he did not get consensus with the birth date, and really birth dates shouldn't be messed with, I wonder who started this rumour, personally I wouldn't be in here if it wasn't for the sudden changes a week after her birthday. Zak Hammat (talk) 1:45, 27 July 2013 (ASST)
Your comments at WP:ANWell said. — Scott • talk 17:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
KieferIs that a good block, if that IRC log is accurate? Black Kite (talk) 23:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
I have unblocked Kiefer Wolfowitz. Explanation is here. Fram (talk) 13:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
removal of lucy liu's racist commentsyou removed an edit with a very reliable source; a youtube video of her saying the comments. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lucy_Liu&diff=prev&oldid=517877459 ... You're not sorryI wish you wouldn't say you're sorry when you're not. Don't be sorry for what I did, be sorry—if you're sorry at all, which you're clearly not in this instance—for what you did. Saying you're sorry for how somebody else feels is an annoying mannerism that you would do better to shed. If you do it for politeness, it's really not working. You might perhaps read the very short essay I'm sorry you screwed up. Bishonen | talk 20:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC).
Arbcom filing notificationYou are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Offsite comments and personal attacks and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 23:27, 5 July 2013 (UTC) #Beautiful (Mariah Carey Song)The song charted on the Brazil billboard hot 100 airplay I just need you to give me the official website release. Thank youFidel 23:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC) Notice
#Beautiful (Mariah Carey Song)Hi, the Lebanese Mix FM is the Lebanese Official airplay top 20, you can check its official article on Wikipedia concerning the #1 hits since 1996 - 1998... Just wanted to check if I can add the chart position of #Beautiful to the chart list. [here the chart position] Fidel 12:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC) Brexx again? — Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for correcting my bad edit on the article. It happened because I'm struggling with the new visual editor and would really like to turn it off. Do you know how by any chance? Shalom11111 (talk) 06:05, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Billboard BrazilHi. the information I've been were copied and saved from the site Billboard.biz or prints of physical magazine. Diamonds was # 12 on editing a note on February and March (issue # 38) which featured three months of HOT100 because sometimes the Billboard Brazil used not to publish in January, perhaps for vacation and bring 2 or 3 months of Hot100 Airplay in the next edition. The position was # 15 in the April issue (number 39), which was related to HOT100 March. I would not edit the page Diamonds because someone had already placed at # 12, actually I opened to copy the similiar code to edit pages of other songs and clicked save wrongly. Finally, the problem is that sometimes the peak of the songs are not updated on the website of the American Billboard as the one you showed me or are updated with delays. The billboard Brazil is still young (4 years) and still thinks more on selling physical issue, ignoring a bit to put data HOT100 Brazil Airplay on the internet, unfortunately. But I only include actual data. Regards. Thissz (talk) 07:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC) ARTPOP has a release date!Hi! ARTPOP finally has a release date, so can you please move the article Wikipedia:Article Incubator:Artpop out of the incubator into the mainspace please? Thanks! ARTPOPist (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Glen Campbell videosHi, an editor called Hyacinth added a BLP notice to a (merged) videography article called Glen Campbell videos, apparantly because you told her in this discussion (User_talk:Hyacinth#Infobox_single): "Do not add information about living persons to any article unless you can provide a source" (which is true, but doesn't mean one has to start adding a BLP notice to every album, single or discography page for living artists on wikipedia). Any idea what is going on? Thanks. Lumdeloo (talk) 13:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 26, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC) User page blockedmy user page is still showing as blocked any chance you can undo this?Deneuve15 (talk) 16:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC) Page blocked. Not able to edit / CD-single coversHello, Kww I'm trying to keep the Ana Johnsson Wikipedia page updated, but I noticed that you blocked some pages (for exemple: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Catch_Me_If_You_Can_(song)&action=history , https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Way_I_Am_(Ana_Johnsson_song)&action=history , https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Break_Through_Time&action=history ) and I wanted to ask you why, what was wrong with those pages and why am I not able to edit them anymore. I'm asking you this because I don't understand the reason why they are blocked and I'm hoping that you can clear me this up. Also, I have another question and maybe you can answer me. Is there a copyright if I try to upload a CD-single cover? Because sometimes I upload CD-single covers and they are OK, and other times I upload them and I get copyright warnings and I fill up all the credits sections. Hopefully you'll have time to answer to this. Thank you for your time. Have a nice day. Cozican5 (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2013 (UTC) Infobox personPlease revert your recent change at {{Infobox person}}, for which no consensus has been demonstrated. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC) DFTT
Resignation discussion at WT:ADMINPlease either undo the close, withdraw, and allow a neutral third-party to close it, or redact your final barb "I think that's a shame, as I know of no other job where a person can quit in rage one day and come back the next with zero consequences". You and I both know that Wikipedia is government by WP:CONSENSUS, and stabbing your fingers in the consensus' eyes in a closing statement is certainly not respectful of the consensus formed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
unlock Brooke ShieldsIt has been 2 and a half years. Unlock it. Thank You. 71.191.244.33 (talk) 17:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Put that thing on it where edits are delayed b/c have to be approved before they go live. To just lock the article forever is a disservice. 71.191.244.33 (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I was being polite in asking you since you locked it. I didnt want to go over your head. But since you wanna throw out smart ass comment you have shown how you are. Keep thinking you matter bc you locked a page on wp. In reality you dont matter. 71.191.244.33 (talk) 18:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC) Dispute commentHi. If it's no bother, could you weight in on this post of mine regarding another editor's content removal? I'm not expecting much understanding from them, so an outside opinion would be greatly appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 19:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Admin StatusNow that my block is over, I wanted to ask you that if I do execute a policy of rigorous honesty will I have a chance one day of becoming an admin? Leoesb1032 (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Please help?Hello Kww! I was wondering if you could help me out with this user, who keeps adding the gossip website HollywoodLife, as well as iTunes, as "reliable sources" for genres on the article Stars Dance. I have already explained to him why this is not allowed, as well as leaving a friendly reminder on his talk page, yet he continues to show blatant disregard for WP:RS. I know he is new, so if you could please help me out, that would be greatly appreciated. Cheers. (CA)Giacobbe (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Could you help me understand pleaseCould you help me understand please (besides linking me to the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria) as I have already read all that. You just disconnected the image i uploaded via the uploader and attached to the article Joe "Tiger" Patrick. I asked in the teahouse for help and still waiting for a response. I filled in all information required for the free use clause and still need to add something else but I have no idea what it is asking me to do? Can you tell me the exact reason? It may help me to know what I have to do next. Thanks TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 17:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Dispute with an IPThere is an IP that has been reverting my edits to Gracias Por Estar Aqui. I have pointed out to the IP (who I suspect is a sock puppet of Sc30002001) that the upcoming does not satisfy WP:NALBUMS because of its lack of confirmed release date and track listing. It's gotten to the point that the IP is now resorting to name calling and ignoring the guideline for WP:NALBUMS. I don't want to resort to AFD, but the IP has been keeping me trouble so that's why I'm telling you this. Erick (talk) 08:29, 19 July 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Missed talk pagesHey, I just wanted to let you know that when you deleted a few articles that I PROD'ed you forgot to delete the talk page. They are: Bojan Gjorgievski, Alex McQuade (footballer), Danilo Tomić, Aminu Umar, and Kostas Vlachos. Cheers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 04:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Added them, thank you ---$oHaM ❊ আড্ডা 04:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC) Nicki Minaj discographyThanks for blocking the Nicki Minaj discography page. An edit war was never intended on this side. KaneZolanski (talk) 00:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC) I see why you blocked the page but can you please look into it before the expired date because I think that I had a valid and reasonable point as to why the section could be allowed to stay on the page even though a videography page exists. Thank You. JACUBANHELADO (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC) In no way was I trying to insinuate that by you blocking the page you were "sideing" with me, that would be stupid. I was simply thanking you for blocking the page so that a discussion could take place without further edit warring. KaneZolanski (talk) 18:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC) Hi KWW. I had opened a section for discussion on the Nicki Minaj discography talkpage in which I explained the Issue days ago and KaneZolanski has not yet responded even with contacting the person on their talkpage. Protection has NOW Been Lifted and In an effort to NOT Edit War Again I Need To Know What To Do. JACUBANHELADO (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC) OK. Thanks For Your Help. JACUBANHELADO (talk) 00:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC) Charlie (July)Hi. He has returned and now edits as 86.147.126.86 (talk · contribs). Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 16:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC) Followup on infobox personHello KWW. Thank you for following up on the discussion about the influences fields at the infobox person. I don't know if you saw but the instructions for how to use those fields are still part of the Template:Infobox person#Parameters section. Also I don't know if you want to close the discussion on the talk page or not. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 20:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC) TeahouseAs others echoed at the Teahouse question for the person who wanted to inquire about the redirection of a man's article, your response was very bitey and not generally in the very polite tone that Teahouse hosts try to respond with. It's not really a big deal, but in tne future, try to explain a bit nicer. One of the big things of the Teahouse is to try to improve editor retention, so making it an environment where they can be told what's wrong but at the same time feel welcome and nice is key. Thanks :) ~Charmlet -talk- 00:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Stars Dance sourceHi! I want to ask you something. In this source,[4] i'm sure that some content is a copy/paste of a past edition of the Wikipedia article of the album which source was changed so now isn't valid. I think this rest some veracity to the source and make this not reliable. What do you think? Thank you so much.Justasaddream (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
TH Re:Use Of CoverHello Kww, I added the low resolution newer-versions, would you delete the previous versions? I would be eternally indebted to you for your service. :) Regards ---$oHƎM ❊ আড্ডা 12:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Discussion at WER talk
Come & Get ItHello! I want to ask you something: In this source [5] the song Come & Get It by Selena Gomez is described as tribal electropop. It's okay to put in the infobox tribal-electropop? I think it means electropop in tribal-style and that is incorrect to put tribal-electropop in the infobox because it does not exist as a genre. What do you think? Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justasaddream (talk • contribs) 15:35, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Talkback - User talk:Launchballer#SinglechartMessage added 18:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC) by Launchballer. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Eric Corbett unblocked[11] What an extremely sad, little person you must be. Corbett had been pointlessly blocked for ages and the decision to unblock was quite clearly for the benefit of the project. That project is something that most us are here to improve, not spend half our lives enforcing ridiculous rules and judgments. You really need to get over yourself - edits like this [12] make the project appear narrow minded, spiteful and downright pathetic. I recommend that you amend your ways and grow up - fast. Otherwise, find some other hobby in which to indulge you yourself. Giano 19:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Coulda at least came up with a better name. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:19, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
IP questionIs 76.126.32.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) just a standard dynamically allocated IP from Comcast? In other words, is there anything unusual about it? Assuming it is "normal", what range is it part of (and how do you figure that out)? Finally, is there a way to figure out which IPs in the range have recently edited at Wikipedia? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
ThanksHey Kww, I know you're not especially happy with the state of VE, but I still wanted to thank you for the template hack to disable VE on a per-page basis. It's a good hack to use exactly as the template documentation suggests, until we have a better per-page switch. Thanks, also, for your constructive comments on the feedback page.--Eloquence* 05:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC) ReplyI'm not attempting to enter an edit war. My last edit summary requested he go to the talk page, where I have started a discussion. Rusted AutoParts 16:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom requestI've made an example proposal in response to your comment; an approach where SA does not need to interact directly with pseudoscience pushers, IRWolfie- (talk) 20:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC) VE RFCAny chance we could get a sitenotice for this, d'ye think? Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Re: Your addition to the RFCI added that question just before I went to bed and after I woke up there're already discussion in that section. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to remove it right now, or just move it to the talk page? -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 22:14, 30 July 2013 (UTC) AdminshipHi there! I was wondering if you could help me request for adminship? It'll be nice learning from someone who already ran for adminship! ChicagoWiz 00:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Need some help with a strange Notifications thingHi there - the messages you left on my talk page generated a partially Dutch email for me. Do I have your permission to post my notice, which refers to you by username? And do you by any chance have Dutch set in any preference? If you're interested, it's T54298. Risker (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Re:AdminshipThanks for your help! I'll try to work hard for this, but I'll eventually accomplish my goal soon! Thanks again! ChicagoWiz 01:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC) RE: Translation helpIt is literally translated as "Hay una petición de comentarios en curso en cuanto a si el editor visual debería ser/estar* habilitado para nuevos usuarios y editores anónimos." It can be freely translated as "Hay una petición de comentarios en curso en la cual se discute si el editor visual debería ser/estar* habilitado para nuevos usuarios y editores anónimos." (There is an ongoing RFC in which is discussed if the Visual Editor should be enabled for new users and anonymous editors.) The "ser/estar*" verbs in this particular sentence have a little difference in their meaning (in Spanish, in English the meaning may vary), as both forms are grammatically correct. In my opinion, the difference between "debería ser" and "debería estar" is that the first means something like "it should be enabled"--it is not enabled but it should--and the later is like "it should have been enabled"--VE had to be enabled for all users, but it is only active for registered users. This Yahoo! Answers question can help you to understand more the difference between them. I think you are referring to "it is not enabled but it should", if it is the case I would suggest you to use "ser" and not "estar". I hope this helps you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 08:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC) A cup of coffee for you!
Re: Default State RFCJust wanted to say thank you for expressing how I feel so well in the RFC. Red Fiona (talk) 13:59, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Superscript text ReplyAlright, just tell me why this is an option. Also, why are you always happy to permanently block me? That's rather abusive of your admin rights. An indefinite block is definetly not at all a fitting punishment. Rusted AutoParts 20:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC) the return of Brexx?We think this could be Brexx again? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 18:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC) StyleI have to say, I like your style. Keep up the good work, IRWolfie- (talk) 02:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC) CluebotYeah, Twinkle did that automatically. It appears from page history that Cluebot created the article. Beerest355 Talk 16:31, 3 August 2013 (UTC) QuestionHi, there, after appealing the block you gave me and being unblocked, am I allowed to remove the block notice from my talk page? --MatthewHoobin (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks for letting me know. :D A barnstar for you!
Crazy Kids certificationSorry, but Crazy Kids is gold because it has sold 552,308 units, and the gold certification. Is when a dong sold 500,000, it's not my problem that RIAA dont update the new certifications, example: Ke$ha - Die Young sold 2,500,000 and in the RIAA's website there's no any certification for that song, the same with We R Who We R and Blow, but it's Ke$ha and we all know that songs habe certifications. Sorry, but i'm not lying. Wikipedia is based on truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablogarciadaz (talk • contribs) 19:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC) Wild card contribution check questionKevin, see 76.126.140.123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). If you substitute an asterisk for the 123, you get a bunch of hits, none of which includes 123 itself. Why? Completely diferent topic. If you have a moment and can look at this discussion to see if a range block is feasible, that would be helpful. It seems to me that the range to catch all would be too broad because each IP has a different third set of bits, but maybe I'm not looking at it right. Also, do you think those IPs are really static as geolocate says they are?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:51, 4 August 2013 (UTC) CommentHello, I noted your comment here and would like to ask if you would care to comment here ? Thanks. - thewolfchild 03:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
24/Seven (Big Time Rush album)A few days ago you protected articles about songs by BTR due to the addition of dubious charts. This user has now moved to 24/Seven (Big Time Rush album). Can you protect the page? Thanks. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC) ThanksJust a note to say thanks for sharing your alternate opinion at WT:VE. I don't actually care what the outcome of the discussion is, but I do care that anyone interested in it feels free to join the discussion, no matter what opinion s/he holds. When "everyone" has the same opinion early in a discussion, it can be hard for some editors to publicly disagree. Your comment, by not agreeing completely with everyone that posted before you, may encourage others to share their real opinions. So, thank you: I appreciate it. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 22:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC) LEAVE ME ALONE.Stop trying to tell me what to do and dictate the words I choose on a Wikipedia page. You are working my last nerves. Do me a favor and please leave me the hell alone. Thank you and have a good day. Dbunkley6 (talk) 23:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Charlie (August)He has returned as 86.145.156.165 (talk · contribs), per this undid of this undid. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
[[13]]I would appreciate your input here. Do you think a 1RR should be attached to any unblock? Thanks. Spartaz Humbug! 07:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Geena Davis protectionHi, I see you protected Geena Davis a few times in 2012. I just have a few questions, not questioning your actions. Now, first of all, im confused, when i hover over the lock, I get the message that the article is semi protected until October 17, 2012. When you go to edit the article it shows that that is old information from the Chase Watson SPI, that may be a technical issue, i'll see where I can report that.. It seems that you SP'ed for a year, is that usual? Sephiroth storm (talk) 23:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, NP. Sephiroth storm (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC) MathiassandellIt didn't take long: Special:Contributions/85.76.121.199. Thanks, Kww. Acalamari (from Bellatrix Kerrigan) 11:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Single networkHello. I see what you mean with the Single network rule. However, there is a problem: I cannot find a suitable Turkish chart for foreign songs. There is a Turkiye Top 20 from Billboard Turkey, but their website is down, nor does it appear on any search engine. I therefore think Virgin Radio Turkey is the most suitable. If possible could you research and look into the official charts for foreign songs in Turkey? Thank you. --Kimberlylambert (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Sock puppetDespite being reverted and warned several times by other users, TommyMerlyn15 (talk · contribs) insists on adding rowspans and other incorrect formatting to sortable filmography tables. Not only did this person start using a sock named Arrow615 (talk · contribs) a few weeks ago, they also use both accounts concurrently. SnapSnap 18:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC) Disable VE templatesHi there :) I wanted you to know that this major bug, which could be a reason for adding those templates, is now fixed. It seems to me that they are actually included in articles having troubles with tables, like these. Any other similar discussions I should know of that you might have read in these days? Thanks! --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 09:25, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Joseph Smith - FACHello Kww, I have put the article on Joseph Smith up as a nominee for Featured Article Status! I think the article has come a long way, and has a very good chance of being featured this time around. I would personally appreciate it if you took a moment to review the article and vote for it (or against it, I suppose) at it's FAC. Thanks! --Trevdna (talk) 19:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC) IP questionKevin, please look at this post. Is it technically possible for the same individual to be using both IP addresses? The blocked IP is a dynamic IP from Chile. The currently-editing IP is using a corporate IP address in Canada. The only way I can see it is if the Chilean person is hooking onto the Canadian proxy server, but I would have thought that possible only if the proxy server were open. Thanks for checking.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:40, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings, Kww. I have volunteered to oversee and close the WP:RM discussion currently taking place at Talk:Chelsea Manning#Requested move. I have also agreed that, given the contentiousness of the issue, it would be good to have a panel of admins close the discussion as a committee. Your name was suggested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure#Talk:Chelsea Manning#Requested move, and I would be quite pleased to have you involved, given your solid record in carrying out your adminship. I intend to draft a proposed closure once the RM has run its course, and present it to you and the third admin on the committee (I have asked User:BOZ also), for evaluation and revision. Please let me know if you are interested, and cheers! bd2412 T 02:24, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Just a quick heads up that this discussion will close in about 12 hours. My plan is to close it right on time, put the headers and footers on, and indicate that the result is PENDING. I have updated my sandbox draft with the latest votes, and a brief summary of the rationale behind each vote (I think most of these are self-explanatory, but let me know if my abbreviations are too cryptic). Whenever all three of us are available thereafter, we can discuss and determine what consensus there is, and what it means. Given the breadth of this discussion, and the passion on both sides, I think we should try to come to a unanimous agreement on the closure if at all possible. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Lindsay LohanGood day, kww! I noticed that on Aug. 5, you undid my addition of Oprah's Next Chapter to Lohan's television filmography. Your logic was that it was a talk show, which is not correct. You also stated that "talk shows are meant to promote films..." Actually, the project is a television series. Not a special, or a talk show. While I appreciate your input, this does belong in the section, and I was correct. It is not my intent to come across as rude, but I'm assuming you can relate to how frustrating it is to have legitimate edits "undone." I look forward to working along with you on future articles, including Miss Lohan's. However, if you could go to my talk page with the issue before undoing my edits, I would really appreciate it! It just really stinks to have your work vanish with a click, especially since its not like I posted libelous info. Things like filmography should be a little more open to discussion, in my opinion. Thank you, and have a beautiful day! Mpo90 (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC) Message added 17:24, 23 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. WarningHello! I removed a comment from my talkpage. You are not allowed to reincorporate material to another user's talkpage after they have removed it. This is directly against policy. If you do it again, I'll report you. AmericanDad86 (talk) 02:43, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Please do not make personal attacks and accuse me of deception. As stated to the other user, my being here may well be temporary. Please do not use personal attacks and behave uncivilly. Kww, you've already broken policy by incorporating material back on my page and in the same breath are trying to tell me not to break policies through personal attacks. Please stop! AmericanDad86 (talk) 02:52, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Your behavior of jumping in the way you did with reverting talk pages and nasty accusations of deception has been totally disrespectful. As I've just said several times now, I am not sure if I will be editing here for very long and your nasty accusations are convincing me that I should not quite frankly. I have been hired for a new career that I will be beginning soon which may earnestly cut down the amount of time I have here, not that it's any of your business. And I probably won't dedicate my time to Wikipedia because of aggressing behavior exactly like yours. AmericanDad86 (talk) 03:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission
MathiassandellCaught one. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 11:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC) QuestionWhat criteria do you use to determine which userboxes with which images should and should be not be deleted? - thewolfchild 22:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC) Userbox imagesI don't mess with userbox images as a rule. Copyrighted material being used outside of article space is a different matter, though: copyrighted images can only be used in article space.—Kww(talk) 22:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)chose
Tiyang, Visual Editor and IE10I think I've found the reason Tiyang believes he has been able to use VE in IE10. Per this talk page, Tiyang (apparently a retired person with fewer than 500 edits) has been testing a guided tour called "The Wikipedia Adventure" (TWA) that simulates edits. Having tried using IE for that tour, I can confirm that it's not really clear what's happening. The walk-through attempts to launch visual editor by browsing to
Kww, I obviously need your help! Please look at Ocaasi's talkpage Archive 5. Scroll down to #128, The Wikipedia Adventure. This is where I mentioned using Visual Editor with Internet Explorer 10. Ocaasi explained that it will only work to a certain point. I tried it earlier today and made a comment at a talkpage it created. That page, and probably every other page it created, should be deleted. I am very concerned that Administrators will have many pages to delete as Editors test VE. I will stay away from Visual Editor. Thank you. Respectfully, Tiyang (talk) 02:58, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Hello Kww, I've started expanding Trouble (Natalia Kills album) and two anonymous IPs started to revert my edits replacing my texts with theirs. One of the IPs I contacted via its talk page but I recieved no answer and the reverts kept happening. What should I do about this? Thank you in advance Pedro J. [talk] 11:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Hot100brasil.comPerhaps you noticed this already, but I've copied your editnotice text into a template ({{Hot100brasil.com}}) and transcluded it onto all those editnotices. Nyttend (talk) 22:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC) You've got mail.It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. - cheers! bd2412 T 16:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC) I randomly came across this unblock request, and found 3jz01bcs and Studiomusica Thanks
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Mariah is backNow as a 217.43.161.146 (talk · contribs), per Cherish history, and the beautiful messages left in my talk page. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 15:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
TheREALCableGuyI have proposed a community ban of TRCG here; they have had a very heavy sock weekend and are obviously not going to wait six months and come back here and be a good editor any longer. Nate • (chatter) 20:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Help regarding article titleHey Kevin. I was wondering, should the new Miley Cyrus song "Wrecking Ball"'s page be titled "Wrecking Ball (Miley Cyrus song)" or "Wrecking Ball (song)"? I had created a redirect to the album page from the former as there was already 4 songs listed on the disambiguation page. They don't have articles (yet) though. 五代 (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC) A thank youHi Kww, I've been back for a few days now. Thanks for dealing with Mathiassandell socks while I was away and had to use my alternate account. I appreciate what you did. Best. Acalamari 17:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Miley Cyrus IS a singer-songwriter.Miley Cyrus writed 29/43 of her songs released under her own name, MILEY CYRUS. Wich is a 70% of all of her songs. You may not consider her as a song-writer but officially she is. From her first studio album she writed 8 of the 10 songs that are on the abum. On her second studio album, she writed 8 of the 13 songs on the record, and 2 of the songs that she didn't write on that record are covers. On her first EP, she didn't write any song of the 6 songs and (one is a cover), because it was released as a promotional vehicle to promote er line of clothes nad its not even an full album. And on her third studio album she writed all of the songs except for one, wich is a cover. On her lastest recordwich will come out cotober 8, she writed the two songs that are out of the album, and she mentioned that she writed all of her songs on this record. So SHE IS an SINGER-SONGWRITER. For examples Birtney Spears or Selena Gomez are not one, because she write like 2 songs of her albums. --Raúl Romero (talk) 01:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC) oh and one more thing 4 of the 14 songs published under her name that aren't written by her are COVERS. So that means that she only BUYED 10 songs on her whole carrer to make ir her own songs. SO she IS a SONGWRITER. --Raúl Romero (talk) 01:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
CherubHi. I tried looking but can't find. There must be MOS rules in christianity topics similar to the pbuh rules. SlightSmile 23:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Question about inclusion of R&B Bubbling UnderI just want to double check with you if R&B Bubbling Under... chart peaks can be added to R&B columns. STATicVerseatide has been adding a peak coming from R&B Bubbling Under... section to Rick Ross discography. Sometime ago I remember you mentioned somewhere that the columns for Hot 100 and other charts should not include Bubbling Under... peaks. I just wanted to know if it's still correct to follow that rule? User: STATicVerseatide doesn't seem to think so.--Harout72 (talk) 20:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Charlie (September)He still as 86.146.144.82 (talk · contribs). Thanks for the block. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC) TalkbackYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Kurtis (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Evidence phase open - Manning naming disputeDear Kww. This is just a quick courtesy notice. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by September 19, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Seddon talk 23:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Billboard/Nielsen "worldwide" salesHi. Just so you know, neither Billboard nor Nielsen claim to track worldwide album sales. Neither of them is even close to being capable of doing so. What Billboard promotes is what Billboard gets paid to promote. When it comes to worldwide sales for a particular album, I'd tend to believe what the record label has been legally obliged to tell its shareholders, than what some random Billboard contributor has to say on some random article. Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC) Chart linksHi Kww :) Could you help me with the chart links on the "Loved Me Back to Life" article? I'm talking about Belgium, Switzerland and France and the chart table. When you click on the sources, theu don't lead you to the page with the single :( I don't know how to fix it :( --Max24 (talk) 14:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
InterventionSeeing that you are involved in the discussion is there a way you can intervene over at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop#Perceived harassment? I see a very angry editor cussing out Tarc for his comments. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Manning CaseI am cautioning you just with regards to making statements that are clearly inflammatory and will simply make what is already a difficult worse. You aren't the only one, nor is it restricted to one side but I won't allow the case to devolve further into rehashing of the same inflammatory comment and counter-comment that brought this case in the first place. Banning parties from case pages is something that can be done if it is the only way to maintain some sense of decorum on the case pages. Please be aware of that. Seddon talk 09:57, 13 September 2013 (UTC) CheckHi there. Can you check whether User:Dan56 and User talk:12.168.46.153 are somehow connected? This is why I'm worried.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Grammar"a group of editors that isn't skilled enough " You mean "aren't". Plural. Just sayin' 88.104.27.75 (talk) 02:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
RFAR:Manning naming dispute - Formally added as partyThe drafting arbitrators have requested that you be formally added as a party to the Manning naming dispute case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Seddon talk 18:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC) MathiassandellHe is back, just to inform you in case admin actions have to be performed. He has edited as 91.154.104.79 (talk · contribs) and 91.154.108.17 (talk · contribs). Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Hey, Kevin, if you would, please take a look at this report just for the purpose of illuminating the nature of 218.248.13.196 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). There are many variables in my head as to how to handle the IP, but the Geolocate turned up stuff I've never seen, so, naturally, I turn to you. :-) Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
A very active blocked proxyI have over 8,000 items, plus talk pages, in my watchlist, and the majority are now lit up with the same edit by a huge variety of IPs, apparently connected to this proxy you have blocked: I have begun to populate the category, but I have to leave now. -- Brangifer (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
New OpenCart article comingI have written a fresh OpenCart article; its notability has increased over the last couple of years, and deserves inclusion. I intend to register, so I can create the new article stub in the next few days. Message to you here given your role in deletion of previous versions of the article. 194.144.210.184 (talk) 11:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC) OK, here I am. "This page is currently protected. ...If you feel this page should be created, please raise the matter at deletion review," so, what is the best way to proceed? I can put the new article draft up on my user page if needs be, for example. OldEcomGuru (talk) 11:58, 18 September 2013 (UTC) And here it is. User:OldEcomGuru/OpenCart_article. OldEcomGuru (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deletion review for OpenCartAn editor has asked for a deletion review of OpenCart. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. OldEcomGuru (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC) User:ScotXWI am not linking to the userpage to avoid echo notifying them, but can you please have a word with the user. Their attitude and comments are not appropriate (I removed the box entirely (GNU is not a kernel...) and started working on the section "Game theory"; please do bother somebody else with your shit; obviously you are paid for doing it;. I would prefer we head this issue off at the pass before it becomes more problematic. Thanks, Werieth (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC) please join discussion on talk page
Please reconsiderKww, I am asking that you reconsider your proposed course of action (using common.js to suppress VisualEditor). Acting hastily to actively damage the experience of users, numbers of whom have repeatedly given anecdotes of better editing experiences using VisualEditor would be in violation of long-standing practice about not breaking the software, and be an exceptionally bad idea. Further, looking over your code and having quickly discussed with colleagues, we are extremely concerned that this will place a significant amount of strain on the servers, while not actually accomplishing what you're (presumably) aiming to do. I ask you as a partner in improving the project to consider not doing this. Your long experience as an admin here is noted, and I’ve always respected you - I’m dismayed that you’d consider this course of action when the WMF has expressed an interest in finding a compromise solution that would work. To pursue this without even considering compromise solutions, or reaching out to us, strikes me as unnecessarily adversarial. We are, and remain, open and willing to discuss actual solutions with the community. This one, though, is not one that we can support. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 09:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Re: User:Kww/anonpatch.css: this will need to go in MediaWiki:Common.js, not MediaWiki:Common.css, of course. While you're manipulating CSS, you're doing so via JavaScript. --MZMcBride (talk) 17:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
+1 —rybec 16:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC) The user has continued the revert, add section to talk page process. I am tempted to request a NFC topic ban to stop these re-insertions without meeting policy. Werieth (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Don't roll it out yetDon't roll it out yet; I think I found a typo (though I find it hard to believe nobody else found it...) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Possible RfCWhat do you reckon on User:Dpmuk/JamesForrester as an RfC?
Thanks for hiding VEThank you for the patch to hide VE, and that is the best "broken code" in the world: to allow opt-in after only one edit was a brilliant feat of engineering. I still believe if we pull together as a community, then we can improve many important aspects of the site. For example, most wp:edit-conflicts are simple to auto-merge, and the MediaWiki diff3.c utility could be easily modified to allow edits to adjacent lines without triggering "Edit conflict" (currently limited to 1-line separation). However, we need to set the edit-Save operation to perform a database read-lock on the page, because 2 edits within the same minute both read the same (unlocked) prior revision, and after the 1st editor merges to the prior revision, then the 2nd editor overwrites the 1st editor when he should have merged with the 1st editor's revision, waiting after a read-lock. Although WMF does not seem to care, numerous hot-topic articles and busy talk-pages get edit-conflicts, such as the Talk:Bradley_Manning page in recent weeks. Similarly, we could set the wp:expansion depth limit higher, such as 41/40 to 50 or more. There are many important simple changes we could make, if we take a stand to focus on major improvements, rather than push a complex tool (mis-)used by 3% of editors. -Wikid77 (talk) 05:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Three years passed since semi-protection has been enabled. Is amount of edits too high to consider "pending changes"? --George Ho (talk) 17:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
User: BrexxI have seen this name being used in some of the blocks as sockpuppets, and I saw you just blocked one user. Any pointers on how to note his/her reocccurence again and report it appropriately? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
@KWW: How on earth can you give advice to others when you cannot properly spell? Your spelling is atrocious and you should take up some lessons on the English language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdatruthwriter (talk • contribs) 03:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC) There must have been edit warring in August 2013. Would that interfere with "pending changes" request that I intend to do? Should there have been temporary full protection? --George Ho (talk) 19:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Visual editorI stand and applaud you. Well done. And thank you. --Tóraí (talk) 12:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC) By the way, you are mentioned here. --Tóraí (talk) 12:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC) More indef. semi-protected pages3 (Britney Spears song) has been protected from unregistered editors for three years. There are more at Category:Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages. --George Ho (talk) 23:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Keeping Up With BrexxI've noticed that you've blocked a number of Brexx sock accounts and addresses. One thing I'm curious about is: how do you manage to keep up with this user? He/she seems to take new disguises quite frequently. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
You oversighted several edits to this article including addition of downtown redevelopment discussion and links to buildings articles from image captions. Please restore those edits and/ or undo your oversighting. If you want to undo the merge of content regarding Silver Lake that's fine. I can proceed with it once the AfD is completed if there are no objections (I haven't seen any) but you oversighting has disrupted both the AfD and the work improving the Fenton article. Notice for example that someone had to revise their comment in the discussion because you undid the merge by means of oversighting. If you have a content objection that's fine. And yes, you are correct that if/ when a merge is carried out the history has to be preserved. So if you have a substantive argument against doing that you should express it instead of carrying out unilateral action. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC) BlockThanks for taking care of Grounelzee. I'm thinking it's one of those K-pop fans that have descended (or maybe ascended) into trolling Dr. K. and me. But I don't think "Ultimate notorious editor" is connected: they strike me as a newbie (with POV and poor citations and all that) who got dragged into this because Grounelzee started reverting Me and Dr. K. on random articles. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:30, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Well, this is overdue!
A Nobody, againYou may want to take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A Nobody. Seems clear to me. Deor (talk) 15:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Regarding Image of Jeet GangulyI've taken this snap at a Music Concert ! (Mitrabarun (talk) 19:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC))
Obi-Wan said I should put down the stick.Could you let me know if you think I went over the line on the Chelsea Manning move proposal page? I was trying to advise Obi-Wan not to find ways to meddle with the header, but it only seemed to provoke. I thought I was showing mild disapproval, not a stick, but I can tone it down if you think it's unhelpful. __Elaqueate (talk) 00:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Regarding submersiblesHello, Can you please specify from where it is copied ? As it is my own article. Thank You ! (Mitrabarun (talk) 06:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)) ImageThen this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nirmalananda.JPG) is also copied from www.vivekananda.net/PDFBooks/Nirmalananda.pdf www.gurusfeet.com/guru/swami-nirmalananda www.mediander.com/connects/.../swami-nirmalananda/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitrabarun (talk • contribs) 07:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
And we're backIn case you hadn't seen it yet: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Sophisticated_mass_vandalism_from_IP_ranges.3F. Drmies (talk) 14:43, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Legality of archive.is questionYou have raised the question of whether there is something illegal about archive.is. That raises the question of what law. US federal law? California or Florida law? WMF is subject to those, but there is no reason to think that archive.is is subject to them. We don't even know where it is. The TLD is in Iceland, and the domain is registered with the Icelandic registry, but its registered address is in Prague, Czech Republic, and one of its name servers is in Lichtenstein. Your concerns that the operation is strange are well taken. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:24, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
PodcastHi Kww, thanks for your comments. I invite you to be on the Wikipedia Weekly podcast next week to comment and clarify those issues that you brought up. The tracking of the chronology of all this, without real centralized, threaded discussion is incredibly tough, and we always work on the best information we have at the time that we can glean from things that are read after the fact. We welcome those who want to make their positions and interpretations clear. I would also like your views on how you view an understanding among the veteran editors, WMF employees, chapter participants and newbies can create what constitutes "community consensus." The "community consensus" phrase was used over and over again in the RFC to declare a quasi "will of the people," which was accepted as a trump card over WMF actions, without much pushback. But as I said on podcast, I'm very skeptical claiming this as a valid consensus that imbues individual actors with such authority. The community has more communications channels than ever, with constituents living in different geographical and virtual spaces. Without the implementation of a system of "public notice" and widespread engagement in debate and comment, in what way can "community consensus" be declared in any meaningful way on one set of pages in the corners of Wikipedia? How many people know how to navigate the labyrinth of RFC, Village Pump, Administrator's Noticeboard, Talk pages to understand the progression of these issues? (I will also note that pushback against the addition of "social media" features in Wikipedia by certain loud community voices may be a hindrance to getting a wider audience for determining consensus.) Also, in an era where every year sees fewer and fewer en: regulars, and administrator numbers dwindling, shouldn't the concerns of potential new editors be seriously taken into account, and their user experience in coming and staying? The only ones in the position to study this in any systematized way are the WMF and other NGO/academic partners (such as UNU-Merit, who did early user editor surveys). The mistrust of a small cache of power users of the WMF leaves some significant casualties: attracting potential editors, engaging new editors and retaining existing editors. After being in the editing community for ten years, I think the blasé view that the complicated technical editing environment and unfriendly community norms in Wikipedia is no big deal (and that it's OK to keep bozos out) is stronger than ever. And that's worrying. But I invite you to the dialogue. Let me know if you're interested. -- Fuzheado | Talk 17:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC) archive.is abuse filterIs blocking use of archive.org by newbies necessary? Shortly after you made that change, an IP reported a false positive related to it, an IP that looks certainly unlike Rotlink. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Plagiarism/copyvio websitesCan you blacklist weaponplace.ru and topwar.ru? They post articles from Russian magazines without permission or even attribution to the original source/author(s). I posted about these at EL/N a while back, but nothing got done. I see dogswar.ru, which is the same boat, is already blacklisted, so this seems the appropriate course of action. Thanks. Someone not using his real name (talk) 12:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC) ChloeI'm thinking this is nothing more than a troll who just lunged on something; I doubt they have anything to do with Jesus (and I doubt they'll fight the block or request an unblock). I do have the feeling that recently I'm seeing more of this stuff, the Vgleer case being one of the more obvious ones. Thanks for the block, Drmies (talk) 23:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC) A curious decisionHi Kww, I have to admit that I am surprised to see Synthwave.94 unblocked. This user has not accepted any responsibility for any of the conflicts they have caused and has systematically refused to learn from more experienced users or accept advice. They still don't understand why they were blocked in the first place, don't understand WP:SYNTH or WP:MOS. Their last response to questions from admin regarding accepting mistakes was "I had learnt far enough from other editors so far. I'm not waiting for anything else. I've got everything I need in order to improve any song article and I'm ready to continue what I've been doing so far, because I know it's the perfect way to improve song articles. Bjelleklang, I hope you are more comprehensive than other users I met so far and that you will unblock me after this series of errors made by other users." I fear this will end in tears. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC) ThanksJust wanted to thank you for revert to remove the libelous content from the Casandra Peterson talk page. This editor seems to have a history of quick trigger finger and using warning templates to intimidate. They edits had clear summaries, were to remove libbelous content and not in anyway vandalism. I was also issued 2 warnings in quick succession for edits made before the first warning another violation of policy on handling vandalism. 74.4.198.186 (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
More than 1000 edits...More than 1000 edits and thanked 3 times ! What am I talking about ? I'm talking about this. I've continued editing Wikipedia, but on my language-speaking Wikipedia this time, and here are some proofs my edits are actually helpful & constructive : "tu apparais souvent dans ma liste de suivi, ce qui est une très bonne chose, c'est cool ce que tu as fait pour les classements." "continue ce que tu fais, je trouve finalement que je t'embête pour rien. Oui, c'est très bien ce que tu fais, j'ai beaucoup d'articles de chansons dans ma liste de suivi et je te vois tout le temps passer !" I imagine it can be quite hard to imagine this kind of situation, however this is the truth. This positive messages come from my talk page. While I've been editing here, I've been learning how to improve songs articles as efficiently as possible. Look at the differences before and after I've been improving each of these articles. Look at Bad (before/after), Macarena (before/after) or We No Speak Americano (before/after). This is what I'm really able to do ! This has nothing to do with my very first edits. Don't listen to other editors who missed an essential detail about me. I've been edting over 150 songs articles like this on the French-language and I can do the same on the English-speaking wiki without any problem. If everyone trust me, hundreds of songs articles would see the same benefits from my edits. Synthwave.94 (talk) 21:50, 4 October 2013 (UTC) My Talk PageExcuse me, but if I'm not mistaken, it's MY talk page, and you shouldn't be reverting MY edits on MY talk page. It's a barnstar, an image formatted for a barnstar. I won't revert back, but you should no this now. Rusted AutoParts 19:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello Kww! Recently I've been seeing a anon IP with IP addresses near the range of those listed on Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC. The anon IP user are posting up archiving links to http://wayback.vefsafn.is/ as the archive link thing. I'm not sure if this is related, but it could be. The archive service uses .is domain names. However the services uses the Wayback Machine, which is legit, however I'm very curious. The IP I seen were:
Both IP addresses traces to India, the same ones listed with the RFC, all have which seems to have the same edit summaries with, "(fixing web references (dead links))". I'll update you with this event. You could feel free to move this discussion to the RfC, I was not sure where to place it. ///EuroCarGT 00:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Lucy Liu Chinese nameHi there, I saw you reverted my edits on the Lucy Liu article. I thought there were sufficient source(s) to back up my edits. Here's an article from the Guardian, which states that she does have a Chinese name. And even though it doesn't provide the pinyin of her name, if you do a Google search, the majority of Chinese newspapers refer to her Chinese name. Maybe it's because Liu doesn't have a middle name - most American-born Chinese/Canadian-born Chinese people have their Chinese name as their middle names. But it doesn't negate the fact that she has a Chinese name. How do you argue Michael Chang and Connie Chung's Chinese names? Yes, their middle names are their Chinese names, but what about the characters? How do we know their Chinese names are those specific characters? I don't see any sources that prove that - unless you do a Google search and see Chinese newspapers actually use those names... Anyways, please let me know what you think. I apologize if I do appear to be aggressive/angry. This isn't an angry message - I just wanted another person's opinion. Thanks!--Guat6 (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Block evasions (again)Hi Kww, You issued an indef block on 13 May 2013 to Claus Michael2 (talk · contribs) for block evasion. I think he may have returned under a new name, see Claus Michael3 (talk · contribs). The editing history and creation of user pages within article space are identical, which makes this case a very loud quacker. Wesley Mᴥuse 20:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Polish chart change adressI ask you to change name of chart for Poland (Polish Airplay Top 5) to Polish Airplay Top 20 because ZPAV today change form of chart. New adress for chart is http://zpav.pl/rankingi/listy/airplay/topairplay.php?idlisty=1107 (Number 1107 is chartid). Old is http://zpav.pl/rankingi/listy/airplay/top5.php?idlisty=1071. Sorry for my english ;) Mihelpl (talk) 13:54, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Further discussionHi. On whether the CSD guideline should mention nominators checking interlinks I think it would be helpful to take a break for 24 hours and let others speak, don't you think? In ictu oculi (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Notifications bugMaybe this is another example of bugzilla:54639? Helder 20:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Charlie (October)He has returned as 86.160.9.65 (talk · contribs), per this. Thanks. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Semi-protection requestHi, Kww, can you please semi-protect Avril Lavigne albums and singles, and I think that contributors or unregistered contributors did vandalism the music genres without sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.176.252 (talk) 04:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC) This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Rschen7754 01:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC) Ramtha's School of EnlightenmentHi there Kww! I wanted to let you know that I responded to your message on the Ramtha's School of Enlightenment discussion page. Another editor, Maproom, also thought that my version treated Ramtha as if he were real, though there is no concrete evidence to prove this, so I went ahead and made a few changes to my draft in places I thought you might be talking about. Will you please point out any other areas you're concerned about? Still, I'd like to share with you the same thing I told Maproom: My intent is certainly not to present Ramtha as if he is real, but instead to provide an accurate account of the school's teachings in a neutral way. In articles for new religious movements, such as Cao Dai, beliefs are clearly labeled as such, but once labelled, are discussed as if real. The intro to the article for Tenrikyo, for example, contains the sentence "Followers of Tenrikyo believe that God, known by several names including Tenri-O-no-Mikoto, expressed divine will through Nakayama's role as the Shrine of God…" Note that it doesn't say, for example, "...allegedly expressed divine will…" or something similar. This is the model I was trying to follow. Did you have any other specific thoughts about my draft? Calstarry (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Request for commentAs you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Synthwave.94 still at itSynthwave.94 (talk · contribs) has resumed the antics that got him blocked, with no course corrections at all. He's slowed down a bit, but since he was unblocked, he's systematically revisited every article where he was reverted and re-introduced his changes. For example, see Come Back and Stay. He's repeatedly tried to add "blue-eyed soul" as a genre having picked it out of a quote in an Allmusic article, and "pop rock" without any source. He's been reverted by two different editors and he's just gone in and added them again. --Laser brain (talk) 17:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Jimbo Talk page discussionThere is a discussion that has begun about you as an admin and your deletion of articles on Jimbo's talk page.--Mark Miller (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Avengers: Age of UltronI normally wouldn't do this, but I invite you to join this discussion, subsection "And we're back". An editor simply refuses to accept consensus. Rusted AutoParts 19:21, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
NFCC policy problemsI'm sure you're not following the defunct discussion on the notice board, so I thought I'd repost my last comments here. I think I bring up some valid points. The following graf is an exact repost:
I think of lot of policies that were put in place to protect WP in theory have in practice turned out to be detrimental and contribute to the amount of wasted time editors must spend on dispute boards. Copyright law is meant to protect copyright holders from exploitation by those who would illegitimately profit from pirating the copyrighted works; it is not and never has been to stifle criticism, discussion, and education. The overreaction of WP on purported copyright violations in reality just feeds the control lust of those who live to enforce rules. If WP adopted some common-sense policies it would go a long way to making this place a lot more attractive to content editors. And the lack of content editors is WP's big problem, not rule enforcement, IMO. Tom Reedy (talk) 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC) A NobodyComments from 143.105.13.12 seem to match his usual tone if you feel like checking. TTN (talk) 16:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Love Will Save the Day (Boyzone)I saw that you deleted the page Love Will Save the Day (Boyzone). I don't recall User:Pesf or his possible sockpuppets editing the page after his block. I'm not sure if it actually was one of the sockpuppets, (one of the possible 30), I just wanted to bring to your attention that the page may have been incorrectly deleted under the G5 criterion. If this is not the case, just give me a heads up on it. Thanks. MrScorch6200 (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Kww is mistaken because i have no idea who this pesf is but i am just an ordinary user of wikipedia who has been trying to create a page that KWW continuously deletes because he thinks people who creates the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bz20 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Will_Save_the_Day_(Boyzone) pages are sockpuppets. Please can these pages be created and my block be got rid of! 80.47.202.12 (talk) 09:50, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Mariah (October)S/He is now editing as 86.170.121.176 (talk · contribs) per a, b and c histories. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC) archive.isI tried to add some references to article Carbon print and an automated filter disallowed it. Problem is with archiving website(archive.is); removed it and insert original solved the problem. http://archive.is/B0Kuw is archived and http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Carbon/carbon.html is original link. Try without login.-- 117.216.71.4 (talk) 16:16, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
VE still puts nowiki-wikilinks one month laterI just fixed yet another garbled wikilink for a nowiki tag (cut nowiki dif564), added by the VisualEditor on 24 October 2013, the one-month anniversary of removal from the top menu, in new article "John Cowan (computer scientist)", who ironically co-authored XML 1.1, a forerunner to wikitext markup. VE is still putting garbled nowiki tags in pages, in late October 2013, even after 6 months of knowing it was a major bug corrupting articles edited 99% by wikitext source-editor. I had suspected VE would still be defective 30-days later, and I estimate at least 100 pages still contain VE-corrupted text. I cannot emphasize enough how wise you were in September 2013 to remove VE from the top menu, and reduce the planned disruptive editing fostered by VE. BTW: I am now one of the 40 wp:template editors fixing protected templates, and many improvements are being made much faster to major templates. Anyway, thanks again for detering VE corruption to numerous WP pages. -Wikid77 (talk) 09:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Neutral noticeThis is a neutral notice that an RfC has been opened at an article which you have edited within the past year. It is at Talk:Clint Eastwood#8 children by 6 women. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Recording datesA source was provided on February 2, 2010 showed by article interview that LL Cool J and Lopez worked together on October 16 and 17, 2002. The link expired in December 2011, but it doesn't mean that anyone dare lay the burden of proof on me to go find another one after everyone had 1.9 years of access to the link to confirm its validity. Again, that source was live and present for essentially (a remaining) 2 YEARS, so for one to now just decide at the last minute to delete it due to the dead article link, is absurd. That should be done all across the board on Wikipedia then. I've known that from the Backstreet Boys Wikipedia main page issue in early 2010, your conduct towards me is very negatively biased and not objective one bit, especially regarding how you chose to handle that situation poorly. I let that go years ago, but I necessarily won't swallow such a thing again, as deleting information due an expired/dead link/source is unacceptable to me and Status doing so is also questionable. When that supposed policy is not fully applied across the board in other articles on Wikipedia. If that was truly Wikipedia standard then, random deletions of information would be occurring all over Wikipedia based on dead links. I endlessly encounter articles, in which they have interesting statements with a citation next to them. Often clicking on those rather proves to be useless in having a dead or redirected link, due many years passing since them being cited. My first instinct is NOT to go and delete or "clean-up" the information provided because of a dead link. I will leave it alone or do my own research to re-confirm its validity. You knew very well why I reverted the removal of the "All I Have" recording information by Status and saw my explanation towards that, yet chose to disregard it on supposedly being "unsourced". When in the first place, it should have NEVER been reverted by Status without further analyzing where it came from. I do not like pettiness and will point it out when I see it, as I do not care to go wasting time, money (pay-per-view archives), and effort doing research of deeply/privately kept background information, for it to be treated as mere poppycock. For all the reverts you are more focused on doing, why haven't you corrected the incorrect "March 10, 2003" release date that contradicts its December 2002 Hot 100 chart debut? I can only figure, it's only because I didn't add it myself of course--Carmaker1 (talk) 21:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC) IP activity again, archiving linksHi Kww, just to let you know: I see a few IPs in my watchlist again, performing the archiving of dead links, this time to http://web.archive.org:
--Pgallert (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Semi-protect Jamiroquai all pages indefinitelySorry for interrupt. Can you please semi-protect Jamiroquai all pages indefinitely, including main articles, albums, singles and more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.177.84 (talk) 01:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
