|
User talk:Kww/08252011New sockCould you block User: Yung game's new sock User: Yung 50 ovious just by name alone and was created after Yung game got blocked. STATic message me! 04:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC) New sock by Yung game is User:Yung hood ovious by editing habits, created after Yung 50 got blocked and similar name as previous names. STATic message me! 16:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC) Another sock by Yung game; User:Yung hussle. STATic message me! 00:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC) Back again: User:Yung malone. STATic message me! 16:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC) As promisedWhile I'm not opposing the FAC, I've made my position clear on that spammy German title here. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC) FIMIHi Kevin! Thanks for removing that info from Hitparadeitalia. Is it a fake chart? I think Punkox is back again, as Rayos19 (talk · contribs) (I'm not sure, the editing pattern seems similar). Also, I've asked this before, currently an album article is Just Whitney.... But I don't think full stops have importance (like "You Make Me Wanna", Happy Christmas (Jessica Simpson album)). Can you move it back to Just Whitney? Thanks! Novice7 (talk) 16:21, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
30 STMI saw the old revisions so I removed the genre. Allmusic "style" is secondary to the review which states "prog metal beats". Allmusic doesn't mention post-grunge in its review. Post-grunge is quite different from prog metal or space rock. And there isn't any source that describes this as a post-grunge album. There isn't any reason for add the genre to the article and I think that that source isn't used correctly.--Сказал (talk) 22:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC) Marking an IP as a "Vandalism-only account"[1]. I may not be right. Isn't it incorrect to mark an IP as a vandalism-only account?Jasper Deng (talk) 00:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
And Then We KissThe source does say the song charted:
Plus, Billboard does not show any chart position for Unusual You or Shattered Glass either. - http://www.billboard.com/#/song/britney-spears/unusual-you/12074402 - http://www.billboard.com/#/song/britney-spears/shattered-glass/12074400 Yet, they charted (see the articles) and have their own articles. - Sauloviegas (talk) 18:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC) A bit excessive on the protection now are we? How about trying to just block the accounts and the ip before we go to the extreme of full protection for half a year.--Jojhutton (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
About Akon's NameHi Kww. Thank you for the response! I am a new Wikipedia user and I don't know what you're talking about the providing thing. Please talk back.RobertRay45821 (talk) 01:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC) RobertRay45821 3/11/2011 An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration Enforcement sanction handling/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration Enforcement sanction handling/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, NW (Talk) 01:30, 12 March 2011 (UTC) Ok, I understand now! I just have one more question.Where do you say where you've got it? Please send me a message back! RobertRay45821 (talk) 02:12, 12 March 2011 (UTC) RobertRay45821 3/11/2011 The website I found Akon's birth name.Ok the website is http://www.myicore.com/music/akon-the-real-life-story-of-aliaune-badara-thiam/ in the first part. Thanks for your patience. RobertRay45821 (talk) 02:34, 12 March 2011 (UTC) Um, really I don't know what your talking about.{{help me}} Hi Kww. I do not understand why that's not a good website to prove that that's his real name. Go to http://www.ask.com/ and search for "Aliaune Damala Dakha Bouga Time Puru Nacka Lu Lu Lu Badara Akon Thiam". I see it everywhere. If it is good enough to add something, tell me becajuse I am a little confused. Ok thanks. RobertRay45821 (talk) 02:47, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
PunkoxYou're right. I started an SPI, but I have no evidence of him being Punkox. Almost all the IPs editing Irresistible and A Little Bit are from Lima. I'll surely let you know when he's back again. It's easy, he'll most probably edit Irresistible. Novice7 (talk) 05:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kevin! Can you take a look at this. Is the chart really reliable? Novice7 (talk) 12:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC) Is this your disney vandal?96.32.178.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Colonel WardenIm coming very late to this, and i know its closed, but thank you for the summary of apparently deceitful redirect reversions in your comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Colonel Warden. I had wondered last year why this editor was defending some (in my opinion) highly unnnotable articles. I didnt know that others had noticed these behaviors. Now I dont feel so bad for almost always disagreeing with one editor. I hope he can stop this behavior, but your list is a smoking gun showing a pattern unlikely to be changed. If he continues to do this kind of work, and another administrative proceeding is held which i for whatever reason dont get alerted to, feel free to inform me. Of course, if i see a change from him, i will be among the first to thank him and encourage him.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC) VandalsHi Kev. Can you do something about Jesal33 (talk · contribs) and his sock Jesal333 (talk · contribs). The former kept on vandalizing Rajkot. The latter added the same content a few moments before. Novice7 (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
A question Kev. If Dutch 100 chart is included on a song article, can Tipparade chart be included too? Like in "Irresistible", I found this. It shows a position of number ten. Also, I saw these edits by Punkox. Seems like he wants to set Simpson pages right. Novice7 (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Elissa AFD copyright/licensing issuesI've finally managed to put together a moderately readable response to your comment/request at this AFD [2]. The article is a real mess, with text cut-and-pasted from multiple other sites, including a mirror of a deleted WP article, and I don't see any way to handle the copyright/licensing problems except to repeat the original deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
This is not factual and I would like you revertThis is not factual and I would like you revetThere has been a speedy applied three times and I understand why, but no prod. I'll be restoring if you don't. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2011 (UTC) RE: Ilurvrihanna24? Or who?No, he is the guy who loves to do death threats against me. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 19:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
New proposed article for Elissa (singer)As I promised, here is a completely fresh article prepared by me User:Werldwayd/Articles-Test that addressed the issues raised against the former version. Hopefully this will be adopted with my sincere wish that the article remains semi-protected and that only well-established editors can edit. werldwayd (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Zobbel.deIs this website reliable enough for use in articles. I mean, UK charts? Novice7 (talk) 11:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Do not remove others' comments from talk pages
TalkbackMessage added 17:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Still interested? - Jarry1250 [Who? Discuss.] 17:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC) Re: Jennifer Lopez genre vandalismThanks, I hope it helps. I'll keep you posted. SnapSnap 20:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC) TalkbackYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Greekboy (talk) 17:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC) I see you were involved in discussion on a previous AfD. Anything you'd like to add? --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Goodbye Lullaby chart positionsPlease don't delete the chart positions for Goodbye Lullaby. They are genuine chart positions, I will be posting sources later today. --StephenN17 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2011 (UTC) --User:StephenN17 Rebecca BlackKevin, can you un-protect Rebecca black and redirect it to Rebecca Black, if possible? Thanks. Novice7 (talk) 13:10, 26 March 2011 (UTC) Please contribute to the discuss whether or not this article should be deleted at its articles for deletion page. Thank you! ℥nding·start 14:35, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
ExplanationThere's an explanation here. Note that the name was being associated with strongly inappropriate behavior both on and off Wikipedia. DS (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC) AfD notificationsHi Kevin. I haven't nominated any article for deletion at the moment. So, I don't think I may have posted a message on your talk regarding the same thing. But, I will surely follow your advice :) Novice7 (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC) PC and SPII'm curious about your comment that PC makes SPI more difficult. I don't doubt you as I have little experience with SPI. However, I'm not clear on what it is about PC specifically that disrupts a SPI. Thanks for your support in the PC discussion. —UncleDouggie (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Block an accountSo Kevin, I have an alternate account which I don't want to use. Does Wikipedia rules permit blocking of that account? The account is Mag41 (talk · contribs). If Wikipedia does permit, can you do an indef? Thanks! Novice7 (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Kevin, I have a small question. I don't know if I am allowed to ask this, but, does indef block (in case of Nathan) mean he cannot edit his talk page too? I don't know much about blocks, so I thought I should ask you. He is such an amazing editor and has helped me out on everything. We were working on a project together :( Novice7 (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. --♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 14:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC) Brittany MurphyPlease see my discussion with Ianmacm on this topic. If the citation to the death certificate is necessary with regard to Sharon Murphy then it follows that the citation to the birth certificate is necessary with regard to Angelo Bertolotti since he does not appear on that copy of the death certificate (although this has subsequently been amended) Any attempt to enforce a double standard could be read as an attempt to undermine Angelo Bertolotti's claim to be Brittany's father on behalf of Sharon Murphy. Please explain why the birth cerificate is unreliable and the death certificate is not (W090584 (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)) New Brittany Murphy Articlecan this [3] be linked in place of the existing paternity citation, and if not why not? (W090584 (talk) 14:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)) RE: Petergriffin9901Ridiculous stuff as always, search at his talkpage and my talkpage at January 26 and here as well. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 21:31, 4 April 2011 (UTC) Revdel?Is there any particular reason that this needed to be revdeleted? It doesn't look like something that needs to be hidden from public view at first glance, and the sockpuppet page doesn't give any hints, either. --Conti|✉ 18:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC) Thread on solicitation of others in !votingHi. This is a courtesy notification to user Jivesh boodhun, user Ratizi, admin Andrewa, and admin User:Kww. ( I've posted this identical message to each of these four user-talk pages. ) I'd like to let you know that I created a talk-page section entitled "Solicitation concerns" about an article or matter that you've been involved with previously, and that I think may be of interest to you. I've added this page to my own watchlist, temporarily, in order to not miss any response you might make here, but I'd prefer to keep all comments on the talk page for the "Dangerously in Love 2" article, if possible. Best regards, – OhioStandard (talk) 05:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC) History MergeHi Kevin! Is it possible to merge the history from this into the history of Mandy Moore discography? I would like to nominate it for an FL. Novice7 (talk) 17:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but I had to give you two barnstars. Novice7 (talk) 03:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC) HelpHey, its User:L-l-CLK-l-l, im logging out so a user doesnt stalk me as id rather stop this discussion. Could you please do something about User:Simon Dodd. As you can see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Writer (song) and Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#User:L-l-CLK-l-l he is continually insulting me and other editors for our view (which everyone, including an admin agrees with me) based on us being "incompetent" and "logically flawed" based on our age, hes not even commenting on rules anymore (because he lost) hes just insulting me, he was already warned and continues, please help. Ive stopped commenting to show good faith, tho he has insulted me on both pages yet again. 96.55.231.33 (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Re: Usher discogYeah, I am aware of that. I just thought that s/he'd understand what I was talking about, but obviously s/he didn't/still doesn't. I'll ask for somebody to revert the changes for me. Thanks! ℥nding·start 10:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC) I didn't.....Receive any welcome back flowers on behalf of my return :P. Thanks again Kevin, hope you're a little less morose than last week :). Keep in touch, I'd like to hear from you once in a while, not just when its something negative ;) Hope you're doing well!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Charles Harrelson Edit WarKevin, I believe that Nkgal is censoring my edits without justification. I have attempted to include facts about Charles Harrelson and the murder of Sam Degelia and each time Nkgal simply removes them citing copyright policy. The fact is that the content and reference material is not copyrighted. Can you please look at the edits I have made and verify that there is no copyright violation. I have read the wiki policy of copyright and verfiability and I do not see any violation of wiki policy. Please advise. Thank you. Sam Degelia (talk) 20:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC) qDo you have any thoughts re. 189.194.174.228 (talk · contribs) (and possibly, connecting to Monkeylegend (talk · contribs))? I may well be paranoid, in which case, please tell me so. Cheers, Chzz ► 03:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC) Singlechart issue?Kevin, I don't know if the problem is only for me, but it seems like the singlechart template has been modified by someone. Whenever the template is used, "On the Floor" article shows up! Novice7 (talk) 11:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
ImpersonationIP impersonated you here. I checked their contributions, because at first I thought that you forgot to sign in. --Confession0791 talk 19:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC) 'Auto update' [4] seems like a good idea, but, the ref [5] seems to say that the position is 54, not 34? Chzz ► 16:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
User WecantdoanythingaboutitNope. Its a lie. I know nothing what so ever about that account. That account is nothing what so ever to do with me. I am even happy for a check user to do a check user on my account to prove that I am nothing to do with User Wecantdoanythingaboutit. User:Ruth-2013 is my first and only account on wikipedia. (Ruth-2013 (talk) 17:47, 11 April 2011 (UTC)) 99-year blockI saw you changing a block's duration to 99 years. Isn't that as good as indefinite?Jasper Deng (talk) 18:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Megan McCauley deletion.Chime in. I Help, When I Can. [12] 02:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC) Reverting banned user's editsWas is necessary to revert the edits like this? I checked this, and it appears to be correct. Do you do this to discourage the user from making yet another sock puppet, because they will just be banned and reverted again? Blake (Talk·Edits) 16:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC) RE: Hungary Dance Top 40Hungary Dance Top 40 unnecessary. Because more important Hungary Radios Top 40.alptns90 (talk) 21:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC) I understand your concern. I tried to refrain from doing so, but that was the second time it was relisted, and I wanted to get the result (whatever it may be) over with. I will stop doing that, however. I Help, When I Can. [12] 23:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC) demi lovato awardsi am not disrupting any pahe..im just gicing my oponion which i think is right..............you should put her awards back on the list.... removal of long term trial articles from pending protectionHi I noticed you removed a few articles from pending protection that had been on long term trial, would you please avoid this without good reason as it will interfere with the possibility to easily see the long term trial articles that if they are to be removed will be removed in a single sweep, so to speak and then analysis can be done of the past and the difference in edit history from the overall removal date - it was especially Robbie Williams without reason removal that alerted me to this, Williams was one of the original trial articles, also as you are seemingly a strong opponent the trial even being in existence at this time perhaps its better if you leave the long term articles where they are till this is resolved, which will be quite soon anyways - I was wanting if there are many removals as a result of the RFC and as such the end of the long term trial to use this body of articles to see any differences between b4 and after, trial results from start to finish will imo be especially usefull from such high profile BLP articles, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 20:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
Asd140 now editing anonymouslyIt appears that User:Asd140 is editing Mike Patton-related articles again, this time by IP. I'm wondering if you think further blocks would be in order, or semi-protection for those articles? Wyatt Riot (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
SHLI'm amused by Wikipedia:Short horizontal line, and halfway hope that it will be adopted. However, this line: the only one an editor can directly type is the hyphen seems to describe only one subset of users (namely, those who use brain-damaged operating systems like Microsoft Windows). All three SHLs are easily available from the keyboard of any Mac. An en-dash is "option-hyphen", and an em-dash is "shift-option-hyphen"—slightly different from, but no more work than, typing a capital letter or most standard punctuation marks. You might want to think about a more accurate way of phrasing this sentence. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC) FleetCommandI've had a very similar discussion to the current one at WP:AN/EW before with Fleet Command, and personally, I think the best solution is for him to refrain from throwing BRD at people and to be able to admit he is wrong. I need to just know to throw it away even if it results in me not getting what I want.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Hello, Kww. As someone who edits/looks after articles of musical artists, would you mind weighing in on the Talk:Chris Brown (American singer)#section 1.4 needs to be reWritten : 2008–09: Graffiti album and domestic violence case discussion? It's about whether or not Brown's domestic violence case should be divided into its own section. We desperately need other editors weighing in on the matter. Flyer22 (talk) 20:57, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Take That DiscographyHi there, yes that is fine on second glance I see where you are coming from. No problem. Yids2010 (talk) 21:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 20:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hi there, I notice that you have been redacting and reverting some revisions on that article. I understand what you're doing, as you're removing additions by an indef-blocked user in violation of their block; but I had a look at this article's history, and noticed that your actions (Particularly on April 5) reverted a bot's edit. Is it possible for you to re-insert the bot's edit? Minima© (talk) 20:43, 16 April 2011 (UTC) Debbys Songs"Made of Matches" was released twice on iTunes, Once by the television company Debby gave them the rights to upload the tv version of the song, the second time she released it herself on iTunes. "Deck the Halls" is from the soundtrack for The search for Santa Paws. XDebby (talk) 11:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC) checkuserAny chance of a checkuser on this account http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mikeyasadie - he is creating issues everywhere. Off2riorob (talk) 22:28, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
About our discussion regarding Nobody's PerfectSongs does not need to hit charts, or receive awards to have their own article on wikipedia, this guideline is often addressed to independent and indie artists. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 23:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Block?Howdy, can you renew the block on 91.8.xxx range? Past investigations here and here. I've reverted several edits today from a few IPs in this range and its extremely irritating. Thanks in advance and how are you? - eo (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Desejo de AmarYes, i have checked it out on the magazine, which i have the signature, but if you want to, i can also post a reference from the official YouTube Channel of the Billboard Brasil, which shows the 50 most played songs on the Brazil and it shows the peak of Ivete's songs. Alright, thanks!! Loveableone(talk) 16:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC) Man, I had already apologized on the subject. If I made another account was because I lost the password and other things (e-mail). Nonetheless I think I did anything else wrong, and i don't understand why the things that i put with references were reverted (again and again, and without give me any reason), only giving as a reason "sockpuppet", being that these were properly referenced. I understand that is very bad to have another account, but I explained why it happened. This won't happen again. Greetings. --201.241.10.117 (talk) 20:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC) Flip GraterHi Kww. I was discussing a CSD with Wehwalt, and he referred me to you. The article in question is Flip Grater. Someone applied an A7 speedy tag, which I believe to be unfounded, since the references seem to suggest that the subject is notable. I have removed the tag, but I thought it a good idea to ask you and make sure. Thanks in advance!-RHM22 (talk) 18:13, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrikeHello. I reverted your recent edit at July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike because I did not understand what you meant by bad grammar and removing sources. I did not remove any sources that don't appear elsewhere in the article with the proper formatting or that do not constitute reliable sources. Feel free to fix the grammar, or if you must revert again, please explain which part you think is bad grammar. Also, you said to take my own advice and make the changes individually, but the problem is that I already have done this multiple times and V7-sport has reverted them all in a single hit, but as long as he is blocked form the article I am willing to go through and make the changes again individually. Thanks. Gregcaletta (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Re:I'm sorry, I looked wrong but corrected.alptns90 (talk) 09:32, 21 April 2011 (UTC) I'm loathe to come running to an admin, but Gregcaletta is just making the same edits that I had undone before and made objection to on the talk page without any attempt to address the previous objections on the talk page. Now what? V7-sport (talk) 00:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Nobody's Perfect.We now have our user re-opening the article because the song has charted "a little" but sourcing from crap places. I've removed a load of junk. I don't suppose you could redirect the article then fully protect it? I'll begin work on one in my sandpage and see of can't make something more notable. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 03:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
QuestionA certain editor was blocked indefinitely just about a month ago by you for having a "compromised account". His attempted legendary "alternate accounts" were not, but they have remained thankfully unused (the ones that were registered). This editor has been back as an IP since April 12 in full force; and while he may have many wiki-friends around here, I have never been one of them and his editing retains the same bad-faith nature that it always did. Why was the account blocked in the first place? If there was supposed to be a clean start, he is openly flaunting his identity yet again. I think you probably know who I'm talking about, but I can spell it out for you if I need to. My understanding was that indefinitely blocked users cannot edit because they are indefinitely blocked. What's the deal? Is this some sort of open secret? Cheers... Doc talk 08:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
ANI threadPlease give your opinion at WP:ANI#This is ridiculous - propose 1RR rules for V7sport and Iqinn - I would appreciate it. FWIW, I'm really getting tired of the filibustering, as I've called it on that page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Can you take a look?I'm increasingly troubled by this user... not only because nearly every edit of his has been reverted, but also because his overall pattern of editing seems very familiar to me. Do you think he may be related to any of our old friends? - eo (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Question on ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 being used in DiscographiesHi Kevin, a fellow wikipedian has listed Backstreet Boys discography for featured list, see it here. The person who reviewed it, claims that 3-letter county abbreviations must correlate with ISO codes, his and my comments can be found in the middle of the review. What confuses me is that when I look at all of the Featured discographies, I can't find a single one that uses DEU for Germany or CHE for Switzerland, and the sample at Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies/style also does not use ISO codes, just GER for Germany, SWI for Switzerland. But again the reviewing person states that those abbreviations may have all been surreptitiously changed, from DEU to GER, CHE to SWI. Has there been a resolution on this matter, I mean I don't see any editor trying to apply those ISO codes to discographies.--Harout72 (talk) 06:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Nagyon köszönöm Köszönöm a kedvességét. PetergriffinKevin, I'm getting really annoyed by Nathan's continuous name calling me over to other people, most recent being this one, calling me "Troll DJ from India". He has previously called me other heinous things like "asshole, moody, creep" etc, completely violating WP:NPA, but this is getting ridiculous. just because I commented in one of the GAR that the original reviewer should have pointed out obvious prose concerns. And not only me, but he goes around attacking other reviewers just because they failed one of his nomination? Thats really a bad faith and douchebaggery. I believe you have dealt with this kinda behaviour from him before also, so you will be best to help me on this matter. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Since he was unblocked he has been only attacking and harassing others:
(as well as re-assessing to his POV all Carey-related articles to high-priority in all Wikiprojects, when most of them hardly are mid-class). I don't know what's his problem, but comments like "I was not aware that I am not allowed to represent my feelings to another editor" when he perfectly knows that there is a policy. He wants people AGF on him after all those comments, and after this, please Nathan you are asking too much. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 21:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kevin. I have a favor to ask of you. Well, it's a big one. I'm currently working (have finished my work) on an article. It's in my sandbox and I'd like to merge the history with the article. Well, these revisions. I know it's a tedious job. If you don't mind, can you do it for me? Please? Thanks in advance. Novice7 (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC) ThanksThank you very much. Again I apologies. I'll be more careful.alptns90 (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC) Nevandc98 edit-warring at Sonny with a ChanceAfter your warning, Nevandc98 continued edit-warring at Sonny with a Chance and has now breached 3RR by making five reverts in less than 14 hours. Accordingly, I have reported him at WP:AN3. As one of the people who reverted him, I have mentioned you in the report and you may wish to comment. The discussion may be found here. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Re: JLO discographyThanks for the message. Yes, I'm glad alptns90 is finally getting the hang of all this. The other user involved (Harout72) seems to have changed all the chart positions in the template and the sources to them. I have reverted it because of that reason. Harout72 was making pretty bold edits, and it should have been discussed on the talk page. It looks pretty odd to me, for example, "I'm Into You" has charted in several places, and that user removed them saying it's "not backed by sources", by sources he changed. I think I'm gonna leave him a little message on his talk page about this. ℥nding·start 17:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Re:I looked at the other singers in the Canadian chart history. Does not support them up. For example: Lady Gaga and Britney Spears. Last songs "Born This Way" and "Hold It Against Me" is not included. "On the Floor" I had used it for: [7]. Is it wrong to use? it is not included here: [8] Lady Gaga Canadian chart history:http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100#/artist/lady-gaga/chart-history/1003999?f=793&g=Singles Britney Spears Canadian chart history: http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100#/artist/britney-spears/chart-history/290150?f=793&g=Singles —Alptns90 (talk) 07:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC) HelpJennifer Lopez Singles the new version looks really bad. In the old version looked better. "If You Had My Love" is Austria number 13. In addition, only two entered the top 10 and number 1 has only one in Austria . Netherlands was the only one No. 1. Also, only one No. 1 in Sweden. I really was better than the old version. Can you edit the old? and Can you help?Alptns90 (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Robert Greenblatt pageThe page for NBC executive Robert Greenblatt was deleted apparently because it was created by a banned user. Since Greenblatt is now president of NBC Entertainment (and has had a few other notable assignments), it would make sense to resurrect the page, or I would like to create a new one, whichever works best. Ducold (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC) User:V7-sport and User:IqinnI would be interested to know your opinion as an administrator as to whether topic bans for either or both of these editors would be useful here. I am frustrated: it is practically a guarantee that any page that both of these editors touch will turn into a massive dispute with an incomprehensible edit history - a violation of the spirit of the edit warring policy whether or not technical violations of WP:3RR occur. Blocks don't seem to work and both editors are capable of writing well, so I am hopeful a solution can be found that keeps them part of the community. What are your thoughts? Kind regards! VQuakr (talk) 02:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 03:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Re:There is a lot wrong. For example: "If You Had My Love" was No. 1 in The Netherlands. But it seems to No. 2. Check if you see others. As such there is a lot wrong. The old version was more reliable and better.Alptns90 (talk) 07:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC) Edit warring by V7 againCan you please maybe suggest to V7 he promised to stop his edit warring on articles? I see you recently had warned him about this, and I don't want to have to report him which could result in a block. User: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AV7-sport He is edit-warring now here, with 3 reverts already in 24 hours, without using the talk page for discussion and gaining consensus. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_and_state_terrorism&action=history Thanks.BernieW650 (talk) 19:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Born This Way (song)Kevin can you please ask Z33K not to Edit war on "Born This Way (song)" and not do MOS violations with the credits? I donot have any intention to do any 3RR, but this is just silly. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Bonaire hotelsInteresting subject. Plaza Resort Bonaire is certainly notable. The other I created, not so sure. You tell me. If you can expand it, please do, if not and you think its non notable, please delete it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC) Disruptive editorKevin, I don't think edits of User:ThisKidKnowsMuzik!:) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) are in any way good, or even accountable. Continuous vandalism of articles. Would you take administrative actions based on your judgement? — Legolas (talk2me) 02:53, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Review requestHey, Kww, I have an article I'm building, currently at GAN, which is just up your alley as one more familiar with Dutch language and culture than the average bear. It's Koninginnedag. I'd be grateful for your comments.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:23, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey Kevin, so while re-doing this article I stumbled upon an issue with the Dutch charts, maybe you could chime in and help. I found this source from Hung Medien claiming it reached #11, and then I found this source which also is official, and lists it as #1. So I'm really not sure which is the main one or which take precedence. Care to explain. Thanks :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 17:22, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Issue with Dutch Top 40.Is it just me or is the singlechart macro not working for the Dutch Top 40. See here. Also for the link I'm given can we clarify whether the song has reached number 4, 6 or 8 on the Dutch Top 40 as there appears to be lots of confusion. Thanks, — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 23:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC) BIKOYou are involved in removing that protection and you should not have done it - please revert you involved admin action. Off2riorob (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Please stop using your tools removing a protection applied in good faith because you are involved . Off2riorob (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Please explain your administrative actions using your tools - your tools were not given to you to use when you were involved and as a personal knee jerk response, please comment. Off2riorob (talk) 00:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC) admin recall -You have lost my respect for any authority you think you have . Your tools are not for you to gain in conflicts when you are angry. Off2riorob (talk) 00:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Administrative actions on Steve BikoPlease explain your reason to apply indefinite semi protection to the article Steve Biko - there is also no history of protection on the article - see here previous protection logs - Off2riorob (talk) 01:35, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Remove it from semi protection indefinitely please you have no explanation as requirement to protect it like that. Off2riorob (talk) 02:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC) MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Short horizontal lineWikipedia:Short horizontal line, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Short horizontal line and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Short horizontal line during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gerardw (talk) 10:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC) Possible GMC IP useAn IP (77.54.100.183) previously blocked after apparent use by GMC/LoveActresses/Phoebus de Lusignan is still being used to edit pages on minor nobility and actresses, the first such post-block usage coming just 2 days after Konakonian's demise, quickly followed by edits on Sir John Campbell, of Airds, a previous GMC and LoveA favorite. It does have some other edits on the Libyan insurrection, but has a distinct ducky quality to it, particularly given the past incident and it's geography (pt). Agricolae (talk) 06:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Just noticed, also edited John Say, another LoveA target, and Pilar López de Ayala a GMC target, and in a gift that keeps on giving, there the IP seems to be tag-teaming with 193.136.149.253, similar to another blocked GMC IP and elsewhere restoring Konakonian edits (and adding pedigrees to modern actresses, Lopez de Ayala and Helena Bonham Carter which quacks loudly). Agricolae (talk) 07:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Pending changesI don't know if the trial is over, or admins are bolding re-protecting pages, and I don't care, but could you please not protect pages that have not had vandalism in a while or practically never? For example, Juliano Mer-Khamis article, you probably argue BLP violations, but those happens almost never. Also, there's no justification for an indefinite semi-protection and the "standard protection mechanism" is apply to the previous proection], not upgrading it. Thank you. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 02:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Revert on my talkThanks for the revert on my talk. I restored the post, though, as I wanted to (sort of) clear up who Panichappy1 was and was not. As I said in my reply on my talk, the less said about the vandal, the better really, but if you're curious, you're welcome to email me. Cheers! TNXMan 22:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC) SongsHi Kevin, I would like your opinion and possibly help. I believe the Gaga song "Yoü and I" definitely is ridiculous as a song article. It hasn't charted anywhere, has no critical reception or background info. Only one small section about live performances. I think i will nominate it for deletion, what do you think?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC) Full protectKevin can you full-protect this page, before IPs and uber fans start another notability failing article? — Legolas (talk2me) 07:10, 11 May 2011 (UTC) Admin reconfirmationHi, you have bumped up against me recently and I was looking - its almost three years since your RFA Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kww - As a couple of users have recently allowed the community to reconfirm their support, please present yourself for reconfirmation , thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 00:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC) One, I've only been an admin a year, and two: no. Reconfirmation in an unnecessary waste of everyone's time. If you think I'm a bad admin, take it to arbcom.—Kww(talk) 00:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Creating templatesHi Kev, I've read the tutorial for creating templates but don't really understand it. Could you offer some advice or tips? I'm thinking of creating something along the same lines as {{allmusic}} but don't really know how to go about it. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 02:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Maybe?Do you think our friend TrEeMaNsHoE has returned? - eo (talk) 12:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC) Yet Another Secret ArchiveHello, I keep finding secret archives in enwiki. :-) Now it's your turn: User talk:Kww/07182010 is not listed above and not linked from anywhere. I collect interesting archive names for an upcoming bot, and I found your page and the bot discovered this hidden subpage. Bináris (talk) 19:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC) What Gos Around...Hey. I'm not sure if you do move requests, but I was wondering if you could move What Goes Around.../...Comes Around to What Goes Around... Comes Around. The song was officially released as a single as such, and there was a move request about it last month, but nothing came of it (nobody but me, just now, commented on the matter). ℥nding·start 16:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC) So...... since I'm your IP sock, what do you think we need to have this guy banned from editing? It's getting annoying. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 00:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 01:53, 17 May 2011 (UTC) Editor WiseNinja1 at List of best-selling music artistsHi Kevin, the user WiseNinja1 doesn't seem to have understood why we go with origin of careers, after everything you and I explained to this user, he/she edited the way he/she thinks it correct. I don't want to revert because I'm quite sure he/she will do the same. Could you please take a look at it if you have the time. Thanks in advance.--Harout72 (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC) Images againKevin, the similar issue to the "On the Floor" discussion is taking place here only this time with three. Care to weigh in on the discussion here?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC) ANI noticeHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Massive violations of song articles. Thank you. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC) Barry Chamish and Dustin DiamondHi, I have replaced the pending changes flag on these articles. There are specific BLP reasons for using it, and I didn't set it as part of a trial. This was marked clearly in the setting summary, but I understand that's sometimes easy to miss. I've left notes on the talk pages of the article explaining why the flag should not be removed (sorry, I should have done that before). I am happy to discuss what's the best approach for those articles either on their talk pages, or on mine. Thanks.--Scott Mac 09:06, 21 May 2011 (UTC) Cease and desist.Please do not remove FP from any BLPs without discussing the matter with the admin who placed the protection and inquiring into the circumstances. You many well be putting living people in danger of libels, or (as in one case) removing protection from the article of someone who has been libelled and complained. BLP articles need treated with the highest sensitivity - and certainly no form of protection ough to be removed without careful consideration of the specifics of the article. I will be examining the protections you have removed and restoring any on BLPs where there isn't a sign of such discussion. I would urge you to do that same. If you remove protection from any further BLPs without proper discussion and view of the specific impact to the article, I will block you as a precautionary measure.--Scott Mac 16:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Preventative blockSorry, but I have asked you to stop and so have several others. We can discuss this on ANI, but you need to desist from removing flags from BLPs in the interim. It is dangerous and the consensus is at least questionable. I will unblock you when you indicate you will not restart.--Scott Mac 17:38, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 Kww (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Pretty obvious. I've been systematically going though articles protected with Pending Changes and setting them to semi-protected or unprotected, based on my individual judgment as to the appropriate state, given the history of the article, the protection history of the article, and the results of anonymous edits during the trial period. I've invited any admin that disagrees with any individual decision to change it as he sees fit. Scott apparently believes that I need to have an individual consultation and discussion with every admin that placed the article under PC in the first place before undoing anything. That isn't the RFC result, and appears to be only supported by his individual judgment. The discussion at WP:ANI#Mass removal of Flagged revision from BLPs certainly isn't supportive of his position. Accept reason: Unblocking, but I strongly urge Kww to join the discussion before continuing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC) This is being discussed on ANI. Any admin reviewing this is invited to join that discussion first.--Scott Mac 17:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Arbcom requestI have filed a request for arbitration. May I yet again request you desist from mass-unflagging of BLPs, without discussion, until arbcom can consider this.--Scott Mac 19:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Start againWould you be willing to put the last hours aside (I'm not asking you to agree with my actions, or even to refrain for calling for me to be desysopped) and see if we can actually get some agreement. The starting point would be:
My suggestion would be
Any thoughts?--Scott Mac 22:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Thoughts: Sounds like reasonable proposals, so maybe you can propose them, and see if you can get consensus. Meanwhile, please accept current consensus. Chzz ► 02:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC) PeachesHi, I put Peaches (pornographic actress) back to semi-protection, and there is a pretty strong case for that based on the OTRS ticket Jclemens referenced (I'm not sure you can see that, if you can, take a look). Whatever the fate of PC is, IP's have been nothing but problems there. Courcelles 02:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
As for Peaches, I find the protection based on an OTRS ticket a pretty weak argument for that one. It's an article on a Hungarian porn star that was being blanked by a Hungarian IP for a short while three months ago. The difference between the version the IP was intent on blanking and the current one is this. The only possible BLP issue is whether a woman that participates in lesbian sex on camera for a living can be placed in an LGBT category, and that's not much of a BLP issue. As for Tony Meléndez, the only edit since Oct. 2010 was this. There's no way that any objective view of that edit history would warrant protection. I won't undo anything you've done, but there's nothing in either case that justifies protection.—Kww(talk) 02:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
AAAAaaaaarrrrgggggghhhhhhhh...etc. Whatever vestige of faith I had in consensus has been eradicated by the recent action in blocking you. I will write more later, I imagine. Chzz ► 02:30, 22 May 2011 (UTC) "Tricks"I've come to terms that this is the best solution and the confusing mind of Disney has set a standard that makes people go crazy with the back and forth and such. I'll just let everything go and just add to the article and prevent any vadalism as what an Editor should do. - Alec2011 (talk) 15:40, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Record Chart template removal considerationI am contacting directly you because you have edited Wikipedia talk:Record charts more than once in the last two weeks. The following templates are at issue at The Beatles: See Talk:The_Beatles#Template_removal.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Edit summariesPlease do not use an edit summary like "wasting time, per Arbcom injunction" when unsemiprotecting articles. My concern is not the feelings of my arbitrator colleagues, but that the edit summary will be incomprehensible and seem unprofessional to editors on the article who might have occasion to review the history and are not familiar with the pending-changes dispute. Thanks, Newyorkbrad (talk) 03:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC) commentsHi. Look we're not going to agree on a load of stuff, but in response to iridescent's question about where you and I stand, let me say a few things.
I bear no grudges (such things are useless on Wikipedia) I hope this may help put the drama (if not the genuine disagreements in perspective) behind us. Thanks.--Scott Mac 17:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Secure articlesHow do u put a security lock on a article? Dbunkley6 (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC) Link may need fixingHi! at the arbitration case (section "The Timeline"), the following statement...
...might be better if the URL... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Scott_MacDonald&oldid=430212314 ...was replaced with the URL... Is there a barnstar I can award you for "most obviously innocent person ever falsely accused of wrongdoing on Wikipedia?" (smile). Guy Macon (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Shearonink (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC) Word limit and BLP and flagged revisionsHi Kww. This comment is made in my capacity as an arbitration clerk. I have removed your responses to other participants from the BLP and flagged revisions case request, because your statement was well in excess of the 500 word limit. As a reminder, the word limit is established in the introduction to WP:A/R/C thus: "All editors wishing to make statements should keep their statements and any responses to other statements to 500 words or fewer, citing supporting diffs where possible.") I will leave it to you to re-add the material that you want to keep, but please ensure that your statement does not again exceed the length restriction. Thank you. AGK [•] 21:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Puffery?you dont know the box office results of her movies in that country because if you do that isnt puffery merely a description of what she has achieved. Just like what is stated i wiki rules that state the just facts. Her movies are consistent box office hits and her movie You Changed My Life is the Philippines Highest Grossing Film of all time. Articles stated that she is the box office queen of this generation in that country. Any questions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamikazee99 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC) Puffery?Hello kww. i think you dont know the box office results of her movies in that country because if you do that isnt puffery merely a description of what she has achieved. Just like what is stated i wiki rules that state the just facts. Her movies are consistent box office hits and her movie You Changed My Life is the Philippines Highest Grossing Film of all time. Articles stated that she is the box office queen of this generation in that country. Any questions? i will clarify them up to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamikazee99 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC) it is a legitimate award given by the group of people in the Philippines.the box office queen award is a legitimate award given to the lead star of the highest grossing film of that year. Guillermo Mendoza Memorial Scholarship Foundation Inc. is an awarding body that gives recognition to such artist. It is a yearly award in the Philippines and it has always been for 40 years. It is a widely recognized award giving body in Philippines. [1] [2][3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamikazee99 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC) Jennifer Lopez genre vandalism, againKevin, do you think you could use that soft block thing you used the other time? The fanboy is back as 2.33.80.129 (talk · contribs). Thanks! SnapSnap 22:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC) Routerone and John FoxeI'm curious as to why you indefinitely blocked User:Routerone, but didn't mete out the same consequences to User:John Foxe. Both are coming off of the same short block for edit warring, and both seemed to have returned to the same edit warring behavior. In fact, I would say that John Foxe's recent edit warring was far worse on that page - 6 reverts in the last 48 hours, including a (imo) clear 3RR violation ([11],[12],[13],[14]) - the fifth violation he's done in a about five weeks. I guess I fail to see how Routerone's behavior is considered chronic edit warring and deserves an indefinite block, but John Foxe's behavior isn't and doesn't? --FyzixFighter (talk) 04:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Kevin, we have another case of a Gaga song being created out of the gate based on its charting. These are all getting kinda out of hands now. How can we stop this? WP:NSONGS really needs to be upgraded to make it tight. There are so many loopholes in it. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
VanniyarHi Kevin, This is regarding the article Vanniyar. Thanks for making the article protected. I would like to improve the article by cleaning it up and citing references, making corrections etc. Please let me know how I can do this, because I am not able to edit the article as of now. Looking forward for your inputs. Thanks, Kalingarayar (talk) 11:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC) Nelly FurtadoHello! I just wanted to inform you that Nelly Furtado is not just an artist of the pop genre. I've heard all her albums and I know that for a fact. Whoa, Nelly! her first album had a trip hop sound with folk and electronic elements, while her vocals were mostly R&B. Folklore her second album was majorly folk and folk pop along with an overall acoustic and rock feel to it. Some songs were also of the blue-eyed soul and world music genre. Loose was dance-pop, R&B and hip-hop. Mi plan was latin music and pop latino. I know that the genres were unsourced, but rather than just wiping them away, why don't you help me in finding some references. Please! Thank you!Manas justice (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC) Nelly Furtado articleMaybe this article will explain Nelly's eclecticism.Cite error: There are Nelly Furtado genreThis article should help as well..... Cite error: There are Nelly Furtado pageOk. Thank you for enlightening me! But I think that you should atleast include folk and r&b as well because songs in both genres have been consistently performed by Nelly in most of her albums. By the way, the genre list that I had put up was actually very diluted. Nelly has performed in more than 50 different genres!!! I think in the associated acts James Bryan should be included as well having worked with her on more than one album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manas justice (talk • contribs) 17:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC) Dcupdates11 is a sockpuppet of Nevandc98I've only just realised that User:Dcupdates11 is a sockpuppet of User:Nevandc98. The latest SPI case is at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nevandc98. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC) Hi, could you comment there? Routerone has accepted 0RR as a condition of an unblock, but I'd rather that you as the blocker be the judge of their sincerity. Sandstein 06:03, 7 June 2011 (UTC) unblock thanksThanks for summing this up so well. I expect it's a "rope" case also, but I would love to be proven wrong. tedder (talk) 14:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC) Sock questionHi, I see you are familiar with a sockpuppeter called Wiki-11233 (talk · contribs). Would you say that EachCoach2 (talk · contribs) is possibly him? Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
WFFI'm considering sticking {{db-userreq}} on User:Alanyst/WFF since that dispute is now over two years old. Since you were involved in it, do you have any objections? I'm happy to keep it around if you feel it's still useful. alanyst 14:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Take another look?I know I asked your opinion before (when the user was new) but this editor keeps grabbing my attention. Do you think s/he has anything to do with User:TrEeMaNsHoE and his many socks? It just seems so familiar to me, but maybe I'm looking too hard for something that isn't there. - eo (talk) 18:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC) Chartingohh right ok, thanks. Yeah i asked that question then a massive thread started about things which had nothing to do with my question haha.calvin999 (talk) 13:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC) Page move revertYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. User:Z33k... still causing trouble, removing BMI/ASCAP credits as seen here. He was previously blocked for similar behaviour at Born This Way (song). — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 22:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC) re: my revertThanks! Crystal Clear x3 20:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Hot100brasilKev, this IP 201.58.178.2 (talk · contribs) has been going on adding the hot100brasil.com peaks for the songs in articles, while sourcing them falsely to Billboard Brazil magazine. I caught the tomfoolery today after my magazine arrived in mail. Can you please take a look? — Legolas (talk2me) 07:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Kevin, there seems to be a small issue with re-directs or something of that nature. When you search for "Underneath the Stars" (its a Carey song), its an automatic re-direct to the 4:13 Dream, which has a song of the same title, but not one notable enough for its own page. I would like it if you can please remove that re-direct, and then i could possibly move the song to just "Underneath the Stars" since no other article has the name. Please and thanks Kevin!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 10:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC) Possible Sock puppetryHi Kevin, we seem to have the same person editing with two different accounts at List of best-selling music artists, Enriquetaha and Farid1374. These recent edits especially made me realize that, an edit made by Enriquetaha at 10:27 and an edit made by Farid1374 at 11:16. Both are the same exact edits and are made within a period of some 45 minutes apart. If you have the time, please take a look. Thanks.--Harout72 (talk) 15:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
ReIt's not that i do not know. I have forgotten his username on Wikipedia. And who told you i am the one adding those positions? Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC) Please reply. I will go to bed in 30 minutes or a little more. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC) I think there is a difference between "adding" and "re-adding something that was removed", right? I explained my point on the IP page. Just because the position of Lady Gaga's song "Hair" seem to coincide. we cannot ignore those of other artists' songs whose chart positions are different from that on the bad chart. Do you get what i am telling? I know, i do not use a very good English. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC) What do you mean by validated? Do you mean having a physical copy of the magazine? Please explain. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC) Okay. But Google does not have it. So will i be blocked now? Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:19, 14 June 2011 (UTC) Sorry for late reply, as i told you, i would have gone to bed by that time. Hey as you know, i was blocked a lot of times when i came her in 2009 but i have changed now. You know i have, don't you? And all the mistakes i did, they were not intentional, i think we all pass through this phase before becoming a good editor (if i can apply this term to myself). I hope you have not kept anything against me because of the Afd of Freakum Dress. No offense, just asking. Jivesh • Talk2Me 04:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Who Says (Selena Gomez & the Scene song)Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the song is, in fact, certified Platinum by the RIAA. It may or may not be in the database as of this writing, but it is on the main RIAA page where it lists recent certifications. I just wanted to clear this up so there wasn't any confusion in the future. Thanks. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 16:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Charlie (again)Could you please protect those pages? He insists in edit Ray of Light (song). ۞ Tbhotch™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 19:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Kevin what do you think of the edits of Gabiarakelian (talk · contribs) and Gaga690 (talk · contribs)? Both seem to have a common interest in Britney Spears' album Femme Fatale and its corresponding tour, and both are edit warring with Iknow23 (talk · contribs) over a date of a song in the inforbox, although there is an open discussion in the talk page. I do believe these might be sock of each other. — Legolas (talk2me) 16:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC) Teen Scene Top 50Now an 92.20.4.61 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is now at it too... — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 15:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
CharlieJSKevin one request, when you block this bugger's IPs can you please block talk page accesses also to stop abusing other users? — Legolas (talk2me) 16:59, 19 June 2011 (UTC) RE: On The FloorI'm not from Brazil, but I know that the only source available to support these positions is the magazine itself. However, the peak position to "On the Floor" in Brazil's Hot 100 Airplay is #15. I'm not sure of the second. VítoR™ get LOUD! 20:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC) Template:SinglechartHey Kww, since you seem to have a better grasp on {{Singlechart}} than I do, I wanted to point out that all links to Billboard need to be changed to take the form of http://www.billboard.com/#/song/artist/artistid, for example, http://www.billboard.com/#/song/Evanescence/8222332. Good grief, I'm getting tired of Billboard changing their link format. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
He's back again as 69.115.82.63 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I've just done an IP block for a week, but he's been active since May 21 and there's a ton of articles. Any ideas? cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 19:02, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Ducking to me, but take a look at 12.196.0.56 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 68.197.112.12 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), the former is a mobile device, latter is the home network, same geolocation and ISP. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 10:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC) Meera Jasmine ProfileKevin Wayne Williams I had been in touch with Sarah Ewart and Joseph Evans of Wikimedia/Wikipedia information team and had given them links of the various historical changes associated with this profile "Meera Jasmine" via emails. The ticket number associated with this is [Ticket#2010030910028377.Starting from 2004, lots of obscene stuff had been entered into her profile by a vandal. I don't have the time right now, to search for those links(from 2004) but will mention the most recent vandal attacks here: on January 13 2010, the vandal entered a column "DIED" and the day of her death as January 14 2010. Also under the spouse colume the name Josesph was entered. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meera_Jasmine&oldid=337540787 on January 19 and 20, lots of changes associate with her profile once again took place and it was entered by this Vandal that she was marrying "Vibin Joseph". http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meera_Jasmine&oldid=338961608 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meera_Jasmine&oldid=339132542 Since, 2003 or so, looks like this Vandal has been instrumental in "Spreading a number of Malicious Rumors" about her not only via. Wikipedia but also calling up various national newspapers in India, like the "Times Of India" etc and other electronic medium. Hope this was helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmicschool (talk • contribs) 12:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meera_Jasmine&oldid=132171500. There have been quite a few edits in the Past, that have been downright malicious and insulting to her. Cosmic (talk) 06:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meera_Jasmine&oldid=24159392 - Cosmic (talk) 07:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC) RE:English commentI'm seeing three problems:
Kevin I have a question, I know that Pop 100 was discontinued, but why does Billboard still list it in recent songs? I was looking through my account in Billboard.biz for charts pertaining to Lady Gaga song "Yoü and I", and found a Pop 100 peak included also among the other charts. Do you know of this? — Legolas (talk2me) 06:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. --Sodabottle (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC) KwwSodabottle keeps on chasing me and reverting my edits after a brawl in a social networking site. He has been blocked for revert wars already. He is becoming a Wikibully 59.96.216.209 (talk) 07:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC) KwwSodabottle keeps on chasing me and reverting my edits after a brawl in a social networking site. He has been blocked for revert wars already. He is becoming a Wikibully 59.96.216.209 (talk) 07:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Just see. I will make an edit in Chera dynasty page and he will revert or one of his socks will revert in 5 minutes. 59.96.216.209 (talk) 07:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC) And now, they have branded me as a sock and protected the article. All of 'them' are socks of one and only a single individual named Sudarshan. 117.206.98.106 (talk) 08:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC) BusSDriverI believe Pé de Chinelo is back. We've dealt with him before. Do I have enough proof? :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
AN noticeHello, I mentioned your username at WP:AN, because of an issue you may be involved. The direct link is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Proposing_community_ban_on_User:CharlieJS13. Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:30, 3 July 2011 (UTC) Brazilian chartsI know there has been an issue with wrong Brazilian chart data being added lately. Is 201.58.134.8 adding the correct data, or could it be the same user with a dynamic IP address? Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
IsThis a legit edit? — Legolas (talk2me) 16:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Austrian chart and Swedish charthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Austrian_chart_and_Swedish_chart SJ(talk) 10:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC) FavorCould you please delete User:L-l-CLK-l-l-Tester or change it to a "vanished user" and delete the pages associated with it; I dont remember the password and im never going to use it again. Please and thanks :) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 06:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC) RihannaHi Kevin. I see you are aware of the brewing battle at her bio page. Please keep watch, as I fear a block will come for me for reversions. It appears they either don't or want to understand the independent rule, or her certifications argument. Thanks--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 22:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Red Hot Chili Pepepers album edit warI noticed recently you blocked z33k for 72 days. This person seems to have a history of unwanted edits and has been warned countless times. Now they have decided to make daily unwanted edit the album page for the Red Hot Chili Peppers' I'm with You. When each album artcle was created we always went with the U.S. release date (in this case it is Aug 30 2011) to be consistant with all the other album articles/discography for the band. Even though this is NOT the first date of release (it's always released days earlier in other countries) it is the one the band promotes on their website, which is seen by every fan worldwide. The user continues to edit the page with the German release date of Aug 26, 2011 despite the Aug 30, 2011 release date being used for over a month in this and other band articles/disographies, something they tend to avoid when making their edits so the album page lists a different date than the main band article or discography. This person seems to have zero other contributions to the article except for their daily edits to the release date. Anytme I chane it back to the original Aug 30 date this person edits it the next day. Please if possibble either keep a watch on this article or step in if you can. I have been part of the Wikiproject for this band since 2006, keeping it updated/cleaned up more than most. I also do the same for the album article, which I helped to create/form. So far this is the only so-called edit war I have been invovled with but clearly not the first for this other user. I was unsure what else to do because the daily careless edits are getting to be annoying. Jason1978 (talk) 06:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC) Requiring sourcesI've been meaning to drop you a note about Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Require_all_new_articles_to_contain_at_least_one_source since I first saw it. The proposal is doomed (2:1 against), but if your reasons are different from the ones already suggested by other editors, then I'm sure that Floydian (the proposer) would be happy to hear from you. He entertains some hope of refining his arguments and perhaps someday gaining support for the concept. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Quick questionWe have an editor Sufur222 who constantly inserts positions for Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles and Bubbling Under R&B/Hip-Hop Singles at Eminem discography and others. He claims on my talk page in this edit that they are ok to use because Bubbling under... charts are simply extensions of Billboard Hot 100 and Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs. While I have removed Bubbling under... positions from Eminem discography because I think the two should not be mixed together, I'd like to be 100% sure if the bubbling positions do really have any direct relation with the main charts (Hot 100 and R&B) as Sufur222 claims. Are they really extensions of the main charts? We don't seem to have any sources supporting those claims at the wiki pages.--Harout72 (talk) 00:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Another Chace Watson sockAt least, I think it is. It's an IP trying to canvass people. See this message left on my talk page. Nymf hideliho! 13:44, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Unsourced positionsTechnically all of the below-top 50 positions in Australia on the Selena Gomez & the Scene discography are unsourced, as is the supposed #78 in the UK for "A Year Without Rain" and #168 for "Love You Like a Love Song", as the source provided is only the OCC's Top 75. I'm pointing this out because it's a bit of a double standard to remove my recent additions of below-top 50 peaks in Australia, but leave intact the old ones, or the ones from other countries (of which I'm not sure you're familiar with). The same goes for the Foo Fighters' discography: Where's the source for #55 in Australia for "Rope"? Same with the #121 for "The One" in the US, which is not covered by the Billboard reference. I'm not saying this to excuse myself, but selecting just my additions seems like a bit of an oversight. Ss112 15:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC) In case you aren't aware: 69.115.82.63 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Blocked again today and now unblock declined too. —SpacemanSpiff 18:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Speak Now, recent edit`I opened a talk page post at Talk:Speak_Now#SYN:_Total_sales regarding the material I reverted to Speak Now. Would you mind adding your thoughts on the matter? Dan56 (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 01:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Calvin • 999 01:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Hi Kevin, hope you are doing well. I came to ask your opinion on the matter, to see if you think its even worth the discussion and campaign. Now, I know cover versions of songs are usually always one article, but I was wondering what you thought about possibly separating the Carey version. Thing is, with all three high profile versions on that page, it will become an incredibly large article ("Hero" alone is almost 75K and this one is arguably more notable in many regions). I fear the page will become very difficult to navigate, and very large to load etc. What do you think about proposing a split? I'm sure exceptions have been made in the past. Thanks!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 06:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Foo Fighters discographyJust thought I would point out to you that the US chart positions for the Foo Fighter's singles "The One" and "Let it Die" are not impossible as you say they are. They actually charted on the Billboard Bubbling Under Hot 100 which is an extension of the Hot 100. For example "The One" charted at number 21 on the Bubbling Under Hot 100 which means it got to number 121 on the Hot 100. However as that particular table only states the Hot 100 I am not going to change your edits. QuintusPetillius (talk) 15:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC) User:ImdoingThe above user's edits are somewhat similar to that of Punkox (talk · contribs). Can you take a look Kevin? Novice7 (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2011 (UTC) ReLol i'm so sorry! I didn't realize I made that edit. I just installed Twinkle and I accidentally pressed "Vandalism" on one of his edits. Pancake (talk) 18:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Hi Kevin, so we had an AfD for this article, and the result was to merge it with Rainbow. I do not know how to merge those things, and how to close the page for good once its been merged. Can you help me? Thanks! :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 21:17, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Question on Template:Singlechart/docHi Kevin, the Template that we use for the singles' tables seems to produce an incorrect chart provider for Switzerland, see this for example. It reads Media Control AG. Does Media Control GfK International work with official Swiss charts provider, Hitparade? I don't think it does. I tried to discuss this at the Template talk:Singlechart, but that page doesn't seem to be on anybody's watchlist, I got no replies. Anyways, I changed the incorrect Media Control Charts for Switzerland to Schweizer Hitparade, but it didn't seem to affect the tables anywhere including this. Are they all being fed on from another Template page? I was under the impression I made the correction on the right page.--Harout72 (talk) 01:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
RihannaUser talk:PD.Baker24 really worth unblocking? 6 months off and they still fail to figure out what got them blocked in the first place and are still making the same incorrect edits. WP:COMPETENCE is lacking (no offense to them), EG: Twitter as a source. The only reason they confessed to socking is because i caught them "I have begun editing on July 23, 2011 to update Wikipedia" he/she has said it like 4 different times "im new here" and thats what tipped me off because of the continual restating of this. If they get unblocked, i dont think it will be long before they're reblocked. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 18:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 19:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
