This is a Purge link for the page you are currently on. There is no reason to click it unless something looks out of date. An example would be if I did some archiving and the list of pervious pages is not yet updated on the current page.
pending changes reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Page locks are only used as a last resort. One user referring to the Lincoln memorial as being a fart does not require that strong of a response. The fast majority of Reg users & IP users do not commit vandalism. Krj373 (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
. Vandalism and or possible sock puppetry. I am am not sure. on the accuracy/validity of the changes and am not comfortable in reverting to a previous version at this time.
Someone else saw it and reverted everything 3 minutes after you posted. Grin. I'll just mark this help request as answered. Alsee (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Whistle Radio
Hi there thanks for your info, A post was made 16 December 2015 that is inaccurate. I want to update the content with the latest information and current status according to the CRTC. The old content is inaccurate and damaging to the station.
The accuracy of the current information can be verified by the organization.
You should put the reasons for the change on the article's talk page and why you feel it is necessary. I am not familiar with the station & do not know the details of what you believe is in error. Your edits do appear to be promotional and that is against some Wikipedia policy. If you have good reason to believe a change is warranted they may however be accepted. Krj373 (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have a dynamic IP. (Look it up if you don't know what that is.) As a result of my ISP's practices of using dynamic IPs, which I have no control over, Lord Laitinen has plastered sockpuppet/vandalism warning all over those IP talk pages. I have been attempting to remove those egregiously ignorant warnings, as I am allowed to do per WP:BLANKING, but a bot won't allow me to remove an entire warning at once. So I'm forced to remove part at once. Removing a warning is perfectly legitimate per WP:BLANKING and *NOT* vandalism.32.218.43.204 (talk) 23:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please try to keep the discussion civil. Insults in comments & edit history's are not necessary or appropriate. If what you are saying is true. I would suggest you to create a account. It will keep your edit histories in one place & remove any appearance of sock puppetry. A large percentage of residential internet users have a dynamic IP. I have worked as a network admin. I do understand how these things work & why they are used. Have a good day. Krj373 (talk) 16:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I never claimed there was. However if you IP is using load balancing and switching IP addresses as quick as it appears it would eliminate that appearance. I will again point out the WP:civil guidelines. Your tone appears aggressive & some of you previous edit comments appear rather rude. Granted what is intended and what is interpreted can be two very different things. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib)16:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
What did I do wrong? I took one page, put its content on another, and said I was merging them. Am I supposed to ask people if they think it should be merged? It makes no sense to have to go through all that process just because you think that's how it's supposed to happen.--2601:140:8200:DE:3005:7302:9C2B:33D8 (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your questions on my attempted edit on the WXDB LP page. I was the person who did the work raised the money and launched the Charleston, WV low power FM station. The article is detrimental to my character. I have been portrayed in a “false light” where the information written is not technically false, but is misleading. The problems relating to the demise of WXDB where due to my mental and emotional well-being at the time not based on my radio management abilities. The information on this page stains my reputation. Thereful I request your help with my edits.
Assuming the subject passes the notability test, excision of the purely promotional bits would leave enough material for a decent article, so CSD G11 doesn't apply.
That said, just because it doesn't qualify for speedy deletion doesn't mean it belongs here, so I do encourage you to submit it to AfD. larryv (talk) 20:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
