|
User talk:Krish!/Archive 6
Kareena KapoorIt seems a strange coincidence that you've suddenly edited this with derogatory remarks and threats to take it to FAR as if its some sort of angry backlash that I didn't pass your Kaminey article for GA and against Smaro. You never ceases to amaze me with your level of childishness, my 10 year old cousin displays a greater maturity at times than you Prashant. If you have concerns with the article, please provide sufficient evidence on the talk page and it can be discussed in a mature fashion without accusations and attacks and if you're correct then adjustments can be made. Its funny that you should suddenly launch an attack on an article which largely was written in the last few years by Bollywooddreamz rather than myself. If you think something is unfair or unjust, how about you use your brain and go about it like an adult eh? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Don't reflect Blofeld, you have admitted that Kapoor's article is a bit too much praise....praise....praise and more praise. Remember negative review for Fashion is used in her article....Infact that comment praise her but, next line criticizes the sketch. I can't find other reviews which don't praise Chopra for fashion. But, critical acclaim for Heroine??? I can give 10 negative reviews. Intact, kapoor article has been widely written and know you are not a main contributor but BD is. So, you can't really be bias here. Remember an editor asked to remove a quote from lead Burt, he is adding quotes in his GAs and adding biggest grossers in the lead??? Has he included given box office duds on those articles??? For the FAR, it's my right, in the same you Dharm did. I can ....i just notified him that he should correct. And, NO its not because you failed Kaminey. I saw your review after that inclusion on Kapoor article. I'm not getting childish here. Well for the correctness, I'll come to every Indian FA which are written just to praise. Not neutral at all.—Prashant 13:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC) No, I said that both the Zinta and Kapoor articles haven't that much criticism, there's a difference. Me personally if I'm solely writing an article I like to have a delicate balance of positive and negative reviews. Anyway, if you can overlook this for a bit, I've created User:Dr. Blofeld/Priyanka Chopra filmography. Some of those TV appearances might be worthy of inclusion but it needs a fair bit of work.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC) I don't think so because she has done 10000 appearances on TV. So, I'll have to create another article for her appearances. If we chose randomly than, According to vensatry, we are not comprehensive. For vensatry, who are you to judge me and my research? I know everything about her, as a fan I know almost all things which I should know. Then how Balan, Kapoor and Zinta passed as they are not comprehensive as well as they don't list their entire tv appearance. WHY YOU DIDN'T IPPOSED THERE. I MIGHT OPEN FAR OF ALL THE ARTICLES FOR YOU SO, THAT YOU DO THE SAME THERE. I KNOW YOU ARE SPEAKING WHOSE LANGUAGE!! GENTLEMENT AGREEMENT DON'T MEANS TELLING OTHERS THROUGH EMAILS TO OPPOSE OTHERS ARTICLE. YOUR ARTICLES (OOPS! YOU DON'TWRITE ANY!! YOU ONLY WRITE EASY FLCS TO SHOW THAT YOU ARE A BRILLIANT EDITOR....HUH?? —Prashant 16:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Shreya GhoshalCan you help in improving the article Shreya Ghoshal by working on it or suggesting ways to improve it, such that it becomes eligible for FA class or GA class. Bubaikumar (talk) 07:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Thanks! Bud. I'll start working on it. Cheers!—Prashant 10:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Also, I want to tell you that it's going to be a tough process as we really don't have featured or even a good article on Indian playback singers (I don't know why we don't have?). But, nothing is impossible. We will do it.—Prashant 10:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Yes, we will do that. Also, Shreya Ghosal is an icon and she deserves to be a featured article.—Prashant 11:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC) FLCPer this comment, do you wish to withdraw the Priyanka Chopra filmography nomination? Please let me know. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 9Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parineeti Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Film Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Your requests will get done faster if you don't ask for a particular copyeditor; for example, I'm working on other things and probably won't have time for requests until next month. If you have trouble at GA and FA, chances are it's for a reason other than the copyedit. All the best, Miniapolis 19:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
CopyeditThe copyediting for Don 2 and Dostana (2008 film) is complete, any plans on taking them to GA? ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC) Hey User:Kailash29792, well I'll definitely nominate them for GA. But, I have nominate Kaminey first and then Aitraaz and Don 2. Well for Dostana, it is not ready I was about to expand it but I couldn't. So, are you ready to review any (all( of them? Lemme know!—Prashant 05:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes, Blofeld! Kailasg29792 was saying the same thing. I want to be fully prepared before nominating any article. I don't want to hurry.—Prashant 11:04, 14 November 2013 (UTC) OK, I'll try to give Kaminey a copyedit myself before the weekend if you can take care of the plot. It will pass GA this time :-].♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC) Reviewing Shreya
Copyedit complete!
ChopraNot too keen on the current photograph. Looks a bit manly. I think there are better photos of her in the commons.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Dunno, can you remember what we had before?♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC) Ya, I think that pic was from her appearance at the Marrakech Film Festival but, I think it was deleted for the reasons unknown to me. I don't even know the time or the user who/why deleted it. That picture was like a royal one, which was awesome. It was the best picture by far. The picture was kind of royal princess. So, what to do?—Prashant 16:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC) Ha I knew it was too good to be true! Oh well...♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC) You may choose from the rest.—Prashant 17:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC) StarThank you! BollyJeff | talk 14:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Happy New Year
Happy new year — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bheem26 (talk • contribs) 05:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks! for the wishes.—Prashant 12:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC) HAHK....!What I really need is info about its making. Haven't found anything. BollyJeff | talk 00:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC) IP attacksWhy is it that you are frequently being harassed by IP addresses? I've never seen so many such attacks. BTW, I've reverted most of their actions. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
WP:ANIHi Prashant! Seeing the IP abuse in your talk page, and now that you have mentioned of the abuse in Dr. Blofeld's page, best for you is to raise it in WP:ANI and tell them of the threats. Also you can forward those threatening e-mails to administrator's inbox with the E-mail priviledge and let them know too. Very soon this will be sorted, cheers. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 09:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Avoid ANI. The best thing you can do is to email a trustworthy admin, forwarding the emails.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Reference Errors on 8 January
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC) PleasePlease try to understand that speaking in capital letters can signify rudeness, cruelty et all. that is not normally acceptable in Wiki and can lead to u being blocked. Even if somebody insulted u on Wiki, u must maintain ur cool and not show them ur bad side. Pls do not think I am commanding u, but I am trying to save u from facing unnecessary trouble. I know how excellent an editor u r, with anger management being ur only weakness. So pls do not do anything that can lead to u being blocked bcos of that one silly reason. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Ya, im sorry but, those nominations made me a bit angry. Will not happen again. Sorry!—Prashant 15:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Pls help meI have trouble adding info on varun dhawan page. TheRedPenOfDoom keep on reverting pages film info. tried to the same wih Priyanka Chopra filmography as well and i added Yash Raj films reference then the user stopped blanking Priyanka Chopra page. Hope to get help from you as im not a brilliant on wiki, only on and off editor. Daan0001 (talk) 12:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hasee Toh Phasee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC) March 2014
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 16Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mujhse Shaadi Karogi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 24Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parineeti Chopra, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coke and Mahindra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
In My CityLooks like an interesting topic. I'll review it tomorrow. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
MCU GA reviewHi, I think you remember having opened the GA review for Marvel Cinematic Universe. I think it would be fair that you finish it before the GA review for Disney's Beauty and the Beast. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Since you did both that and Thor 2, are you willing to take a look at a Marvel list? Thanks. igordebraga ≠ 18:12, 28 April 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Yup it went through with a little less drama than previously LOL. Well done Prashant for sticking with it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
When?The bot hasn't been working properly in a long time. It's by far the most frustrating part of being involved in this process, for us closers and the nominators. I'll take a look at your FLC when I get a chance (probably tomorrow) and see if I can trigger a close. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:32, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
A little reminder on Frozen (2013 film)My gratitude again for reviewing the article. However, I'd like to remind you to close the review by updating the article status as in the instruction. Thanks! P.S. If you had planned to do so, sorry for any inconvenience ;)Forbidden User (talk) 15:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Precious again actress A year ago, you were the 574th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Talk:The Chainsmokers/TempTalk:The Chainsmokers/Temp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:The Chainsmokers/Temp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:The Chainsmokers/Temp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 18:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC) RequestHey Prashant. I request you to review the Lucknow article for GA status. I have worked tirelessly on the article pulling many all-nighters to make it a high quality WP article which includes copy-edit and restructuring. Now all it needs is an honest GA review because i will be out in some some days for a few months so i will not be able to provide solutions to the shortcomings which the article may have during the review and the nominations seem to have been pending since May and i wanted a rapid review. Thanking You. Wikiboy2364 (talk) 19:30, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Two GAs you took on for reviewHi Prashant! I hope you're well. I was looking over the Good Article nominations, and I saw that you have two still open (one for Gravity and one for Captain America: The Winter Soldier) that you haven't commented on in awhile. The editor who opened the reviews has made several changes, so I was wondering if I could sort of call you back to them. I understand if you've been busy, of course, I just wanted to follow up. Thank you for reviewing! Sock (
I can understand. My exams went nicely. Actually, great except one paper (Network Theory: Synthesis and Analysis), which was above average.—Prashant 04:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Kom (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Olympic, Outlook and Black (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC) Mary KomHere are a few references regarding PC as Mary Kom (development). Ssven2 (talk) 07:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC) http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/first-look-priyanka-chopra-mary-kom/1/347361.html http://www.business-standard.com/article/specials/finding-mary-kom-114082101060_1.html http://www.firstpost.com/living/priyanka-as-mary-kom-casting-coup-or-racist-faux-pas-737231.html Thank You. But, I know everything regarding the film, when it was started, how, why? It was made. Every article I have read about the film since its inception. So, that should be okay. Thanks again!—Prashant 04:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Forgotten GA review?I think you remember opening the GA review for Gravity; it's still not over. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC) Introduction of each other.Hi, thanks for taking time for updating this Mary Kom (film) page on wikipedia. Glad to see this. I also update this page but there is a user "TheRedPenOfDoom". He keeps altering the updates and falsifying them which is irritating and considered as a severe offence according to Wikipedia rules and regulations. All started, about Mary Kom movie number of screens: the movie was released in around 1500 screens across India (confirmed by reliable sources which i used in the page) but Mr. TheRedPenOfDoom was hell bent on falsifying this and was wrongly representing the number of screens as 3000! To my amaze, Bang Bang was released in around 3500 - 4000 screens (Big budget movie) and Mr. TheRedPenOfDoom thinks Mary Kom as well has the similar number of screens though 3000 screens for Mary Kom do not have any reliable source and Mr. TheRedPenOfDoom was only showing false updates. How silly of him! He has become so irritating and undoing all our edits. This case should be reported to immediately to Wikipedia! Recently, I updated the whole music review of Mary Kom and that as well was undone by Mr. TheRedPenOfDoom. I even created a professional ratings for the music which he removed as well. This is so annoying because he is removing true sources and implementing only negative updates. So, what's your views on this user's actions? Thanks Again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TwitterYa (talk • contribs) 17:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Well, I really have nothing against anyone. I think The Red Pen is a nice user, though never interacted. I doesn't hold bad feelings against anyone. My main focus is good film articles and I had done with Priyanka Chopra articles. But, there are few problems in your edits, you sometime add unreliable sources like Bollyspice.com and others. So he did good by reverting you. I request you to let me expand the article first. I'll be expanding it to a large extent. So, pls dont edit in between as it will create collision.—Prashant 04:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC) October 2014
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for October 25Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Kom (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dharamshala and Manali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 25 October 2014 (UTC) ChangesHello Prashant! Hope you're well. Just to let you know that I have made major changes in the lead of the article List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra, on which you've put a lot of effort. Please have a look at the article and let me know if you disagree with any of them, looking forward to your reply.--FrankBoy (Buzz) 17:19, 6 January 2015 (UTC) Sorry! But, I have worked on this list and I was planning to update it. Your version is nice but I will re-write it. Thanks!—Prashant 17:27, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
ReqHi. Hope you're well and sorry to trouble you. I have a filmography up at FLC: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Preity Zinta filmography/archive1. If you have some time, would appreciate a review. Do reply me, thanks.--FrankBoy (Buzz) 18:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC) February 2015
|
_Pr%C3%A0_della_Valle_2.jpg)
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
