User talk:Kazuha1029/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kazuha1029. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Global Association of Risk Professionals

I saw your message on the talk page. The page is, however, a classic example of content eligible for WP:CSD#G11. Whether or not your intent was to promote, that's what the result was, at least in large part because you are uncritically reproducing content from the company's website. If you want to write an article about that group, please start from scratch, and stick to using independent secondary sources. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

User:Vanamonde93 I disagree, the page could have been improved rather than completely deleted, it did take a sizeable amount of time now that I have no draft to start with. This did not meet the speedy deletion criteria and if you thought the language could have been improved, you should tell the author what exactly should be done to make the article pass the standards. I will re-create the article but please note this. Even if info is from primary sources (eg. company website), there are information that are reliable. For example, all the information in the infobox was from the annual report, which is in turn audited by an independent 3rd party accounting firm. This primary reliable information is in turn always cited by other independent secondary sources, such as news articles, books, exam prep material...etc. A lot of times I notice editors don't know this and the moment they see "oh primary sources" they start freaking out and tag deletion. That's why it's very important to consider discussion prior to making such a move. Furthermore, do consider the exam weightings/information are set by GARP. This is non-disputable and even if I find secondary sources, they pretty much just copied the GARP website. This has nothing to do with whether there's bias or not, it's just facts. I hope you can revert the delete so I can work on revamping the article by deleting all the primary sources.Jjj84206 (talk) 16:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jjj84206

Thank you for creating Master of Taxation.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Note that other editors have called for improvements, mostly due to the article's current state of incompleteness. Please consider developing the article further.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

☆ DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) ☆ 23:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

{{Re|Doomsdayer520}} Hello, thank you for bringing this to my attention. According to the template listed, it required more citations and more continents, which I have just added using reliable, trustworthy sources. The article is now complete as per request.Jjj84206 (talk) 03:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Global Association of Risk Professionals

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Global Association of Risk Professionals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tinton5 (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

I have restored the speedy deletion template that you removed. Do not remove it again. As the template says: "do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

I have moved this to a full discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Association of Risk Professionals. I have no real opinion on whether we should have this article or not, so feel free to make your case there. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry

I come from the Spanish Wikipedia, there the old discussions are archived, not blanked, Sorry. Sr. Knowthing ¿señor? 01:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quebec City Tramway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Community of Metros logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Community of Metros logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Canadian inventions and discoveries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page California Roll.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Community of Metros logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Community of Metros logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)