User talk:Karenjc
The Documents in the CaseYes, this book is rather unusual. But I agree with the author that it is not one of her better works: for one thing, it is unfair on the reader to leave it until so late in the novel to disclose the nature of the crime. I also imagine that if the reader has never studied chemistry, they would not be in a position to understand the method used, and they would find the whole thing rather unsatisfactory. [I am collecting bits and bobs on her collaborator on this novel, Robert Eustace ... ]
WikiProject Novels - Narnia Task ForceHi! You would be glad to know that a new wikipedia ad has been created by Srinivas to encourage users to join Chronicles of Narnia Task Force. You can display that ad on your user/talk page too using the following code:
-- Alan16 (talk) 10:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) WikiProject Novels - August 2009 NewsletterThe August 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16 (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC) HiI'm glad that you appreciated the wedding story on RD/Misc. Thanks, very kind of you! :-) --pma (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2009 (UTC) DYK for SkimmingtonMaterialscientist (talk) 12:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC) KingofFilm here, I need Starpointe to stay. It is good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KingofFilm (talk • contribs) 23:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, but it needs to be noted. An encyclopedia should have stuff that people want, not standard stuff. It is a free encyclopedia, which is free in 2 ways. It is free in cash and free for words. KOF —Preceding unsigned comment added by KingofFilm (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
OK, but can I do Sandbox? KingofFilm (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. So when I want to save it into a page, I just take it from the Sandbox and make a new article? KingofFilm (talk) 01:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Ok, I never knew Wiki was so simple! Thanks!! KOF KingofFilm (talk) 01:27, 30 January 2010 (UTC) It's not a redlink anymore! KingofFilm (talk) 01:27, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
There ya go, I made an article. It's for Barbara Corcoran. KOF KingofFilm (talk) 13:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC) ![]() KingofFilm has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! Help with Cebu's Cultural CenterNot for sure what i have done wrong. I left a talk page called Cebu's Cultural Center. I hope you can read that and tell me where i am going wrong. I just want to do what the others i have spoken about have done...... Cebuexpat 14:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cebuexpat (talk • contribs) You can find the talk page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cebu%27s_Cultural_Entertainment_Center —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cebuexpat (talk • contribs) 14:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC) You can find the Mactan Island Aquarium here at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mactan_Island_Aquarium —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cebuexpat (talk • contribs) 14:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
AfDPlease see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Edwards (2nd nomination)Kitfoxxe (talk) 02:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Talkback![]() Message added 00:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Supertouch (talk) 00:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks for offering to help out at FeedbackThanks for your offer to help at WP:FEED. I go through periods where I am able to look at many of the submissions, but there are some subjects I just don't qualified to review, and I sometimes just don't get a chance to stop in. I feel bad when someone has obviously tried to create an article, and is asking for help, and it just sits there with no responses. It will be great of a few others weigh in on occasion; I know some others do as well, but if you scroll back, you'll see a number in a row with no responses.--SPhilbrickT 00:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Re: User:ChrJesRe your message: I just blocked him and nuked all of the user pages that he created. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Thanks for the ResponseThanks for clearing some things up. The only reason why I linked that wooden railway forum was because I found it very useful. I am a parent with two kids who love the wooden railway and that forum has helped me quite a lot with the prices and information about all the wooden items. I still do not know how to make a signature, so please do not flame me. One again, thank you for the explanation? Are you a robot? - thomas123wooden123 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas123wooden123 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Prove your facts!I tagged the sentence about shampoo being a hair care product as it has no Relaible source to back this claim.--9 to 8 (talk) 23:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC) I have retagged the sentence. As WP:RS states, any material that is challenged needs to be verified by an inline citaton of a reliable source. This applies even if the claim is true.--9 to 8 (talk) 23:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
How do I nominate an article for deletion, or for not being neutral?Hey! Thank you for your previous help! Now I wanted to ask if there is a special way to nominate an article for deletion or to point out its lack of neutrality! Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexi lover (talk • contribs) 14:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Just a quick thanksThanks for quickly removing spam with this edit :) ~EdGl ★ 20:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Corinne MalvernMaterialscientist (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
sorrysorry if broke wikipedia i hope i did not do much harm and thanks for replacing i hope i did not cause any trouble
In briefMy edit i made to User talk:Christianity was very constructive! wasnt it? --Light for JC (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC) Light for JC I hate dirty niggers, it's a problem ?--151.20.236.182 (talk) 18:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC) SorrySorry about the accidental revert on John Wayne. Huggle was being a bit laggy, so I accidentally reverted the page back to the vandalism revision while attempting to revert the vandalism. --Seahorseruler (Talk Page)
Trying to remove pornographic material....Vmconcernedad... Trying to change content due to the recent articles I've read about Wikipedia and trying to remove offensive material...why block me when the president of WP was trying to remove things himself...I've included links to articles I've read to show my reasons. http://www.techcentral.ie/article.aspx?id=15000 http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/05/10/porn-wikipedia-illegal-content-remains/ http://www.helium.com/items/1827018-wikipedia-porn-scandal-how-and-why-wikipedia-began-removing-pornography-from-their-pages Why is this a problem - I thought I was helping now I'm told I will be blocked. Is this what happens?? Vmconcernedad (talk) 20:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC) Vmconcerned —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmconcernedad (talk • contribs) 20:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Karenjc. Thanks for the heads up on my user page. Here is my belated response. Reviewer granted![]() Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. –xenotalk 17:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Talkback![]() Message added 03:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Category queryI wasn't sure either, so I've removed him from the category; I've left him in the main college category, though. I just can't think where else to put him, is the problem. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC) DYK nomination of E. G. Swain
DYK for E. G. Swain
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Stangeland is actually correctThat unfortunate newbie was actually making a good correction - see Fanbase.com here for confirmation that Stangeland is actually the right spelling. JohnCD (talk) 21:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Feedback - large increase in requests![]() The graph says it all, really; massive increase since we cleared the backlog and introduced a bit better system. As I've said before, it is a 'victim of its own success', I think. Currently, it is pretty backlogged. Quite a few get missed, as you can see if you flick through the archives - but I don't know what we can do about that, really, other than hope more people give feedback. The long-term solution would be to keep these editors; so many come to just create one article, and are never heard of again; if just a few of those stayed, and started giving feedback, then we'd have a more workable system. I suggest discussion in this WT:FEED section. Cheers! (I've send this message out to a small number of people that I think/hope will be interested; people who have given feedback, etc. if wrong, apologies, let me know.) Chzz ► 00:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC) Talkback![]() Message added 10:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Review of my article on Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 October 10Hi, I submitted a request for feedback on my article on Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 October 10 on Spiritual healing. I got your reply and am wondering if another reviewer would be able look at it. Many thanks, Adrian-from-london (talk) 04:49, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Feedback itemYou offered some partial feedback on an article here. On the chance that you decided to revisit it, I had trouble accessing the feedback page, so I provided some feedback directly to the editor here Tunnels (novel) DisputeDear Karenjc I see your replies are both helpful and friendly. I would be most grateful if you could look at this prolonged dispute as follows: Disputes on page Tunnels I wonder be grateful for your help with a complex and now prolonged removal edits by Wikipedian susanne2009NYC, who assessed the article as GA status. The re-write to attain GA status introduced numerous factual errors. I have repeatedly corrected these, including all four edits in the last 24 hours. Yet despite endless comments on the discussions page, no consensus has been agreed . I believe the actions of user susanne2009NYC contravene Wikipedia policy. Problems are namely:
David Wyatt is the cover artist - as on authors website, with link to David Waytt's site where Tunnels features http://www.mathewandson.com/stop_press.htm - July 2007
Re:40+ foreign language editions
http://www.childrenslit.com/childrenslit/mai_gordon_roderick_qa.html AND http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=b528986f-0233-4da1-98df-ad44cc7f2427&sponsor=
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118015432.html?categoryid=13&cs=1&ref=vertfilm On the discussion page myself and other users have been asked not to correct what I know to be inaccuracies with any further edits. I have irrefutable evidence that my changes are accurate. Reading Wikipedia policy it looks to me as if she is contravening policy in - Taking Ownership - Preventing/dissuading other authors and editing - Ignoring consensus reverting changes to ensure her choice of critical reviews is maintained - Refuses to acknowledge Publishers/Authors/major newspapers and industry publications etc. Making changes knowingly reverting to inaccurate statistics e.g. The Highfield Mole 2,000 paperbacks published - Myself and other users have had to change this so many times from the incorrect 200, citing the Authors and other sources. Even now she says she "will let it go for now". Myself and others have 'no' say in editing this page - she will not even let me add a sentence on the Manga edition and has totally removed my latest edit, regarding incorrect references in the AbeBooks article - that she is happy to accept as reliable. I am one of the passionate people Wikipeda policy makes reference to - about this book series. I am an administrator on the UK fansite TunnesDeeper.com - which has the support of both the publishers and the authors. I have read and own all the books, including one of the 2,000 Highfield Moles and know my subject matter well. This whole experience on here has been very upsetting and I feel irrelevant and excluded from this page. Stewardship does support retaining a users version where it is felt further editing would be detrimental to the existing quality. However, this is not the case here. Sorry to make this so long and rambling. A few months ago I was unhappy that on old version of this article was replaced by an inferior version without discussion or collaboration - surely a cornerstone of Wikipdia ethos. I have spent many hours on numerous occasions sourcing the references to ensure they are meet Wikipedia verifiability standards and my only interest is to help make this article an accurate and informative read. If this matter should be dealt with elsewhere on wikipedia, please advise me. Your expert opinion would be greatly appreciated. (Lifesawhirl (talk) 21:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC))
Karenjc, Many thanks for the advise and looking into the issues here. As you say there are numerous avenues for resolving disputes and I think your suggestions regarding reliabilty of sources make that noticeboard the next step for me. Thanks for your help (Lifesawhirl (talk) 20:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)) Requests for feedbackHi Karenjc, I know you have helped out here before and hoped I might be able to persuade you to do so once again. One of the regular helpers, Chzz is currently taking a break so things are getting pretty busy. If you can just knock off one or two that will be a help. Regards--Ykraps (talk) 16:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC) feedback for the indian stammering associationHi Karenjc, This is regarding your review comments for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Indian_Stammering_Association . I have added a lot of references to independent reliable coverage of the Indian Stammering Association. Please guide me further if anything else needs to be added or modified. Jaiprakashsunda (talk) 17:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
It looks really great now!! Thanks a ton! Jaiprakashsunda (talk) 07:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Surely i will. Thanks once again! Jaiprakashsunda (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Template for request for feedbackHi, I was doing some requests for feedback and noticed you suggested a few months ago a template to leave on the article's talk page, so editors know it's been discussed. I wondered if you ever finished the template; is it available to use? It seems a good idea to me. --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
New WikiProject Novels initiativeWe have begun a new initiative at the WikiProject Novels: an improvement drive. As a member listed here, you are being notified. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#5-5-5 Improvement Drive and Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Collaboration for more details. Also I would like to remind you to keep an eye on the project talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels. Thanks, Sadads (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC) WikiProject Novels Collaboration for FebruaryThank you everyone who participated in the January Collaboration, it was quite a success with 5 new C class articles, 3 stub kills and several articles were removed from our backlogs. In support of the Great Backlog Drive, the WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February is going to help remove backlog candidates in the backlogs related to WikiProject Novels. Please join us, and help us wikify, reference, clean up plot sections and generally improve Novels content, Sadads (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC) You are recieving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Novels according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Members Ref deskCuriously enough, that editor was created over 3 weeks ago and just today made its first posting, with that peculiar question about comics. "Hosiery", perhaps? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Edit me againHi Karen, you helped me with Isaac Seligman a few months back and I found your help invaluable. I am about to place a short biography on Edward Carleton Holmes, and I should like it if you could be my blue pencil> Hope to hear back from you. I will make the entry tomorrow (2 March 2011). Thanks in advance. Might it be possible to send me an e-mail link so I can contact you directly? DrSchaub (talk) 13:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi! A request for your inputPer wp:CANVASSING, this is a neutrally worded notice being sent, without any type of "selection" bias, to everyone that edited fairly recently the MOS page about how to term the Latter Day Saints denominations on Wikipedia in the belief that your various and collective expertise or expertises, if that's a plural, can help us improve its wording, if possible. a bit. The most pertinent section is here. And the issue is to what degree the terms "Mormon church" and "LDS church" relate to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in specific, and to what kind of sourcing should be used to document this. Thanks, if you find time and the interest to look into the matter and offer your opinion or commentary.--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 23:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Barnstar awarded!
Thank You!Thank you very much, Karenjc, for your timely and excellent response to my plea for help on the "butchered" Lee Smolin page! I was feeling terrible about what I'd done. Now, perhaps I'll be at least a tiny bit more bold, henceforth, knowing that help like yours is available to repair inadvertent glitches. Fwiw, by the time I went to the Smolin page to implement your suggestions, someone else had already made the fixes you outlined. I did, however, flesh out the new reference with the additional publication info you recommended. Thanks again! I highly value Wikipedia, and want to do whatever I can to help make it even better. JCNSmith (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Talkback![]() You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Thanks A lot!Hi Karenjc. Just stopping by to say thanks for the help with my article. Learning a lot, yet learning the HARD WAY by making tons of mistakes. Not even really sure is this is the proper place to post on your 'talk' page. I was looking for a 'click here to post a message' type button but didn't see one so i figured the proper way to do so was to 'edit' the page. So, in advance, sorry if this is the wrong place to post. Moving along, I posted a reply to you on the 'help' page where you initially replied to me at. I wanted to come to your page and notify you just to make sure you get it being that I could have possibly posted that wrong too, so I wanted to make sure you got my response being that i'm working on the 'notibility' issue with my article. Just get back to me when you can. Sorry about being Mr. Mistake, but i'm learning. Soon enough, I will be one of 'the masters' of wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitm6337 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Crown & AnchorThere were probably several Crown & Anchor inns in London, but the one associated with Chartism appears to be the one in the Strand. Ehrenkater (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC) Thank you very very muchThat's the show I was trying to remember since last three months..Again, very very thanks for answer. :) GiantBluePanda (talk) 21:25, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Benbow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jubilee year (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 29 August 2012 (UTC) A kitten for you? or how about 9 old cats? we've got them.![]() thanks for your response to my question It's been the most helpful and thorough response I've had. I've been somewhat disheartened by the process so far - I understand absolutely the needs of legality and thoroughness - but you're the only one who has been of assistance in working through this. Abearfellow (talk) 05:59, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Anthony Knyvett (1507-1554)As we say in London - "fill your boots" (go ahead). Regards, Alansplodge (talk) 12:06, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
Is that it? --Jayron32 22:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Your answerI think I like your tldr answer at User_talk:Impromp2Music better than my tldr answer there. It looks like she read yours... Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 01:20, 31 October 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 5Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elijah Dixon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Temperance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC) A barnstar for you
A kitten for you!![]() Loved your use of "pointy" on the Language Ref Desk today -- especially on a topic so often fraught with frustration and annoyance. Cheers! Deborahjay (talk) 21:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Strange terminologyI am American. Your help desk response looked strange to me.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Chris DiffordSorry - I keep writing under completely unrelated subjects because I cannot for the life of me figure out how I start a new subject on this! Just to let you know that the Picture for Chris Difford has had approval sent by the author/photographer, Grace. If you could replace it as soon as that is passed through, I would be really grateful. I'll post this on Egghead's site too. Thank you. Also - Not sure how I go about getting the strap line removed about the page having issues due to me having an input - Apart from requesting the picture on the grounds that I did on the open forum, I didn't actually do anything. Any thoughts? Best wishes, (Loulou660 (talk) 10:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC))
I'm learning so much here - it's great. Thanks for explaining how to open a new title. With regards to the consent - I copied and pasted the 'Declaration of Consent', I def named the file 'Difford.Chris Sept2013' and I gave her that email address. She did only send it at lunchtime today though - so I guess it could take a day or two? What do you think? (Loulou660 (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2013 (UTC))
I think permissions have been given now - I emailed again and said it had been sent. Another box has appeared under the picture saying they have received permission in accordance with the licensing so I guess you can upload it? Wdyt? Best (Loulou660 (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC))
My brain hurts. Okay. I'll send another email alerting them to the fact it has been sent again and hope that they find it. I'm guessing that they'll alert you in some way when that is done? I don't know what else I can do except get her to send the permission again I guess? (Loulou660 (talk) 06:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC))
That's great. I'll wait and watch to see. Thank you for keeping an eye on it for me. (Loulou660 (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2013 (UTC)) Hatting at Help DeskAs I mentioned, I think your decision to "hat" the Help Desk post in question was reasonable. It looked to me like it was sort of a rant, and the quality of the English wasn't good. He or she then continued ranting at WP:ANI, which is not useful because ranting at the noticeboards tends to be like throwing a boomerang. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
I have reverted the article to the original content about a politician from Rajasthan. If you take a look at the history you will see that between my last edit and yours, User:Sid5439 (clearly a newbie who doesn't know how WP works) replaced all the content to make it about a different politician from Uttar Pradesh. Clearly there should be two separate articles about these people - with dablinks. Unfortunately it is now past my bedtime so if you get to it before I do and you know or can find out how to do a history split then please go ahead. Thanks Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:31, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
We slimy vipers thank youCongratulations on creating Gaston Borch, a title which I've had watchlisted since Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2012 October 29#Bad guy riff. Deor (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the prepalate answerHey, thanks for the answer at the help desk. I just now logged in, so it was already in the archives. I suppose that I will just leave the term "prepalate" in the article in question, since it seems that it is separate from both the soft and hard palates. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Bolekaja and Dele JegedeHelloooo Karenjc! Bolekaja is back asking where his ne'er-been-edited Dele Jegede article is and I'm starting to wonder as to his sincerity. Hope your day is well, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Gaston Borch
Gatoclass (talk) 08:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC) October 2013
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Barnstar
Disambiguation link notification for January 2Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mysterioso Pizzicato, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC) DYK for Mysterioso Pizzicato
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Wanted(2008 film)I didn't understand your response sort-of. Your response was little vague, but what other website can I find answers? How & where can I contact the Writer for this movie? What's the writer's name? Have you seen this movie? Can you help me out? The Wikipedia Synopsis seems (1/2) vague for this movie.(76.20.90.53 (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)).
On the Entertainment Desk, if someone gives me a Speculation Answer, then I don't mind at all. How come Speculation's banned from this Website?(76.20.90.53 (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)).
MissingHi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Hi, RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey![]() Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers! This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis) Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016. Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings. Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia