|
User talk:K. Lastochka/Archive 3Happy Birthday!I wish you all the best. Tankred 17:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Boldog szuletesnapot! M A Mason 18:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Welcome back and happy birthday. No videos this time, but I have two jokes for you: a) - Did you know Gheorghe Funar has Hungarian blood? b) Ceauşescu was hosting one of his big patriotic spectacles. At one point, he asked a boy: LOL – Alensha talk 13:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC) The infobox is generally just an easy way for users looking for a very brief overview to easily find information. Whether or not we encourage it, lots of people are just looking for quick reference facts, like the members of a band or when a person started/stopped performing. It also helps standardize the appearance of our articles. Right now, the article looks to be in decent condition. Here are a few things you can do:
So you know, the B rating is generally the highest rating given. The article would probably need a peer review from WPP:BIO to get A class. ShadowHalo 05:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I see it is not your birthday anymore;) Oh well, a belated Happy Birthday to you. — $PЯINGrαgђ 17:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Thanks anyway. :) I had an idea about Liszt and his symphonic poems, no time to describe it again, but it's on Mason's talk page, check it out and let me know what you think.K. Lásztocska 18:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Re:I'd be glad to say something nice to him. I'm glad to hear about your apparent conversion to monarchism (do elaborate if you have a chance), though I would balance Colbert and Stewart with some Lou Dobbs and Bill O'Reilly. Biruitorul 05:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
NamesI am sorry for such an end of the discussion at the Hungarian notice board. I think your idea of having an infobox rule that we all could follow was not at all bad. But it seems it is unfeasible right now. Tankred 16:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello K. Lastochka, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Puskas Ferenc.jpg) was found at the following location: User:K. Lastochka/Userboxes. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Fine, fine, rules are rules....*grumble*...K. Lásztocska 16:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Re:My first suggestion would be to dispatch the specially-trained Wikipedia death squad (death squads being on my mind lately) to liquidate him. Barring that: hmm. You know, the thing I've found is that even if someone is rude, disruptive, etc. but doesn't add much content (I think you know who), it's very hard to [insert cartoon image of lever being pulled and performer falling through stage]. You have to set the trap very carefully, and spring it at the right moment (assuming this guy isn't a total fool and issues outright unacceptable personal attacks). For instance, as I understand it, in an RfC, you need to show evidence of trying to resolve a specific conflict - it's not a general invitation to comment on that user (at least not officially). Maybe a Wikiquette alert to begin with? Then again, this all drains away lots of energy and I for one am not here to concoct conspiracies against disruptors, which is why I end up letting them get away with so much. Eventually some administrator should invoke WP:IAR and send him down into that chute beneath the stage. Hello K. Lastochka, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Vaclav havel.jpg) was found at the following location: User:K. Lastochka. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC) Hello K. Lastochka, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Vaclav havel.jpg) was found at the following location: User:K. Lastochka/Userboxes. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC) Prague Spring for FA?Hello. I consider your idea about improving the Prague Spring article and promoting it to FA very interesting. You did a really good job with Hungarian Revolution of 1956. I would also be very happy to cooperate on something similar. Recently I find myself busy in the real life, but I hope I will be able to join later (but not sooner than in July). I also hope that more people will respond. If not, they might join after the work is started and after they see some progress was made. Jan.Kamenicek 21:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC) Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
VinceB againHi. I think we both agree that the "new" IP is not a new user (a newbie, just by coincidence spamming user talk pages of administrators and WP:ANI few days after joining Wikipedia). Perhaps you think it is someone else, but I have a good reason to believe it is a sockpuppet of VinceB. That IP has reinserted VinceB's old edit, uses his specific style of communication, and belongs to VinceB's ISP. Believe me or not, I would have been very very happy if VinceB had decided to leave Wikipedia after his ban and ten new Hungarian users had joined Wikipedia instead. By the way, there are several Hungarian IPs, which I do not know, editing anonymously every day. I do not call them sockpuppets. This is not a crusade against Hungarian IPs. It is merely an attempt to enforce a ban of one extremely disruptive sockpuppeter. Tankred 23:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC) thank youThank you for trying to speak to their minds, yes it is like a paranoia. However, despite your efforts, this gone insane. And now you started too. I do not know, what debates you have with Vince or VinceB or however you like to call it, but I'm tired of being constantly harrased of being a sockpuppet, by some vandals, who use this as an exuse to spead their ideologies and delete everything what is against that. I've corrected the he/she thing before your comment (or after?) with a summary: "terribly sorry" :) However, I appreciate your efforts to open their eyes, but as you see, it was totally worthless. As mine too. I sometimes edit on enwiki, but I do not feel the need to have an own username. Maybe once, when not paranoia will rule. Cheers, --91.120.113.31 00:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry, I'm not. How can I prove it without doubt? --91.120.113.31 00:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
books, wich are obviously not Hungarian-made books, but by Americans. And I'm pretty sure, "Miha Tavcar", or "Thomas Sakmyster" are not ethnic Hungarian names. Those are the best books in english about Horthy, and they all containing my edit. However Golubovic is a politically motivated author, who's book is everything but neutral, or factual. This is a long thing, I don't want to bore you with this. Who's aware of the literatue about and around Horthy, knows that Golubovic is as good as Irving to Holocaust. I hope, I didn't said anthing similar linke VinceB does (did?) :))) --91.120.113.31 00:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC) But all that would show is that you found new books. Please don't assume I am here to defend you, I just made an observation on the admin noticeboard and promptly found myself sucked into this absurdist play. I don't know anything about Golubovic. You really do have a similar writing voice as Vince, which I hope is just evidence that your first language is Hungarian. K. Lásztocska 00:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Re: anonymous...How so? You are a Hungarian and therefore almost expected to edit articles related to Hungarians (I didn't want to put too much pressure on there). Liszt was Hungarian, you can't put it any other way. His father even worked at the same court that Franz Joseph Haydn did. It is true that there are German roots in his line, but was he born in Germany? NO. Despite the fact that his birthplace is now in Austria, he was born in Hungary; that at least makes him partly Hungarian by nationality if not ethnicity. (I myself am Irish. I was, am, and will always be. Had I been born in America and not in Ireland I would consider myself Irish and American, not just American. See my point?) What I'm trying to say is please do not under any circumstance just give up. I support you fully in this and I encourage you as much as I possibly can to go on. I'll even join in the reverts more than I have been. ;) — $PЯINGrαgђ 08:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
VinceYeah, you're right, I read frequently wikipedia, to report the impersonators of me (last two: [1], [2]) but I always do that mistake, that I report or comment on Tankred and PANONIAN about how do they use this situation, and why is this good for them (and why won't these never ever stop despite the fact, the fact, that I only report impersonators, since I was blocked) for their POV pushin. By not simply requesting, but reporting, and also commenting, they manage to deny all my claims for real investigation, claiming (wich is true) that those IPs, wich requested investigation, were me. No wonder, they defend duck test so deliberately. They would immediately been revealed if ever a real checkuser case would take place. More in e-mail, you can send me, by clicking "e-mail this user" on User:VinceB. Try to think about, why did many sock accounts appeared instantly after my ban, while before it, there was none, just IPs, when I was not logged in. No voting abuse, or any wich are prohibited by wiki policies. Start to wonder, why no real checkusers were indicated on any of my new sockpuppets, and why do they find them immediately, within seconds, and so deliberately call them my sockpuppets, and present those in a way, where noone would spend time to check it. Pls, send an e-mail. -- Vince --195.56.51.183 12:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Although I believe, all of hungarian users diliked me, so I would not be suprised if it turns out, that some of you (one of the hungarian users) are those IPs, and do this, to "take revenge" on me, and/or such. --195.56.51.183 12:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC) I'm not going to send you an e-mail because I don't have wikimail enabled. I cannot possibly have been any of the IPs trying to get "revenge" on you, I don't even live in Hungary so my IP address is totally different. (Also I would never stoop so low as to impersonate someone else to discredit them.) I made a big mistake in ever getting involved in this issue, please don't write to me anymore in the future. K. Lásztocska 13:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC) B/bell H/hooksIf it was any other editor in the Feminine Mystique article, I would have reverted that edit >:( but I don't want to revert you. But I think Wikipedia should respect the rules of grammar over individual choices. (These lowercase names are a really really big pet peeve of mine. :-) Anyway, I hope next time someone reignites the debate over this, there'll be a conclusion, since right now there doesn't seem to be any agreements about this... :( – Alensha talk 14:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Further reI know of at least one other user like that - great contributor, but arrogant, and uses 3RR and other brinksmanship to stay just within the bounds of the rules. Of course, since Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, it shouldn't be that hard to dislodge him. My original idea still stands: next time he misbehaves, make a reasonable attempt to resolve the dispute, and when that doesn't work, it's grounds for an RfC. Unfortunately, mediation or arbitration are only steps in a longer process, once other avenues have been exhausted. Like you can't normally file a case directly to the Supreme Court, so too you need to go through other steps before reaching those. Biruitorul 15:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
New articleYou might be interested in this: History of the Székely people. In case you find some disturbing grammar, or spelling mistakes, and you have some spare time... --KIDB 15:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I would like to add some comments to your edits, if you don't mind. Your edits are not wrong, but what I fill is, that you took a dart that was at 8, and instead of putting it at 10, put it at 8, 90 degrees appart. No offense, but what in the world is that metaphor supposed to mean?K. Lásztocska 18:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Of course, ethnicity is something else than DNA heritage, b/c one can accept the language and be completely integrated in that culture without sharing much of the DNA. But it is amazing that the famous Hungarian-Romanian dispute in 19th century about the origin of Romanians (H historians claimed [1] was prevailing, R historians claimed [2], and both were sure [3] accounts for the remainder, leaving no more than 2-3% for pre 4,000 years ago) now turns into "this is not one mistake, this is way way way things got wrong" Those 2-3% turn out to be over 60% ! And that is in male population, which was believed to be prone to "migration of DNA". A suggestion: "altered in a small but non-negligible degree the ethnic composition and significantly changed the balance of power in Transylvania". Anyway, whatever you think is better. I don't mind, b/c your edit is not worse than what was believed reasonable before the availability of DNA data, which is only the last 5-6 years. It is just turns out that what was believed reasonable people got completely wrong, they got it wrong at a more fundamental level than only the last 2000 years.
Again, I do not intend to rv any of your edits, b/c the old ones are not better than yours. It is just that it would be nice to have better edits, not only at the same level. Please don't take it personally. I like to criticize (sometimes over-criticize), but there is absolutely nothing personal in it. :-) :Dc76 17:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
SupportSpring told me to drop by to give you a bit of support. So here it is :)  Will (We're flying the flag all over the world) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Good luck! :) Will (We're flying the flag all over the world) 17:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 Hi there, K. Lastochka. It looks like you've really been through the mill recently :( Don't be disheartened, though. You're doing the right thing and mean well, regardless of the rights-or-wrongs of the matter. Anyways, maybe step back for a little while and catch your breath, then get back to it again :) You've a lot to offer the project and you've done so much good so far - Alison ☺ 23:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC) _-_A_Little_Coaxing_(1890).jpg)
<whisper>Lastochka…I've been trying to get all my friends to know Phaedriel, and now you know why. ;) Don't tell her I said that though ;)</whisper> — $PЯINGrαgђ 19:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC) Mhm, I have a too little time now, but from October it will be better. I thing I can a little help. --Cinik 04:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
TransylvaniaI see you are also interested in issues about Transylvania. I was thinking to develop more about and maybe, if you are interested in this, we could colaborate on developing more about the history, the places and other things that are related to it. Think about and drop me a message if this would be an interest point for you. --R O A M A T A A | msg 16:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC) Hungarians are 40 millionsNot actually that are more than 20 but more than 40 millions.--Székhu 06:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
No you as hungarian you should know that there are more than 30 millions hungarians, possible 40.--Székhu 12:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
FantasyI don't really need to slap you, so instead let me share a fantasy with you. The wheels of the latest RfA against Piotrus are slowly grinding; let me draw your attention to this part - in particular a quote that caught my attention: "Irpen has been gunning for Piotrus for some time". That led me to imagine all Central and East European editors on their own vessel in, let's say, the Black Sea - Romanians, Bulgarian(s), Serbs, Russians, Poles, even landlocked Hungarians and Czechs. And we're all pursuing different objectives on these ships, with plenty of fighting onboard and between ships. For instance I see Irpen as a combination of Captain Ahab and Dennis Hopper, standing on the mighty, nuclear-armed Kornilov, crouching over his machine gun, wearing combat goggles and madly firing toward SS Polonia. Piotrus can only hurl kielbasa back at him, worriedly looking through the glass bottom and seeing all previous Polish navies at the bottom of the sea. I'm there, steering toward Cetatea Albă, Dahn trying to pull me back from irredentism, Anonimu thrashing about in a cage. The Czechs play music. Volleys of cannon fire go back and forth between Hungary and Serbia... Anyway, run with that, maybe find a role for the Bulgarian(s). Biruitorul 17:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
ROTFLOL :) Thank you, guys, I needed that laugh. I never thought somebody could take some of our sad wiki adventures and turn them into... that :D Kudos :D PS. Let me assure you that SS Polonia is still afloat; its crew is tired and decimated but our fight for neutrality and reliability will not be over until the last one of us falls...-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 04:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not Danielle Steel - I actually think before writing. I doubt this was worth the wait, but here goes. (Incidentally, I just realized Kornilov was not the best name for a Soviet ship, given who he was, but anyway.) Aboard the Dacia, Anonimu had been reduced to insanity [more than usual], incoherently babbling, "Romania was not occupied. Romania was not occupied..." and sobbing into his beloved Communist flag. A merry band of sailors drank ţuică belowstairs, chanting the Orthodox liturgy in high spirits but very off-key -- soon, after all, they would be the first choir to sing it in Hagia Sophia since 1453. Their teetotalling captain gripped the wheel with intensity, feeling the hand of God on his shoulder as he steered down the Bulgarian coast, with Bulgarian fishermen staring, mouths agape, in confusion. Then Dahn emerged from below, his shirt ripped, his arms smeared with blood. "I've fed Bonapate to the dogs! The mad priest is in chains. You're next, psycho." Captain Biruitorul stood shellshocked for a moment, bewildered that the normally mild-mannered Dahn would undego such a metamorphosis. Before he could raise his scimitar, though, or call to the oblivious crew (now rapidly descending into inebriation, a garbled string of Beatitudes dimly emerging), Dahn had thrown him aside and fired a tranquilizer dart directly into his back, putting him into a profound sleep. As the captain dreamt of hacking apart the minarets around the cathedral, Dahn quickly turned the ship northward. He would play hero this time. Meanwhile, the Polonia continued its slow drift; the Soviets had backed off for the night but were sure to be back for more. The Polish Cabal was melancholy -- lacking weaponry, they had at last met a change they could not revert. Irpen sneered toward them, "I will promptly report any aggressive moves to Captain Fedorov!" Ghirlandajo chimed in, "Revert warriors! This is what you get for invading Moscow in 1610!" Piotrus laughed bitterly, momentarily distracted as Appleseed and Halibutt tackled Dr. Dan and plunged him into the deadly waters below. And then the strains of Chopin's 17th Prelude grew louder from aboard the SS Masaryk; the sleeping giant had been awakened. Piotrus and his band of brothers felt their courage restored, their spirits returning, their anger driving them forth and the example of the Battle of Hel before them - a long, bold resistance if necessary. The Captain spoke: Thus invigorated, the men prepared to renew their assault. That night, the Czechs in their own little world would continue to work their way through Chopin, the Russians would go to sleep while Poles played a trick, the Bulgarians would turn from confusion to mere apathy, Admiral Lastochka would be gagged but little else would change on the Hungaria (except the Arrow Crossers would continue to emit decrees). Dahn had his own plans in mind. So did the Serbs. Biruitorul 05:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Once again, many thanks for all your help. I'm kind of cheating by writing so little, but I do need to write something, so here we are. (By the way, was Szigeti not born in the Kingdom of Hungary, which had a different flag too? I've always wondered about the rule for infoboxes; personally, I like to put the flag and name of the country at the time of the subject's birth rather than today.) During his year-long block, Molobo was certainly not idle. Rather, he had spent his time in a Deep Submergence Vehicle, isolated from the Polonia but still tethered thereto. Initially bored, he had stumbled on massive petroleum reserves beneath his bubble. By now, barrels and barrels of oil surrounded him on the seafloor. These were now dredged up to the deck of the battered Polonia as the Kornilov crew slept soundly in a haze of vodka, the soothing voice of Stalin with his thick Georgian accent having lulled the men to sleep. Silently Piotrus and his compatriots filled their red-and-white waterguns with black gold. Rage burned within the breasts of the Polish Mutant Ninja Turtles.
Enescu worklistThank you for your hard work- I'm not positive that the titles of the two Romanian Rhapsodies should be italicized but I'm not sure they shouldn't? Tend to the former interpretation though since there are such works by others, hence a generic not a "true title"... Best - Schissel | Sound the Note! 18:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC) The anonymous scholar's IP address can be traced to the Belgium/Netherlands area— $PЯINGrαgђ 09:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: Prague Spring for FA?My previous experience with this article suggests that it attracts way too many partizans and way too few historians. The current text IMO lacks depth and would need complete rewrite for FA. There aren't very many Czechs on English Wiki and there aren't many recent popular history publications in Czech language about the event, AFAIK. Pavel Vozenilek 21:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC) Thank you so much!Wow, dear K - that's a lot of info, and most helpful indeed! If it wasn't because of you, I would have never (or maybe it would have taken a long time) to find out about these awesome Wikipedians. Thanks to you, tho, not only I'll be able to offer them my modest recognition, but I'll also learn many interesting things by reading their contributions. You truly are a wonderful person, like Spring aptly said. You will forgive me, tho, if I pick you before any of your friends... ;) Have a beautiful weekend! Love, Phaedriel - 16:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Re. Contribs listIt's not just you, dear - we're all experiencing the same problem. My own contribs list froze at around 22:00 UTC. Apparently, the devs are working on it. Check here: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#User_contributions_not_appearing. Let's hope they solve it soon! ;) Love, Phaedriel - 01:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Horse HeadsI see you have been appointed an Admiral by Biroitorul, now you are the second one in the history of landlocked Hungary. I am wondering whether you are going to enter Budapest on a white horse like your predecessor did in 1919 :-)
Thank you!Phaedriel mentioned that you spoke highly of me and that's why she dedicated this day to me. Thank you so much! It's a great feeling that my little contributions are appreciated :) Love, – Alensha talk 13:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC) I haven't seen the drama – I was busy in real life and huwiki, and seems I'll have to catch on... It would be nice to get Prague Spring featured, I'll try to help, though I'm not an expert of 20th century history (or of any kind of history after the death of the last Ramesside pharaoh... :) – Alensha talk 15:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Wife and sonThank you. :) — $PЯINGrαgђ 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Biru for AdminYes, please let me know ahead of time and I will vote/advocate for him. Its not like Im gone - Im still around but just not writing much; its just that pain medication (often worse than the back pain itself) docks the IQ about 20 points, cuts one's patience in half, and completely zaps any sense of humor laying around; not the best way to contribute; Im afraid that no matter how tempting, my edits may provoke some who are a bit hot of head (Central Europe can be a tough neighbourhood, as you know). I, as anyone, owe the community better than that. My choice now is either write on the wiki or be able to pick up and carry my daughter - you can see how it has to be for now. But I miss you too and if you ever need my help let me know, Im still around. István 18:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Nagy-Magyarország et alDon't worry, the first sentence you wrote was perfect. My problem with the Greater Hungary article is that it is a real issue and should be dealt with but some users try to use it as an anti-Hu propaganda. Now the article has improved after your edits (my only note would be about this sentence: "For centuries, Hungarian rulers such as Matthias Corvinus had maintained a relatively cosmopolitan kingdom; for example, Croatia joined the kingdom via a royal union." I suppose some readers might think after this sentence that Croatia joined the Kingdom in the time of Mátyás.)
The disambugiation of Mr PIt will be hard to convince You-Know-Who about that disambiguation page. I believe he is sure that most neighbouring nations to Serbia are dangerous to their very existence and he has to fight against them in Wikipedia articles. Quote:
TrianonHi KL – I'm not sure that redirecting Trianon to the Treaty of Trianon is a good idea. I've gone over the pages that link to "Trianon", and about 75% of them was talking about the palace(s) in Versailles. Actually, those with no interest in the history of Central Europe are likely to link the word "Trianon" meaning the palace without ever checking where the link is pointing. KissL 09:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Just thought you should know.Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard/Incidents#Fascism and/or chauvinism in Wikipedia. What a dick. I closed it for you because the guy's obviously trolling. Will (talk) 11:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
btw, have a nice time on your holiday :) Will (talk) 06:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC) A couple of pointsA. I don't think you're taking the Anonimu business too seriously, and I find Anittas' intervention rather bizarre, but the key is to keep watching and waiting, and acting when really ready. It's frustrating that he can get away with so much (and his attacks have been pointed out to a number of administrators so far). B. I too despise the profusion of flags, especially when coupled with recentism. Take for instance a biography I was looking at today: that of Anna Politkovskaya. It starts out nicely, but once she gets shot, spirals quickly out of control. Maybe, just maybe, the assassination deserves its own article, but as for the main article, a serious, scholarly biography would never look like this, especially the "political reaction" section. C. By the way, here are the other "international reactions" articles: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Some are just perhaps salvageable; with others, now that a few months have passed, "who cares?" seems a more fitting reaction. Biruitorul 06:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Won't it be so good to come back from your nice refreshing vacation and have to look at Talk:Franz Liszt?Would seem there's more trouble brewing there. — $PЯINGrαgђ 22:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC) Anti-hungarian sentimentHello. Please read the "Re: Anti-Hungarian sentiment" on my talkpage. You will find the "reasons".Baxter9 06:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC) I wonder...... if you noticed my reply above. :) KissL 08:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC) It continuesThe story, that is, though not so well as with your hilariously incisive installment. And thank you kindly for your offer - let's say next month after I get my RfA out of the way, unless things really get out of control - or have they? Are you taking nice pictures on your trip to upload on Wikipedia? The Royal Wikipedian Authority for the Protection of Kids rates this section to be
Category A ("You absolutely should not read it!") for persons under the age of 18,
because it may contain "scenes of brutality or torture to persons".
Regulation "Boyz and Girlz, don't try this at home" also applies. --KIDB 08:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Biruitorul, guided perhaps by the hand of the Holy Ghost, had slipped away from the savages' grasp and fled deep into the forest. There, a chance find of a machete had raised his spirits, and impulsively he made his way back to Dahn and Lastochka, then being harangued with Leninist jargon by Anonimu. Biruitorul saw a chance to liquidate his opponent - he knew he was violating the commandment against murder, but was counting on absolution and hoped to be allowed to receive the Eucharist in five years. The woman instinctively screamed as he raised the weapon high, and Anonimu wheeled around. "Come, my dear fascist, you wouldn't want that on your deep-green conscience, would you? Think of how history will judge you!" The other momentarily paused, thinking to spare him. The other three were soon fast asleep and Biruitorul enthusiastically manoeuvred the lifeboat out to sea, along with its four ready-to-launch nuclear warheads. Of course, the Polonia had 76 of these, but four thermonuclear devices was still serious stuff, more than Japan, Germany, Italy, Brazil and Indonesia combined possessed -- and Romania was a nuclear power! Standing up in the darkness, he gave a terrifying cackle. "At last! At last, fools! The hour of Romania has come! The triumph of Orthodoxy is here! Bwahahahaha!!!" Hoisting the Would the Poles stop him? Would he stop them? Would the three island stowaways concoct a kamikaze mission, sailing away on a raft and shooting an arrow though his head as his finger approached the nuclear button? By next morning, these questions still hung in the air as he neared the Bosphorus. It was a clear day; he imagined hearing the long-silent bells of Hagia Sophia, and the oblivious Czechs sat on deck, playing Vivaldi's Spring as that season, and perhaps the world, entered its final days. Biruitorul 06:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC) That's that, it seems. Could I ask you to please help me out with a statement backing me up over there? Thanks a lot. Biruitorul 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
|
-2007-05-17T05:54:00.000Z-Image:Puskas_Ferenc.jpg){kind=link}
-2007-05-19T06:03:00.000Z-Image:Vaclav_havel.jpg){kind=link}