User talk:Jussi Karlgren

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jussi Karlgren! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Marek.69^talk 21:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article

I'm afraid that you can't release copyright just by saying it on a talk page. We have no way of knowing that you are the owner of the copyright (especially as you used the third person about the person whose name you use here...), unless the procedure outlined in WP:COPYVIO is followed. The page that appears to be the source belongs to the KTH site, so I would imagine that they would have to release the copyright. An easier option is to totally rewrite, making sure that you avoid close paraphrasing and comply with WP:BIO and WP:RS (about the reliable independent sources needed to prove the notability). I would also ask you to read WP:AUTOBIO, as writing about oneself is strongly discouraged here, and even editing on subjects you are close to can cause problems WP:COI. I don't know the policies and procedures at se-wiki, but en-wiki is rather stricter on referencing than some of the other language Wikipedias are (personal experience speaking there - not a reliable independent source...). Referencing at Wikipedia is, as you probably know, rather different from referencing in the academic world. Peridon (talk) 12:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Point seems to be moot now since the original poster appears to have rewritten the text. In any case, I would not feel comfortable authoring a page about me anyway. And what pronoun the author of a comment uses would seem to be of less import for a copyright discussion :-). Jussi Karlgren (talk) 15:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LILT)

The article Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LILT) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 05:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of S/s Helsingfors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S/s Helsingfors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S/s Helsingfors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IM3847 (talk) 07:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've bashed the article into shape. FYI, when creating steamship articles, use the format "SS Foo", rather than "S/s Foo". The article will need to be moved, but not until the AfD discussion has been closed. I'll sort out the move when the time comes. Mjroots (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thx, looks quite proper now! Jussi Karlgren (talk) 05:03, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gavagai Explorer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gavagai Explorer. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gavagai Explorer (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gavagai Explorer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gavagai Explorer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 21:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jussi Karlgren! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 21:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gavagai Explorer

Hello, Jussi Karlgren. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gavagai Explorer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 01:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ExclusiveEditor

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § ‎AI for WP guidelines/ policies. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 15:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]