As a note, I get that it's easy to forget. I always need to remind myself to send out the newsletter. The best way to remember, is to pick a day of the week, and always update the happenings on that day. For example, I always send out the newsletter on Monday, so maybe you could update the recent happenings the same day. As an advantage, me sending out the newsletter may remind you to update the recent happenings. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)17:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jonathan, due to your lack of performing your tasks, after numerous acknowledgements and warnings, a conference has been opened at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy/Administrative board, to help figure out the best solution. Please do not think you are being automatically removed from the board; you will likely be placed on a probation which would hopefully encourage you to complete the position's responsibilities. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)19:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You're not being removed from the board. It has been decided that you will be placed on probation, meaning that you have to perform the duties associated with your position, at least once a week. The probation will last until the remaining board members can trust that you will continue to address the responsibilities. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)19:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Jonathan. I don't know if you read my recent message; you didn't respond. As I said, the conference at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy/Administrative board ended with a decision to place you on probation. Nothing major, it just means that you have to perform your job at least once a week. Today, I noticed you removed all userboxes from your page. This means you are no longer in Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy participants, in turn meaning that you are not a member of the project. The userbox deletion also removed you from Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy administrative board members. You have not been removed from the board, so that userbox should remain on your page. Your removing of the project member userbox leads me to believe that you no longer want to be a member of WP:SGH; I am hoping that's not true. I have to admit, when you said "I didn't want to be in the board in the first place", it came off as a bit rude. I know I asked you to join, but you ultimately decided to join the board yourself. If you planned on not doing your job, and saying things such as the quote above, it seems counterproductive. Nevertheless, you are still currently on the board, so I am assuming you are staying on, unless I hear otherwise. Please respond as soon as you can, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)03:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my God! I am so sorry that I made you think that! I only removed the userboxes to add them under Barnstars, becasue I just thought I didn't look good after GA Contributions. Might have forgotten... As for the work, I'll be more careful. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 10:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them.
Character Pages
Ensure that each character page has this section order:
Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines".
Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page.
General
Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users.
Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.
Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week, a repeat of last time, is to search the internet, and find season 6 reviews to add to Grey's Anatomy. Search through google archives, and news websites, to find reviews that talk about season 6 in entirety. Please make sure the reviews you find come from a highly reliable source such as a major news site, or a well-known magazine. If you find some reviews, please post them on the talk page of Grey's Anatomy, where they will be evaluated for quality. If you find a suitable review, that fits the criteria we are looking for, you will be awarded a barnstar! Take part in this initiative, have fun searching for reviews, feel proud after the review you find is added to the main article, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!
Have fun, and don't forget to only look at renowned sites! We hope to see several season 6 reviews posted on the talk page soon!
--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)
I've read through the section, here are my thoughts:
Writing and filming
Fisher Plaza, which is the headquarters building for the media company Fisher Communications and Fisher's ABC affiliated Komo radio and television stations for Seattle, is used for some exterior shots of Seattle Grace Mercy West Hospital, such as air ambulances landing on the Komo Television newscopter's helipad. -- KOMO is an acronym and needs to be capitalized as such.
The last paragraph has absolutely nothing to do with writing or filming, and should be moved to 'cast' (which is the place for this kind of stuff.)
These paragraphs are really long, and should be split.
The average reader knows what those words mean. As I've said, vocabulary terms should not be linked. I have never taken philosophy, and I am fully aware of the word's meaning. We are not here to dumb down to people. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)15:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
philosophical
marriage
courage
vulnerability
mental confusion
optimism
happiness
stress
identity
reconcile
mother
husband
fright
frustration
childhood
near-death experience
climax
acting
auto racing
leisure activities
realism
being shot
career
medical condition
secret
single-minded
recover
confidence
the writers' blog
ego
inductive argument
exhaustion
fear
sex
conclusion
dramatic
comedic
That's as many as I'm listing, but there's quite a few more below what I've listed. Some are seriously ridiculous (ie. mother, husband, marriage, etc.).
No, actually it shouldn't. The idea is that any words that are simply terms should not be linked. Obviously a reader can comprehend what that means without a link. We are not a dictionary. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)21:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted your edit to Sadie Harris. As you probably know, the article was recently promoted to featured quality, and the paragraphs were split for organizational purposes. The first paragraph covers the character's storylines. The second covers the characters casting and creation, while the third covers her departure and reception. In the future, it would be nice if you left edit summaries, to explain why you did something. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)18:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I just noticed you merged paragraphs all over the article, which I also reverted. I know you like having larger paragraphs in your articles, but it is unacceptable for articles of featured quality. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)22:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's not that I like using larger paragraphs, but I do not believe that 13-14 lines per paragraph can be looked upon as a "long" paragraph (20 lines or more per paragraph would be long, indeed). The ones I used for "my" article cover one topic and therefore can't be split. But it's okay if you don't agree, I'll see what the FAC reviewers will have to say on the topic. :) (By the way, I am nominating Erica Hahn for FA very soon.) Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 08:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Jonathan! I like your new user page design. Sorry about the lack of newsletters recently. My primary laptop broke, and I've been using this old dinosaur computer. I wrote the newsletter, and then the computer crashed. I got so frustrated that I didn't rewrite it. Hopefully my laptop will be fixed by Monday, and I can get back to developing articles and writing newsletters. Let me know what you thought about the GA premiere after it airs! You're on EST, right? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs)19:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm EST. But I am freaking out right now 'cause my internet and television are interdependent (same network) - the internet crashed, so did the TV !!!!! And I won't be able to watch the episode, I'm practically dying here! (now I'm editing from my iPad with 3G internet connection). I'm gonna wait until I have the TV/internet fixed, so please don't tell me any spoilers! Cheers! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Jonathan! I noticed that you're planning on developping some season 4 episodes so I was wondering, when are you going to finish I Am a Tree and The Other Side of This Life (Part 1)? I remember the reception for I Am a Tree was problem for you but I thought you'd be able to do it after Joey and I found some reviews... You used Alan Sepinwall's review in a whole paragraph but not the others; is there a particular reason for that? ;) --Sofffie7 (talk) 10:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Season three episodes are still a priority to me, but I have decided to try something new as it was getting kind of boring. I am so grateful to Joey for finding the reviews for I Am a Tree, and the only reason I used only one, is because I couldn't find the time to write the others. I have also started medical school. The Other Side of This Life (Part 1) was not anywhere close to my interests, as I originally planned to create an article that included both The Other Side of This Life (Part 1) and The Other Side of This Life (Part 2), but had to split it. Thank you for your concern! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 10:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
