|
User talk:Jogers/Archive 2
Another confused contributor (who is now less confused)"Recently, I've been using AutoWikiBrowser to fix some capitalization errors in band names and titles of films, books, albums and songs." Also, you're not particularly consistent in your corrections. For example, on Romantic Guitars: Amour#Track Listing, you've changed Just The Way You Are to Just the Way You Are, and I Heard It Through The Grapevine to I Heard It Through the Grapevine,but you have NOT changed What A Fool Believes to What a Fool Believes. How do you decide which ones you'll change, which ones you won't change, and what you'll change them to? By-the-way: If you look at the contents of the pages I Heard It Through the Grapevine and I Heard It Through the Grapevine (album), you'll find a variety of capitalizations have been used on those pages, including I Heard It through the Grapevine and I Heard it Through the Grapevine. Have you given any thought to correcting the content of those articles too? (Personally, I would have thought the "correct" capitalization would have been one of "I heard it through the grapevine", "I heard it through the Grapevine" or "I heard it through The Grapevine" ... ) Also: Can you try explaining (again) why what the artist/author chose to use for the capitalization is an error? I'm afraid I couldn't understand your explanation(s). I would have thought that whatever the author chose as the title was, by definition, the "correct" title. For reasons I don't understand, you don't agree. Thanks for your patience in reading this. I look forward to your reply. Pdfpdf 15:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Jogers, thanks for the reply. Yes, it did "clear things up a little". (A lot, actually.) "I'm sorry if you are annoyed by my recent editing pattern." "I do this because we use standard English capitalization on Wikipedia."
Who's "standard rule in the English language"? Reference please! Note that in other situations, the Manual of Style implies or states rules which give quite different results. Why is there a separate and different rule for Albums? Changing topic: Thanks for explaining AWB to me. Most appreciated. And thanks for explaining and/or clarifying the other topics too - also appreciated. Regards, Pdfpdf 13:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
"I believe that it makes the encyclopedia a little bit better by helping to maintain consistency." "Despite what you may think"- that's an interesting choice of words - "it's not the only thing I do here". I've read your user page. I know you do other things. I'm sorry if you are annoyed by my comments/observations; it has not been my intention to annoy you. "The Manual of Style is not an arbitrary set of rules. It is largely based on authoritative style guides like The Chicago Manual of Style and Fowler’s Modern English Usage." "I guess some central guideline would be nice" "The rules are the same ... Could you point me to the ambiguities and inconsistencies you are referring to?" Regards, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Postscript:
I've just looked up the definition of "arbitrary", and see that there are several ways the word can be used - some of which are not what I'm trying to communicate.
"Your comments are welcome." Thank you! "I don't find them annoying or offensive" Good. " ... I only mean the convention followed by most English language publishers ... " Good. So it seems that we're both on the same track here. The difference is that I don't think there is just one convention that most follow. I admit I haven't done an exhaustive study, so I'm not in a position to comment on "It doesn't seem to change that much.", but I have developed a different impression. I guess it's time to do some homework and turn my impression into an opinion supported by hard facts. "I'm anxious to hear from you about the ambiguities and inconsistencies that you have mentioned." Yes, I know you are. I want to give you a thorough answer, and I don't currently have enough spare time to do that. "By the way, ... " Well spotted! Thank you.
"but consistency is a good thing, isn't it?" Not always; it depends on the situation/circumstances. e.g. On one hand: "Variety is the spice of life". On the other hand, the world would be a very different place if the laws of Physics and Gravity were not consistent. Film updateIf you'd take a look at User:SkierRMH/List You'll see that it's down to 4 groups:
That's it for that bunch... if you ever want to repeat the scan allowing for more false-positives, just dump it in the file & we'll get to work on it! Thanks. SkierRMH 23:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Questionable punctuation?Does the bot have the capability of picking up on questionable punctuation in a title, such as Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. It's been moved from the apparently correct "Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow" even though the Italian original is punctuated correctly. Just thought this might be parallel or part of the ongoing grammatically correct struggle :) SkierRMH 06:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC) Bot help!Hey mate, I have boh clue as to how to create a bot. I want to create something that looks at all pages that use {{Infobox music DVD}} and changes anything that uses the region codes differently to changes I've just made where all it needs is the region number and it links accordingly, but many pages that use the template use different things, like NTSC and other things (that aren't right or topical). Can you give me a hand in dong this? I'm pretty much thinking anything that isn't regions 0 - 8 or using the words "region {0-8}" to be cleared and anything that says "region #" is just replaced with the number in question. What do you think? Is it possible and is it plausible? --lincalinca 08:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: Strip unorthodox chronologies?
Re: Unorthodox extra chronologiesTopic moved from WT:ALBUM#Unorthodox extra chronologies:
Julian DobrowolskiConcerning my new article, I do not understand the problem. It is well referenced and articles have been written about this man's activity in the Polish newspapers over the past couple of months, notably within the last week when he was connected to Krzysztof Rutkowski. Please tell me what I need to add to make it more reliable. This is the first time I'm making a Wikipedia article, so I am vary inexperienced and don't exactly know what it lacks. Thanks.Matti1003.
I'm going to be posting newspaper references with online links wherever possible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matti1003 (talk • contribs). vandal revertThanks for reverting vandalism (by the contributor above) on my user page! Cheers. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 13:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC) WikiProject Nickel CreekJust wondering if you wanted to join! If not, that's okay! Thamusemeantfan 06:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Minor whitespace issueHey, Jogers. I notice your AWB changes like this remove the empty line between the artist navigation template and the categories. Is that intended? To me, it is clearer with an empty line there. --PEJL 14:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Disambiguation of albumsI just do not see any other way. How else is a person to know who created an album when clicking on it from a genre's category? It may be that it should never have been listed there in that way, but the practice is so widespread - because most people think of categorizing an album directly into a genre, not knowing that in fact you are supposed to place groups of artist albums in them. But that is not practical. It is really hard creating Category:John Coltrane hard bop albums over and over for new artists. Not to mention they might have only made one album in that specific form throughout their career. If we made [[Album name (Artist name)]] a standard then we wouldn't have to create categories like Category:John Coltrane hard bop albums; we could just list the album directly in the hard bop category. (Mind meal 21:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC))
possibility of "borrowing" bot - or a request for listsI'd really like to use a bot to create several lists like you've made for albums, etc., but specifically for films. I've tried several other modes, but it seems like a bot would be the best for this. I don't have any experience in writing/using these, so I'm turning to you to see if one or two things would be possible. Listed in what I see as less work for you - to more...
I'm open to other suggestions as well, but I think that this would greatly speed up some of the massively repetitive things I've been doing as of late! And, thanks much for the constant work with the Albums project! :) SkierRMH 04:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
The other lists are pretty self-explanatory, just never thought of using AWB with the regexes to filter out the titles... a job for this weekend! Thanks for any direction you can give me on the correct use of AWB to make those lists! SkierRMH 14:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
album cover furFYI: the template has been brought up for discussion both at WP:AN (here) and WT:FAIR (here). As you're probably the one who has now used the template the most times, your input would probably be valuable. Also you should be aware that there have been attempts to modify or even outright delete the template, even while discussions are going on. I have asked at WP:AN for full protection of it, pending the discussions, but I don't know that anyone's done anything. Jheald 12:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC) A couple suggestions for User:Jogers/List7, where you talk about albums needing rationale. First, you ought to mention that Template:album cover fur is only appropriate for specific types of uses, e.g. album covers in the infobox about the album. You should say that people can use it "if appropriate" or something like that. Second, people don't have to skip over images that are bigger than 300 X 300. I'm not exactly sure where that limit comes from, or why 400 X 400 or 500 X 500 is too big. It might just be a rule of thumb that comes from nowhere. But anyway, if people want to reduce the size of an image they can just do that by editing the image and re-uploading it. That's best if they have some software. But that can also be done easily by finding a 300 X 300 pix reduction on the article page, saving that, then re-uploading that one into the image page. Wikidemo 10:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Perhaps some sympathetic admins could be rounded up to undelete the redlink images on that list/add rationales to them? (or just undelete if quicker and leave the rationales to non-admins). I'll do a few if I know that other folks are doing some too i.e. that I'm not fighting a losing battle when I could be doing something more useful :) --kingboyk 23:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Peer review for Street Fighting ManWould you mind contributing to the peer review for "Street Fighting Man"? Thanks in advance. Stan weller 04:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Finished off the rest of these - left a couple that could use a confirmation on the lack of need to move. SkierRMH 06:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
A question for youJust a note that there is a question that I hope you can answer in this topic. Thanks in advance. --PEJL 10:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC) The Jogersbot tech barnstar
Planet EarthHi. The article Planet Earth refers to a TV series, not an album. I know that it contains details of the soundtrack album, but this is very much a subsidiary part of the article and not its main subject. I've reverted the Talk page several times now because the WikiProjectAlbum tag keeps getting added. Obviously not your fault as the Bot is only following instructions, but is it Wiki policy that the tag should be added to all articles that feature albums, regardless of subject? :-) Chris 42 16:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC) That's fine. Thanks! :-) Chris 42 17:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC) AntiSpamBotAntiSpamBot runs continuously, except when it crashes. It also does not revert when his main 'feeder' (a bot that actually observes the link-additions) crashes. At this very moment, both are dead. If you want to learn more, you can join us on IRC (link to talkchannel & link to bot-channel; you need e.g. MIRC or the Firefox plugin 'chatzilla' for that), that is where we control the bots. Hope this explains. --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC) Re: Using regexes when manually editing articlesCopy-paste from textarea into my text editor, run an action which performs a batch of regex replacements, make manual edits, copy-paste back to textarea. It could probably be done more easily with AWB, but that doesn't run natively on my primary operating system. --PEJL 13:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
List of improperly capitalized album articlesSure, I've actually run the old regex that you had on list 5 on books (pretty good - less than 50), songs (what an absolute mess - I think between the two of us we kept a couple admins busy with requested moves for a couple of days!), and films (pretty good). I see that you've updated User:Jogers/List5 and I'll start working on that in the next couple of days. Thanks also for putting up the new regex on that list -makes it easier to cut and paste it into AWB. On a similar issue, is there a way with AWB to cull out the ALL CAPS titles - or titles that have words that may have all capped words (the first would be preferable, as the second would probably give way too many false positives)? I've been fixing them as I see them, but with the tendency of some language groups to use all caps (really bad with the "Anime" articles), it's getting harder to keep up with them! SkierRMH 17:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
List 5I've added a section on the bottom of this page for "second opinions" - hopefully the concerns are explained well enough. SkierRMH 07:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Capitalization lists for books and filmsThe film list looks good, although theoretically "A" and "B" would have been resolved to have gotten that far long - theoretically! I don't know of an overarching category that includes all of them. The books and novels categories are the ones that I ran the minimized version on, so there hopefully wouldn't be too many in them. SkierRMH 23:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC) AWB DeveloperHi, Your now listed on SF, and have SVN access Enjoy, and welcome aboard! Reedy Boy 15:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
List 5 User talk:Jogers/List5Jogers - There's a group of titles of which I was uncertain on the correct caps at the bottom of the talk page. The last bot was almost entirely this list. Would you take a look at them and see what you think - either retitle or move. Thanks. SkierRMH 19:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC) Welcome back & hope you enjoyed your well-deserved vacation! I ran abbreviated versions of the lists when I saw they weren't being generated. I've also gotten into the "bot" racket SkiersBot that's doing some of the other work that I was doing manually... tedium beyond belief! It's tagging articles that (first runs) have "stub" category templates on the articles but are not tagged as such on the talk pages. After the stub categories, I'm going to run various categories that belong to different projects. Only a couple of little glitches so far - and it's been interesting going through the process! SkierRMH 06:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Fair Use request.Hey there, I saw you did the fair use rationale for a House Of Pain CD Cover... Could you help me out and give me the fair use on a image I uploaded from a screenshot? Image:Everlast1.JPG - This is the image I need help with. Thanks! Erryday I'm 05:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Re:GetDiff() ExceptionHi Jogers, Seen as you are someone who should be able to provide some more information easily, what caused this error for you? Or what were you doing at the time? Cheers Reedy Boy 15:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Ahhh, ok. That makes sense. If these other people had done some form of manual install and not moved the DLL, that would cause it i presume. I think it may be worth getting AWB to check if the Wikidiff2.dll dll exists on loadup - Then let the user know if it doesnt. Reedy Boy 13:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
AWB Bug fix ReleaseIm thinking we should put out 4.1.1.0 this weekend... Reedy Boy 12:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Your RfA was successfulCongratulations, I have closed your RfA as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the #wikipedia-en-admins channel. Good luck! --Deskana (talky) 23:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
AWBAh thanks for allowing me, I plan on having a look, but I'm really not familiar with it at all. Hopefully I can configure it to do some menial tasks. Phgao 11:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
RFAMy sincerest congratulations. I wish you good luck in your admin work. - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 00:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
TLA - "Professional" opinion requested ...Hi there! There's a bit of a debate going on at Talk:Three-letter abbreviation about TLA. (If you have no idea what a TLA is, could you read this first please?) I figured you would be a good person to ask: "What is the 'best' name for the 'main' page?" Could you post your reply on Talk:Three-letter abbreviation please? Thanks. Pdfpdf 11:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC) Re:AWB user count update automationYup :) I noticed the new talk page for it Reedy Boy 16:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
AWBHi, I was Rambutan (talk · contribs · logs) and I had a username change; I'm no longer able to use AWB. Could you help?--Porcupine (prickle me!) 20:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
CongratsCongrats on getting adminship. Good luck!:)--SJP 01:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Thanks for once again adding TypoBot to the list of approved AWB users. However, shouldn't the bot be listed under the Bots section instead of Approved users section? -- Saaga 03:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Barnstars say too little, so...
UserpageHey Jogers. I was curious if you wanted my to redesign your userpage, if so leave me a message on my talk page with a series of colors, themes, and maybe a picture or two you like. --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 19:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Deletion RequestI have closed the deletion debate Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calita (Driv3r Character) as delete. Is it possible if you delete it because I do not have the admin tools, thanks. (If this was an inappropiate request, please tell me, I have only spent six months here and don't know that much.) Marlith T/C 01:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
My AWB Request
Ah, I didn't know about that particular rule, because that's what I wanted to do in the first place! Yesterday I already fixed the links that pointed to "Yankovich" instead of "Yankovic" which falls under the acceptable usage of changing the redirects. I'll probably use the AWB for things like typo fixes and so forth instead. Thanks a lot! ~~ Gromreaper(Talk)/(Cont) 01:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC) AWB updater failureWhen I decline the attempt to update my 4.1.0.0 (you know that I'm still using it =) ) to later version, the updater encounters the following problem: Value cannot be null. Parameter name: address AWB encountered an exception.
Thank you for making the AWB better. Mashiah 21:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Replacement next to refJust tested User:Rich Farmbrough/another user page and the replacement (of {{check}}}} works if I uncheck the first box "Ignore external/interwiki...", not otherwise. Probably the <ref/> tag is seen as part of the URL. So this may specifically apply to refs endig with URLS and similar. Rich Farmbrough, 11:30 22 September 2007 (GMT). Jogersbot false positiveWhat's up with this? --PEJL 19:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Use X newline charactersHello, Jogers. I've successfully installed the new version of AWB and now using the parameter X from the subject. It seems to me this parameter is not saved to any setting files and it has to be changed again and again each time I restart AWB. Maybe it is not a good idea to put this parameter into an xml settings file, because one user may not probably have different values for different setting files. So, I suppose it depends only on a user, not on the task he solves. Thus, do you think it is possible to put the value into a general settings file for AWB? Mashiah 20:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
AWBI've applied for this twice now. I know the first time i didn't have over 500 edits but the second time? Do you know why i haven't been approved? --Savre 23:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
AWBHi, noticed your observation on my 3RR blocks. The first blocks in February and March 2006 were in relation to the controversial American System page and my newness to Wikipedia. I had not yet understood the policy. The middle block of the same year was over the WP:NOR page in which an intense discussion over policy changes being made without discussion was underway. I tried to protect the page in its original form with the reverts; until discussion was concluded. This was obviously wrong and didn't help the situation. Eventually through the intervention and guidance of a few longterm admins I was unblocked and gave my word to stay away from the debate - which I kept. The latest block (Sept. 2007) was over Anchor Baby and here I fully disputed it - as I had not actually violated the policy in my opinion - however I did agree with the admin who blocked me in the end as the best move and it further enlightened me about the policy's changed wording and gave me a different perspective on reverting overall. Eventually this block was lifted the same day as well. I fully understand if this is off-putting and you wish not to approve on the block log's themselves. Just wanted to let you know the reasons therein. Regards - --Northmeister 13:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Re: My userpageNo problem. I assumed you wouldn't mind. --PEJL 16:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC) ReturnedThanks for the welcome back! I'm going to be sporadic in the next couple of weeks, as I'm going to three mandatory (and boring) continuing education workshops, but the hotels have free internet hookups, and there's no homework involved, so hopefully I'll get through the backlog of stuff! SkierRMH 21:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC) Can you approve my bot for AWB use?Hi Jogers. My bot was recently approved (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CapitalBot) and flagged as a bot, so could you approve it for use with AWB for me? I posted a request here already: Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage. I just want to get started while it's still the weekend which is why I'm asking you directly. Thanks, and let me know if there's a problem. --CapitalR 19:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC) AWBI know that this will seem really stupid to ask, but, is there a way that I can get the, for want of a better word, power to approve users for use of it? Thanks in advance for your answer. Your Grace Lord Sir Dreamy of Buckland tm 02:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: High CultureThanks! --PEJL 11:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC) AWB Feature RequestsCouple for you to look at
I'm pointing at them as i've commented/implemented one of them =) Reedy Boy 20:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Improper title botsGreetings again! What's the possibility of adding special characters to the 'no no' article title lists? I just ran across a Beautiful Reel. B'z Live-Gym 2002 Green ~Go★Fight★Win~ which violates about 3 of the naming conventions rules! I'd add all the punctuation characters except . , : ! ( and ). I know there'd probably be a slew of false positives for the first list, but I'm willing to look through a list (maybe trying the non-language characters first) to see how bad it would be. SkierRMH 07:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC) AWBI don't understand why. I try to make edits on it that aren't just spacing, but if it came up, I'd just press save. Many of my edits were other things, anyway... ✗iℎi✗(talk) 11:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
List suggestionsHey Jogers. Would you consider adding lists for
Fair use rationale lists automatic updatesYou actually beat me to the 'punch' on this one! I was trying to come up with a way for the bot to tag the image itself in some way so that it could be transcluded to another page by the date. The benefit of the current system is that it does list by dates, so that whomever is working on it knows the oldest, thus the most 'stale' and immediate images and can work on those first. With the other system(s) it would be nice to have that feature - at least know what day it was added, for the same reasons. A further thought - to create a daily list (images that 'pop up' for the first time on day X. Then have the bot simply check that list, remove ones that have been deleted or fair use added, and when the list disappears, delete the section. Subsequent sections would then not include anything listed in the previous sections. Don't know if I explained that well, hope so :) SkierRMH 17:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Just worked through User:SkierRMH/List4 - This Wikipedia:Template messages/Image namespace was included in the "not dated" list! I added fair use where appropriate and just ignored the others. Let's see what happens after the next run! THANKS!! SkierRMH 23:47, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
User:SkierRMH/ListI've been adding the exemptions for both the books and films on the talk page, could you double-check that the bot is catching the books - the same ones keep popping up each week! Thanks. SkierRMH 14:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
User:Jogers/Template:AlbumHi again. I've been cleaning up Category:WikiProject Albums, moving the templates to a new sub-category Category:WikiProject Albums templates and doing other clean up. Other than the two editprotected requests pending for {{Album}} and {{Needsinfobox}} which need admin assistance (hint, hint), all that's left is User:Jogers/Template:Album. Is that a test page that serves a purpose anymore? If so, can it be moved to Template:Album/sandbox? If not, can it be deleted? --PEJL 17:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Re:TypeInitializationException in AWBYup, I do And i also got it on a version i pulled from the SVN of the last release So yeah.. Its //void __declspec(dllexport) wikidiff2_free(void *);
[DllImport("wikidiff2.dll")]
private static unsafe extern void wikidiff2_free(byte* p);
static unsafe WikiDiff()
{
wikidiff2_free(null);
}
Its where it goes out to the C++ Wikidiff2 module.. It just throws an exception As for debugging it... *shrugs* Works fine for MaxSem - It doest like it on my 2003 box, which hasnt been updated either (worked on that last time i tried)... Im now on 64bit vista... Notice that Max has presumably accidentally released a debug version... Reedy Boy 19:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Re:"Watch" buttonBuggar... I'll put it on the message. Reedy Boy 19:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Update on "new" botsJust wanted to let you know that the "new" image bots seems to be working well. My only question is, for example, on User:SkierRMH/List4, November 11, Image:Constitutionalchaos.jpg is listed but doesn't qualify for non-free use. If I remove that (and other's that don't qualify) will the bot just replace it the next time? The reason I ask is that, let's say that two people are working on a list, to remove (& not have replaced) non-qualifying images would keep both from doing duplicate evaluation work. Otherwise, seems to be working quite well! SkierRMH (talk) 18:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Can you please approve the users and the bot? Thanks, as I would like to run the bot. <DREAMAFTER><TALK> 02:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Category:Album articles without cover artWould you really call this a rough consensus? Jogers 10:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Category restorationI am restoring the categories to certain redirects to Geraint Watkins, The Balham Alligators, Down to Earth and High Cumberland Jubilee compilations, Jimmy Buffett greatest hits compilations, Jimmy Buffett sound board live albums, Would You Believe? (Hollies album), and Hollies (1965 album) that you deleted. Categories are appropriate for these articles per WP:CAT-RD "Categorization of list entries – Some well-organized lists have redirects pointing at their subsections. In such cases, categorization of the redirects can be an alternative way of browsing entries in a long list. It can also provide an alphabetical listing for lists that are not organised alphabetically, for example, lists organised in a chronological order. " — AjaxSmack 03:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
List of disputed non-free album coversHi Jogers. A Wikiproject has been set up to help deal with backlogs, including Category:Disputed non-free images. Would you mind if I put a link to the list of disputed album covers in your userspace on the project's talk page? They would be very useful for editors who want to work on a specific image type. Regards, Bláthnaid 14:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Captain_Beefheart_-_Shiny_Beast_(Bat_Chain_Puller).jpgThanks for uploading Image:Captain_Beefheart_-_Shiny_Beast_(Bat_Chain_Puller).jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.) If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC) Image:Captain_Beefheart_-_Ice_Cream_for_Crow.jpgI have tagged Image:Captain_Beefheart_-_Ice_Cream_for_Crow.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 20:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)  Another editor has added the " |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
.jpg){kind=link}
