User talk:Jisshu

Discuss

Hi, Jisshu. The good news is that you're passionate and dedicated, so I think there's a reasonable chance we can overcome this. It's going to take a while, but there's no deadline on Wikipedia.

For starters, you've got two main issues- the first with being confident enough to write your own English-language text, and the second with proper sourcing. Let's take these one at a time.

Firstly, the copyright issues. These are pretty complex, so let's start with the easiest one: correctly attributing the authors when you move English Wikiedia articles to Simple Wiki. On Simple Wiki, can you please follow the instructions and fix the attribution for pages you've already imported? The rules are a bit different than they are on enWiki, so I can't help you with it too much, but I'm confident you can do this. Don't worry if it takes a few tries to get it right.

The other copy-right issues are going to take a bit longer to fix. As a first step, I want you to take this course. It's from the Wikimedia Foundation. It only covers the basics, but it's a good first step. Let me know if you have any questions. Once you're done with it, I'll find you something a little more advanced, and we'll start coming up with techniques you can use in your writing. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you i am ready to co-operate Jisshu (talk) 05:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hello GreenLipstickLesbian on simple English Wikipedia i mentioned correct reference with page number
i am still editing some other articles Jisshu (talk) 09:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and thanks for course its really very helpful Specially the close paraphrasing part its really very helpful wich was my main problem. i will try to find a different reliable sources, and take notes in my own writing. Jisshu (talk) 09:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I already finished basic course and now i understand little more about close paraphrasing and Copyright, we can start advanced course, Now before editing any article related history, i will write it in my notebook after searching from three-four source in my own words, this will make it a little easier for me to avoid close paraphrasing Jisshu (talk) 12:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is great to hear. Can you work on cleaning up the close paraphrase issues with your articles on simple-wiki? -- asilvering (talk) 14:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes User:asilvering but it will take few days since i don't want to make same mistake and but can you please review and tell me which article i created have close paraphrasing issues so i can improve quickly Jisshu (talk) 15:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's no rush. I suspect it's all of them, since you continued having the same issues once unblocked over here. There's definitely some in simple:Jassa Singh Ahluwalia. Fixing paraphrasing on simple-wiki should be especially easy, since you also have to convert to a more basic form of English while you're at it. -- asilvering (talk) 17:51, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:asilvering i fixed close paraphrasing in simple:Jassa Singh Ahluwalia, including simple:Naudh Singh page cam you review Jisshu (talk) 08:21, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My mostly Refrences are from Hari Ram Gupta History of the Sikh book set so language is almost same although i have intentions of creating some battle page in future in which i will use refrences from Ganda Singh and Kushwant Singh books Jisshu (talk) 11:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:asilvering sir as Phil knight suggest do I have to take standord offer? i already mentioned my mistake in past unblock request and i am not using User:Jassu712 account as 331dot suggested the only problem I have is Close paraphrasing which i am trying to improve Jisshu (talk) 15:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We do normally ask that block-evading editors take the standard offer. In this case I don't think it's necessary, and I'm also inclined to leniency in that regard since you've been so badly jerked around with this unblock-reblock business. I can't guarantee other admins will feel the same way, but at any rate I don't think you should open another unblock request until the paraphrasing issues with your simple-wiki articles have been resolved. Unfortunately I'm extremely busy these days and don't really have the bandwidth for complex copyvio cases, so I can't promise I'll be able to look at your fixes. If you're sure you're ready to have your work checked, you could try pinging GreenLipstickLesbian, but I'm not sure you're there yet. Let's look at what you've done so far:
Here are your edits to simple:Jassa Singh Ahluwalia: [1]. These are still basically the same sentences, just with the wording rearranged. Sometimes, that's the best anyone can do; I'm sure we can find sentences that have been treated like this in basically any Wikipedia editor's contribution history. It becomes a problem when every sentence is like that. The overall sentence-by-sentence structure of the Wikipedia article should not match the source.
Here's a description of each individual sentence in the first paragraph of this diff: [Sentence about Jassa Singh being 13.] [Sentence about him taking control of his uncle's jatha.] [Sentence about Murtaza Khan's horses.] [Sentence about attack.] [Sentence about how attack made him famous.] [Sentence about giving the horses to Kapur Singh.] etc. This is true about both the article before you started doing your paraphrase edits and the one from right now. That's way, way too close. Here's an actual paraphrase: "Jassa Singh inherited control of his jassa when he was 13, upon the death of his uncle, Bassa Singh. Soon after, he became famous for a horse raid on a merchant caravan." But far better would be to integrate this with other sources, picking and choosing what is most important. And keep in mind that the English on simple-wiki needs to be simple. -- asilvering (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
okay i guess i get certain Idea now Jisshu (talk) 08:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i fixed jassa Singh Ahluwalia page it's mot have copyright issue i also use content available within Wikipedia which makes things easier for me i will work on other articles now Jisshu (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
user:asilvering Hello sir when you get some free time please review simple:Naudh Singh page for which i was blocked in main wikipedia this time i didn't did close paraphasing and including Jassa Singh Ahluwalia page thank you Jisshu (talk) 14:23, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:GreenLipstickLesbian sir can you please review simple:Jassa Singh Ahluwalia page I just want to know if i am ready for next step now Jisshu (talk) 14:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ranjit Singh into Draft:Military campaigns of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Jassa Singh Ahluwalia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or imagesβ€”you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Indian campaign of Ahmad Shah Durrani. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Β DanCherek (talk) 00:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have applied this indefinite block because you keep copying text from elsewhere into Wikipedia, in spite of previous warnings like the one right above as well as this one. If you wish to request an unblock, please follow the instructions in the above notice and submit an unblock request that demonstrates your understanding of Wikipedia's copyright policy, and a commitment to following it in the future. DanCherek (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir for repeating my mistake DanCherek I tried to take full care of copyright this time. So I took sources from different books. But in every book exactly same to same is written, that's why this happened., I apologize to you, Can you please tell me how can I apeal about this block, Maybe I shouldn't edit on historical articles anymore because they tend to be very complicated. I will focus more on other categories article if you unblock me. --Jisshu (talk)

Unblock Request

Request for my Block Jisshu (talk) 07:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jisshu (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After being blocked I am gathering information about copyright so that I can understand it better, Copyright is a intellectual property that protect original work we cannot used copyright content without permission of copy right holder and I also come to know that Wikipedia is subjected to US copyright law in this matter and may not host material which infringes US copyright law because of which copyright content not allowed on Wikipedia we can use Copyright content on Wikipedia if the owners give permission if you unblock me and forgave me to avoid violating the copyright policy I will not edit historical pages anymore because they tend to very complicated I will now on focus on other categories article if I use Copyright content I will do so from Wikipedia

Decline reason:

These answers are not generally correct. Copyright law is not intellectual property. You've missed all of WP:FAIRUSE. Copyrighted content is allowed on Wikipedia. Indeed, almost all content on Wikipedia is copyrighted. Yamla (talk) 12:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jisshu (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been trying understand copyright better for the past few days and am I taking time, Copyright are exclusive rights granted to the owners of an original work including right to copy distribute and adapt the work it helps protect owners from other people copying their work without permission, a work only be copied if the owners give permission, Because the database servers are located in USA, Wikipedia is subjected to US copyright law in this matter and cannot host material that infringes US copyright law There is expcetion to the rules of the copyright called fair use, Fair use is doctrine in United States law that permit limited use of copyright material for criticism commentary, news reporting teaching etc I will take care of all this things so that I don't make such mistake again in future please forgive me and unblock me

Decline reason:

Reading through the attempts to paraphrase cited sources below, I'm afraid that the resulting text still copies too much from the original to comply with copyright. signed, Rosguill talk 06:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jisshu (talk) 07:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining what copyright is. Please answer the following questions below to help administrators determine that you understand how to avoid this mistake in the future:

  1. What articles did you add copyright material to?
  1. How can editors add information from sources without infringing on copyright?
  2. Please give an example of an article that you would like to add information to. Please provide a brief example (one sentence) of something you would add to the article that demonstrates that you understand copyright. Ensure that the example is cited.

Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 20:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. I added copyright material in mostly historical articles like Jassa Singh Ahluwalia, Ahmad Shah Durrani Invasions of India and many other historical articles
  2. Editors can add information from sources without infringing on copyright by Paraphrase the original text by using their own words to convey the same meaning as the original source or work this involves changing the sentence structure and wording of the original text while retaining the main idea, editar must always attributes any information or ideas they take from other sources by giving credit to the original work by including a citation or reference, Editor can seek permission from the owner of the original work,
  3. If I got unlocked I will add mostly sports related article I will make sure that I will not violate Wikipedia copyright policy

Hi Jisshu, please ensure that you sign your posts by adding four tildes (like this: ~~~~). This will let Wikipedia editors know who is saying something on a talk page and timestamp it. To demonstrate your skills in paraphrasing work, please pick a Wikipedia article that you would like to add content to. In an edit below, please post what information you would like to add to the article, paraphrasing information from a source (a sentence or two will suffice). Do not forget to cite your work. Z1720 (talk) 17:32, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 For Example Jassa Singh Ahluwalia attacked and pludendered Malerkotla in 1763 source[1]Jisshu (talk) 19:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hari Ram Gupta. History Of Sikhs Vol. 2 Evolution of Sikh Confederacies. ISBNΒ 81-215-0248-9. page no 198

Unfortunately, the sentence that you proposed above was too short to allow me to determine that you are able to paraphrase the information, and I can't read Sanskrit so I can't confirm if this has been paraphrased. Can you use an English source, and write a longer sentence or two? Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 For example In Match 1783, Dal Khalsa under Jassa Singh Ahluwalia and Beghal Singh advanced upon Delhi Jassa Singh Ramgarhia also joined Dal Khalsa in the neighborhood of the Delhi The Sikhs entered the red fort and placed Jassa Singh Ahluwalia on the throne of Mughal Emperors, They called him badshahi Singh Jassa Singh Ramgarhia chalenged him Both sides drove out swords, Jassa Singh Ahluwalia steped down the throne and declined the honour Source[1] Page no 166 Jisshu (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 Hello sir can you please tell me how much more time it may take for my unlock procedure, if you have any other questions then you can ask me I assure you after being unblock I will not violate any Wikipedia policy and guidelinesJisshu (talk) 04:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jisshu, I am busy in real life so I might not follow up with this as quickly as I want. Administrators are all volunteers so how long you will need to wait depends upon when admins have time to look at unblock requests. I welcome any admin who wants to comment or take this over, as I believe collaboration and teamwork are the best parts of Wikipedia and admins are all part of a team. Z1720 (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request: Second Chance for User:Jassu712

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jisshu (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request unblock for my account, User:Jassu712. My this account, User:Jisshu, was blocked due to Wikipedia:Copyright violations. I acknowledge and take full responsibility for my past actions.

Upon reflection, I realized creating a new account, User:Jassu712, to evade the initial block was a violation of Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry. I take full and unequivocal responsibility for my unethical actions, acknowledging that evading a block by creating a new account was a serious mistake.

To prevent future copyright violations, I will:

  • Verify sources' copyright status before uploading.
  • Use public domain or Creative Commons-licensed materials.
  • Properly cite sources and provide attribution.
  • Avoid copying content from external sources without permission.
  • Use Wikipedia's built-in citation tools.
  • Paraphrase or summarize original text.

I assure you:

  • I will use only User:Jassu712 for editing.
  • I will follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
  • I will contribute constructively.
  • Never creating or using alternative accounts for deceptive purposes.

I kindly request consideration for unblocking my account and grant me a second chance

Decline reason:

We want to hear from you, not ChatGPT. GPTZero score of 100%. HouseBlasterΒ (talkΒ β€’Β he/they) 20:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3rd Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jisshu (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I would like to apologize. Actually, I used ChatGpt to improve my grammar. First, I would like to tell you about my original block, my first account was blocked due to copyright violation. Earlier, I did not have much knowledge about copyright policy. But now I understand The Wikimedia Foundation follows US Copyright Law, but also encouraged to respect international copyright law too even if they don't have have formal agreement with the US as stated in Wikipedia:Non-US copyrights, I also know now how copyrights violation can be avoided For Example * Paraphrase or Summarize source material in my own words, adding inline citations as required by the sourcing policy. * Use of Public domain * Re-using content available with in Wikipedia as outlined in Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content * Request Permission from the Copyright Holder My second account was blocked because of Sockpuppet. I created a second account to avoid my first block. Which was very wrong and I take full responsibility for it. I assure you that I will not do anything that violates Wikipedia's policy again. If my account gets unblocked. I will just use my User:Jassu712 account I now understand that I was blocked not as a punishment, but to prevent further desruptive edits, I am very much interested in contributing to Wikipedia, so I assure you. If I am unblocked, I will not do anything that further violates Wikipedia policy

Accept reason:

The appelant has answered a series of questions, been educated about copyright, acknlowedged their past errors and agreed to stick to one account. I think that is sufficient for a second chance. El Beeblerino if you're not into the whole brevity thing 23:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jisshu, if you're using ChatGPT to improve your grammar, is that because English isn't your first language? Do you know that you're only blocked on the English-language Wikipedia? You can edit on whatever other language Wikipedia you like, since you're not globally banned. For example, you can get to Hindi Wikipedia here, and you've already got an account there: [2]. -- asilvering (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you Sir, but I am gradually improving my English and I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time. Jisshu (talk) 06:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I would love to continue contributing to the English Wikipedia without violating any Wikipedia policy. Jisshu (talk) 06:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
asilvering It's been a month. I am not getting any reply. I know. Wikipedia admins are very busy since many unblock requests come almost every day. But I should also know what progress is being made on my unblock request, If you have any question regarding my knowledge on copyright, Sockpuppet policy etc, you can ask me.I am completely ready to cooperate. I hope you can reply me sir Jisshu (talk) 09:53, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jisshu, I don't think any progress has occurred, since if it had I presume someone would have replied here or actioned the unblock request. I do have some questions for you:
In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:
  • What is copyright?
  • How is Wikipedia licenced?
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Again, please be sure to use your own words. It's fine to make mistakes in your English. If you use AI generation or translation software to write your responses, it makes it much harder for us to determine whether you've actually understood the questions and their answers. -- asilvering (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
okay sir i will answer your question based on my understanding Jisshu (talk) 16:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Answer: Copyright is law that protects orginal work of copyright holder for example Book's movie art's music etc
Jisshu (talk) 16:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jisshu (talk) 16:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • copyrighted content are not allowed in Wikipedia because it's an orginal work which owned by copyright holder, for example: Book music, movie, art's etc, We can't use copyright content in Wikipedia without Copyright Holder permission, it will be illegal if Wikipedia use copyright content without Copyright Holder permission
Jisshu (talk) 16:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jisshu (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re-using content available with in Wikipedia
Jisshu (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:asilvering Sir these is My answer regarding copyright Jisshu (talk) 17:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In your "avoid copyright violations by" answer, you mention a lot of things that can be done to avoid copyright violations, but most of them aren't things we actually do in practice all that often. I see you received a copyright violation notice for edits you made to Jassa Singh Ahluwalia. Can you explain why a particular one of those edits was a copyright violation, and how you would make an edit to that article that used the same source, but didn't violate copyright? -- asilvering (talk) 17:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
asilvering It's because I didn't paraphrase properly, i copied it exactly from History of the Sikh by Hari Ram Gupta even after getting the repeated warning i have now learned to paraphrase or Summarize properly and i also have a better knowledge of reliable sources now although, i am not perfect but i assure you that, I will not repeat the past mistakes again i have also been contributing to Simple English Wikipedia for a while after being blocked. i created articles on Jassa Singh Ahluwalia, Nawab Kapur Singh and some other Sikh Worrier on Simple English Wikipedia Jisshu (talk) 07:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks you so much sir Beeblebrox for giving me second chance and asilvering for your guidance I will not disappoint you for giving me a second chance. Jisshu (talk) 11:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


asilvering, Hello sir, I just checked my old edits again today, most of which i found to have copyright violations because i copied and pasted exactly from History of the Sikh By Hari Ram Gupta Books Specially Jassa Singh Ramgarhia and Jassa Singh Ahluwalia page including some other articles like Indian campaign of Ahmad Shah Durrani and as i said in my previous answers I can avoid copyright violation through paraphrasing and summarize specialy for history related pages and i also take a lot of help from Ai tools for paraphrasing however I search for reliable sources on my own.. i hope i can get another chance. Jisshu (talk) 14:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no - please, don't use AI tools to help you avoid plagiarism! AI tools are actually pretty likely to cause plagiarism that you're not even aware of. That doesn't mean you need to go and scrub everything you wrote on simple-wiki, but please don't use them anymore.
As far as I'm concerned, all that needs to happen for this unblock request to be accepted is for someone to check your contributions on simple-wiki to make sure they're not close paraphrasing or copyvio. I had a look at your articles there, but it's not easy to check for accidental copyright violation or plagiarism because you don't provide page numbers in your footnotes. I'm not going to decline this unblock request, since I haven't seen evidence that you're still making copyvios, but I'm not presently in a position to accept it, either. -- asilvering (talk) 02:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
asilvering oh okay sir i provide Page number in simpl-wiki so it's can become easier for you and I will not used ai tool as you said since it's can create problem thanks you for your guidance Jisshu (talk) 06:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Beeblebrox, it looks like you didn't check any of this editor's contributions before unblocking? -- asilvering (talk) 16:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are implying that what you wrote above was or is binding on any reviewing admin, I'm afraid I don't agree. El Beeblerino if you're not into the whole brevity thing 21:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was not implying that. Could you answer my question, please? -- asilvering (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Congratulations on getting unblocked

Hello @Jisshu , I wanted to congratulate you on your unblock. I see we edit in the same topic areas (Sikh history), so I am looking forward to seeing your edits that will improve Wikipedia's coverage of this area. I have seen your edits in the past and thought they added a lot of valuable information to many articles.

On the Sukerchakia Misl article, the early history of the Sukerchakia family was removed. Regarding Jat clans (got or gotra), it is not unusual for newer Jat clans to form and separate from larger, more established clans, these newly separated clans are often then named after toponyms. It is very likely the parent clan of the Sansi and Sukerchakia clans was Warraich, hence why an early ancestor of Ranjit Singh was identified as a Warraich. The section also discussed the migration patterns of the family, their locations of habitation at various periods of time, and how they became associated with the Sansi tribe (which often confuses people and makes them assume that Ranjit Singh was a Sansi rather than a Jat, so that section I had written helped clear up that confusion). It is clear Buddh Singh was the first to adopt Khalsa Sikhism, but as the sources show, earlier ancestors, such as Baru, were basically Nanakpanthis. That section that was removed was supported by various sources, including one written by G. S. Chhabra, a professor, and sources published by the Institute of Sikh Studies and in the periodical titled The Sikh Review. I believe removing it will oversimplify the article and remove valuable historical nuance that needs to be understood for readers to grasp the complex history of the family. I hope we can have a fruitful discussion on this matter.

Kind regards, MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MaplesyrupSushi thank you brother regarding Ranjit Singh Ancestors. According to GS Chhabra's book, Ranjit Singh's first known ancestors were Warraich Jatts. However, it's mentioned that Ranjit Singh's great-great-grandfather, Budha Singh, was a Sansi Jatt. If Ranjit Singh's first ancestors were indeed Warraich Jatts, why is Budha Singh identified as a Sansi Jatt?Jisshu (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jisshu - As explained in the initial post, new Jat clans tend to form out of larger, more established clans. This fact is recounted in colonial-era literature, such as district gazetteers. I suspect that Sansi was a child clan from the Warraichs. The sources identify his earliest ancestor as a Warraich. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 14:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
regarding Ranjit Singh ancestors Jisshu (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And it is not that I did not try to know much, I tried to double verify in many historical books but I did not find much. The first known ancestors of Ranjit Singh is believed to be Budh Singh in most of books. Jisshu (talk) 14:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jisshu - There were four sources that supported that early family history section I had added to the article. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 14:42, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
okay i will verify them again please wait Jisshu (talk) 14:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jisshu - Thank you for working together with me on resolving this. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 14:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem I checked sources but their are still some dispute regarding Budha Singh according to Hari Ram Gupta he accepted Sikhism to wash away his sins and according to GS chabra he accepted Sikh due to his father last wish theirs is also dispute about his death different author mentioned different date Hari Ram 1715 Kushwant Singh 1718 what should we do thenΒ ? Jisshu (talk) 14:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jisshu - We can provide both views/theories on the article. That would be the most neutral approach. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 14:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
okay go ahead i agree with you, you can add all remove information about Ranjit Singh Ancestors since it's already mentioned in that section it's disputed so I don't think it's a problem anymore just don't forget to mention my theory too Jisshu (talk) 14:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jisshu - Yes, of course. Thank you for reaching an agreement with me. I am looking forward to possibly collaborating with you in the future. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 15:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
same here thanks you Jisshu (talk) 15:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 00:30, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Β Izno (talk) 00:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rarely have I seen someone blow a second chance this badly in so little time. I think it is arguable that edit warring could be a secondary reason for the block as there numerous article edits where they simply undid edits by MaplesyrupSushi with the explanation "my account is unblocked" which is obviously not a reason to undo a bunch of someone else's edits and shows they learned nothing here and may have actually acted worse aftert being unblocked than they did before being blocked. I'd also note that in at least one of their edit sumaries they said "my main account is unblocked which begs the question of what other accounts they may be operating. El Beeblerino if you're not into the whole brevity thing 21:08, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not operating other account as of now as 331dot advice i Stop using Jassu712 account and only using this as my primary account you can check on my Jassu712 account Jisshu (talk) 05:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblocked request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jisshu (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to talk to the about the issue whom I did not get a chance to talk in the discussion. Budha Singh had two sons, Nodh Singh and Chanda Singh. While Nodh Singh stayed with his father at Sukarchak, Chanda Singh settled in Sandhanwala, Sialkot district, and became known as Sandhanwalia. Chanda Singh's sons later moved to Rajal Sansi, which became their permanent home. Nodh Singh married into an influential Sansi Jat family, gaining status and building a large house at Sukarchak, known as Sukarchakia Garhi. (Cited to: Singh, Khushwant (11 October 2004). A History of the Sikhs: 1469–1838 (2nd ed))

it's mentioned in Kushwant Singh book at page numbers 186 or 187 although i could have paraphrase better like this,

Budha Singh had two sons, Nodh Singh and Chanda Singh, when he passed away. Chanda Singh's descendants became the Sandhanwalia Sardars of Raja Sansi. Nodh Singh married into a prominent Sansi Jat family, gaining prestige and building a large house in Sukarchak called Sukarchakia Garhi.

and on Budhha Singh page

Desu, a Sansi Jat farmer, owned 25 acres of land near Gujranwala. He was known for stealing cattle, but later changed his ways after learning about Guru Gobind Singh. In 1692, Desu traveled to Anandpur and received initiation from Guru Gobind Singh, becoming Desu Singh. After the establishment of the Khalsa in 1699, Desu Singh received another initiation and became a brave Sikh warrior, earning the nickname Budha Singh. He fought in Guru Gobind Singh's battles and later served under Banda Singh Bahadur.

i tried to paraphrase into simple English which led to close paraphrasing like I did on Simple Wikipedia, i probably needed to change that too. There are not many reliable sources about Budhha Singh and Nodh Singh except Ram Gupta and Khushwant Singh. so information about both is heavly dependent on Both refrences specialy Hari Ram Gupta book which focuses on Sikh Misl although i admit my mistake i could have done better i could have also practiced in the sandbox before editing. you can put a one year topic ban on me till i learn to paraphrase a little better by trying out Simple English Wikipedia since i know the goal of Wikipedia's work is to prevent disruptive edits i am interested in many topics other than history

If I am unblocked now I want to start clean. as I have made a lot of disruptive edits with my primary account If the admins has any question in their mind tgey can ask me but if Wikipedia admins feels that I will not be able to make constructive edits even after block they can let me know because i understand since i t is my fault I have long history of abuse i will not waste much of your time further this will be my last unblock request after this I will not make any more requests.whatever the admin's decision i will accept it

Decline reason:

You have used Jassu712Β (talkΒ Β· contribs) to evade this block, so I think your best chance is to take the wp:standard offer, and re-apply in 6 months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@PhilKnight: Not that I am even considering unblocking, but your statement You have used Jassu712 (talk Β· contribs) to evade this block is techincally not correct, they used it to evade a previous block. That account has been blocked for several months so it can't have been used to evade the curent block which was issued nine days ago. Again, I agree with the current block, but socking is not really part of it. El Beeblerino if you're not into the whole brevity thing 22:45, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jisshu (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that i created another account to avoid a block, but that issue has already been resolved i was blocked again due to copyright and close paraphrasing issues i am currently working to improve in this area i suggest PhilKnight review all my previous requests and discussions from both accounts. Right now i am focusing on improving my close paraphrasing issues i am contributing to Simple English Wikipedia and working on many articles to fix these problems i am also taking a course suggested by GreenLipstickLesbian an to improve my knowledge.

and please also read my discussion with asilvering who is helping me to solve my close paraphrasing issues

Decline reason:

"That issue has already been resolved" -- no, it hasn't. The standard offer is available to you; given your block evasion, the timer starts on the last day your other account edited, Oct. 25. --jpgordon𝄒𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--jpgordon i was unblock for that but re block for my close paraphrasing issues and i am not using that account as 331 dot aaid please read my previous request and discussion i am as of now working on close paraphrasing issues i am right now block for copyright not for sockpuppet i also know very well now creating account to evade block is very wrong Jisshu (talk) 16:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--jpgordon can you please reply? Jisshu (talk)

@Jpgordon: I am forced to agree. This is double jeapordy. The block evasion was done under a previous block, not this one. I agree the user should probably remain blocked but we should be fair about it and not retroactively re-block them for socking that happoened months ago. I chose to give this user a second chance, and they blew it right away by returning to the exact same behavior. I don't see how that is not enough and we need to be going to these absurd lengths to come up with another reason that really, really, doesn't seem to apply here. El Beeblerino if you're not into the whole brevity thing 22:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So unblock! Fine with me. --jpgordon𝄒𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:07, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So....you didn't actually read what I wrote.... cool. El Beeblerino if you're not into the whole brevity thing 00:58, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sorry. been a too interesting day. --jpgordon𝄒𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
that was unintentional close paraphrasing i was really trying to write in my own words but ended up close paraphrasing i fixed that problem you can check and compare my edits to Naudh Singh on main wikipedia and Naudh Singh on simply wikipedia i know i have history of abuse so chance are low for my unblock but i still want to contribute rightfully and I have made good edits in past sports related pages including entertainment anime etc and i also working with other editors to working improve myself you can check above discussion Jisshu (talk) 05:39, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jisshu (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will request the admin to take make decisions on my current block i am as of now block for copyright not for sockpuppet, I was already unblocked for SockPuppet and I'm not using that account again anymore. i was reblocked because of doing close paraphrasing edit which was my main main problem which i fixed it you can check Naudh Singh page and simple:Naudh Singh page i am also editing on other simple English Wikipedia to make myself better so i can contribute rightfully if you have any questions please you can ask me And if the admin feels that I will not be able to make good edits on the history page, then they can unblock me with the topic ban. I can also in sports related pages like cricket and hockey. i can update stats and expand their profile in past i also edit some cricket and hockey players Page like Harmanpreet Singh entrainment related pages and include anime

Decline reason:

We've been through this before. You were given a second chance after your block for copyright violations, and you immediately continued to commit copyright violations. It's not easy to extend good faith after that: see wikt:fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. I'm revoking your talk page access for the next six months as I don't think any admin is going to be willing to unblock you before that time (at a minimum). You can continue to edit other Wikimedia projects, but I would suggest focusing on projects in your native language rather than English-language ones, since your writing on this talk page doesn't really demonstrate the level of language proficiency needed to write substantial prose without committing copyright violations. Spicy (talk) 21:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Jaspreetsingh6 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaspreetsingh6. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ https://archive.org/details/HistoryOfTheSikhsVol.IiiSikhDominationOfTheMughalEmpire1764-1803/mode/1up

 

Index: pl ar de en es fr it arz nl ja pt ceb sv uk vi war zh ru af ast az bg zh-min-nan bn be ca cs cy da et el eo eu fa gl ko hi hr id he ka la lv lt hu mk ms min no nn ce uz kk ro simple sk sl sr sh fi ta tt th tg azb tr ur zh-yue hy my ace als am an hyw ban bjn map-bms ba be-tarask bcl bpy bar bs br cv nv eml hif fo fy ga gd gu hak ha hsb io ig ilo ia ie os is jv kn ht ku ckb ky mrj lb lij li lmo mai mg ml zh-classical mr xmf mzn cdo mn nap new ne frr oc mhr or as pa pnb ps pms nds crh qu sa sah sco sq scn si sd szl su sw tl shn te bug vec vo wa wuu yi yo diq bat-smg zu lad kbd ang smn ab roa-rup frp arc gn av ay bh bi bo bxr cbk-zam co za dag ary se pdc dv dsb myv ext fur gv gag inh ki glk gan guw xal haw rw kbp pam csb kw km kv koi kg gom ks gcr lo lbe ltg lez nia ln jbo lg mt mi tw mwl mdf mnw nqo fj nah na nds-nl nrm nov om pi pag pap pfl pcd krc kaa ksh rm rue sm sat sc trv stq nso sn cu so srn kab roa-tara tet tpi to chr tum tk tyv udm ug vep fiu-vro vls wo xh zea ty ak bm ch ny ee ff got iu ik kl mad cr pih ami pwn pnt dz rmy rn sg st tn ss ti din chy ts kcg ve
Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Portal : Agama
Agama
Portal : Bahasa
Bahasa
Portal : Biografi
Biografi
Portal : Budaya
Budaya
Portal : Ekonomi
Ekonomi
Portal : Elektronika
Elektronika
Portal : Film
Film
Portal : Filsafat
Filsafat
Portal : Geografi
Geografi
Portal : Indonesia
Indonesia
Portal : Ilmu
Ilmu
Portal : Lingkungan
Lingkungan
Portal : Masyarakat
Masyarakat
Portal : Matematika
Matematika
Portal : Militer
Militer
Portal : Mitologi
Mitologi
Portal : Musik
Musik
Portal : Olahraga
Olahraga
Portal : Pendidikan
Pendidikan
Portal : Politik
Politik
Portal : Sastra
Sastra
Portal : Sejarah
Sejarah
Portal : Seni
Seni
Portal : Teknologi
Teknologi