User talk:Jgroves

Welcome

Hello, Jgroves, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ardenn 21:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Selkirk Students' Association

While I appreciate the article, I think it's a bit pre-mature since there isn't even an article on Selkirk College itself. Maybe you want to start it? Ardenn 21:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Selkirk Students' Association, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Selkirk Students' Association. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Ardenn 21:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

University of Victoria Students' Society

The onus of adding citations is on the person adding the material. So I'll list my objections for yo.

1. The complete lack of citations, and these need to be from 3rd-party places, not the students' society itself.
2. Removal of the controversies: They were cited, and they are notable for inclusion. There's no reason the two can't peacefully co-exist, both history and perhaps a separate controversy section.
3. Copyright: Where did the material come from? Without sources, I can't tell if you write the material, or copied and pasted it from somewhere. It looks too well-written, which I suppose is a bit of a catch 22 since we want well written material. GreenJoe 21:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]