User talk:Jetstreamer/Archive 15

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jetstreamer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

→

Archive 20

Malawi Airlines

Good day I have noted that you have changed my edits with regards to Malawi Airlines.

Please be advised that Malawi Airlines returned the Boeing 737-700 (ET-ARB) on 30th November 2022, the aircraft was replaced with a Boeing 737-800 (ET-APO) as of 01st December 2023.

I am unaware as to how to attach a picture here hence kindly refer to various blogs online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anassayed737 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Malawi Airlines fleet

Dear Jetstreamer

It seems you do not want to agree with me on the Malawi Airlines fleet.

Our Boeing 737-700 was withdrawn on the 30th of November 2022. Due to the fact that passenger demand has been increasing in the recent years, the airline decided to lease a Boeing 737-800 (ET-APO) which has an increased passenger capacity compared to its predecessor.

Hence, the Boeing 737-700 was returned to Ethiopian Airlines and currently Malawi Airlines does not operate any Boeing 737-700.

I kindly urge you to do your research before updating as this is becoming way of publishing misinformation to the public.

https://www.nyasatimes.com/malawian-airline-acquires-new-boeing-aircraft/ Anassayed737 (talk) 17:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't know why you say "Our Boeing" but it seems you are editing the article on behalf of the company; you have a conflict of interest here. In any case, you should not use the sources in the article and pick the information from them at your discretion. On the other hand, the url above is not in the article so you cannot base your changes on references not included there.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:05, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Kuwait Airways

I'm giving more information to Kuwait Airways. Why are u reedit it. Any problem. Why are u not agree with me. Search it on Google. Parent Is Kuwait Airways Corporation and Why are u reedit it. Thank u 37.39.174.178 (talk) 12:10, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

WP:VERIFY. Simple.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Qantas Fleet revision 1141859835

I don't understand why you reverted my deletion of the A220 from the Qantas Mainline Fleet page.

I had fully referenced the fact the A220's on order are to be operated by National Jet Systems using multiple sources that you clearly didn't check as if you had, you would have seen I didn't just 'reference another Wikipedia article' as claimed. 49.187.154.57 (talk) 16:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your edit summary [1] said "For references, see Qantaslink fleet page with citations." Say no more.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

revision 1140014438 (Qantas)

Hello Jetstreamer, you recently removed a photo from the Qantas article due to the caption being unverifiable. I believe that the reference to Qantas' efforts in design in the relevant section justifies inclusion of the image as an example. Please also see this source in particular. The image itself seems to check-out as well, unless I'm missing something. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello again, I'm trying to improve visual content related to design (as well as the overall quality of design related articles), and I'd like to add the Qantas Noritake porcelain designs to the "Design, hospitality, and lifestyle" section of Qantas article. Could you please let me know your thoughts regarding captions (for reference, your comment regarding this matter was "Unverifiable caption")? Thank you, Cl3phact0 (talk) 06:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

For context, please see: Delta Air Lines / Design collaborations. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

@Cl3phact0: Sorry for not responding in a due time. I read all the messages above. Give me a couple of days to elaborate a reply.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. No rush. (Also, see: http://www.qantasnewsroom.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/here.pdf) It seems like a valid inclusion vis-à-vis the company's design related activities. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

@Cl3phact0: Much delayed response, but I took a look at the pdf above and it seems ok to include it as a source along with the image. On the other hand, the inclusion of the image in the article is warranted as its description says it all.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Great, thanks! -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

I've added the photo as per above. Not sure I did the cite properly. Apparently not, as it's showing an error that looks like this: "{{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)" (the nowikis are mine – didn't want to inadvertently introduce an error on your Talk page). What am I missing? Appreciate any help. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 11:01, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Please ignore previous. Found the error (my dumb mistake: left full URL in "Name of the website"). All good.

 Done
Cl3phact0 (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

 Cool.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Qatar Airways fleet

You have reverted this page to such an old version that it now contains blatantly false information. In addition, Qatar Executive is its own page and should not be detailed throughly on the main page. SurferSquall (talk) 14:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Also, per WP:3RR I never committed and edit warring violation. SurferSquall (talk) 14:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

You do not need to violate 3RR for warring. Separately, the edit you made to Aerolíneas Argentinas was reverted. Images are not considered reliables sources, and neither is planespotters.net.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 11:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

How? The image is of the plane in question, parked at an Argentinian airport. SurferSquall (talk) 14:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Images can be easily manipulated with a number of programs.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Who would bother manipulating such an image, though? SurferSquall (talk) 03:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Planespotters.net is not automatically considered unreliable- there is an active debate about that, yes, but it has not reached a consensus. SurferSquall (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

If in doubt, do not use it.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Most airline articles have it as a reference. SurferSquall (talk) 03:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

That means nothing.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

per ch-aviation the aircraft is delivered. SurferSquall (talk) 03:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your last edit was reverted. You did not add a new source supporting your changes. I also left you a warning regarding the addition of unsourced changes.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

??????/ I gave the source SurferSquall (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

You did not. Adding a source means using it a reference in the article, not in the edit summary.

Hello

Hi there, I see you warned User:2607:FEA8:2280:2BC0:6569:FDD6:B762:4E3 about their unconstructive edits on 3 May. They have been continuing their unconstructive editing under different IP addresses as can be seen in the history of the Blake River Megacaldera Complex article. I've warned them myself but they keep at it. I'm not sure what to do. Volcanoguy 23:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Report at WP:AIV?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 11:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Done. I'm not very familiar with reporting vandalism because it doesn't normally happen on articles I work on. Volcanoguy 16:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

TAAG Destinations

Please do not make inaccurate edits, like you did to the List of TAAG Destinations, removing the Seasonal designation for Porto. TAAG stopped servicing Porto during the pandemic (and therefore should have been listed as a Terminated destination. However, this past week TAAG announced that it will resume service to Porto during the December/January holiday season only, making Porto now a seasonal destination. This information is readily available with a five-second online search. 190.193.132.212 (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

It would not be difficult for you to find a source and add it to the article then. The url for the current supporting source is dead. Read WP:BURDEN.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

I added a source newer than the one you used [2], and it says the route is terminated by TAAG. You should first learn to find the correct information before labelling other experienced users' edits as vandalism [3].--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Ahunt unhelpfully removed my post, so I am quoting it again, "The route was terminated. Now, TAAG announced last week that it is resuming OPO on a seasonal basis in December/January. DT 654 departing from LAD to OPO at 11:30 PM arriving 6:15 AM; return flight is DT 655 departing OPO at 9:15 AM and arriving at 6:00 PM. This is not speculation. The flights are loaded and available for sale in Amadeus, Sabre, and TAAG's website (see: https://www.taag.com/en-gb/booking/select/?origin1=LAD&destination1=OPO&departure1=2023-12-15&adt1=1&chd1=0&inf1=0&currency=AOA).

YOU are the one that needs to first have correct information before speaking."

You have the nerve to go onto the talk page for my IP address, state that adding incorrect information is vandalism, and then accuse me of doing so.

However, I have not only sourced an article about the reintroduction of the LAD-OPO on a seasonal basis, but I also cited TAAG's website itself!

In the comment section of TAAG destinations when reverting my edit regarding Porto, you state that the connections offered are two-segment flights. That is a misreading of the source (TAAG's website). The flights are being offered on Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday (in December) and also on those same days of the week plus Saturday in January from LAD to OPO with the return flight from OPO to LAD being the next day. If you look at another day when TAAG does not fly nonstop, TAAG will offer for sale a connection via MAD (flying IB between MAD to OPO).

I provided December 15 as an example from TAAG's website for the aforementioned flight (DT 654 from LAD to OPO).

While much on Wikipedia can be subject to interpretation, these flights in December and January are a black-and-white fact that leaves no room for interpretation. TAAG has publicly announced the resumption of seasonal service to Porto and has begun to sell tickets on those flights.

I have been editing articles with blatantly incorrect or out-of-date facts for 20 years. Don't assume that I don't know what I am talking about or that I should use the Sandbox. You can't misinterpret the source (by saying that it is selling connections while ignoring the days of the week that there are nonstop flights).

On this one, you are in the wrong. 190.193.132.212 (talk) 01:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes, you are right and I am wrong. The link you provided above leaves no room for doubt. Please accept my apologies.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Planespotters

Show me where there has ever been a CONSENSUS that planespotters is an unreliable source. It is one the the best sources we have! Do not revert my edits solely because you believe the source to be unreliable. For a source to be unreliable, there has to have been a consensus that it is, or it needs to be blatantly obvious. Planespotters is neither. SurferSquall (talk) 01:34, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) comment: see WP:PLANESPOTTERS and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Resources#Common_sources_to_avoid. - Ahunt (talk) 01:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Where on either of those is there a consensus? I see none SurferSquall (talk) 02:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

@SurferSquall: The disclaimer says Planespotters relies on a number of websites, blogs among them. Since you cannot distinguish what information comes from where it cannot be considered reliable as blogs are not. It is not that difficult to understand.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Again I ask, what alternatives will you suggest instead? SurferSquall (talk) 20:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Bundled AFD on 14 Airline destination lists

I’ve probably commented enough in this AFD so I thought it best to leave this as a talk-page response to you: you’ve raised the prospect of all of the airline destination lists being deleted, but (speaking only for myself) I don’t intend to launch directly into a mass AFD of all of the airline destination lists if this passes. The 14 articles are particularly low-quality ones selected because they are easy candidates for deletion, and shouldn’t necessarily be considered representative of the whole.

I think a more sensible approach would just be to let things lie for some time after the AFD closes (3 months? 6 months? a year? Two years? more?) and give the community some space to decide what they want to do with the airline destination list article set. That wouldn’t have to be a discussion at AFD and wouldn’t be locked in to a keep/delete decision. That might be deletion, or merging, moving to a fandom wiki, or some way of improving them to avoid the WP:NOT/WP:CORP/WP:NOTNEWS/WP:OR/WP:V issues that I and the other the delete !voters have highlighted.

I realise that this is not what you want nor a welcome message, I’m sorry you are worried that much work by you and others will be wiped out. Ultimately, there is no deadline but something had to be done eventually about this article-set that has been controversial since 2006 at least. FOARP (talk) 09:23, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Not jetstreamer, but I’ve commented a bit and I can merge the 14 pages in question back into their main article if you’d like. I’d just hate to see the content deleted entirely. SurferSquall (talk) 20:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

The issue is at AfD, so you need to let that process come to a conclusion first. - Ahunt (talk) 20:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi SurferSquall. Thanks for responding. For the 14 articles, the WP:V issues mean I t’s not clear to me what could be merged that is reliably sourced, but then I don’t know everything. If you think there is content that can be merged, go ahead and make that proposal in the AFD as an alternative. FOARP (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Fleet totals

Thank you for updating the fleets tables on airline articles, but please remember to also update the “Total” number at the bottom of the table and in the airline infobox. SurferSquall (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

South African Airways Intercontinental Route Resumptions

Hi, you left a message on my talk page recently, regarding the route resumptions of South African Airways, well, if you see in my edit, I had added in the place of São Paulo/Guarulhos route "Resumes 31 October 2023" and it is of course resuming on 31 October as they are starting the Cape Town-São Paulo route on 31 October, it is also written in the article of the airport + the source of simple flying given already. And now if you see another edit made by me in the same article, I had added the Focus city cell on Cape Town, well if see the history of SAA, it has maintained it's focus city at Cape Town since it's very first flight, and when it got bankrupt, it had also kept it's only route to Cape Town and it is still the airline's focus city, so please prevent doing vandalism. Advit Das 2010 (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Jetstreamer,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Request the opinion of spilting

Hello kind user, Jetstreamer, Since April, there was spiliting the article of Asiana Airlines from specific user on purpose. For that, multiple users replied with feedback, which was 'since it isn't too large, there's no need." but that user still trying to achieve for its goal, and I think it seem to be privatsied of that page.

I heard you're quite professional of Wikipedia's aviation pages. Could you see it and reply for your feedback? Thank you. KorFlyer88 (talk) 01:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aerolineas Argentinas, you may be blocked from editing. You need to provide a valid reason for stating that a source is unreliable, especially when that source is used on hundreds of articles. SurferSquall (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) See WP:PLANESPOTTERS. BilCat (talk) 03:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

@Ad Orientem: For the record, SurferSquall (talk · contribs) keeps making disruptive edits regarding the use of Planespotters and accussing me of being disruptive. This nonsense has to stop.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Reliable Site TAAG

So your saying that Planespotters is not reliable? Guess what: It is. Planespotters isnt wikipedia. If you need to make an edit. You need to message Planespotters and they do the edit not you. So im reverting my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmartinezmdr (talk • contribs) 02:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

WP:PLANESPOTTERS says it all.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 11:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Highbeam

The Highbeam info you restored is worthless. It does not WP:Verify anything for the readers and only clutters the articles. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 17:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Jetstreamer,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Air Serbia E195

PlaneSpotters is very reliable source. For every change on the website they require strong source. Indeed, the fourth E195 is OY-GDC and it is already painted. Please do not remove sources from PlaneSpotters. PikiLuka (talk) 19:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

WP:PLANESPOTTERS. Say no more.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

OK, I don't want to argue about PlaneSpotters, although it is very reliable because for every change they require strong proof and then they check for it. Try Yourself to send a request for editing something on PlaneSpotters without valid proof. You will immediately be rejected.

However, there is a link to the picture of OY-GDC in Air Serbia's colors. That should be more than enough to believe that the plane is coming, right? Or You believe that the aircraft is painted and not coming?

Tell me please which sites are reliable? People here are using "Zamaaero" as a source. That site, for example, is VERY UNRELIABLE because it's author is writing based on rumors and his own feelings, not based on facts because he doesn't like the truth. Hence that cite is considered as reliable?! PikiLuka (talk) 21:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Images are usually considered not reliable as they can easily be manipulated with any application. Reliable sources: Flightglobal, the monthly lists released by Airbus, any press release coming from Embraer or the lessors, etc.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

No problem, I have put two independent links to aviation news websites as sources. PikiLuka (talk) 22:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

My country's flag carrier

now i understand that you haven't gotten any updates on South African Airways i understand that but what im asking from you leave the page of South African Airways to South Africans okay... Because we knoe our airline cos we are the ones funding it so if yoy haven't gotten any news im giving you one

SAA has 4 a320 on order Received 1 A330 Leased a 737-300 And has 2 boeing 737-800 on order

So i dont understand where you from cos this has made headline news across south africa 41.135.28.40 (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Unintelligible.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) User:41.135.28.40: Reliable sources are required for any information added to Wikipedia. If it "made headline news across south africa", then you should have no problem proving as source for where it was reported. BilCat (talk) 23:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Reversions on El Al destination

Regarding the Istanbul flights, would I simply add that onto the Sundor destination list? Because from what I see Istanbul is operated by Sundor.

Lashyurn (talk) 21:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Exactly. Including a reliable reference to support the addition, please.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 11:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Jetstreamer:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles. I saw that you participated in a previous discussion on this topic. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

@Sunnya343: I'd chime in but I cannot find the proper thread.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Actually the RfC was closed recently and can now be found in the Village Pump archives. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

redirect pages

Hey!! Since I've been fixing redirect pages for airports on all airline destination pages, does bypass redirect is a good and strong explanation or reason with this link added?? Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 14:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

IMO, it is. But please bear in mind that fixing redirects is ok only if they are not included in piped links.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

oookayyy thanks mate!! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Accidents/RAM/RJ

Copied to: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Aviation accident task force
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hi there - I saw this edit you made on Royal Air Maroc correctly undoing an addition as unsourced. This accident actually has its own article 1975 Agadir Royal Air Maroc Boeing 707 crash. However, this led me to two questions which I thought I'd bring up: The accident is listed on Royal Jordanian but not on Royal Air Maroc. I know that accidents are usually listed on the operating carrier's article, but I'm not sure what policy/guideline that comes from. I'm unsure if this should be the case when it's a charter flight for another carrier. It seems the article was renamed last month without discussion. I'm not sure what the correct name would be here but it seems inconsistent to me that we would list the crash under Royal Jordanian, but not Royal Air Maroc, while the name of the article is "Royal Air Maroc crash". Figured I'd just ask these questions here for you given your involvement and knowledge of aviation style/guidelines (and tag @Steelpillow and @Ckfasdf who are also knowledgable) for discussion. Avgeekamfot (talk) 18:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC) I don't know much about air crash articles, so I have posted a request for help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 21:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC) @Avgeekamfot: it's an interesting question. I guess the main question is on how we treat accident that involves charter flight for another carrier. I don't think we have guideline or consensus of such case yet, see WP:AVTITLE. And, I also think it would better to discuss it on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Aviation accident task force instead of other editor talkpage. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC) That's fair. I initially started writing on Jetstreamer's talk page to explain why I was undoing his revert, then it morphed into questions that I thought you + @Steelpillow would also be helpful with. I'll move this discussion where you suggest. Avgeekamfot (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello

Sorry don't want to sound rude in any shape way or form, nonetheless i will like to point out that an image especially of the founder of the Airlines won't hurt the article in any shape or form since it doesn't have a very large amounts of image as other articles have. CtasACT (talk) 01:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your patience and hard work, even being one of the major contributors to make Ethiopian Airlines and other articles reach good status. CtasACT (talk) 02:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Do you realise that you inserted images in the middle of paragraphs, therefore breaking the text flow?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Lifetimelucid contributions

Most airlines have added a delete tag to the destinations section and pages from their pages. [4], [5], [6] Eray08yigit (talk) 17:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Some of them have been removed already.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Qatar Airways

I think it's best that some images that you removed on the Qatar Airways article be kept on the article. Would like to hear your opinion on this though. Yoohhooy (talk) 22:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Take it to talk.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I will begin making a "Qatar Airways fleet" article. Please let me know if you have conflicting opinions. Yoohhooy (talk) 18:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

You first wanted just images in the article and now you want to create a new article?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 01:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, not only for images. Every major airline has a page. Weird that Qatar doesn't have one yet. Your call though. Yoohhooy (talk) 04:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Go ahead, of course.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Lists of airline destinations

Again I don't want to sound patronizing. But I do admire the work you have put in to improving aviation-related articles such as Nigeria Airways and Vietnam Airlines. I also recall that you were the one who welcomed me to Wikipedia in 2013 and recognized my addition of sourced information to a list of airlines and destinations. I would deeply regret being part of the reason you left this site. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Jetstreamer,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Royal Brunei in Brisbane

Re: your rollback of List of Royal Brunei Airlines destinations, the article already included https://australianaviation.com.au/2019/07/royal-brunei-airlines-back-on-brisbane-route/ as a source: Royal Brunei Airlines (RBA) has resumed nonstop flights to Brisbane for the first time since 2011 with the arrival of BI9 early on Thursday morning, July 11 2019. Jpatokal (talk) 20:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Indigo

Please see the diff of edits properly before reverting them, like you did here. That IP edit was restoring content that was removed by another IP without any explanation. I have reverted your edit. Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Aeroflot Flight 593

Hi. This is regarding your revert in the Aeroflot Flight 593 article. What do you mean by "crashing in a flat attitude"? I thought it was "flat altitude" (probably I assumed so since it is related to aviation; I might be wrong). Thanks. Rasnaboy (talk) 04:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

It means the aircraft was almost level when it crashed.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Air Serbia

Hi, please refrain from giving false comment for previous edits in the future as you did here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Air_Serbia&oldid=1228485253. The source provided in the article https://www.apr.gov.rs/upload/Portals/0/GFI_2023/Publikacije/TOP_100.pdf has all these stats (just converted from RSD to EUR with official exchange rate on 30 December 2022). If you continue to do se, I will have to seek administrator to end the potential dispute.--AirWolf ^talk 12:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

I have replaced old financial figures in the infobox with the latest ones, sourced in the financial position table. Regarding seeking help from and admin, go ahead whenever you want.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Zambia Airways fleet

I did some research and air fleets has information that Zambia airways has 1 737-700 41.150.252.104 (talk) 15:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

I did some research and air fleets has information that Zambia Airways has 1 737-700 Cessna 402c (talk) 15:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

The research you did was not supported by any new source in the article. Your edits were reverted [7] and you were warned at your talk [8].--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:50, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

i have added a new source and updated the fleet [9] 105.184.229.170 (talk) 10:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Happy birthday! Hi Jetstreamer! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

@The Herald: Thank you very much!--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:33, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Cubana de Aviación destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Cubana de Aviación destinations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cubana de Aviación destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.--Protoeus (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

You’re my inspiration, so I give you this gift.

. Protoeus (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

@Protoeus: A little bit late, but thank you very much.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

@Jetstreamer: Thanks! Protoeus (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of LAM Mozambique Airlines destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of LAM Mozambique Airlines destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of LAM Mozambique Airlines destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 12:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, but I will no longer participate in these discussions.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Jetstreamer, thanks for the reply. I think you are automatically receiving these message as a result of the XFD script. I will do my best to see that you don't receive any more from AFDs I open but unticking the box for notifying the original editor on any I see were authored originally by you. I hope you don't mind if I delete any that slip through the cracks. It is possible to change your talk-page configuration so that you don't receive any further AFD notifications, but this would mean that you would not receive any further notifications about any AFDs being opened against articles that you started. FOARP (talk) 10:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Jae winwin

Might it be time for AN/I?

He(?) just goes on with is unsourced edits. And is completely unresponsive. Zero edits on talk pages and so. The Banner talk 15:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

@The Banner: Definitely.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

I have filed a case against Jae winwin on WP:AN/I due to his failure to source edits and the total lack of communication. See the case here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Jae winwin, unsourced edits and no communication. The Banner talk 16:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Much to my pleasant surprise (as the previous AN/I-case went nowhere) my creative approach seemed to have worked. He added two sources today. To connections that were already sourced, but it looks like an effort... The Banner talk 16:26, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Silk Way 995 additional crew

Please put the additional crew of SWA flight 995, which consists of 3 radio operators and 2 mechanics. The citation has the number [4] at the article of Silk Way 995. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spongebob796 (talk • contribs) 10:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

You already have [10]--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Austral Líneas Aéreas destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Austral Líneas Aéreas destinations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Austral Líneas Aéreas destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Apologies Jetstreamer, I hadn't noticed this was one of yours. I'll delete if you like. FOARP (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Never mind.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your revert on Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961

The first line of the Telegraph article states that this is about Ethiopian Airlines Flight 409 – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 409 was minutes from the airport bound for Addis Ababa, when the Boeing 737-800 plunged into the sea in what witnesses described as a "ball of fire" – a completely unrelated incident in the Mediterranean in 2010. The content about life vests is discussed in the source; I'm not disputing its accuracy, but it is not at all relevant in the article about Flight 961, a crash near Comoros in 1996. I hope this clarifies any misunderstanding and I ask that you reconsider your revert. Thanks, ^Complex/_Rational 02:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

I read the entire source. Whether it refers mainly to another accident is not important as it provides some information regarding Flight 961 and it says that people got trapped inside the aircraft because their life vests were inflated inside it, I see this rather relevant as some people died due to this.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Ack, I missed that line when I skimmed through the source and so I stand corrected. Thanks, ^Complex/_Rational 21:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Albawings

Hello!

My name is Eisen Lamaj and I’m a italian/albanian user. I joined in Wikipedia.

Im writing to you because there are fake sources and someone blocked the page. His name is Illyrianzz and he shared a source from AeroRoutes that Illyrianzz told that Albawings has failed. But if you can see on the AeroRoutes is written that Albawings has suspended flight FROM TIRANA and Albawings has flew from Pristina. Now is flying from Italy with a Maltese COA together with the Italian new airline Aeroitalia. The web site is open. OpenCorporates.al is saying that the Albawings Business is active. Not close. So please can you check? Because Albawings is not failed. Please. Have a good Day Trenix902 (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Alaska Airlines

Alaska Airlines has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Real4jyy (talk) 02:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

review an article

can you please review this new Article , it's translate from Arabic Wiki. thanks

Dina96 (talk) 08:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, not interested.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

IndiGo

Hi Jetstreamer, All I was doing in IndiGo was just shortening the fleet section in the main article to basic information since there's already a separate fleet article for IndiGo. It wouldn't make a difference for people to read fleet information in both the main article and fleet article, and one fleet table has to be up to date and people can't edit both places, causing confusion. Mostly other airlines that have separate fleet articles have basic information in the fleet section and also showing link to the main fleet article. But you could be right that it's lacking sources if I failed to do so. MegaMewtwo777X (talk) 02:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Changes to one article cannot be supported by content in other article per WP:CIRCULAR.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

TAP AIR PORTUGAL FLEET UPDATE

Hi Jetstreamer,

Hope you're well.

I just wanted to update the TAP air Portugal fleet list. I have a credible resource now — the airline itself, press release from today, that states that the airline has 99 active aircraft, not the 80 odd that you have listed.

https://www.tapairportugal.com/pt/media/comunicados-de-imprensa/Press-Release-1040

"A frota operacional era composta por 99 aeronaves, a 30 de setembro de 2024, com a adição de um A320 NEO e a saída de 1 A319 CEO durante o trimestre, sendo que 69% da frota operacional de médio e longo curso consistia em aeronaves da Família NEO (face a 68% a 30 de setembro de 2023 e 33% a 30 de setembro de 2019)." Latinthug23 (talk) 14:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

The changes must use sources that support the entire fleet table, not just the total number of aircraft.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Removal of flags from SkyTeam page

How come the SkyTeam page can't have flags next to the names of airlines, yet the Oneworld and Star Alliance pages can? It makes no sense whatsoever!!! Josh0108 (alt) (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Read MOS:FLAGS. Flags should be removed from those articles as well.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Trenitalia-SkyTeam MOU

You said, "Trenitalia partnership is a memorandum of understanding, not a firm agreement", but you need to understand that Eurostar partnership is also "a memorandum of understanding, not a firm agreement." Also, how come a release from SkyTeam official website is cited "unsourced additions"? Gagayoulookbeautiful (talk) 23:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

If it is not a firm agreement then the entry should me removed from the list.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Curious question...

Why did you remove an IP users edits to the crew names of Silk Way 995?I know you are not wrong and you were never while doing that edit, but what is the exact reason? Spongebob796 (talk) 09:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Those names were not in the supporting source.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:18, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

EngvarB

Please check before making easily-checkable false claims.

Template:EngvarB is deprecated so we use specific templates where applicable as per MOS:TIES. cagliost (talk) 14:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)