This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jenova20. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Dennis, i don't recall ever seeing these article names on Wikipedia or linking to them and so you're free to delete them. Born This Way Foundation was a redirect someone else created after the article was moved from my user space back to article space though. Thanks for bringing this to my attention although i'm not entirely sure i understand it. And thanks for assuming i wasn't a noob/newbie =P Thanks again ツ Jenova20(email)14:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Weston Super-Mare Grand Pier Map Shore End 2012.jpg
This barnstar is awarded to Jenova20, for their inspiring leadership abilities and incredible editing. You are such a valuable asset to the project Dragdrag (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Wow, thank you very much, I hardly even did anything but it's nice to be acknowledged =D
If you need anything just message me or ask at the LGBT Studies talk page again. Thanks and have a nice day/evening! Keep up the good work! ツ Jenova20(email)16:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
As i said before i plan on adding another (at least one) poll that is currently in my sandbox being worked on. The Manual of Style justifies the hiding of these and the readability is served better when a third of the article isn't visible unwieldy tables people may not wish to scroll past - that's why it was hidden and why it was discussed on the talk page. Thanks ツ Jenova20(email)09:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Planning on doing something in the future does not justify a violation of the Manual of Style today. You stated your intention about 2 weeks ago but nothing has been done. Wikipedia editing does not proceed under the assumption that problematic material may be added in the future. Instead, Wikipedia articles are written based on the content they currently have. The polling section as it currently exists does not need to be collapsed. That is the beginning and end of the considerations. 70.253.79.10 (talk) 15:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
There's no violation of the Manual of Style. How about creating an account before your IP address is blocked per your current edit warring, POV pushing and WP:SYNTHESIS violations on over 10 articles. Thanks ツ Jenova20(email)15:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
From the Manual of Style since you failed to read or understand it: "Collapsible sections or cells may be used in tables that consolidate information covered in the main text...." The polling table does not "consolidate information covered in the main text." The polling table presents information not provided elsewhere in the article. As for whether I register, how about minding your own business? There's no Wikipedia policy against anonymous IP editing. Regards. 70.253.79.10 (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jenova,
The way the data is split (by Android) is by API level[2]. 4.2 is indeed a new API level, but it hasn't figured into the distribution yet, because it hasn't been released. But when we get next month's data, it will have a separate entry (and a new color). --Fjmustak (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
If you decide which colour soon then let me know and i can undo my revert and recolour the table the same. Thanks, off to apologise to someone now ツ Jenova20(email)09:47, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I do not decide the colors... Microsoft Excel does. I haven't looked into the possibility of manually selecting the colors. I also hope that when I add a new category the colors aren't reshuffled! I'll play around with it a bit. --Fjmustak (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Excel chooses? CHEATER! I thought you were choosing those Fjmustak...I look forward to your next addition anyway. Thanks and have a nice day ツ Jenova20(email)11:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I've figured out how to manually select the colors. If you'd like to create a custom palette, and choose your own, go ahead, and send me a list of RGB codes and I can use them in the chart (if you also want to include colors for future versions, that would be nice). --Fjmustak (talk) 08:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
I'll leave that for you to decide mr, i just thought we could do with something less random. like different greens for gingerbread, rather than three different colours. Thanks ツ Jenova20(email)02:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "LGBT rights". Thank you! EarwigBotoperator / talk14:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
LGBT rights in African countries
Hi, Jenova20. Even though I don't think you were directly involved in the specific dispute in question, you created the edit warring submission regarding the IP user who was involved in editing conflicts in various Africa-related articles, and Psychonaut and I commented on that with regard to our dealing with the user in various article on LGBT rights in African countries. Hence, I'm letting you know that I mentioned you in a notice I've submitted to the dispute resolution noticeboard here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey Jenova-- thanks for your responses. Just wanted to give you a heads-up that it might actually take me longer to get an editor review back to you-- I've had some sudden news that will require me to be out of town for a while and away from Wikipedia. I'll likely get back to you mid next week. My apologies for the wait. I, Jethrobotdrop me a line (note: not a bot!) 11:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Unless someone beats me to it, I'm going to start an ANI as soon as I get caught up with some tasks IRL. This has gone on long enough and the point is not being heard.
Meanwhile, enjoy this delicious chocolate dessert. But I suggest not sharing it with trolls, as it seems to give them endless energy. - MrX14:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
While you were making this, i was making a final warning on Talk:Homophobia. Thank you very much for the dessert, i'm going to forgo the chocolatey goodness on this occasion and instead prepare to chuck it at another editor next time he posts. Thank you very much MrX, i appreciate the treat and you have my full support whatever you do. Have a nice day/evening! ツ Jenova20(email)15:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 19 November 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡11:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I am sending this message to all the people I judge to be principal actors in the incident being discussed at this AN/I subpage. The discussion there has already become a bloated re-run of the dispute between you all at the original article talk page. You have made your points there and at AN/I and no further good can be gained by continuing to rehash old arguments. As an outsider, I have to say the only impression this continued argument gives is of all parties being unable to resist trying to get in the last word. Not every post by the "other side" needs your response. Your dignity and the cause you are arguing for, suffers with every further response. Please leave the AN/I field free now for other editors to respond. Please note I am leaving the exact same note on a number of people's talk page - not everybody has been equally active so please excuse me if you feel my tone here feels undeservedly critical. Kim Dent-Brown(Talk)11:55, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
It's looking like a time wating exercise specifically to get a no consensus declared from where i'm sitting. Not really my concern though, i've said my bit. Thanks Rosetta ツ Jenova20(email)19:59, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Because
Hot chocolate
Because I thought you might be tired of tea, and a hot drink is always nice while one is poring over the dictionary. (Sorry, couldn't help myself.) In all seriousness, thanks for making WP a less stodgy, more interesting, friendlier place. Rivertorch (talk) 06:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
It is for linking to a specific section in the article only by adding the anchor into link instead of the section title. In case the titles of the sections might change in the future, linking to the anchor will still bring the screen to that specific section. See Template:Anchor. BaboneCar (talk) 13:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Jenova20, I see you doing consistent good work and putting up with some professional POV pushers. You hold your ground and act diplomatic even when provoked. Thank you for the good work you do. Keep it up. Cluetrainwoowoo (talk) 04:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey I read your feedback and Im very thankful for it but could you consider looking at my titles? I need to know if Im to also put the subtitles after each title in unison? CFyre (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Oh and one mor thing, every time I seem to save a change in my sandbox when I go to something else such as advice or to read another article when I return its like nothing every changed ?-( CFyre (talk) 15:07, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Did you save it or use "show preview"? Saving should be instant, while show preview is just a preview. Is that what you mean?
I rewrote your lede paragraph but ultimately your article should look something similar to this. And rather than just say who reviewed the book, you could also go into more detail over what they said about it. What's good, what's bad, what did the reviewers say which stands out? Thanks and good luck ツ Jenova20(email)15:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much, you're very welcome! I noticed from looking through the Dave Barry article that he has wrote a lot of books, although most of what we have on them are low quality stub articles. Hopefully you can change that =P. Good luck, and let me know if you need anything else! ツ Jenova20(email)15:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
What up! hey I finished and I need somebody to look over it...(preferably you). I know that there isn't much information but its a book and I just finished and its not like I'm going to write a college essay on each differents story. I put the sub-titles in so will you look at it and give me some feedback on my talk page? Thank You. CFyre (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Well a list of chapters and subchapters isn't really useful for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is more about the reviews of the book, what it's about, how many copies it sold or is expected to sell. Anything controversial? Anything odd? Chapters and subchapters are just filler and won't survive long. More in depth coverage for the reviews too, rather than one line answers, if you can. Thanks ツ Jenova20(email)21:09, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Birmingham Gay Village
Hi, not at all. There's no promotion going on there in the slightest. It's just a short collection of statements of pure fact which some members of the community feel creates a monopoly over the the gay village for a certain person(s) and hands control of what is supposed to be a "community" to that person. I'm in no way trying to do anything untoward with your page. I just think that people should be aware of the (whole) facts and draw their own conclusions. Declaring that one company owns over 50% of the capacity for the whole area and also controls Pride isn't a conflict of Interest I don't feel, but matter for the public interest.WomblingAlong (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
I agree completely it's a monopoly, but it can't be added to the article like that because it appears promotional. And i would caution against adding it to the article at all because it's irrelevent unless there's decent coverage in the media to reflect those concerns. This is an encyclopedia after all and not a blog for our own opinions. Thanks ツ Jenova20(email)18:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Rude remarks. Civility warning
It appears you disagree with my wording
{{for|British motor insurance definition|Total loss}}, so you changed it to
{{for|common British motoring definition|Total loss}}. This is just fine, however the edit comment "(reword - less shitty)" was uncivil as you did in this edit. Thank you, Cantaloupe2 (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
It's not a good summary but it's not uncivil. I never insulted you, i just didn't feel that wording was accurate at all. And considering you want to merge the article into Total loss my frame of mind was that you weren't even bothering to look into the actual meaning of Write-off (whether that opinion at the time was right or not), just to make Total loss look better.
I agree it's not a good summary but please don't go throwing civility accusations around to detract from a busy moment i had and had to rush an edit summary. Thanks and apologies ツ Jenova20(email)18:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Then perhaps you could point me to which source(s) backs up the claims made that the Tyrant are "the most recognisable and popular creatures of the franchise" and "even gaming in general."
I've had a quick look but not seen any source for these.
If it's reference 27 it would not substantiate either claim as it's is a list of what they consider the 10 best Resident Evil bosses, of which a T-002 won. Thanks ツ Jenova20(email)14:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)That might be because this page doesn't have {{reflist}} or <references/> here. Place it and we will be able to read it. Or you can remove the <ref> tags and simply list them. (I came to this discussion, because I saw ''Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found'' at the end of this page in red.) Ignore this if the problem is already solved···Vanischenu「m/Talk」11:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
I couldn't open the links because i was using my phone and didn't want to open multiple tabs at the time, not because there was no references section on this page. If that was the issue then i would have opened the links at the article page. Thanks for your concern and stalking. Have a nice day ツ Jenova20(email)11:41, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words. (But I wasn't teaching, I thought that the display of "Cite error:" was missed or was unnoticed.) Wish you a great day! See you ···Vanischenu「m/Talk」12:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for signing up to test the experimental features we're building on the Wikimedia mobile Beta site! We just released a few new prototypes you might be interested in trying out. Please keep in mind that since the Beta is a testing ground for early stages of feature development and design, you'll definitely encounter bugs and unpolished software – your feedback will help us understand what areas we should focus on as we build these out into real features :)
To explore the Beta, visit any Wikimedia project on one of the supported devices/browsers and opt into Beta (tap on top left navigation menu > Settings > Opt in to Beta). From there, you can:
Log in (via the link in top left navigation menu)
Browse some articles and watchlist/unwatchlist them
Check your watchlist (via the link in top left navigation menu)
Edit
Add images to articles without any images in the lead
(Again, keep in mind that everything on Beta is highly experimental, so check to make sure that your edits/uploads went through successfully!)
Please leave any feedback you have for the mobile team on the mobile Beta talk page on Meta. Let us know if anything is especially confusing or strange, and feel free to give suggestions for improvement.
Tested first on articles Birmingham Gay Village and Citroen C3 Picasso where i'm greeted by a message to upload the first image to the article...despite both having one in the infobox and many more throughout.
This changed after i started expanding collapsible sections, which was unfriendly and only works the second time you tap them, even though they light up each time.
Tables on many articles i checked (including my talk page) are concealed by blue boxes marked "table 1.1" plus. It appears the software classes anything other than text as a table to hide by default but strangely doesn't include thumbnail images. This means it hides the infobox, tables, and also those little media boxes ("Wikimedia Commons has media related to..."). Example 1 below
Tapping these table boxes loads the image only, rather than displaying it in the article. This also means it treats an infobox as an image and only shows it if you tap the corresponding blue box which leads you to it.
The space directly after a reference is non-existent.
There's no lines in tables, which is a bit awkward to look at as there's only colour boundaries if the cells are coloured. Example 2 below
Rowspans in tables are invisible for some reason or the table lines not being visible makes the table disfigured. Example 3 below.
The Euro NCAP tables (See C3 Picasso for example) display as blue "table" buttons, but with a surrounding grey barrier as wide as the page...can't explain that one...
Not sure if this is the software or the browser but i can zoom in with landscape or portrait mode, but can only zoom out in portrait.
The File upload wizard offers me the chance to "add the first image to this article" like any other page. Example 4 below
Tapping on "click here to start the upload form" loads the desktop version, rather than keeping me in the mobile site and so i am unable to upload images with the mobile site to En.Wiki.
Main page looks good but displays only the featured article of the day and news, no "On this day" or "Did you know" or "featured picture". I don't know if that's how it's meant to be.
We're definitely aware of some of these issues (wrinkles in the way the photo upload feature displays, redirecting to desktop bugs) and are working to fix them. The table collapse button is actually not a bug but a very early exploration of how to deal with huge tables and infoboxes, which render poorly on a mobile device. It's helpful to hear your expectations for how this should look and feel; we're going to be putting some UI/UX design love on this soon. Check back later next week – the upload & redirect issues should be fixed by then, so you can actually test out uploading.
Thanks again for the detailed feedback and bug reporting! If you're interested in helping out with mobile QA, you're welcome to leave browser/device-specific notes here for the regular non-Beta mobile site. We need more people with a high attention to detail like you to get their eyes on the product :) One last thing: if you're an IRC user, you should come join the mobile team channel, #wikimedia-mobileconnect – we hang out there throughout the workday (Pacific Standard Time) and are happy to get visitors. Cheers, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:01, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I'll try and leave you detailed reviews weekly as this one.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, Jenova20. You have new messages at the Help desk. –– Anonymouse321 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
.jpg)
