Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Johann Michael Lavien, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 03:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jennmlin, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Jennmlin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).
We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts
16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
|
An article you recently created, Rachael Fawcett, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 10:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. It references two published books on the topic, a published article, and a US government website. This is more than sufficient for the content. Jenndox (talk) 17:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Rachael Fawcett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachael Fawcett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
scope_creepTalk 22:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
