User talk:JennKR/Archive 7

British Spelling

Doh! I knew about some of the differences, but not that one! Thanks for catching it! Matt (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce

Pick and choose what parts of my comments you want to focus on, cuz that's what you do. --Aichik (talk) 19:59, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the dispute your brought up at the Dispute Resolution Board? Was it resolved? (It's not there anymore. If you have access to their archives I'd love a link.) thanks--Aichik (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mrs. Carter Show Box Office

Hello Jennie. First of all I want to say thank you for all you do for Beyonce's articles. Keep up the good work! Hmm, well I actually don't really know. This is the first tour article that I'm editing. I know that Billboard reports every concert by Lady Gaga, Madonna, Rihanna. But I think that maybe it will be updated. My love is love (talk) 18:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haha

Well we had the same picture, so no wonder you confused. No problem btw xax :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 08:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, do not worry. And for the box office, you should be patient and check constantly, really. I was so pissed off they didn't update the Diamonds World Tour scorebox during its course, they did it later for all the shows (when the tour finished). Cheers! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 09:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JennKR. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page.
Message added 13:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

 — AARON • ^TALK 13:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I really do not see how quoting song lyrics should count as original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MackyBeth (talk • contribs) 13:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

What do you think about this? I kind of trimmed to the most important things and also added some important quotes. Would you be interested in helping me with it a bit? If you want you can edit in the sandbox [remove/add stuff] and then we gonna transfer it to the article. Cheers! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 15:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And? I see you didn't make an edit, it is that good :P lol — Tomíca^(T2ME) 19:00, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then we can name the section legacy and impact. I think that would go. And no, I don't think it should be included, because the song was not being notable both commercially and critically. It was there, but I removed it. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 19:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added the information about Spotify announcing she is the most streaming artist. I agree quotes are kind of useless (although it's nice to see some praise for your favorite ;]). And yeah I agree, I looked about her influence on EDM, however, I didn't find anything :/. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 19:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should I paste the sandbox in the article? Is it good already? — Tomíca^(T2ME) 18:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okey dokey :) ! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 20:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Sorry Sorry

I am very sorry about this Jenny. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:26, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I spent at least two days doing those tables on the discography page. Tables are really difficult to use. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you know that two new snippets from "Standing on the Sun" surfaced online today. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why but I don't enjoy GW. Maybe because it is too lengthy and obviously for women. :P Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce live vocals?

Greetings. How are you? Hey don't you think that the bio page puts too minimal emphasis on her live vocals given all the praise she receives for them? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A lot has also been removed while trimming and copy-editing by someone whose name I won't take. :P Thanks for everything you do Jenny. You are a gem to that bio page. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NZ certifications

I am on a break from university, but I head back in two weeks and the library has a copy of a book which I think has certifications. I'll add refs for CIL and BB certs then, if I find them. Until then, I can't think of any other source to back up the NZ certs, unfortunately... Adabow (talk) 08:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Illusive Man

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Illusive Man. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

JennKR, I'm not sure if we actually know each other or not - but you can took down my Oz site off the Wizard of Oz movie page. We do a lot of promoting of people in the oz community in regards to the wizard of oz and it is an amazing educational site for entertainment etc in regards to the 1939 movie. It is very successful, please explain to me further your issue as to why it just even being a fan site is a problem though. thanks im sure we can resolve this.Aaronpac1 (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Aaron[reply]

Got your other recent message....as in regards to -

"Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority..." I believe I am a recognized authority in this topic and or do you mean I need to have it posted by a recognized person within the Wikipedia community?

Please comment on Talk:The NeverEnding Story (film)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The NeverEnding Story (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JennKR. You have new messages at Adabow's talk page.
Message added 21:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Adabow (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

uh, yeah...

This one's gonna take a while. Serendi^podous 05:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback Request

Hello, I got your name from this list.

Would you please get involved in the article Hog-dog rodeo. As you can read at the following links, Link1 Link2 Hog-Dog Fighting, Hog-Baiting, Hog-Dog Rodeos, Hog dogging, hawg dawgin and hog dog "rodeos" are synonyms for the exact same activity. This article should be moved to "Hog-baiting", so it is inline with the naming convention of the other articles in its classification here. Wikipedia defines Dog baiting as follows:

"setting game dogs against a chained or confined animal for sport. The dogs bite, and tear to subdue the opposing animal by incapacitating or killing it. Baiting is a blood sport used for entertainment and gambling."

This definition fits for Hog-Dog Rodeo, Hog-baiting, Hog-Dawging, or whatever name or idiom you want to call it. It is all the same activity. Please see the two citations I provided above for third-party confirmation. Just because some parts of the world do not call it illegal, does not mean is not Hog-baiting. It is all the same activity, it might be marketed and packaged differently, but it is still the same and fits into the definition of Dog-baiting. Currently, one editor Chrisrus does not like the term "Hog-baiting" and keeps reverting the article, even though I have provided strong third-party citations, he seems to be exerting article ownership and is not displaying a NPOV.

You can read our conversation on the article talk page and see the reverts of the article for the edited changes.

Thank you IQ125 (talk) 09:49, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:The Last of Us

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Last of Us. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of Kim Possible characters

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Kim Possible characters. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Skyfall

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Skyfall. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Nicki Minaj discography

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nicki Minaj discography. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion for Lauryn Hill

I see that you've had to wait quite awhile for the second review for this article, so I've stepped in and offered some thoughts on the review page to help continue the process. WikiRedactor (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé discography

Good work on Beyoncé Knowles discography (it was promoted to FL)! Just thought I'd let you know that there is a WikiProject at WP:BEY in case you were unaware; if you're ever in need of another project have a read through there. Well done again and happy editing. Adabow (talk) 10:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Congratulations on scoring your first featured list with Beyoncé Knowles discography. Keep up the great work and behaviour! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 10:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé Knowles discography

Congratulations on making Beyoncé Knowles discography a Featured List - the first ever for the WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles. Keep up the good work. My love is love (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Misha B Page Layout

Great improvement on the Page layout for this article. Thanks.Bodney (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this is quite marvellous, puts things into musical respective http://techland.time.com/2013/08/09/like-a-nerdy-wind-chime-real-time-wikipedia-edits-set-to-music/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodney (talk • contribs) 13:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Countdown

You've done a great job copy-editing this article. You can also nominate it for GA when you finish. I just wanted to tell you that all Beyoncé FAs and GAs (see "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" and "Halo (Beyoncé Knowles song)) use publishers in the references. I know that during the nominations of those articles, editors always mentioned missing publishers in the references. Are you sure that publishers shouldn't be used in the references? My love is love (talk) 11:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Recently, on my "Diamonds" FAC, I was told that the publishers should be avoided in the references because of their repetition. Being in her older FAC's doesn't mean they could be used in the newer, because every article on Wikipedia tends to be different. :) Cheers! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 11:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I thought it was mandatory until I nominated Lauryn Hill for GA status. I actually spent a huge amount of time adding every publisher to every reference in on the Beyonce Knowles discography. Both the Template: Cite web and Template:Cite news say that the publisher field should "not normally [be] included for periodicals", I think this stems from the corporate ownership changing so much and not really having much relevance; for example, The Village Voice has changed ownership three times over the past few years. —JennKR | ☎ 12:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I've spent a lot of time just adding publishers and going through the references of the articles and fixing them. Anyway, if it's better this way, it's fine. My love is love (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have one more demand from you. Can you please take a look at Revel Presents: Beyoncé Live, copy-edit the prose and reduce the number of quotes? You can do this whenever you want or whenever you are free and ONLY if you want to do it. I want to nominate it for FA so I would be very grateful for your help. My love is love (talk) 18:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help, please with my RfC?

Would you help me, please with RfC: Is inclusion of the word "cosmetic" in the Criteria section appropriate?

I started it after another user undid some changes I made in the Criteria of an assault weapon section of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban article. On my talk page, the user told me that what I'd done was "scrubbing," told me the matter had been discussed previously (implying but not citing a consensus of opinion among article editors), and just generally treated me like I'd not acted in good faith.

I have been a Wikipedia user for many years, and an editor for quite a few, too - though I am not a very experienced one. I'd never been involved in a dispute before that I can remember. When I realized what was going on (after a revert and another undo), I reviewed the Dispute resolution page and chose RfC. Perhaps I chose poorly, but here we are.

Help, please?

Lightbreather (talk) 01:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png

A tag has been placed on File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LGA _talk^edits 23:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP takes copyright very seriously, I will WP:AGF for your reasons behind why you cropped out the copyright watermark on this picture but if you do that sort of thing again you are likely to get blocked. LGA _talk^edits 23:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png

Thanks for uploading File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png, which you've attributed to http://www.flickr.com/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA _talk^edits 07:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —JennKR | ☎ 12:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Kardashian's middle name

Please note that realitytv.about.com is probably not a reliable source, especially for BLP's. Further, removing a source without explanation is inappropriate. [1] You'll note that there is a short discussion on the matter of his middle name on the talk page as well. --Ronz (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hello JennKR. How are you? Are you ready to nominate "Countdown" for GA? I have to tell you about the last mistakes you did with the references of the article. One publication should be linked only once in the references, not every time it is mentioned. The thing you did last was WP:OVERLINKING. Plus remember that websites should never be italicized. If you put the work field in the references for a publication you should then make it in italics. My love is love (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Misha B

Regards RCA being a subsidiary of Sony, thus your advice on only using RCA. Relentless is a subsidiary too, not sure of RCA or the bigger Sony. Do you think we should just use Relentless?Bodney (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revel

Can you tell me, is this article ready for FA and have you finished with your c/e? My love is love (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Simpson family

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Simpson family. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Million Award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Madonna (entertainer) (estimated annual readership: 3,362,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Madonna (entertainer) to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Beyonce Knowles

I didn't read the whole article, but I will. For the record you did an incredible job with it, so I guess it will be easy at FA. Btw, can you please review Talk That Talk (Rihanna song) and comment here Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Talk That Talk (Rihanna song)/archive1? I would appreciate it. Cheers! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 21:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I read portions of the article. I have a suggestion, why don't you take the article for WP:Peer review? You can invite users to comment there... I will too :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 22:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Idolator / 4

You should remove the references that use Idolator from the article since you nominated it at the FAC. Idolator is an unreliable source. My love is love (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure. Because it is considered as a blog and blogs are unreliable. But I don't know, maybe you should contact someone else who had more experience with FAs. Don't make the changes until you're 100% sure. My love is love (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is a magazine and it's reliable. I'm pretty sure it can be used. My love is love (talk) 20:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About the picture you used in the Release and artwork I'm 50% sure that it will be deleted as non-free work can not be used on Wikipedia. But I think that you should wait for someone else's opinion; someone who knows better than me. My love is love (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I think there are just some minor issues. You left me speechless with your re-write. It is amazing! I really, really hope it becomes an FA. My love is love (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I must say that the prose of the article is flawless. However I think that there are several publications that will be questioned during the FAC review: The Boombox, Prefix Magazine, Idolator, MTV Buzzworthy, The CS Perspective and Entertainment Focus. I think that you should wait for someone to point it out at the review (if somebody points it out). But in the meantime you can find different sources that could replace them if that happens. This is just my advice. My love is love (talk) 02:48, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MTV Buzzworthy is totally fine to use, since is part of the MTV publications and even if it's a blog, it's written by a qualified writer. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 08:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

4

Hey Jenn, just a word of advice: after making significant changes to an article like you did at 4, it often pays to wait a week or two to let the changes "sink in" and so that a more consensual (and therefore, stable) article is reached before nominating at FAC. Stability is a criterion for both GA and FA. Great work on 4, by the way—what a big article to touch up! Adabow (talk) 00:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologise at all! Good on your for being bold and jumping in the deep end! I just think that there's a possibility some editors may disagree with some or all of a major revamp. That's normal. People have different opinions. If an edit war or a heated talk page discussion arises though, it could seriously hurt the hope for FA promotion. Good luck! Also, if you're feeling up to it, drop a couple of comments in another FAC or two - you never know what you could learn about writing, the FAC process or even just fun facts about a topic! Adabow (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Wow, do you like Iggy too? I'm so excited, I'm going to see Beyonce and Iggy in October! Can't wait! Adabow (talk) 00:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No words can be thankful to describe what you did on 4

Amazing!!! ... The best I can say. You re-wrote that whole article yourself all alone and it reads so well. I am short of words. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I prefer not to say when because every time I mention a date, I am never able to come back. But I am free on weekends now. So I will surely be here more often. I am going to change remove that template soon. And I see how hard you have work, you will definitely achieve what you want. There are many kind people here on Wikipedia who will surely help you. You may ask user WP Penguin to have a look at the prose. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:List of Jem episodes

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Jem episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film)

Hello JennKR,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film)

Please have a look at the notability guidelines for future films which explains why this is not yet notable. I'd suggest any information be added to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them#Film adaptation for now. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - ^my talk + _{my edits} 19:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aura (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aura (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aura (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Plmnji (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good Girl Gone Bad FAC

Hey Jen! How are you? Do you have some spare time to view and check the article and give some comments at the FAC? I would be grateful. Cheers! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 21:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Million Award

A bit belated, but it looks like I owe you a second one of these:

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Lauryn Hill (estimated annual readership: 1,000,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Lauryn Hill to Good Article status.

Thanks for all you do--that's quite a lot of readers your work is helping. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Not sure how to do full references with the (relatively) new Wikipedia editing layout? Please could you give me some guidance? Shiningroad (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not a fan, but on my social media people are excited about the album. I do like how she sampled the Nigerian writer's TED Talk, but I've not listened to the album at all (and I don't have iTunes). Shiningroad (talk) 19:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce (2013)

Thoughts on Beyoncé guys? Personally, I think it's sheer genius; my favourite B album and one of the best albums in years! —JennKR | ☎ 22:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC) @Adabow: @Journalist: @Acalamari: @Lolcakes25: @My love is love: @Tbhotch: @Jivesh boodhun:[reply]

Definitely her best album. "Partition", "Mine" and "Superpower" are my favourite tracks, but I love every song! Adabow (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You fooled me at first, JennKR: I thought you'd posted this on the album's talk page, which would have shocked me if you had! :P Since this is your talk page and because you pinged me, I'll answer: I have not heard the album yet but I am looking forward to it and expect it to be excellent, as Beyonce's music always is. :) In the meantime, I'm glad to see that the album's article is developing nicely, so congratulations to you and everyone else working on it! Good work, indeed. :) Acalamari 23:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was so completely shocked when I woke up at 6am this morning to see her album just on iTunes. The visuals are stunning, I really was blown away. Pretty Hurts touched me especially the video. Pretty Love, XO, ***Flawless, Partition are my favorites, whilst Haunted, Pretty Love and Yoncé are my favorite videos. --Lolcakes25 (talk) 23:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The visuals are fantastic! I listened to the album in one go, then went back and watched all the videos, and now I've returned to it again! I also agree that "Partition" is one of the best, also enjoying "***Flawless", "Haunted" and "Superpower". Sort of surprised that "Grown Woman" was relegated to a video extra and "Standing on the Sun" made no appearance, but I would argue that all fourteen tracks are superior to those. —JennKR | ☎ 23:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi peeps. Hope you are all doing great. Well, I have only listened to "Mine" as of now and I love it so much. I am very busy in real life but I will try to find some more time to be here as from now. That's a promise. Don't you all think it's worth mentioning in the article about how the press is saying here and there that Beyonce has brought a "change" in the music industry. I mean this information is already there but it does not quite directly hints at it. I also read somewhere that the album caused iTunes website to crash (LOL, is this becoming a habit Beyonce, remember Superbowl anyone? :P )and it has set a new record for the most tweets. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm dead, buried, rebirth, dead again and reburied. She's the greatest, most successful troll ever. This album is everything Artpop ever wanted to be, Prism ever dreamt off and Bangerz who? —Indian:BIO · ^[ ChitChat ] 12:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaaha, IndianBio! Also, thank you Jivesh, I'm working somewhat on the "Music and lyrics" section, but I will (or I'm sure someone else will) slot them in when I get round to the other bits. —JennKR | ☎ 12:55, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/2013-12/enhanced/webdr06/13/12/enhanced-buzz-4863-1386955812-20.jpg, http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/2013-12/enhanced/webdr02/13/10/anigif_enhanced-buzz-7986-1386949694-0.gif ... It's my favorite Beyonce album so far. I think that she became the Mozart of pop music with this album. And Jenny you did a great job with the album. I think that you should nominate something for WP:DYK as the main contributor to the article. My love is love (talk) 16:07, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've been in a state of euphoria since I bought this album. At first, I was worried that people wouldn't get what she was was trying to do, and that they would receive it poorly. But I'm glad that I was wrong. Ratings are as follows:

• "Pretty Hurts"—9/10
• "Haunted"—8.5/10
• "Drunk in Love"—9.5/10
• "Blow"—9/10
• "No Angel"—8/10
• "Partition"—9.5/10
• "Jealous"—8.5/10
• "Rocket"—7.5/10
• "Mine"—8.5/10
• "XO"—9.5/10
• "Flawless"—9.8/10
• "Superpower"—10/10
• "Heaven"—8/10
• "Blue"—8/10

And the great thing is that the videos aren't just cheap clips like her B'day and Sasha Fierce days. They're epic short films. Love them all. Orane (talk) 22:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BOOTS

Stylizes his name in all capitals.

You can see that here: https://soundcloud.com/thisisboots

Here: http://rapgenius.com/Beyonce-beyonce-credits-lyrics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moraljonathan (talk • contribs) 02:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beyoncé (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• name="NY Daily Review"/> ''[[Spin (magazine)|Spin]]'' compared the album to its predecessor, ''[[4 (Beyoncé Knowles album|4]]'', saying that ''Beyoncé'' was more textured in terms of sound and
• in terms of sound and content, noting Knowles' movement from "diva pop/R&B.<ref name="spin"/> (Bey Nick Catucci of ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' praised the album, and commented that "Some fans

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FAC comment?

Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 21:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas! :-)

Happy Yuletides!

Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!)

~TheGeneralUser (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi JennKR, Wishing you a very Happy and Wonderful Merry Christmas! Hope you are having a great time with family and friends :-) Best wishes. ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A personalized New Year greeting

Hope you have a bright 2014! Acalamari 13:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JennKR, Happy New Year! Thank you for your excellent work on Beyoncé Knowles-related articles. :) Best. Acalamari 13:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Year

Thank you a lot Jenny. That is very nice of you. I wish health and happiness to you too. My love is love (talk) 19:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Katy Perry help

While the work has only just started, thank you for stepping in to help with Katy Perry. It's hard to fully express how grateful I am for your help. :) Acalamari 18:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine! I know how hard peer reviews are to come by (especially for these types of article) and the article is at a good standard so there shouldn't be too much to do! :) —JennKR | ☎ 18:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's good to know; I look forward to seeing what happens. :) XXSNUGGUMSXX deserves a lot of credit for the article's current state. Acalamari 19:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :3 XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Beyoncé (album)

On 7 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Beyoncé (album), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Nigerian feminist writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie is sampled on Beyoncé Knowles' new album Beyoncé? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beyoncé (album). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Harrias ^talk 08:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

awards of Destiny's child are the same for beyoncę and kelly, la tavia and le toya(1997-2000) and michelle(2001-2014)

Insert in kelly, michelle tavia and toya,equally to beyonce109.55.203.65 (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rowland and Williams's awards and nominations pages includes grammy and ascap in the group and s solo artists, and their solo awards ONLY, not like beyonce's page, which includes all destiny's child awards. Is not equal and correct.109.52.68.12 (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hello JennKR! I'm not sure if you give peer reviews, though, I'd love to see your comments on Trouble: much like 4, I'm trying to get it to FA eventually. Just some comments would be great. Thank you in advance. prism △ 18:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FL

Hello, I've seen that you turned Beyoncé Knowles discography into an FL, so could you possibly give some comments here? Forget about my previous request. This is more important. Thank you in advance prism △ 15:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Socratic Barnstar
		For your excellent arguments on Talk:Beyoncé, which successfully lead to the Beyoncé Knowles article being moved to the mononym after all the other attempts to do so failed. Well done, JennKR, well done indeed. :) Acalamari 23:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much—I never get these! —JennKR | ☎ 23:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's a shame. :( With everything you do, you really should have more! Acalamari 23:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

On behalf of those who have significantly contributed to the Katy Perry article, just wanted to give a big thank you again for your peer review input! Admittedly, I felt rather disappointed that it wasn't nominated for GA after all the work put into it from the review. Regarding early life section, I haven't found anything on her education prior to high school. In fact, I don't think it's ever even been known to the public. When the points you mentioned have been addressed, though, could you perhaps be the one to nominate it for GA? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Haha, it took a woman to use logic and destroy the flawed arguments of frankly insane geeks who, year after year, used completely flawed and twisted logic to hang on to "Knowles" (by taking advantage of nothing other than their abundant free time and numerical advantage) —Loginnigol (talk) 10:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

4

OMG, Jenny you made my day. Congratulations on 4 becoming a Featured Article. You did an amazing job. I really mean that! And also you did a great job with Beyoncé (the album article). I can't wait to see it becoming an FA one day. My love is love (talk) 14:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FA congratulations

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of 4 (Beyoncé album) to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA) appear as "Today's featured article" soon, please nominate it at the requests page; if you'd like to see an FA on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to the "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with 1,326 articles in Category:Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. Bencherlite^Talk 10:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, JennKR. This probably couldn't be incorporated into the Beyoncé article, but I wanted to share this fun fact with you anyway, in case you haven't seen it. There is a new expression, "to pull a Beyoncé" ;) LA Times — Mayast (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what to do with the categories. The main problem seems to be that the WikiProject was renamed without any prior consensus – I'm not an expert on all the Wiki policies and guidelines, so I'm not sure if we can reach a consensus for something that already happened? Would be nice to have a time machine ;)
Should we try to notify WikiProject members and ask them to express their opinion to reach consensus? Or just assume that all the interested project members have already done that (that would be just you and me)? — Mayast (talk) 12:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have another example of "pulling a Beyoncé", this time from MTV ;) Mayast (talk) 20:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying :) It's super crazy time for me too (tomorrow I'm flying to London and back, and on Friday to Paris), and I probably won't have any access to my laptop for the next two weeks, so if you have any free time, please feel free to add that info to the article ;) If not, I'll do it when I get back :) Cheers! — Mayast (talk) 11:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

I just saw 4 passed its FAC! Congratulations! I hope we can make Beyoncé's self-titled an FA one day as well. I see that you put a lot of work in 4 and you know better, so I wanted to ask you, could you please lightly review Trouble (Natalia Kills album): I mean, if you could identify some errors and correct structure errors, etc. If you have time and feel like it, please do it on the talk page of the article, if you can't it's OK. Prism △ 23:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny congrats for making 4 a FA. One of my very favorites from Yonce. :) —Indian:BIO · ^[ ChitChat ] 15:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce Influences

Concerning your explanation, even though provided by at least MTV sources as you said by liking = in this context it is the same as influence. Shakira's influence in Beyonce videos and choreography is extremely obvious, in the dancing, videos. This fact just cannot be hided. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borkan85 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The intro

One word: Flawless! Orane (talk) 02:19, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heartfelt congratulations on making 4 an FA. ***Flawless article. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Question

Jenn,

Thanks for the rearrangements/simplification you just made on Katy Perry. Before I nominate for GA, I thought I'd ask this: as the peer reviewer, is there anything last things you particularly recommend changing (aside from adding more references to "Achievements" or checking for dead references, which I'm in the middle of doing)? Having gone through this article intricately for the past several months, I feel it is very close to getting back up to GA after being delisted in October 2012. I've probably worked on that article more than any other during my time on Wikipedia. On a side note, I'd be happy to return the favor for you on Beyoncé-related articles.

XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 19:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting comment

Hi. Would you care to weigh in on this recent discussion at Talk:I Am... Sasha Fierce? Dan56 (talk) 03:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heyy, would this change suffice as a replacement for "lukewarm" rather than "mildly positive"? Dan56 (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is streaming a single format?

Thought you might be interested in weighing in on this dicussion. — Status (talk · contribs) 06:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble

Hi, I saw that you came back from your wikibreak! I'm sorry for bothering you however you never concluded the peer review of Trouble. Will you still do that? Thank you in advance. prism^△ 20:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prism: Yes, either today or tomorrow. Best, —JennKR | ☎ 18:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flawless (Beyoncé song)

Hi, JennKR. I'm thinking about nominating Flawless (Beyoncé song) for GA. However, it would be my very first nomination and I feel like a rookie. Could you have a quick look at it, and maybe say whether you think the article is ready for GAN? Or perhaps give me some tips? Thanks, Mayast (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry for the comment, but I just took a look at the article and I think it doesn't have a lot of stuff to fix. I'd gladly take the review; however I doubt that the Foreign Policy review is deserving of a full paragraph. — prism △ 22:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually I think that you should wait. First, I'm pretty convinced that the song will be released as a single from the album. Second, there are tons of reviews (with many of them discussing the song in depth) which are not included in the article. I think that you should use them to further expand the article. My love is love (talk) 00:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your opinions :) I'll try to improve the critical reception section by adding more reviews and trimming down FP's review. Mayast (talk) 10:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unapologetic

There is a discussion regarding genres in the infobox for the article Unapologetic. You are welcome to weigh in. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 10:18, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beyoncé (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beyoncé (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Petergriffin9901 -- Petergriffin9901 (talk) 22:22, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Jenn! Sorry for bothering you, but I have a question. As you (may) know, I'm prepping up Trouble for its late July/early August FAC and I'm currently restructuring it. In the last month I revamped Perfectionist (another album of Natalia Kills) and included a subsection about its visual aspects, where I summarized each of the music videos and a promotional web series she made for the era as well. Mainly because the visuals were a great part of the album's promotion, and I thought they couldn't be overlooked. I was considering adding a section of Visuals and artwork (similarly to Beyoncé) where I would develop a bit on how each video was made (respecting summary style guidelines, of course) and address their synopsis. Also, a paragraph about the cover art of the album. I think the section would tie in perfectly with the rest of the article as they are mostly inspired by Kills' early life, which is also discussed in the album's lyrics. Since I respect your opinion, could you give your two cents on adding the section? pedro | talk 18:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again, but I really need to know whether I should include this section or not. I'm in the final stages of prepping the article for FAC. pedro | talk 00:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Prism: Did I not reply to this? I definitely typed a reply, give me a sec to see if I have posted it elsewhere, otherwise I'll ping you here and offer my thoughts. Cheers, —JennKR | ☎ 00:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Prism: Firstly, apologies, because I'm certain I typed a reply to this, so I must've not submitted it and have exited the tab thinking I had. I'm assuming this proposition is for Trouble (not Perfectionist) as that is going to FAC soon? If so, I think that's absolutely fine, in fact I think it would more than benefit the article. Remember criteria 1(b) for featured status is comprehensiveness—if the material is available to create such a section, and it meets all the other criteria, then it certainly should be included. Best of luck and message me if you need any assistance! —JennKR | ☎ 00:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! pedro | talk 00:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna article

I also thought the Madonna article was written like a fanpage, so I trimmed the most egregious stuff from the lead. Although frankly the whole article needs judicious cutting. Catherinejarvis (talk) 22:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trimming some of the poorly sourced fancruft in the article. To use a Gigwise source to suggest that Madonna is more influential than Jesus was a ridiculous assertion. To suggest that this was "a new scientific study" was absurd. Regards, Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 08:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not getting back to you sooner. You sent me a note on my talk page about a month ago. recently, however, I did a some digging and discovered that an editor, named IndianBio, hovers around the Madonna page reverting many of the edits other people make. Then I did a little more digging and discovered this IndianBio editor changes pages about Madonna and Lady Gaga every day. Literally. Which explains why my edit was reverted soon enough.Catherinejarvis (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion/content

Hi. Could you weigh in on this discussion regarding a viewpoint by a critic/newspaper and how it's included in an article? Dan56 (talk) 00:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Hi Jenn. I'd like to thank you once again for all your input for improving the Katy Perry article this past January. I doubt she would've passed her GAN last month without your help. She's now up for FAC, and hopefully will be promoted in time to be "Today's Featured Article" on her 30th birthday this upcoming October 25th! SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 20:55, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thank you for bringing Beyonce (album) to GA status! Simon (talk) 02:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much Jenn. It means a lot to me that a user like you (one of the best on Wikipedia) appreciates my work. I Am... ***D.D. 02:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beyoncé (album)

The article Beyoncé (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beyoncé (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Petergriffin9901 -- Petergriffin9901 (talk) 02:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Belated congratulations for this GA and thank you for everything you do on Beyoncé articles! Lolcakes25 (talk) 16:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Gabriel

Thank you for your additions to the So page, but please don't just destroy other people's additions without some kind of discussion as I like to think I put quite a lot of effort into those edits on this page. Rodericksilly (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also appreciate your contributions to the article. They are interesting and informative. My only concern was the huge removal of information from the page, which I have never done to any article, and if I did I would fully expect it to be immediately reverted. Rodericksilly (talk) 16:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Surely it's OK to use quotes from print media article on Wiki? I've seen plenty on many articles, some on much more serious topics than albums. The quotes were a bit long, I'll grant you that, but they are reviews from professional critics in noted publications. Rodericksilly (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have seen your reasoning I can better understand it, so thanks for that. I thought you were a vandal at first. That's what I meant by discussion, I thought that is what the Talk page for the article was for, so you could raise your concerns about the content and its references? Also, I was a bit mystified by your removal of the pop-rock genre, because surely EVERYONE acknowledges, Gabriel himself, that this was the album that truly crossed over into the pop rock mainstream and brought him to a different audience? Rodericksilly (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The AllMusic article on So mentions "pop" several times in addition to his (to quote) "moody art rock", so I would think that was good enough for a source. Rodericksilly (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So using "pop" as a genre would be OK? Rodericksilly (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The magazines are ones I bought and own, as is the 1001 Albums book. I thought the genre pop rock, or at least pop, was OK, since the lede states "Many of its songs reflect a more conventional pop-writing style and became radio hits", and the other genres, art rock and worldbeat, haven't required references. Rodericksilly (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jealous (Beyoncé song)/GA1

Since nominator My love is love hasn't been active for a couple days, Jenn, you might be interested in taking on this GAN. It's on hold until August 22nd. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to do it myself tonight. I don't have access to a computer right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by My love is love (talk • contribs)

OK fair enough. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minaj feuds

A discussion for List of Nicki Minaj feuds has already been established via Talk:Nicki Minaj. A deletion notice is unnecessary at the moment, since the page has yet to be further expanded and improved in the time being. Please feel free to join the discussion or explain why you nominated the article for deletion. ChocoLantern88 (talk) 01:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thanks

As he's done things outside of the band, I'd say it probably wasn't the best link- you could do something like "[[David Rhodes (musician)|David Rhodes]] (formerly of [[Random Hold]])"- don't be scared of red links. If he's notable, add a link, even if it's going to be red. J Milburn (talk) 20:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again

Jenn, thanks largely to your detailed PR, Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson is now a featured article :'D! Couldn't have done it without you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:01, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce

Hey, sorry I haven't been around lately. Unfortunately I won't be able to give too much input to the Beyonce article. I hardly log in anymore due to real life constraints, and don't want to delay the process. I will certainly chip in if/when I can, but probably not as frequently enough to have any real collaborative input. So sorry! Orane (talk) 23:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of So (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article So (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of So (album)

The article So (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:So (album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 08:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So (album)

We're almost there- one last thing before I certify this as GA :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of So (album)

The article So (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:So (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 15:42, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adele

Note that there was a reference for "British"; RyanTQuinn removed it and changed it to "English", I restored it, he removed it again and left it at "British", and now it's back at English, unsourced. "British" was sourced with a direct quote from the subject yet it has been removed. Is that what you meant to do? Note that an older discussion on the talk page was in favour of "British" and the subject is of mixed British heritage. Regards, Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fact she has Welsh heritage has no bearing on her nationality, which you could describe as either British or English. The fact is, it's been English for so long I'm wondering why this is only being questioned now. Issues around nationality are contentious and that's why, as it appeared there was edit-warring, that it would be much better to take the issue to the talk page. However, if you think Adele has shown preference to be referred to as British or English, then I believe that preference should be included. Best, —JennKR | ☎ 20:29, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, her citizenship nationality is British, no question about that, as there is no such thing as English citizenship. As for any finer description beyond that, heritage certainly might have a bearing on it, as Englishness/Welshness/Scottishness basically depends entirely on heritage. The cover-all "British" cannot be wrong because that's what all our passports say we are, whereas English/Welsh or whatever can sometimes be incorrectly assigned. Issues around nationality are indeed contentious, which is why I don't like to see nationalities or particularly sub-nationalities used without anything to substantiate them, however long they've been in the article. The reference that had been inserted contained a quote from Adele saying, "I'm proud to be British", which seems like a pretty solid preference. Are you happy to have that reinstated? Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 02:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Yes, I agree that it's fine if someone says they're English, consider themselves English or sentiment to that effect, then the lead should undoubtedly say English. I think that any personal quote or statement regarding nationality should be cited and override anything else. But I do think that (just my opinion), where there is any doubt and no long-standing wording, the default should be British. British is also a nationality, mine for example. It guarantees accuracy as all English, Welsh and Scottish people are also, by law, British. But in a sense then, many British people have two nationalities, which is a bit inconvenient for us! JK Rowling is a good example of how seriously many people take this subject and they've reached a proper consensus there, but generally, Wikipedia is very poor at providing guidance for it. There are many editors who like to change nationalities around with nothing to substantiate them, and there's no effective policing of that. But anyway regarding Adele, I did wonder if you thought there was a standard edit war, which is why I came here to check rather than just revert again. Someone brought it up again today on the talk page, and I've responded with a proposal along the lines of what you've said, so hopefully people will have their say there. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:24, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage talk RfC

@JennKR: Hi, I would appreciate your input on this disputed matter: Garbage Rfc--Lpdte77 (talk) 03:46, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello JennKR:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:10, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Orphaned non-free image File:Nessa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nessa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Classic Rock magazine

Please explain why Classic Rock (magazine) is a questionable source compared to other publications. This seems rather arbitrary. Thanks. Rodericksilly (talk) 21:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Timberlake discography

Hi JennKR! Can I please get get your input here regarding the list? I would be grateful. :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 20:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Girl Gone Bad FAC

I would be very happy to see your input on the FAC, thanks in advance. :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 16:48, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC United States same-sex marriage map

I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 (talk) 09:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/American Life/archive1

Hi Jenn. Would you care to make a comment in the above nomination? Thanks in advance. —Indian:BIO ^[ ChitChat ] 09:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Edits to Beyoncé (album)

Hey, I just wanted to say that you should try to avoid charged language, even if it's seemingly safe, such as "surprising".

@Crossark:: Hey, two things, firstly, my edit never added the content "surprising", if you look at the diff closely, I moved two paragraphs around (so the section flows better) and therefore the language in question alredy existed. Secondly, "surprising" in the article is used in the sense that that the release was unexpected; this is uncontroversial as it isn't making claims about the album's extent of success, it is meant literally. Best regards, —JennKR | ☎ 19:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello JennKR, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing, TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:38, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

A Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year JennKR :) Best Wishes! TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:38, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year JennKR!

Happy New Year!

JennKR,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Nicki Minaj issue

Refer to Talk:Nicki Minaj to discuss matters concerning the feuds section and proposal of a separate feuds page. ChocoLantern88 (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4 (Beyoncé album)

Stop reverting reliable WP:AGG sources. MeTacritic is a reliable source. MaRAno ^FAN 11:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Chile world same-sex marriage map

Please join discussion for how Chile should be colored. Prcc27 (talk) 08:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna

Thank you.  — ₳aron 22:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]