|
User talk:Jason Rees/Archive2
YasiThat was the format right. I remember an Indian ocean cyclone article like that. 2008 Yemen cyclone. Though it was officially called Deep Depression ARB 02, the page has a different name. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Talkback You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Bidgee (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC) YasiOK, I have updated all four places where Yasi's best strength is repeated.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 18:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC) YasiThanks for the message. Yasi was very interesting lol. I stayed at a hotel on The Strand in Townsville, pretty much couldn't sleep at all on Wednesday night as that was the peak of Yasi in Townsville (I think the winds in Townsville peaked at like 140km/h gusts, could have been a little higher, I couldn't check at the time). I did get a lot of pictures, however it's all of trees over roads and a random roof being located on the beach (no idea where that came from). I got stuck in Townsville for a couple of days with no power so I helped a little with the cleanup (area around all the hotels was very messy). I'm guessing the storm surge came all the way up to the footpath as wet sand was located as far up as that, as well as on trunk of a couple of random trees (the wind probably kicked the sand up that far though). What amazed me was how dark hotel corridors can be at 2pm when the power is out. Completely pitch black, that was kinda creepy. It was certainly more interesting than Hamish, which when I went to Mackay, seemed to instantly change direction. -_- Plus it only ended up costing around $1000, flights included. I was going to go to Mission Beach, but there were a number of things which prevented that, and given Yasi hit that place directly, I'm probably lucky that I didn't. At this stage I wouldn't be surprised if Queensland has another Severe Impact in store for this season, I doubt I'll be able to get more time off work for that though, as it was I lied to my boss in order to chase Yasi, lol. Cyclonica (talk) 04:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC) Re: Epi 2003The 50kt winds appear to be gusts, GP states that the 35kt sustained winds were derrived from gusts using a 1.4 reduction factor. I think it's safe to lower the intensity to 35kt. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC) Tropical CyclonesGood evening Jason! long time no message. haha. well I am now busy studying the weather thats why I can't edit wikipedia. can you please help me? I have a problem. Can you define to me what is the CONCLUSION IN STUDYING TROPICAL CYCLONES? you can post it at my talk page. i will wait for you in the next 24 hours. hahaha. because this is an Investigatory project in our school. 4th year high school is so hard. help me friend! Shalom! Have a blessed day :) God bless you. --jpuligan_12 (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC) Morakot rainfallI fixed it in the typhoon article...but that means it also needs to be fixed within the Morakot article. I haven't added it into the wettest by country list yet, so it merely needs to be added there. Thegreatdr (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2011 (UTC) Is something missing from the tropical cyclone forecast model article?I've put this article up for a Good Article nomination, and wanted the opinion of someone who normally edits Southern Hemispheric storm articles to see if I'm missing anything. I'm worried that I might be missing information which could be available regarding how the Aussies or those at Reunion forecast TCs...though I did find a tidbit about their storm surge model from 1990, but otherwise didn't find much else regarding Australia. I just recently added JMA and JTWC related information into the article yesterday. Any input would be appreciated. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:02, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
OdilePlease see User talk:HurricaneSpin#Odile move. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC) Re: BebengOh wow...that's interesting. They nixed it quite fast. But yea, that's a reliable source. I'm adding it to the article now. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC) page requestCan you make a typhoon page of typhoon Aere (Bebeng) since it was retired by PAGASA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.25.238 (talk) 09:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC) DYK for 1994-95 South Pacific cyclone season
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 31 May 2011 (UTC) JTWC/RSMCI've noticed some of the tracks you have me generate are already as JTWC tracks and I'm overwriting them with Nadi's data. I'm wondering why they aren't all JTWC, or all RSMC. I think I've brought this up before, but I think we need to make some consensus on what to use. Where should I bring this topic up, or can you give me some info about why this is like this? atomic7732 05:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC) IBTRACSHey, would you want me to update the SPAC tracks with the IBTRACS and Nadi BT data? I still don't really get why at all the JTWC is really used... Nadi's got data for all the cyclones of at least C1 strength. atomic7732 22:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Not BlindI'm not going blind...I looked at the JMA report and it didn't show it. Listed 08W as an LPA not a TD. They probably just updated it :P Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC) Be readyAlthough this is still more than a week out, all the models are agreeing on Ma-On being one hell of a storm. GFS, CMC and ECMWF all show it becoming a Cat:5 and slamming into Japan (though they differ on where). ECMWF shows about a Cat:3/4 landfall in Kyushu while CMC shows a direct hit on Tokyo about the same strength. Definitely worth keeping an eye on but obviously now that I said something everything will fall apart :P Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC) Re: TracksHello, I'm sorry for not responding to this earlier; I've removed the extratropical points in the season map. Also, I'm going to India tomorrow so I won't be on until the weekend at the earliest. Have a good day! — Ines(talk) 18:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC) TD letter designationMany years ago (like 20), that might have been true. It could be where I got the idea to label Atlantic TDs with an A. But now that they try to use a letter internationally unique, A is for Arabian Sea. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC) Pacific Tropical CyclonesWould you mind providing me with the link to the website(s) in which you got your information? I just can't locate your source of information. If you do, that would be really helpful to me. Thank you! 68.6.149.53 (talk) 17:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Source[1] - be sure you add a source when you change information like this. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Old Ops PlansA few days ago on IRC, there was a discussion of why names were added to the 1985 PHS midseason, and whether Xavier, Yolanda, and Zeke were present from the beginning of the year on the 1986 name list. You provided a link, and said a names list was not in the 1986 Operational Plan (or some similar title), which is what you linked to. Could you please provide me a link to that archive of old NHC/EPHC operational plans, the source of the links your provided on IRC? Or tell me where I can find them? I would much appreciate it. Thank you very much. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 06:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC) Post-Tropical CyclonesWell, if Post-Tropical Cyclones are actually extratropical, then why does the NHC state that they have a chance to redevelop? (For instance: Hurricane Eugene (2011), and Tropical Storm Emily (2011).) 68.6.149.53 (talk) 01:34, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Source[2] - be sure you add a source when you change information like this. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Old Ops PlansA few days ago on IRC, there was a discussion of why names were added to the 1985 PHS midseason, and whether Xavier, Yolanda, and Zeke were present from the beginning of the year on the 1986 name list. You provided a link, and said a names list was not in the 1986 Operational Plan (or some similar title), which is what you linked to. Could you please provide me a link to that archive of old NHC/EPHC operational plans, the source of the links your provided on IRC? Or tell me where I can find them? I would much appreciate it. Thank you very much. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 06:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC) Post-Tropical CyclonesWell, if Post-Tropical Cyclones are actually extratropical, then why does the NHC state that they have a chance to redevelop? (For instance: Hurricane Eugene (2011), and Tropical Storm Emily (2011).) 68.6.149.53 (talk) 01:34, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
re:AveragesSure; I'll be working on it ASAP! --Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:07, 20 August 2011 (UTC) WebCite TroubleThanks for the info. I am temporarily archiving stuff into a blog, which will (hopefully) be counter-archived at WebCite when its back. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2011 (UTC) I was able to find the 2004 season summary from the JTWC, but nothing else. Was that all you had in mind, or did you have more data I can use? If so, I'd appreciate if you could pass it on. Thanks for the help! Inks.LWC (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC) Tara[****]You and Marius Bla BlaThank you for your notice. Meanwhile at least for accountsd blocked in German WP as well. --Matthiasb (talk) 21:18, 29 October 2011 (UTC) RolfBut where should we write it up? Its own article with a "see also" on the Atlantic page?--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 18:45, 8 November 2011 (UTC) Tropical Cycloneshave a look at W section...it's done..........any suggestions???--Vyom25 (talk) 09:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Tropical Disturbance 01?Excuse me, if I may ask, is Invest 96S considered to be a tropical cyclone (in the South-West Indian Ocean)? If it is, then could you please create a section for that storm? Please let me know you opinion on this matter. Thank you! 72.197.253.243 (talk) 00:57, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
List of unnamed tropical cyclonesThe reason why I removed the four "unnamed" tropical storms from the 1957 Pacific typhoon section is because I later found that tropical storms in the Northwest Pacific did not operationally receive names until the 1958 season, when they were assigned names by the Fleet Weather Center (FWC) on Guam. Can you give me your opinion on whether or not the storms from 1957 should be included? thanks (Undescribed) 09:24, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Re: TCFAI was also mistaken, thinking that was what was wrong with that template ;) Yea, I agree we shouldn't use winds from the TCFA. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC) FYIThere's an error in Marie 1990's row (24|24 hours). Thanks for tidying it up though! HurricaneFan25 00:11, 7 December 2011 (UTC) Tropical Depression 02Then when did the storm dissipate? (And where are you receiving this information from?) 72.197.253.243 (talk) 00:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
A beer for you!
Cyclone Yasi retirement sectionThe section I added under cyclone Yasi is valid because Yasi did not receive its name from the Austrailian naming list, but from the South pacific list. Since the storm did very little damage while in the South Pacific region; where it received its name, the name was not retired by the SP. The austrailian region couldn't retire the name because they were not responsible for naming the storm. Therefore, I have re-installed the section on "lack of retirement", and added references. If you have any evidence to contradict this, you can give me your opinion. Thanks Undescribed (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
1) The sentence hints that the SPAC does not retire names, when they do 2) Your source says nothing about Yasi being not retired, it only says that Anthony wasnt retired, which is so frickin obvious imo. 3) The WMO RA V Tropical Cyclone Committee (which Australia and Fiji are both a member of) are responsible for the retirement of names and not just the RSMCs. 4) The WMO RA V Committee does not meet until the back end of this current tropical cyclone season 5) While BoM were not responsible for the naming they still can request that the name be retired like Cyclone Ului of 2010 and im sure there are others. If you want more reasons just shout. :)Jason Rees (talk) 21:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC) Merry Christmas!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. HurricaneFan25 — 13:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Cyclone Rewa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mackay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC) Thank YouHi Jason, you really helped me back in the 2010 with cyclone articles. If you remember you also gave some info about Karachi 1965 hurricane, without your help this article would not have been made http://pakistanweatherportal.com/2011/12/24/mysterious-cyclone-of-december-1965-karachi-in-the-eye-of-the-storm/ Thanks buddy! HunterZone (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
AlengaHey there, you mind doing me a favor? If you know, then can you please tell me when Alenga's remnants dissipated? Thank you! 72.197.253.243 (talk) 19:47, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Merry ChristmasMerry Christmas, JasonRees, hope you've had a great day. :) —Bruvtakesover (talk!) 19:38, 25 December 2011 (UTC) This page is a self redirect. Were you trying to redirect it to somewhere else? -- A Certain White Cat chi? 03:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Deep Depression BOB 05Excuse me, but is this storm possibly BOB 06? Since ARB 04 did exist in the Bay of Bengal for almost half a weak (as a disturbance), a website I read classified ARB 04 with a second name: BOB 05. And then, they classified the new storm as BOB 06. Should we change the name or the storm, or leave it as it is? Thanks for your help! 72.197.253.243 (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Tropical Cyclone FinaIsn't this storm still active?? According to the satellite image today at 600 UTC, the storm looks very healthy, and organized. And by the looks of it, Fina doesn't look like it will dissipate for at least another few days. But if Fina really has dissipated, or transitioned into an extratropical cyclone, please link your source (or where it might have used to me) to my talk page. I will very much appreciate it. Thanks! 72.197.253.243 (talk) 19:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
New Track?Excuse me, but can I please add this to the WestPac season? File:JMA TD39 2011 track.png It was created by Keith Edkins Thanks! 72.197.253.243 (talk) 20:34, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
You're invited!Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Cup - come join the Hurricane Cup! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited 2011 Pacific typhoon season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Landfall and Shear line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 31 December 2011 (UTC) JTWC filesWhere are the JTWC files for Cyclone Joy (Australian/1990–91) located? I'd appreciate it if you could find them :) HurricaneFan25 — 19:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2012 WikiCupHello, and welcome to the 2012 WikiCup! The competition officially begins at the start of 2012 (UTC) after which time you may begin to claim points. Your submission page, where you must note any content for which you wish to claim points, can be found here, and formatting instructions can be found in hidden comments on the page. A bot will then update the main table, which can be seen on the WikiCup page. The full rules for what will and will not be awarded points can be found at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There's also a section on that page listing the changes that have been made to the rules this year, so that experienced participants can get up-to-date in a few seconds. One point of which we must remind everyone; you may only claim points for content upon which you have done significant work, and which you have nominated, in 2012. For instance, articles written or good article reviews started in 2011 are not eligible for points. This round will last until late February, and signups will remain open until the middle of February. If you know of anyone who may like to take part, please let them know about the comeptition; the more the merrier! At the end of this round, the top 64 scorers will progress to the next round, where their scores will reset, and they will be split into pools. Note that, by default, you have been added to our newsletter list; we will be in contact at the end of every month with news. You're welcome to remove yourself from this list if you do not wish to hear from us. Conversely, those interested in following the competition are more than welcome to add themselves to the list. Please direct any questions towards the judges, or on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn (talk) and The ed17 (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC) Re: JMA TDGood day sir Jason! long time no talk :) uhm I can't open the links that you post to my talk page. However, since your a good editor, I will consider your edits that JMA TD dissipated at around 0600 UTC of January 1st. Sorry for the mistake buddy :) Jpuligan 12 (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
ohh okay :) thanks sir. Cheers ! Jpuligan 12 (talk) 19:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC) hehe. yeah. thanks for the future references :)) Jpuligan 12 (talk) 19:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC) December 2011 South Atlantic Tropical Cyclone?For a few days in the beginning of December 2011, I noticed a strong cyclone that heavily resembled a subtropical cyclone (through the observation of satellite imagery). Throughout the storm's duration, the storm maintained its intensity, before moving inland over Brazil, and dissipating the next day. Could this possibly be an unofficial subtropical cyclone? If not, please let me know. With best regards, 72.197.253.243 (talk) 06:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Oy - breakpoints for hurricane and tropical storm windwiseThis was talked about at surprising length during the NOAA Hurricane Conference. I'll have to find it within my conference notes and get back to you. Thegreatdr (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Category 1: 74-95 mph, 64-82 kt, 119-153 km/h Category 2: 96-110 mph, 83-95 kt, 154-177 km/h Category 3: 111-129 mph, 96-112 kt, 178-208 km/h Category 4: 130-156 mph, 113-136 kt, 209-251 km/h Category 5: 157+ mph, 137+ kt, 252+ km/h This is a change for categories 3-5, but only on paper. This is being done to eliminate conversion headaches, since it's always rounded to the nearest 5 units. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
SWIO Storm colorsHi, I notice you have changed {{Storm color|swsubdep}} to be the same as {{Storm color|mtstorm}} instead of the same as {{Storm color|swiodepression}} - is this logical when there is {{Storm color|sub}} available for cyclone-strength subtropical systems?--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 12:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
MF NC advisoriesWill do.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 20:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC) Storm naming questionNoticed something odd (to me) in the 1st paragraph of Hurricane Bud (2006). It says this was the 3rd named storm of the 2006 Pacific hurricane season. For that to be the case, I assume Tropical Depression Two-E is being counted as the 2nd. Do you know, is that the way it's supposed to be? --LarryJeff (talk) 19:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
PermissionHi! I'm very interested in Tropical cyclones and I was wondering if I could join the Tropical cyclone WikiProject. I don't know if I'm supposed to ask anyways, but your name was at the top of Current Members so I chose to ask you. Please write back! Happyyear13 (talk) 04:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Cyclone Zoe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tuvaluan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC) DYK for Cyclone Susan
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Re:WikicupYep, that looks fine. Nice work! J Milburn (talk) 10:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC) WP Tropical Cyclones in the SignpostThe WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Tropical Cyclones for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 06:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC) WikiCup 2012 January newsletter WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20. A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.
We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition. A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Peer review limits changedThis is a notice to all users who currently have at least one open peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review. Because of the large number of peer review requests and relatively low number of reviewers, the backlog of PRs has been at 20 or more almost continually for several months. The backlog is for PR requests which have gone at least four days without comments, and some of these have gone two weeks or longer waiting for a review. While we have been able to eventually review all PRs that remain on the backlog, something had to change. As a result of the discussion here, the consensus was that all users are now limited to one (1) open peer review request. If you already have more than one open PR, that is OK in this transition period, but you cannot open any more until all your active PR requests have been closed. If you would like someone to close a PR for you, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Peer review. If you want to help with the backlog, please review an article whoe PR request is listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog/items. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Here i will explain why i added the info that you think wasn't real in 2009 Pacific typhoon season-Typhoon NidaI Was watching a video on YouTube- and at 5:26 in the video, you can see Nida spinning up.At 5:36 it appears Nida has dissipated.But on 5:40 in the video you can see a faint spiral associated with thunder storms east of the Philippines.(click this to watch:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qb-yqP18iDA) It appears to be Nida but i was not sure so i went to "Digital Typhoon" and when i go back to the December 4 2009 visible image,of the Pacific, i notice a faint spiral just west of TD 28w-it was the remnants of Nida.As i checked the visible images from December-4-5-6 and than on the December 7, i watched the spiral of low level convection started to budge out some Thunder storms but wind shear was high at that time so it did not strengthen further.As i checked the December 9 image,i saw the spiral dissipating over the Philippines. Here's the prove: 1.Look at this image from "Digital Typhoon"on December 4 and you can see a faint spiral-the remnants of Nida west of TD28w:http://agora.ex.nii.ac.jp/digital-typhoon/globe/color/2009/4096x4096/MTS109120400.globe.0.jpg 2.Check this image from December 6 and notice a spiral far west of the Philippines. http://agora.ex.nii.ac.jp/digital-typhoon/globe/color/2009/4096x4096/MTS109120600.globe.0.jpg 3.You can now clearly see the spiral west of the Philippines,and it has buged 2 Thunderclouds:http://agora.ex.nii.ac.jp/digital-typhoon/globe/color/2009/4096x4096/MTS109120800.globe.0.jpg 4.This image from December 8 shows the spiral strengthening slightly-you can see the low level circulation center is not fully exposed now: http://agora.ex.nii.ac.jp/digital-typhoon/globe/color/2009/4096x4096/MTS109120800.globe.0.jpg 5.The low dissipates over the Philippines on December 9 as shown here:http://agora.ex.nii.ac.jp/digital-typhoon/globe/color/2009/4096x4096/MTS109120900.globe.0.jpg Typhoonwikihelper (talk) 12:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Re:February 2012Watch closely from December 2-3-4 and you can clearly see Nida weakening into a exposed, low level circulation area before moving southwestwards before strengthening slightly again! I am not those ORDINARY people who just RANDOMLY edits articles! I watch closely by 100% check,image by image,track by track,and please don't misunderstand the prove i've giving you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Typhoonwikihelper (talk • contribs) 05:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC) South Pacific Tropical CyclonesAs shown here, the RMSC Nadi has issued the last bulletin on Tropical Cyclone Cyril? Why are they doing that? And if the storm is not "dead" yet, are there any other bulletins out there, that we can use? 174.65.96.212 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC). South Pac IssuesWhat is taking so long just to find the "missing" info, on the South Pac TCs? (Such as missing seasonal effects info, 04F data, (etc.)) 174.65.96.212 (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Tropical CyclonesCan I please add this track to the 2006 Central Pacific cyclone page (under the label of Unoffical track)? It is created from the track data provided on the page itself. 72.197.249.141 (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Cyclone Jasmine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC) JasmineIs Jasmine dead yet, because it is no longer mentioned on this bulletin? 72.197.249.141 (talk) 23:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Since the floods were caused by the storms 06F - Cyril, and 8 deaths resulted, should I add them to the South Pac page? If no, then how are we going to handle this information? 72.197.249.141 (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
TD01wDear Jason Ress, if you don't believe the information i added in TD01w, at least you can keep the original image showing TD01w exposed. If i done anything wrong please warn me as i am new to Wikipedia. 218.103.145.237 (talk) 12:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Then were is your source for saying:" Later on the same day, the remnants of 01W were completely absorbed by the Intertropical Convergence Zone."??? besides, satellite imagery clearly show the convection was absorbed, but not the circulation center! if you don't reply i'll keep reverting that edit! because it is a clear false information. Thank You.218.103.152.230 (talk) 02:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank You for replying, i don't know what to do now.
Typhoonwikihelper has switched to this IP Address: 219.77.32.65 Please read his talk page. He has to be stopped; report him to WP:ANI if you can't block him. 72.197.249.141 (talk) 06:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Jason is right. You can't cite images as proof of anything on Wikipedia. If you had a picture and used that to cite "the sky is blue", that info would be deleted. Wikipedia is all about proper verification. Using images is iffy, since different people can interpret them differently. We need nice, solid sources. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Thank you, my dear Hurricanehink-for giving this helpful advice/lesson--♫203.218.175.102 (talk) 10:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Please answer my question-User:72.197.249.141 told me to ask here
Please be noted that if i get too mad i will seriously create a Vandalism-only account 218.103.145.154 (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Well, to tell you the truth, the chance of that happening above is a low chance-0.4% to be exact.Sorry if it frighten you, but i just get into some temper sometimes --203.218.175.102 (talk) 10:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC) STD 03Well, OK. I have retrieved some Réunion daily summaries and pieced together some sort of track.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 14:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Track converterOK, http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/nrl.htm now converts Best Track files as well as NRL.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 21:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC) WikiCup round 2Hi- this is a message to let you know that you are one of six people tied for 64th place in the WikiCup, and so have a chance to make it to round 2- see Wikipedia talk:WikiCup#Tiebreaker for details. Please reply there. Thanks! J Milburn (talk) 22:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC) WikiCup 2012 February newsletterRound 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design. The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC) TracksThanks. I've extended the Track Converter page to process storm data from the BoM file. They don't believe in regular fixes, do they?--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 22:25, 2 March 2012 (UTC) Ma-onBest track cite renewed.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 08:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC) WikiCup 2012 March newsletterWe are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! Congratulations to It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC) Smile!
Your HighBeam account is ready!Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 1977 WMO source?I checked to see if this was referenced in the tropical cyclone naming article, but was not able to find it. You know of the source of this information? I won't add it without a source. I'm having a hard enough time sourcing what's already in the NHC article. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Cyclone LuaDid this storm really kill anybody? I think it is about time we know. 72.197.249.141 (talk) 23:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC) South Pacific cyclone seasonHow long is it going to take, before we can finally fill in the blanks in the Seasonal effects infobox (near the end of the article)? 72.197.249.141 (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2012 (UTC) WikiCup 2012 April newsletterRound 2 of this year's WikiCup is over, and so we are down to our final 32, in what could be called our quarter-finals. The two highest scorers from each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers overall, have entered round 3, while 30 participants have been eliminated. Pool B's 65 points was the lowest qualifying score for round 3; significantly higher than the 11 required to enter round 2, and also higher than the 41 required to reach round 3 last year. However, in 2010, 100 points were needed to secure a place in round 3. 16 will progress to round 4. In round 3, 150 points was the 16th highest score, though, statistically, people tend to up their game a little in later rounds. Last year, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 points were needed. Guessing how many points will be required is not easy. We still have not seen any featured portals or topics this year, but, on the subject of less common content types, a small correction needs to be made to the previous newsletter: File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg, our first featured picture, was the work of both An article on the WikiCup in the Wikimedia Blog, "Improving Wikipedia with friendly competition", was posted at the end of April. This may be of interest to those who are signed up to this newsletter, as well as serving as another way to draw attention to our project. Also, we would again like to thank Re:ORThanks for telling me that, as i am new to wiki(i'm a little spinning in my head, as i am not really sure what is right, or a little wrong). If you have any more suggestions, please contact me!--Earth100 (talk) 13:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Re: General LinksGood morning Mr. Rees! I apologized for using general links that is not needed. I've always forget that one. However, with adding those things, my work for meteorological history of Tropical Depression 03W will be reverted? why? I put right information about that depression. Hope for your kind understanding. thanks bro. happy hour ! (: Jpuligan 12 (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 May newsletterWe're halfway through round 3 (or the quarter finals, if you prefer) and things are running smoothly. We're seeing very high scoring; as of the time of writing, the top 16 all have over 90 points. This has already proved to be more competative than this time last year- in 2011, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 was the lowest qualifying score. People have also upped their game slightly from last round, which is to be expected as we approach the end of the competition. Leading Pool A is This round has seen an unusually high number of featured lists, with nearly one in five remaining participants claiming one, and one user, User:112.198.77.183's Vandalism!I was checking the 2012 Pacific typhoon season article, when i noticed the the Season summary section text were changed into "9999" please check here to see what User:112.198.77.183 did. His edit changed the "Last storm dissipated" to December 31, 2012-but i changed it back to currently active."Total fatalities" No.8 was changed to "9999"!!! This is crazy! i hate Vandalism! why did he did that?! (I changed his edit back to the original). How can we report him?
Please reply Sincerely,--Earth100 (talk) 07:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh i see...perhaps is just that i'm new, and inexperienced. Well one thing is certain: i won't tolerate any Vandalism and i will always welcome any advisesEarth100 (talk) 12:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC) User:112.198.77.28 VandalismThis Vandalism was quite huge and extreme Vandalism, and almost the entire page was vandalized. He has also done more than one vandalism. What can we do about it?? I've never seen such extreme vandalism! It was by chance that i kept reloading the 2012 pacific typhoon season page when i saw the vandal changed Marwar to a category 5. Please reply--Earth100 (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2012 (UTC) What exactly is an "Administrator"? =Earth100 (talk) 04:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC) okay, okay, i get it- as i seen from here. Still, a big thank you for telling me that there are such super Wikipedians! Earth100 (talk) 15:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Brief climatology of tropical cyclones in LouisianaThis link, pages 3-7. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Jamaica rainfall - too much precisionThe source only gives whole mm. No one reports rainfall beyond the nearest 0.1 mm. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:06, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
1956 publicationI know this much. It detailed tropical storm and hurricane rainfall from 1899-1955, and was published in 1956 by the Washington Office of the Weather Bureau, the forerunner of NMC and HPC. I've done a few searches over the past 24 hours with no luck. =( Thegreatdr (talk) 21:48, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
WP:AccessibilityWhile I agree with you, there is that other table in the next section that also has those abbreviations on it also. The problem with the one table that covers up the bars and just makes an overlapping mess.United States Man (talk) 02:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Re: 3RRCan you point me to where the policy says that dates cannot have the non-breaking spaces? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
JR, can you point me to where the script editors say that, and per what policy? Dates very much are susceptible to breaking. Example: exampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexampleexample November 1 On my screen, November and 1 are on separate lines. I'm just trying to avoid that. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:58, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Tropical cyclone namesHi. I just added the 2018 season of the tropical cyclone names at North Atlantic section on Lists of tropical cyclone names page yesterday. And why did you have reverted it? --8TimesChampionLoeb (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Brisbane's high seas forecastsDone--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC) WikiCup 2012 June newsletterApologies for the lateness of this letter; our usual bot wasn't working. We are now entering round 4, our semi-finals, and have our final 16. A score of 243 was required to reach this round; significantly more than 2011's 76 points, and only a little behind 2010's 250 points. By comparison, last year, 150 points in round 4 secured a place in the final; in 2010, 430 were needed. Commiserations to Pool A's A quick note about other competitions taking place on Wikipedia which may be of interest. There are 13 days remaining in the June-July GAN backlog elimination drive, but it is not too late to take part. August will also see the return of The Core Contest- a one month long competition first run in 2007. While the WikiCup awards points for audited content on any subject, The Core Contest about is raw article improvement, focussing heavily on the most important articles on Wikipedia. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC) List of wettest tropical cyclones in the United StatesHi Jason, You've been doing great work at List of wettest tropical cyclones in the United States! Unfortunately, one of your recent edits broke links to several of the images on the article. While it is important to make sure date formats are consistent within an article, this does not include dates used in image titles, which must correspond with what the images are called or else the links will be broken. I have fixed the links to the images. If you'd like to see this article go up on the main page, your comments would be welcome here. Neelix (talk) 14:02, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Re:FYIOk, thanks for letting me know. BTW, is American Samoa east or west of 180W? YE Pacific Hurricane 19:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC) |
.svg){kind=link}
