|
User talk:Jannatulbaqi/Archive 12
Rollback granted Hi Jannatulbaqi. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi Jannatulbaqi. Thank you for your work on Rampilla Narasayamma. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with Dcotos (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging Autopatrolled statusHi. Thank you for the nomination. I had autopatrolled status for a while but never used it in any way. I didn't know what it was but I thought it was a nice recognition for my editing. When I lost it with Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1109#Autopatrolled I was not aware of the discussion and I didn't understand what I did wrong. I felt hounded with users demanding I lose a right I had never even used and I considered leaving Wikipedia all together. Since then I have definitely improved as an editor, but not sure what qualifies as "substantial page creation" though. I don't know what I could even do to get it back but it's okay. Thanks again. - Moondragon21 (talk 11:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Draft article creationHi Baqi, I have seen that my first Wikipedia draft article Draft:Pauk Ko Taw was rejected again, even if it was a notable subject with credible and reliable references, it got rejected. The article certainly is well-written, encyclopedic, sourced, and neutral. Can you explain why and how can I fix it? Where is there left to fix? Thank you! KhantWiki (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted Hi Jannatulbaqi, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments. This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! --Ahecht (TALK Your thread has been archived
Question from Amdiin1129i (03:39, 3 December 2024)How can I make sure a citation in foreign language can be identified as credible citations --Amdiin1129i (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Draft article creationHi Jannatulbaqui, Thank you for your feedback on Draft:Gamezop. I have carefully reviewed the concerns regarding notability and references. I have now added multiple reliable, secondary sources with significant coverage of the subject, ensuring they meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and independence. I kindly request you to review the updated submission. Please let me know if any further improvements are needed. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Kiran More Morekiranwiki (talk) 08:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC) Primi Nécega, and citing translationsHi Jannatulbaqi. It looks like your recent article Primi Nécega contains translation from the existing article on glwiki. For copyright reasons, those translations need to be attributed in your edit summaries. See Help:Translation#Attribution. Also some of the references seem to have been accidentally mangled -- for example, the first paragraph of the "Career" section was attributed to this statistical report from 2024, which as far as I can tell doesn't mention Nécega at all. The same paragraph on glwiki is referenced by an article in La Comarca del Eo that I don't have access to. (According to this, "it is only available on specific computers at [Biblioteca Nacional de España] facilities or at the Conservation Centers of the Autonomous Communities.") I've removed that citation. Similarly, the second paragraph in "Career" was referenced by an article on paper folding (again no mention of Nécegas), whereas the glwiki article references this newpaper piece on her -- I've changed that. GanzKnusper (talk) 12:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank youThank you Jannatulbaqi - you made my day!--Mojo Hand (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Query about BLP Guidelines concerning low-profile/high-profile figuresHi, I am addressing this to you, as you were recently assigned as my mentor on Wikipedia. I have a query about the BLP guidelines and the criteria for low-profile and high-profile figures. If for example, the subject of the article was deemed high-profile due to giving a recent interview to the press, what would have to change for them to be considered low-profile again? If they stopped talking to the media for an extended period of time and no longer had a high-profile career, could they become low-profile? Secondly, if the subject was deemed low-profile, would that be a justified reason to remove any information not relevant to their original reason for notability that could harm their reputation, such as a historic conviction that is now spent? In brief, what is the general guideline to determine whether a previously high-profile figure has now become low-profile? And, if they do become low-profile, would that justify any information, unrelated to notability, being removed for harm and balancing reasons? Svenska356 (talk) 17:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Thornton Tweddle
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC) New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Happy holidays! Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very happy and productive 2025! ♦ Maliner (talk) 15:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Top AfC Editor
Limited amount of informationthanks for the comment I want to inform you that the correct information about the person is very less as I am associated with the organization I tried to write clearly as much as possible can you suggest me any better tips please Sounai123 (talk) 16:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
|} Hi @Jannatulbaqi! I know it's been a while since you've reviewed Isabelle Pinson, but I've rewritten it not too long ago. May you look over it? Best regards, Hectorinaaa (talk) 06:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC) Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Your GA nomination of Rampilla NarasayammaThe article Rampilla Narasayamma you nominated as a good article has failed Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!
GrabUp - Talk 18:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC) Happy Holidays!.jpg) Ekdalian (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Ekdalian (talk) 12:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg) .jpg)   Hello Jannatulbaqi: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 13:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC) ,_cropped.jpg) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message Abishe (talk) 13:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas to you too! Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten! ¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua! God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus! Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce! Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством! শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스! สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành! Весела Коледа! ~ Meri Kirihimete! Hello, Jannatulbaqi! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}} ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten! ¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua! God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus! Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce! Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством! শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스! สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành! Весела Коледа! ~ Meri Kirihimete! Hello, Jannatulbaqi! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
December music
Thank you for your note! My first Christmas story is about Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ, BWV 91, 300 years today, and its song, 500 years old. Enjoy the season! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
4meter4 (talk) 13:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging 2025 Update from Women in Green .jpg) Hello Jannatulbaqi: 2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved! For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you! This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around! You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC) P. RagulvarmaHi Jannatulbaqi. I wanted to let you know that I have just speedily deleted this article which you just accepted at WP:AFC: P. Ragulvarma. It appears the user created the article as a hoax by copy-pasting content from this one—R. S. Munirathinam—substituting their own name instead. This isn't the first time they have done this—they were blocked previously under the username RMR2004, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RAGULVARMA PRABHU. Because of this, in my opinion the article qualified for speedy deletion per WP:G3 (blatant hoax) and WP:G5 (creation by blocked user in violation of a block, where there are no significant edits by other editors). Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, Mz7 (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Thoughts on Catholic-Hierarchy.org?Thank you for spending time on the Wojciech Radoszewski article. I saw that you removed the reference to Catholic-Hierarchy.org. Could you offer your thoughts behind that? It does appear to be a self-published source, but it also potentially meets the SME standards found in WP:RSSELF given that it is used as a source in some peer-reviewed journal articles and other edited material. The site also has mechanisms for corrections and appears to meticulously cite the sources that it uses. Perhaps the positive qualities of the site do not outweigh its self-published nature, though? Thank you. OldPolandUpdates (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Help to retain it in mainspace article. All content with relevant and reliable indipendent sources like Prabhat Khabar, Hindustan (newspaper), Dainik Bhaskar and more. Your contributions to help on this will be highly appreciated. Thanks and best regards Dbgbr (talk) 22:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Anti-Mosque campaign in IndiaI have nominated it for DYK, listing you as one of the authors, see Template:Did you know nominations/Anti-Mosque campaign in India. - Ratnahastin (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
non WP:RS referenceOn the Mark Joseph Stern You deleted one of the refs as non WP:RS reference. The full ref is: This refers to a site at UC Irvine School of Law. I do not understand why that site is considered WP:RS Also deleted was the ref: This is from the University of Richmond Law Review. Why is that site considered WP:RS? --Toploftical (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC) Toploftical (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC) References
Women in Red February 2025
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging Wikipedia articles versus Wikipedia pagesHi @Jannatulbaqi: How goes it. When your refer to the main Wikipedia component, can you refer to them as articles, not pages. Pages are what social media call them but they are not that. They are articles and that is what they are called on Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't a book. Please refer to them as such. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 08:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Hemlata Mahishwar for deletion The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemlata Mahishwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AndySailz (talk) 12:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Nomination of J. J. Roy Burman for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. J. Roy Burman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AndySailz (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Nomination of Noori Kiran for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noori Kiran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AndySailz (talk) 12:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Nomination of Sohail Khan (athlete) for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sohail Khan (athlete) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AndySailz (talk) 12:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Nomination of Sultan Shahin for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Shahin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AndySailz (talk) 12:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Nomination of Akhtar Hussain Aleemi for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhtar Hussain Aleemi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia
