This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jannatulbaqi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Hello, Youknowwhoistheman!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello Youknowwhoistheman! Your additions to Draft:Joseph Thornton Tweddle have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Kris Lumagui. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁15:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello - I wanted to touch base about this BLP you've approved a while ago. It looks like most of the sources listed aren't reliable, except for geo.tv, and na.gov.pk which, while reliable, isn't independent of the subject. So far, I don't see any issues with this BLP except usage of unreliable sources, but this WP:BE creator The White House from New Faisalabad (talk·contribs) has a history of including false information in BLPs. Therefore, please take extra care to ensure that the sources used are reliable, at the very least. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:50, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
If you see anything wrong with it, you can revert it back to draft. Otherwise, I see this BLP clearly passing WP:NPOL. That's why I approved this draft. Let me know if there's anything more, you'd like to adjust! Cheers and Happy editing. Youknow? (talk) 07:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
No one stated that the BLP does not meet NPOL. I just wanted to highlight that we generally shouldn't approve drafts if they contain GUNREL. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gangadhar Nehru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Youknowwhoistheman!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!16:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Mohammad Najeeb Qasmi
Hi @Youknowwhoistheman: I have reverted your edit on this article. Introductory part of any article is usually an article's summary, so it doesn't either need to be cited nor it makes a thing to be considered duplicated. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Aafi (talk)08:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I had created the page keeping in the mind the notability guidelines. The person in question is the President of a non-profit organization (Jagadguru Kripalu Parishat) that already has a page on Wikipedia. On her own merit, she has won several awards and accolades - all of them have been reported in mainstream media (references have been provided). As such, there are various references to her in several published pages on Wikipedia, so it is imperative to create a stand-alone page for her to inform the reader about the background and achievements of this individual.
Would appreciate if you can help me understand why you believe the page does not meet the guidelines and needs more work before publishing. Happy to discuss further. Sgrao1 (talk) 09:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Sgrao1, Thank you for your contributions! I don't think your article passes WP:GNG, but if you still think so, you can go through AFC. Cheers and Happy editing! Thanks. Youknow? (talk) 12:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I cleaned up my recent submission. I believe it should meet the proper criteria. Please let me know if this is meets the guidelines. Thank you
Joshua Cameron (born November 22, 1989) is a former Canadian boxer and entrepreneur. Born in Windsor, Ontario, Cameron later relocated to Vancouver, British Columbia, where he became known for his contributions to the fitness industry.
Thanks for your contributions to Sammy Weston. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and sources need to be correctly presented and language/grammar is dubious..
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
This was a poor afc acceptance in my view, as the sourcing needs to be completely corrected (not just links to BNA registration page), it has not categories and the level of grammar is dubious/poorly written. Notability can't reasonably be established. Bungle(talk • contribs)17:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" GA Editathon – October 2024
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
I think you may have used the wrong decline reason on Draft:Darren Gualtieri (bowls) previously. I don't think it matters now but just check and make sure (that I didn't make a mistake as well) since the prose is pretty much the same but I left a different decline reason. Reconrabbit17:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Abdur Rehman Shah Sailani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 09:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bedam Shah Warsi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Youknowwhoistheman!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
This draft which you have submitted fails WP:N as it lacks Sigcov. You may want to see the history of this draft where it was nominated for deletion by another new page patroller. Thanks. Maliner (talk) 10:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Sure, your 4th citation, "Indian Journal of Secularism: IJS : a Journal of Centre for Study of Society & Secularism. The Centre. 2006. " Which you have cited for this statement, Sailani Baba was born into a wealthy family, with his father, Kale Khan, being a businessman in Delhi is totally a fake reference for the claim you presented. Apart from this the biography which you have presented, During his childhood and early teenage years, Sailani Baba developed a keen interest in wrestling. To pursue this passion, he moved from Delhi to the Deccan region, where he trained under Noor Miyan, a well-known wrestler from Balapur. Having mastered the sport, he subsequently traveled to Hyderabad. for your claims was not at all mentioned in the book,Hindu-Muslim Syncretic Shrines and Communities by Burman. I will say the whole article is filled with failed verifications like this. You should not try to dodge the system by violating WP:V. Period. Maliner (talk) 10:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:
Multiple failed verifications as mentioned on author's talk page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdur Rehman Shah Sailani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I wanted to check again about the quality of the secondary sources, as it will largely be university/institutional news releases that will independently announce the annual award winners (alongside the Society's announcements). Would these not count as quality/reliable/independent secondary sources? I have also attempted to identify other independent sources, such as the British Educational Research Association, as well as from Senedd Cymru, the Welsh Parliament (national legislature).
This is an award from the national academy for Wales (see Learned Society of Wales) and the award is named after a famous educator in Wales (Sir Hugh Owen), so feel this should easily address notability for the top national educational research award.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Heavy case of WP:REFBOMB. Remember that just because their sons are notable doesn't mean their father also inherits notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gangadhar Nehru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I hope you are well. I noticed that my AFC submission for the stub draft on Draft:Shehzad Poonawalla was declined, and I would greatly appreciate your guidance on where I specifically need to improve.
I believe the topic is notable, but I am struggling with sourcing it properly. Could you please point out what aspects require more work in Detail? Additionally, if you have the time, I would be grateful for any help you could provide in finding suitable sources or by doing some edits yourself, as I’m still new to this process. I am continuously learning about Wikipedia editing and the AFC process.
Regards, AstuteFlicker (talk) 18:01, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
please help me
The register I wrote has reliable sources but few. Review it again.This is my first registration to submit please don't block it.Please re-review the 5th source, the rest of the sources are also free, but the sources are coming from the web of the establishment company itself, so it is so difficult. No source given there is from a personal site. And whether it is a news site or a company, each one is an organization Madian.980087 (talk) 15:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hello Jannatulbaqi! The thread you created at the Teahouse, General questions!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.
When adding tags that are opinion, such as {{POV}} or {{Unreliable sources}}, you are required to explain them on the talk page of the article. Otherwise they may be removed. As the notes say for the POV tag, "Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag should discuss concerns on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies. In the absence of such a discussion, or where it remains unclear what the NPOV violation is, the tag may be removed by any editor." Thanks, Black Kite (talk)13:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, I will keep this in mind for the future. However, I have noticed that many senior editors also tag articles this way, even though they don't provide any explanation on the article's talk page. Jannatulbaqi (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
As per the Wikipedia guidelines, holders of endowed chairs (as is the case here) qualify for notability:
The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a named chair appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.
Hi,
I am writing about my article on Julius Kaplan. The reviewer made the point that he has not been written about by independent sources. In the footnotes I provide, his work is mentioned and it is very important for the field. It is true that none of them discuss his biography. However, the biographical information in which in which I use comes directly from his PhD dissertation from 1932. Given that it is a supervised dissertation accepted by a major US institution, is that not considered a good enough source? I recognize that the person himself has not been discussed a lot, but given the impact of his work I believe the little information that can be gleaned about from his own biography is worthy of a wikipedia page.
Hi @Iaroszler1, Thank you for your contributions! But I don’t believe your article meets Wikipedia’s general notability criteria (WP:GNG). However, if you still think it qualifies, please feel free to resubmit it for review by another editor. Thank you! Baqi:) (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Welcome, welcome, welcome Jannatulbaqi! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
There are three sources cited that provide in-depth coverage of the subject. However, I am not familiar with these sources, so I am leaving this article for a future reviewe, here are the sources, MaktoobMedia, ThePolisProject, and OfTheCitizens
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
The article is unsourced for more than ten years!!! The main activity of the person the last ten years is politics. I preferred to remove the undocumented content of a now past activity and add current developments. Because I don't want to start an edit war, either explain in detail how and where I am violating the policy or reinstate my version. Thank you. 188.4.122.247 (talk) 18:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Request for Clarification on Reference Compliance
Thank you for your feedback on the Gamezop article.. As a beginner, I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines but navigating the criteria for independent and reliable sources has been challenging. I have updated several references to better align with the guidelines. However, I am still uncertain about the following links and would appreciate your guidance:
If these do not meet Wikipedia’s standards, I will remove them. Additionally, if there are any other specific references that don't comply, could you kindly list them for me? Knowing exactly which references to address will help me ensure the article meets the notability criteria.
Gangadhar Nehru, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Please do not abuse AFC by accepting the self-written articles, which were earlier challenged for notability and other concerns. This is a dodging of the system and may revoke your AFC helper script. If your self-written articles were challenged by someone, then please allow the independent reviewer to assess whether they should fit for Wikipedia or not. Maliner (talk) 15:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
You are far more experienced than I am, and I deeply respect you. Your contributions to Wikipedia are truly commendable, and I hold them in the highest regard. Regarding the draft article I submitted and got accepted, I had sought guidance on it from the Teahouse a while ago, which you can review here. I assure you; I am not trying to mislead anyone. Everything I have done is fully in line with Wikipedia’s policies. Best Regards! Baqi:) (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
You are getting destroyed by your own words and actions. I thought you will be disciplined this time but I was wrong. Maliner (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
I apologize and acknowledge my mistake. I have returned the article to draft for further improvement. Once again, I sincerely apologize. Baqi:) (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
To be honest, I never want you to get blocked, which is why I didn't take an interest in your matters. I personally don't report suspected sockpuppets if they are changed or working in good faith, and I assume checkusers also do not block such users easily. But this is my third time that I have to come to your talk page to warn you regarding dodging the system. I have emailed Josh. If he allows me to take the report back, I will do it. But please be disciplined and follow the policy. Maliner (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't aware that I cannot accept a draft I created myself. Otherwise, I would never have done that. My intentions were never to deceive in any way. Several months ago, I had asked a question about this on the Teahouse, which led me to accept this draft. I truly appreciate your understanding. Going forward, I will be more mindful of this. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Abdur Rehman Shah Sailani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 15:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your contribution. With due respect, if you believe this article is not ready for the mainspace, you are welcome to nominate it for AfD (Articles for Deletion). Thank you, Cheers and Happy editing!!! Baqi:) (talk) 15:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
It is not about accepting a draft yourself, but it is about something disrespectful to the New Page patroller when you revert their draftification without going through AFC. And this is the case you did here. Earlier I politely told you that your content for the Sailabi Baba draft is not backed up by WP:RS. You should have listened to that. I will revert my report before anybody comments on it. Happy editing! Maliner (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
I acknowledge my mistake and assure you that I will take special care to avoid such errors in the future. I regret my inappropriate behavior and sincerely thank you for your understanding. I am also gradually reading through Wikipedia's policies to better familiarize myself with them. Baqi:) (talk) 06:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dcotos was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Deen Dayal Bairwa instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deen Dayal Bairwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Jannatulbaqi!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dcotos (talk) 16:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
