User talk:Jack Bethune

This user may have left Wikipedia. Jack Bethune has not edited Wikipedia since 6 March 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Before registering under my own name, I have submitted Wikipedia comments or contributions with these User designations: 68.56.98.132 and 71.228.87.147 Jack Bethune 15:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Jack, thanks for the tidy up efforts on my British sword articles.My apologies that they needed it! Epeeist smudge 12:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Epeeist, glad to be of help. Your work is outstanding. Am new to Wikipedia writing/editing, so I apologize to all for my clumsiness in making contributions. Jack Bethune 03:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words and assistance. Epeeist smudge 15:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jack, more thanks for your work on the Model 1832. I contributed the article as a wikipedia experiment, knowing little about the weapon, digging up some info, and hoping someone would take interest. It was gratifying to see someone fill in the gaps and flesh it out. Thanks for your contribution. Rob Mallott 7 July 2006.

Rob, those who study and collect American swords are grateful to you for taking the lead in describing this historical sword, and I'm glad you think my additions were helpful. I have offered a partial list of American swords that could use similar coverage. Perhaps other Wikipedians will be inspired by your efforts and join in. I certainly hope so. Thank you for your contributions to this important historical topic. Jack Bethune 06:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines outline some things to include.
• Interested in working on a more complete article? The military history peer review and collaboration departments would welcome your help!
• Interested in a particular area of military history? We have a number of task forces that focus on specific nations or periods.
• Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every military history article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 11:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006

The June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 05:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - July 2006

The July 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Coordinator Elections!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 11!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 18:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits

Thanks for your edits to M6 Bayonet. Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. If you do anything to change the wording of an article, it's generally not considered a minor edit. Anyway, good edits all around, thanks again, and happy Wikiing! Kafziel 13:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kafziel, thanks for the tips on editing protocol, and for your kind comments. Both were appreciated. Jack Bethune 13:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sanuel Lancaster Gerry

You added a link to my entry on White Mountain art that mentioned that Gerry was well known for his paintings of the Old Man of the Mountain. Although Gerry did paint the Old Man, he's not the artist that comes to mind when I think of Old Man paintings. Both George McConnell and Edward Hill (in particular) were known for their paintings of the Old Man. Is there some reason that you chose Gerry for this link? Thanks for your response on my talk page. JJ 11:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, Gerry did paint the Old Man, but not a frequently as Edward Hill. I'll leave the link stand. Can you give me a URL to the Smithsonian painting by Gerry? I found nothing in their art inventory or on their Website. Please note that I am curating a show that opens this Saturday at the Museum of NH History. We have a Gerry of The Old Man that's 61 x 48 inches. I very interested if her ever painted a larger image of The Old Man. Thanks. JJ 14:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Willard

Hi, dear wikipedian. I have done some expansion in the Simon Willard article. I would like that you may tell me your opinion. Anytime. --AndresArce 20:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)AndresArce[reply]

Hi, dear Wikipedian. I have been doing some informs which were about Simon Willard. I would appreciate that you may tell me your opinion.

• Simon Willard's Tall Clocks
• Simon Willard's Banjo Clocks
• Simon Willard's Shelf Clocks

Actually, one last article is left and all my inform will be complete. It will take about two days. --AndresArce 20:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)AndresArce[reply]

Willard Brothers

Hi, dear Wikipedian. I have written a new article which is about Willard Brothers & whose function would be progressively to shorten other articles which are also about that family. Please, tell me your opinion. Anytime.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Adrian

Frankly, I don't like left-aligned photos since they obscure the flow of text, and especially so on my layout (I use thumbs at 300px), but perhaps it's a matter of personal preference. But as I said, large pic to the left of the lead is a big no-no. //Halibutt 13:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Halibutt, thanks for correcting the placement problem per WP policy. When it comes to layout, a rule of thumb is it's always preferable to have a photo with strong directionality (like the main photo here) to face INTO the text. In this case, that would argue for a left-aligned position. Have proposed new placement but will leave the final decision up to you. Once again, nice work on this article. Jack Bethune 13:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charles-Honoré Lannuier article

Thanks very much for cleaning up and polishing the Lannuier article. And particularly for fixing my embarassing spelling error: gild v guild! Thanks again. Jim CApitol3 15:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, I was so delighted to find your article on this renowned cabinetmaker that I wanted to compliment you on your fine addition to Wikipedia. Thank you for your kind words, too, and please contribute more such articles on American cabinetmakers when you find time. They are much needed and appreciated. With best wishes. Jack Bethune 17:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Gorgets in British Service

Thanks for clarifying the reason for the suggested change to the article on gorgets. I hadn't realised that Royal Navy officers wore them during the 18th century. The practice appears to have ceased by the Napoleonic Wars as far as the Navy was concerned - although Royal Marine officers still wore a modified version of the pre-1796 Army model engraved with the Royal Arms over a shield bearing an anchor over a laurel spray. Regards Buistr 07:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buistr, thank you for your thoughtful note. You might still be right about the same Royal cypher design being used on both military and naval 18th C. gorgets, so I withdrew my edit in case my memory is failing. Will check further and respond if I find some published evidence to validate my initial impression. In any case, your recent additions to this WP subject are both substantial and valuable. Please accept a vote of thanks for your very fine contributions. Best wishes Jack Bethune 11:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

What is your interest in 19th century art? Also, are you a collector? I am very disappointed that, after all these years, we have been unable to locate a photo of Samuel Lancaster Gerry. Have you ever run across one? Thanks for your kind words about my contributions. JJ 20:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia, award, decoration

Thanx for the comments on my user page. I changed several usages of "decoration" to "insignia" as a compromise, using "insignia" in the generic sense after seeing debate on the discussion page for Air Force awards and badges. "Decoration" is definitely wrong--the Air Force makes a total distinction between them (in fact the governing AFI, 36-2903 devotes separate chapters to the wearing of each). However I saw in that same AFI that insignia usually refers to "US" insignia and insignia of rank, so I have no problem with calling it a "military award" (there's also "device" but that has special meaning too, to different services and different nations). I confess what expertise I have is USAF only. If you have my changes noted, feel free to change them to "military award" and I will change those I come across. All I can say for sure is that in USAF parlance, decorations and badges are different.--Buckboard 17:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Landscape art link to photography

I see that you deleted the link to 'landscape photography' under 'see also' in the 'landscape art' article. I think that the link certainly belongs in the 'see also' section as a closely related subject, a common reason for a 'see also' link in any article. I understand why we need a separate article for landscape art as opposed to landscape photography. But I do not understand your zealousnous in imposing an absolute quarantine between the two subjects, even in a 'see also' section. There certainly IS a strong relationship between the two. Ever since the invention of photography, the two fields have influenced and informed each other. Please allow me to put the link back in the 'see also' section. MdArtLover 13:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MarylandArtLover, I certainly agree that a link to landscape photography is appropriate on this page, and I fully endorse its present placement at the very top of the page. Having an identical or duplicate link at the bottom of the page, under "See also," would be once too many times for any Wikipedia subject, don't you agree? That is the only reason why I removed the redundant link at the bottom of the page. If you prefer to eliminate the top-placed link and have the entry only under "See also," that would be equally fine by me. Thanks for your consideration in discussing this minor issue. More important, thanks for your invaluable and significant contributions to Wikipedia on a wide range of art-related subjects. Your work is quite impressive. With highest regards, Jack Bethune 18:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I thought it appropriate to add to the 'see also' section, even though the redirect is at the top, for a somewhat subtle reason - maybe even a questionable one.

My thinking is as follows: the redirect link to 'landscape photography' comes off as a little bit too brusque and absolute - like saying "go away, you're in the wrong place, because photography isn't an art at all!". Putting the 'landscape photography' link in the 'see also' section softens the dismissive implication of the redirect. I mean, landscape photographs certainly CAN be art, according to people with authority in these matters -- or does somebody need to explain to the Metropolitan Museum of Art that their Ansel Adams collection doesn't belong there? On the other hand, I wouldn't want to do away with the redirect, since that's useful for people who come to the 'landscape art' page primarily interested in landscape photography. So my question is this: do these considerations outweigh the dedundancy issue here?

Another solution: perhaps we could add a small section on landscape photography, and then put a 'see main article, landscape photography' over that?

(By the way, thank you for the compliment. I have worked really hard!)MdArtLover 19:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your initial assessment, that having the redirect at the top is probably less useful or helpful than placing it under "See also." The redirect at the top implies that some readers seeking a tangential subject like landscape photography would mistakenly arrive at the page on landscape art by mistake. I don't think that is either logicial or likely. So, I'd agree with you to eliminate the top-placed redirect and move the link to landscape photography under "See also," where it would be more visible, more pertinent, and therefore more helpful to WP readers. Others might have opinions worth sharing on this subject, but you have my vote to make these changes if you still agree. Jack Bethune 20:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still think it belongs both at the top and in the 'See also', but I can live with it as is. When I have time, perhaps I will attempt the last solution I listed, which I think is best - but of course, it involves some work. MdArtLover 06:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion, please

See me discussion entry re Hudson River school artists. Thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hudson_River_school#List_of_artists_.28again.29 JJ 13:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jack, we still have the issue of Martin who remains in the list. I believe that American Paradise states that Martin was "the last and greatest" of the movement. We must treat Inness and Martin as both in, or both out. Comments? JJ 13:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grosses messer

Hello, I was looking over some of my old edits and I happened upon this article where you actually accused me of spamming. I must say that in doing do you not only made a clear violation of WP:AGF, but also made a rather erroneous statement. I have no affiliation to the site and only discovered it after googling "Grosses messer" in a search for a picture of the weapon. I was unsure about the legal status of the photo so I added the whole link. I suggest next time you accuse someone of anything you make sure that you have some idea of what you are talking about first.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 08:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your intentions were admirable, I'm sure, but linking to a purely commercial website is simple link spamming, something discouraged by WP:EL policy, whether done for personal gain or not. I suggest next time you add an external link and complain about a revert that you have some idea of WP standards and guidelines first. Jack Bethune 13:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn the difference between a guideline and a policy, it was the only picture of the weapon available and thus gives an adaquate reason not to follow it.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 23:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite WP policy language that gives you or anyone else the authority to overlook WP policy on avoiding linkage to commercial websites. Thanks, Jack Bethune 23:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I sorry but you are confusing a policy with a guideline. Please look them up, a policy must never be broken, a guideline should generally be followed unless there is good reason not to, which in this case there is since a picture of the weapon would be helpful to the article. If you so desire you should contact and administrator and ask them if what I am saying is correct.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 23:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greek Revival architecture

Thank you for your kind words! There are a couple of things I'm unhappy about my own article; i) The introduction is a little too waffly to satisfy as a definition ii) I think I've done the French an injustice - I have to admit I know very little about the movement there, and iii) I think I'm right vis a vis polychromy and rationalism, but I'd like a second opinion on that. If you can encourage others to take an interest in the article I think we can build a potential featured article there! Many thanks for your edits too. Twospoonfuls 19:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WASP Edit War

Thanks for putting in your "2 cents" for the WASP page. Much appreciated. -Signaleer 19:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jack, before identifying yourself with Signaleer too closely, you might want to refer to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Signaleer_--_disruptive_editing_and_sockpuppetry. The point with the WASP page isn't that the women aren't notable, it's that it is Signaleer's responsibility to document that notability with either articles or citations, which he steadfastly refuses to do. Remember, it is Wikipedia's policy (at WP:V, not just a guideline) that it is the adding editor's reponsibility to do this, so for you to say that I could Google their names is missing the point. There are well over 1,000 WASP pilots, and we don't need to add them all. What makes these special? Who knows unless the addditions are cited. Akradecki 20:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The users Akradecki and Tom Herbert have removed the names again. Please refer to the discussion page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Women_Airforce_Service_Pilots
-Signaleer 23:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user Akradecki has also made threats and attempted to slander my name on Wikipedia. -Signaleer 23:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mameluke Deletion

I suspected you would pick up on the strange rant about USMC recruiting advers on the Mameluke Sword page.

I'm finding some time to write a bit aagin and will be doing a few more British sword articles. I'd appreciate it if you can proof read them when I post as your contributions to my earlier articles have been invaluable. Epeeist smudge 11:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Epeeist, thanks for your very kind comment. I'd welcome the opportunity to contribute to your excellent sword articles in Wikipedia. Jack Bethune 12:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 03:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cavalry saber

I saw your comments on this article's talk page. It appears you have some knowledge on cavalry saber, perhaps you should try rewriting the article, as you suggested. Naufana : talk 05:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Wandalstouring 08:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Proof Read Request 1897 Pattern British Infantry Officer's Sword

Jack, I've finally got around to posting another British Sword article. Your review would be appreciated. Thanks Epeeist smudge 17:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Epeeist, thanks for your outstanding new contribution to WP articles on swords. I would be honored to help make any possible improvements. Best regards, Jack Bethune 18:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may notice I managed to get the article included as a "did you know". Thanks, as ever,for your help. Epeeist smudge 16:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

M1913 Cavalry Saber

Jack, I noticed there is now an article on the Patton saber. It wasn't great so I've tried to make some improvements without completely removeing previous editors efforts. You know the subject better than me and it would benefit from your attention. Grant aka Epeeist smudge 16:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Epeeist, thanks for the heads up and your additions, which have been an improvement. Will take a crack at expanding the article when I can. Best regards, Jack Bethune 01:22, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 01:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter — Issue XXII (December 2007)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news The Intelligence task force has been created. The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries. Help with converting deprecated infoboxes is needed; any assistance is welcome! {{WPMILHIST}} now supports an explicit tag (class=DAB) for marking disambiguation pages.	Articles of note New featured articles: Battle of Albuera Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081) Battle of the Gebora Constantine II of Scotland Francis Harvey Vasa (ship) Wulfhere of Mercia New A-Class articles: 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions A discussion about minimizing terminological ambiguity has begun.
Awards and honors Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles. Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic. For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007 Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows: 1. Bedford — 7,600 2. TomStar81 — 5,500 3. Parsival74 — 5,200 4. FayssalF — 3,500 5. Roger Davies — 3,000 6. Ouro — 2600 7. Kateshortforbob — 2250 8. Cromdog — 2,200 9. BrokenSphere — 2000 9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000 9. Maralia — 2,000 12. MBK004 — 1,340 13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250 14. Sniperz11 — 1100 15. Burzmali — 1000 15. Cplakidas — 1000 15. Gimme danger — 1000 15. Raoulduke471000 15. TicketMan — 1000 15. Welsh — 1000 15. Blnguyen — 1000 Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Weir

As I said on the Hudson River School Talk Page, I don't feel Robert Weir should be included in the "selected" list of artists. Do we delete his name or let it stand? JJ (talk) 21:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Weir

I deleted him from the selected list of HR school artists. You can read my brief comment on the Talk page. If he gets put back, what do you suggest that we do? JJ (talk) 23:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not worth warring over this any more. Do you agree? JJ (talk) 12:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It's time to get on with our lives. Thanks for fighting the good fight! JJ (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 23:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Weir

Don't the references on his name add insult to injury on his inclusion in the list of "selected" Hudson River artists? Is there a policy of "inappropriate" footnoting? JJ (talk) 01:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

White Mountain Art

Jack, thanks for your comments re Weir. Please note that I have created a list of "representative" White Mountain artists. I know this subject well, and I chose the term "representative" so that many different styles are covered by my list. It will be interesting to see if I need to defend my choices. What do you think? Is "representative" too squishy? I could use "selected," but there is no body of literature to help in defining who are the true "selected" ones. Any guidance you can give me will be appreciated. JJ (talk) 23:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, in the case of 19th century painters who painted in the White Mountains, over 400 artists have been documented. So, the number is daunting for a complete list. I refer readers to White Mountain Art & Artists for such a list. JJ (talk) 23:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PPS. The heading re HRS of "Artists working in the Hudson River School style is completely open-ended. What if I tired to reason with the man and suggested "Representative artists" for the heading? We actually need a word that means "truly accepted" or "prominent" or "real HRS guys." I don't feel we should throw up our hands on this. The article could never reach GA status with all the controversy. Or, as you said before, should we get on with our lives? JJ (talk) 23:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

White Mountain art

Jack, I nominated White Mountain art for Good Article status. Would you consider a critical review? I would actually like it to be a Featured Article, but I thought I'd go for GA first. JJ (talk) 18:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

I very much appreciate your review. I believe I have made all the changes you have suggested. Please take a quick look and let me know if I have missed anything. I would like your opinion on the following. In articles related to art, the first reference to an artist is followed by his birth-death dates, e.g. Benjamin Champney (1817-1907). In the list of Notable artists, some are mentioned for the first time. Should I put in their birth-death dates there? Should I put birth-death dates for all of them there? Also, what is the proper why for wikilinking when a name is used as a caption to a photo? For example, the first reference to Thomas Hill is in a photo caption. I have wiki-liked his name there and also in his first mention in the article. What's proper? Thanks again. You have been very helpful to me. JJ (talk) 12:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WM art GA

Jack. I'm really discouraged. You have made comments that refute, for good reasons, many of Moni3's comments. Yet, I'm to work through him to get GA restored. Can you give me advice? If I agree with you and disagree with him, he seems to have the power to just sweep away the GA status. In some ways, it discourages someone like me from using his time in support of this wiki project. I'm trying not to be defensive, but, for example, why should I eliminate references to WhiteMountainArt.com when it's the definitive (IMO) resource on this subject on the Web? Please give me advice, since Moni3 is now my primary reviewer. Thanks. JJ (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have chilled a bit. See my edits to the article. And, see my responses to the review on the article's talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:White_Mountain_art#GA_review:_evaluation_and_responses. JJ (talk) 01:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WM References

Are fine. I just changed one for Consuming Views. You have been very helpful. It looks like I might have to "cave" to get the GA reinstated. I'll be back in NH this weekend, and I'll decide where to draw the line in the sand. Stay tuned. JJ (talk) 19:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack, I believe that both the Historical NH and hard cover books are identical except the book has an index. I will confirm this when I return to NH this weekend. Where do you live? Did you see Consuming Views? You have been very supportive, and I thank you for this. I'm plugging away on the article. I still hope for FA, but, with all the GA controversy, it must be near to impossible. JJ (talk) 21:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack: I checked the hardcover and Historical NH of Consuming Views. They are identical except for the very last page (which is not numbered). In the hardcover, it's an index to Featured Artists. In the Historical, it's a listing of the Board and Business partners of NHHS. So, all page references that I give can be checked against your hardcover copy. Thanks! JJ (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good articles newsletter

Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 01:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps invitation

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thakinthakin

Jack, thanks for restoring the WhiteMountainArt.com link to the article on White Mountain art. I don't know what Thakinthakin's agenda is, but he pushes links to the Boston Art Club. And, he erroneously states that WhiteMountainArt.com is commercial in nature. Sorry, I made the preceding edit. JJ (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

His agenda is the Boston Art Club. He wrote the article on the club. And, it does have a commercial purpose. I don't know who he is, but that seems his entire agenda. JJ (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:20, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members	Editorial LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:09, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced; Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy	Editorial Opportunities for new military history articles
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants	Editorial In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 19:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)	Editorial In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:56, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 03:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:17, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 20:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 23:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 00:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 09:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]