User talk:JIP/Archive 37

Orphaned non-free image File:Metro Cross Screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metro Cross Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Road Wars (toyline)

The article Road Wars (toyline) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Products_and_services requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Given the near total lack of references (outside fan page), there is no content to merge and anyway there is no valid merge/redirect target I see. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk response

Referring to this question, You said, "Physical references such as books and newspapers don't expire". If only that were true. There may very well be a few cases where the last known copy of something has disappeared. I discovered too late to do anything about it that certain sections of a newspaper weren't microfilmed. And, yes, I used articles from those sections as sources because I printed out the online version, but if anyone ever investigates they can claim something like Photoshop.

And to my knowledge my printout and copies I sent people who could preserve them are the only known copies. I found a site that had most of the other articles of that type -- and they deleted them! Said the man wasn't a staff writer for the newspaper. Never mind that they still have about 30 of his articles.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Operations of KFC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Operations of KFC. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – KFC. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at KFC. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Shirt58 (talk) 11:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Operations of KFC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Operations of KFC. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – KFC. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at KFC. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Shirt58 (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting myself

Thank you for your comment on my supporting my request to move Konigsburg. I had thought that it was appropriate for me to support my own proposal, to make it easy to count those pro and contra. Is this something one should not do? Best wishes,♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ^♥ Talk ♥

You're more than welcome to add comments to your own move discussion and to reply to comments left by others. My point was that you do not need to write "Support." in a comment in your own move discussion. People already know you're supporting the move, otherwise you would not have proposed it. JIP | Talk 17:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bra sausage barnstar banter

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Hey man, I got cracked up by the women's underwear comment on the Bra sausage page I wrote, wanted to thank you as well for the edits. much love big man Spaicol (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. JIP | Talk 10:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Creating List of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement officers in the United States

Hello, JIP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Creating List of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement officers in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Keihäsmatkat

On 7 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Keihäsmatkat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that tourists on holiday trips arranged by the Finland travel agency Keihäsmatkat were encouraged to drink alcoholic beverages, partly to avoid culture shock? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Keihäsmatkat. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Keihäsmatkat), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ilmari Laukkonen

Hi, further to our conversation on the help desk I have found a pdf of a 2012 issue of Sotaveteraani • Krigsveteranen at https://sotaveteraani.fi/lehdet/SV%206_2012.pdf. On page 29 it says (via Google translate) "Ilmari Laukkonen, a TK man who wrote a relevant article for Korven Kaiku magazine on 23 October 1942. He was the editor-in-chief of Vaasa magazine from 1951 to 1980. Ilmari Laukkonen was born on 6 January 1915 and still lives in Vaasa and is well". This confirms that the editor Ilmari Laukkonen was previously a TK man. TSventon (talk) 11:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, then the question of the image's copyright status is complicated, as Ilmari Laukkonen has only been dead for 8 years, not 70 (as required for the image to fall into the public domain). JIP | Talk 12:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could investigate Finnish copyright law, see for example the licensing rationale for commons:File:An_immobilized_Red_Army_IS-2_tank_in_Tammisuo.jpg. TSventon (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The licence information on that page says: This photograph is in the public domain in Finland, because either a period of 50 years has elapsed from the year of creation or the photograph was first published before 1966. The photograph of Arnold Majewski is certainly over 50 years old. It was taken on 10 October 1942, almost 79 years ago. And according to Sotaveteraanit magazine, it is also in the SA-arkisto archives. JIP | Talk 12:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to suggest Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, but you got there first. TSventon (talk) 13:16, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Creating List of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement officers in the United States

Hello, JIP. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Creating List of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement officers in the United States".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 20:19, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Siberian Finnish

Hi, the article which mentions Zlobina and Nirvi is here. DuncanHill (talk) 21:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ingrian Finnish

Couldn't find the thank button, so I thought I'll drop it off personally! Thank you for the fix, I'm not very good at Finnish, but letting the example stay without translation seemed to defeat the purpose, so I did my best... Thanks for fixing it! Thadh (talk) 20:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Marie Wilks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Worcester and Tewksbury.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mev Dinc (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by IceWelder were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mev Dinc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mev Dinc, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

IceWelder [✉] 18:10, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JIP! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! IceWelder [✉] 18:10, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have fixed the article and I believe its ready to review. I think its on its way pending a review but I would appreciate if you can have a second look and advise if I can improve it, thank you. Rainbouw19 (talk) 18:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I ended up here by accident. Thanks for the tips. Should I remove this entire section(clutter)? Or is this something expected from the owner of this page (you) to prune on their good time? Thanks

DYK for Plevna, Tampere

On 11 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Plevna, Tampere, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Plevna in Tampere, Finland, was the first building in the Nordic countries and the Russian Empire (of which Finland was part at the time) to be lit by electric lights? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Plevna, Tampere. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Plevna, Tampere), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lauttasaari water tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lehtisaari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Savoy (restaurant)

Hello JIP,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Savoy (restaurant) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Savoy (restaurant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Savoy (restaurant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savoy (restaurant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ventoura (marketplace) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ventoura (marketplace) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ventoura (marketplace) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Elli (talk | contribs) 07:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of CSD tag from Savoy (restaurant)

Hi JIP - I happened to stumble upon Savoy (restaurant), an article you created a few days ago. When browsing the history, I noticed that Mikehawk10 tagged the article as a G11, which you then later removed. This is contrary to policy, as "the creator of a page may not remove the deletion tag from it". Could you please explain why you did?

Unrelated, on coming here to leave you this message, I took a look at Ventoura (marketplace) and have deleted it. I do not expect an editor of 16 years to publish something so blatantly promotional and unsourced. I'm now going to review your other contributions. ~TNT (she/her • talk) 07:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A quick glance through your creations shows another CSD removal from an article you've created, and a fair few unsourced mainspace creations (e.g. Brainstorm (board game)). I'm sure there's a good explanation that I'm just not seeing, and I'd be pretty keen to hear it. As administrators, we must try to hold ourselves to higher standards. ~TNT (she/her • talk) 07:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Savoy (restaurant) is one of the most notable restaurants in Helsinki and has had a Finnish article for years. I failed to understand how my article was promotional. The deletion discussion did not receive any delete votes and was withdrawn. Ventoura (marketplace) was split off from Ventoura which had become a Frankenstein article, claiming Ventoura was two different, unconnected things simultaneously. I created Operations of KFC after seeing the "Operations" section of KFC took up the vast majority of the article, so I split it off to a separate article. Someone put the article up for speedy deletion in the middle of this, before I had had the time to remove the duplicated material from the main article KFC. JIP | Talk 13:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DoubleDuck

The article DoubleDuck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Haukilahti water tower

On 19 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Haukilahti water tower, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Haukilahti water tower (pictured) has a water container inspired by The Jetsons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Haukilahti water tower. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Haukilahti water tower), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DoubleDuck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DoubleDuck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoubleDuck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Free (gratis) beer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Free (gratis) beer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free (gratis) beer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minttu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chili.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Split revisit

Hi, JIP, posting here in case you dont see pings as readily as Talk page updates. Please see Draft talk:Dinobot (Beast Wars)#Split revisit if you have a second. Thanks! -2pou (talk) 19:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minttu nomination

Hello,

Your nomination lacks one citation before it can be approved. As soon as that is supplied, it will be eligible for DYK. Interesting article.Georgejdorner (talk) 00:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "lacks one citation"? JIP | Talk 01:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see, there is a "citation needed" tag for the Minttu product line. I found this page at Pernod Ricard's official site for Minttu, displaying the current product line. I can add this to the article. JIP | Talk 03:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. It's all that is needed for the nom to pass.Georgejdorner (talk) 23:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! The nom is GTG.Georgejdorner (talk) 01:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]