Our objective is to help the children and adolescents in their growth to honest, responsible, cooperative and inquisitive individuals appreciating the diversity of skills and environments. We want to provide each pupil with strong basic skills and knowledge, prepare them for future studies and support the development of their social skills and healthy self-esteem.
RESSU MISSION STATEMENT
Respects everyone’s right to good and efficient learning
Gives everybody the opportunity to contribute to common issues
Respects everyone’s human dignity
Respects each person’s cultural background and does not tolerate violence, discrimination or racism of any kind
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Didcap, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. --Jtalledo(talk)07:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As a former member and leader of this organization's page, I would like to respectfully request that this page be undeleted so that I may veiw and update its content.
71.185.28.19220:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As this was a prod deletion, it should be automatically undeleted upon request. I've done so, as you should have done instead of opening the deletion review. If you believe we are better off without the article, please feel free to nominate for AFD. GRBerry21:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I did not know PROD deletions should be automatically undeleted upon request. I have no wish to further propose the deletion of this article. JIP | Talk21:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re:USS Thagard NCC-652
With regards to this article being linked from a list, I don't recall doing this, but the logs say otherwise. Please proceed as you see best. Likely, I was doing bottom level maintaince at the time I did this. The error is what it is. I have no further comment or interest in this matter. Thanks for your time and consideration. meatclerk04:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Marquis Jet Article
This is regarding the Marquis Jet article that was deleted on September the 17th. I am still unsure of the reason why the page was taken completely down. Could you please inform me as to why the page was deleted and on how to rewrite it in order for it be appropriate for Wikipedia. Please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you very much.
I have still not received a response on the reasoning for the deletion of the Marquis Jet page. I would like to have this article to be reconsidered and put back up. Please let me know what the reason was that you deleted it and what can be done to put it back up. Thanks. -- Arazara13:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was mostly routine PROD clean-up. The article looked to provide too little outside references. I will put it up on deletion review so it can have a chance to be put back up. JIP | Talk15:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. How and when will I know what the outcome will be? [[[User:Arazara|Arazara]] 16:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi JIP. I'm an admin and was looking at Marquis Jet DRV. There doesn't seem to be a reason to hold it open much longer since blatant advertising really doesn't seem to apply to the article. Advertising, yes, but not so blatant as to require speedy deletion. Also, I did a search and there is a ton of reliable source material on Marquis Jet. You can overturn your own decision, which I recommend. There seems to be no reason to leave your good name at DRV for seven days for the rabble to rouse against. Best. -- Jreferee t/c00:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Transformers episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.CSDWarnBot00:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Question regarding subpages
I have a question. I know here on wikipedia we are not to create "in-universe" and detailed biographies of characters, on the actual article, such as, say, Vito Corleone. I was wondering if I am allowed to create an extensive, in-universe biography on a user subpage? --Victor(talk)07:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I'm interested in knowing what the content of the Encounter (Psychology) page was before it was deleted. Is there a way you could post it to my talk page? The concept is important and I'm considering making a contribution about it. Thanks Whitespace (talk) 01:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've reviewed the material and, given that it addresses a concept considered important by Carl Rogers, R D Laing and Jerzy Grotowski, I think it is worth restoring the article. I'm sure references and citations could be found in due course. What do you think? Was there a discussion held over it's deletion? Whitespace (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you discuss this with me here? I'd rather resolve this with you personally than invoke a deletion review. If I don't hear from you after a week, I'll assume you're not interested and are okay with the article being restored. Thanks. Whitespace02:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robin Lefler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Robin Lefler. Ejfetters08:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi JIP, the translation of the featured German article de:BDSM has now been online for a few weeks. I remember you giving info on dresscodes in Finland somewhere, so maybe you are interested. Further references might be usefull, please feel free to add. ;-) Regards.--Nemissimo15:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, one thing I forgot... of course your opinions are highly welcome on the talk page were at the moment a general discussion on varios aspects is taking place. ;-) Kind regards.--Nemissimo (talk) 14:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
M-Learning
Hi JIP, I'm currently trying to clean up and improve the page on M-learning. There are re-appearing commercial links, as well as a rather shambolic article, but I'm going to go to work and get this page looking good over the hols. :)
I have a question, though. One of the links to a commercial site (in the "Sources" section of the article) currently links to an academic "paper" - but this paper is, partially, a case study of a particular commercial product. It kinda falls into a grey area as some of the information in the paper might be useful, but it has a slight commercial orientation. Should I remove this link or leave it in? There are plenty of (better) papers without commercial bias that could be included in the "sources" section. But if I remove it, I'll bet that the commercial organisation behind this link (and the other commercial links) will try to find another way to get their link in there!
I'd appreciate your experience and expertise on this delicate issue...
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. h i ss p a c er e s e a r c h23:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
