User talk:JGabbard/Archive 1
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
Kukini 05:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Image copyright problem with Image:Home bottom-right.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Home bottom-right.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 22:28, 30 May 2006 (UTC) License tagging for Image:Locker2f.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Locker2f.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images. For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Eric CarmenYou have created both Category:Hit songs written by Eric Carmen and Category:Songs written by Eric Carmen. I have nominated the former for deletion on the grounds of the weasel word "hit" and completed the later category. --Richhoncho (talk) 08:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC) OK that's fine. -- But that is not to say, however, that all songs may rightly be referred to as "hits." While certain songs may be immensely popular yet having never been released as charting singles, most other songs are merely album tracks. Hello. You have a new message at Talk:Planned_Parenthood#Discussion's talk page. License tagging for File:Empirelogo.jpgThanks for uploading File:Empirelogo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Empire logo.png.jpgA tag has been placed on File:Empire logo.png.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ( Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC) PP articlePlease see comments in PP article Talk page. Thanks. --Noleander (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC) 1RR violation at Planned ParenthoodYou've violated the 1-revert restriction at Planned Parenthood ([1], [2]). So has Noleander (talk · contribs). I'm not going to report either of you at this point, since it would probably just result in the article being protected and end up stalling any chance of improving it for another week. But would the two of you please knock it off? In particular, you're reinserting material that you know doesn't have any support on the talk page. MastCell Talk 23:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
September 2011Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Planned Parenthood, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC) My editing, including the recent one cited, is never intended to be disruptive, nor does it include original research. I seek only to be objective, and said nothing in the sentence which the other articles referenced in the paragraph did not also say. Why should it be necessary to repeat references/sources multiple times within the same paragraph??--JGabbard (talk) 19:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC) The idea of a weak central government that had no control over the statesdied with the Confederacy and was rejected by the people that drafted the Constitution of the United States. Your assertion about what the federal government was "never intended to be" is flat wrong. Factchecker atyourservice (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC) ANIHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Falcon8765 (TALK) 14:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Planned Parenthood. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. v/r - TP 16:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Please use review articles for medical contentPer WP:MEDRS. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:40, 24 November 2011 (UTC) Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:
Message delivered by Dominic·t 19:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Edit warring at NTCCYou have been trying to edit war in information which 1) does not have consensus, 2) is partially false, 3) is not sourced to reliable sources. Please do not continue to edit war. It is your job, per WP:BURDEN to gain consensus for your edits. Please do not edit war changes into an article, but follow the process outlined in WP:BRD. Doing otherwise is disruption of the Wikipedia process. Be——Critical 06:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC) Please don't make this harder than it needs to be. You have reverted a series of good faith edits, not all of which were even mine: NTCC's website updates info to 3000 members in 100 individual churches. The 1987 incorporation is corroborated by documents listed and already referenced. Ex-military students are actually closer to 90 or perhaps even 95%, hence the "over 75% of students" should be preferred over the nebulous term, "many." Pastors tithes are funneled to senior leadership along with everyone else's, and that they are changed out frequently is already referenced in the News-Tribune article, which is how NTCC "zeroes out" escrow accounts. The remainder consists of typos or inadvertent word errors, e.g., "Mike Kinson" is a confusion of two men's names. So please do tell, exactly what is left to dispute???JGabbard (talk) 13:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
License tagging for File:She Did It.jpgThanks for uploading File:She Did It.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC) ReferencesPlease use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
References 2May I suggest that you look to: http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/4841/1/4841.pdf See page 305 for prostate cancer. This reference is about as high end and peer reviewed as you can find.32cllou (talk) 16:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Your submission at AfC How Much Love (Leo Sayer song) was accepted How Much Love (Leo Sayer song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! LukeSurl t c 23:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)April 2014Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Travolta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:39, 23 April 2014 (UTC) A pie for you!
undefined Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk questionHello, JGabbard! I'm St170e. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk st170etalk 23:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC) st170etalk 23:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Coolidge song) (October 19) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Coolidge song) (October 20) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank YouThank You for the gift :-) --Peaceworld 09:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC) TalkbackHello, JGabbard. You have new messages at St170e's talk page.
Message added 13:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. st170etalk 13:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Coolidge song) (October 30) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
November 2014Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bay City Rollers may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC) charts & citationsHi, happy new year to you. You might want to note that it's incorrect to insert a space before a citation – per Wikipedia:Citing_sources#How_to_place_an_inline_citation_using_ref_tags. Also, I really can't see that a chart compiled by the likes of WLS-FM in Chicago merits inclusion in a list of an album or single's chart peaks and year-end standings. It's particularly unnecessary when we already give the song's peak and year-end positions on Billboard. Just thought I'd mention that because there's a couple of song articles I'd like to expand for Good Article status, and your addition of the WLS-FM rankings will have to go – at least, from what I can see at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_guide#Charts and links from that guideline. Thanks, JG66 (talk) 07:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Happy New Year to you too, JG: Thank you for informing me of that protocol; I was unaware of it. I have never added spaces into text, and agree with the protocol. Nonetheless, just in the chart box sections I still feel that leaving one space makes them easier to look at it because provides a less "congested" and more aesthetic appearance. However, if only for consistency's sake I will refrain from adding them. Concerning WLS-AM (aka "World's Largest Station", now WLS-FM), their music surveys are notable and should be considered worthy of inclusion because their coverage range during the 1950s through the 1980s was 38 states and most of Canada. In either case, an article's "good" status should not be predicated merely upon an additional item of information.JGabbard (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Reference Errors on 13 JanuaryHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC) A country is not a "Chart"JGabbard, I'm going to continue reverting your changes at articles I've taken to GA or those that I am planning to. I mean, how on earth can naming the relevant chart (under a column headed "Chart") be considered "redundant verbiage" or "debris"? In the UK, for instance, there were at least three notable national charts during the early 1970s – NME, Melody Maker and the "official" chart, which was published in Record Mirror (although it was by no means recognised as official yet, because NME and Melody Maker were seen as more comprehensive in their methodology). The approach I've followed when writing or rewriting articles is not only logical, in that each Chart column contains the name of a chart, but it's consistent with the approach applied by other editors at, say, Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (an FA), Imagine (John Lennon song) (FA) and Abbey Road (GA). (You'll notice that a chart template appears in "Imagine", and there's an equivalent template for albums, although, like me, many others editors don't appear to like using it.) Regardless of whether there was more than a single chart within each country – and there almost always was, even in France, Holland, Italy and the like, I've recently discovered – full chart names appear in all those articles, and many more. They're Good or Featured status, meaning that, just like Back Off Boogaloo and Give Me Love (Give Me Peace on Earth), they've all been reviewed by others, who have obviously supported the treatment given in the Charts boxes. I'm sorry to say it, but if you actually concentrated on writing a whole article – of course there's no obligation to, but if you did – perhaps you'd appreciate the time and thought that goes into making an article work from start to finish. For instance, information given in any field or column heading in an infobox, navbox or table should work with, not ignore, the wording of that heading. Also, could I again ask you to stop introducing a space before each reference. I'm sorry if this all sounds a bit heavy-handed, it's not my usual approach. But add that to the above, and the fact that you're often citing a chart position to a less-than-reliable source (at least, for GA standard), and you add bare URLs, making no attempt to set them as tidy references – well, it's frustrating to anyone who has made the effort to improve something for GA, and has got a second (or more) pair of eyes to review each article. Thanks, JG66 (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Your vandalism included the comment "Go to talk page". Just letting you know that I have followed your request. Cesiumfrog (talk) 04:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:You (Marcia Hines/Rita Coolidge song), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC) License tagging for File:Bad Case of Loving You (Doctor, Doctor) - Robert Palmer.jpgThanks for uploading File:Bad Case of Loving You (Doctor, Doctor) - Robert Palmer.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Ways to improve My Girl (Gone, Gone, Gone)Hi, I'm Ormr2014. JGabbard, thanks for creating My Girl (Gone, Gone, Gone)! I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article could really use more and better citations. The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ormr2014 (talk) 03:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Chutes and ladders?How about doing this at Spiders & Snakes (song)? "Spiders & Snakes" redirects to the song article, which has a hatnote mentioning the band article. Ok? Shenme (talk) 05:02, 23 May 2015 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:You (Marcia Hines/Rita Coolidge song)Hello, JGabbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rita Coolidge song)". The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Keep The Customer Satisfied - Simon & Garfunkel.jpgThanks for uploading File:Keep The Customer Satisfied - Simon & Garfunkel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC) License tagging for File:Being With You - Smokey Robinson.jpgThanks for uploading File:Being With You - Smokey Robinson.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Did It in a Minute - Hall & Oates.jpgThanks for uploading File:Did It in a Minute - Hall & Oates.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Now that I have the German cover art undeleted, shall I remove the French cover art? German was used earlier before I replaced it with Belgian cover, which I mistaken as American one. Therefore, I'll start a fresher RFC and end the other RFC. --George Ho (talk) 21:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Never Let Her Slip Away - A. Gold.jpgThanks for uploading File:Never Let Her Slip Away - A. Gold.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Thank You for Being a Friend - Andrew Gold.jpgThanks for uploading File:Thank You for Being a Friend - Andrew Gold.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Isn't She Lovely - Stevie Wonder.pngThanks for uploading File:Isn't She Lovely - Stevie Wonder.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC) License tagging for File:Maybe I'm a Fool - Eddie Money.jpgThanks for uploading File:Maybe I'm a Fool - Eddie Money.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC) License tagging for File:Maybe I'm a Fool - Eddie Money.jpgThanks for uploading File:Maybe I'm a Fool - Eddie Money.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC) Category:Seafaring songsCategory:Seafaring songs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 22:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Electric Light OrchestraHi, I'm TrekkiELO, please help me in my quest against Synthwave.94 who constantly reverts all of my recent edit additions for Electric Light Orchestra's Weekly Chart Performance on every single with Radio & Records entry by only saying the same ole it is an unofficial/non-notable chart without any proof to back him up when I've provided references otherwise.--TrekkiELO (talk) 02:10, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
I didn't see anything at Livin' Thing to suggest that it is a seafaring song and have consequently removed that category, which you added. Categories added to an article must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC) Disco Duck - Forums are not RSTo my knowledge forums are not and never have been considered reliable sources and should not be used in citations. You are welcome to raise the matter at the article's Talk page or WP:RSN if you feel an exception should be made. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago (talk) 17:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Your changes at Give Me Love (and elsewhere)JGabbard, could you please stop mucking around with song articles. I'm sorry but "mucking around" would seem to be an accurate description. I've given you the benefit of the doubt in the past, regarding your apparent obsession with adding "aesthetic spaces", removing so-called "debris" from charts sections, never failing to write "U.S." when the article's style is British English, and using unreliable sources, often formatted as bare URLs. But I'm finding it hard to see the changes you just made at "Give Me Love" as anything but obstructive. In one fell swoop, you took away countless edits I had made to improve the text with detail, and/or improving the sourcing. In another, you reinstated an external link to a site that doesn't even carry the LyricFind symbol – meaning it's a copyright violation. I know what I'm doing, and I take a lot of pride in what I do. I took the song article to GA, and I own or have access to every single one of the sources in the article; plus I've taken part in many, many GA song reviews – so I've come to know what plenty of other editors regard as correct in these song articles. But you seem to be acting alone, without any thought for whether your personal preferences tally with anyone else's. (For instance, if it's so important to you to see a space after italicised text, why not take it up at the VIllage Pump and see if someone can design automated thin spacing in such instances?) JG66 (talk) 04:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop creating redirects.There are no redirects from article space to user or draft space. So, please stop creating "articles" about songs that only redirect to your user page. Bgwhite (talk) 01:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Before My Heart Finds OutA tag has been placed on Before My Heart Finds Out requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of One Hundred WaysA tag has been placed on One Hundred Ways requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:The Groove Line - Heatwave.jpgThanks for uploading File:The Groove Line - Heatwave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Hi, Good jobI've noticed all the good work you've done on many music related articles and I wanted to tell you to keep up with your excellent work. Caden cool 00:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
A beer for you!
Orphaned non-free image File:Snowbird - Anne Murray.jpgThanks for uploading File:Snowbird - Anne Murray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Better source request for File:(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman - Aretha Franklin.jpgThanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Theme from Close EncountersThe article Theme from Close Encounters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Orphaned non-free image File:Jean Knight.jpgThanks for uploading File:Jean Knight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Please do you know an efficient Wikipedia administrator ?Please do you know an efficient Wikipedia administrator (about stats completely out of order and Henrik "officially on strike") ? Thanks a lot. Best regards.--86.73.64.12 (talk) 13:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jean Knight.jpgA tag has been placed on File:Jean Knight.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redsky89 (talk) 04:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dark Money.jpgThank you for uploading File:Dark Money.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hirsutism (talk) 15:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC) You've Lost That Lovin' Feelin'Hi could you add the chart boxes to the "You've Lost That Lovin' Feelin'" article sections on Dionne Warwick, Cila Black, and Hall & Oates. I know you are good at this and it would help the article. Thanks. Caden cool 02:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
A pie for you!
File:You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling - Dionne Warwick.jpg listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling - Dionne Warwick.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 02:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling - Dionne Warwick.jpgThanks for uploading File:You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling - Dionne Warwick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC) Articles about 60s musicI enjoyed reading your article about the Grass Roots' album, Two Divided by Love and I noticed that you are interested in 60s music. I look forward to reading a lot of your articles and appreciate your interest in the music of that era. Garagepunk66 (talk) 02:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC) HelloHi JGabbard. I noticed you added the infobox and image for the single Who's Sorry Now? by Connie Francis, and was wondering if you planned on adding the chart boxes for her? Caden cool 22:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
You created the European image, but I replaced it with the American image. Then the IP editor removed the US one without a reason. You reinserted the European image; I reinserted the US one without replacing the other. We are discouraged by administrators to use more than one non-free image without unless another image helps a reader understand the significance of the topic more. Somehow, administrators do not make exceptions on extra front covers, so we must choose either the European image or the American image. The song is made by the American band, so the US image is more likely. However, what's your take on this issue? --George Ho (talk) 20:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman - Aretha Franklin.jpgThanks for uploading File:(You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman - Aretha Franklin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC) License tagging for File:I'm Easy - Keith Carradine.jpgThanks for uploading File:I'm Easy - Keith Carradine.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 19Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Castles in the Air (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Butler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC) A cookie for you!
File:The Groove Line - Heatwave.jpg and another questionI didn't realize that you reinserted the Dutch front cover. I think the side label is adequate enough. There is no need to display the band themselves as the main topic is the song, not the band. Shall I remove it? If so, I guess I must take it to FFD then. --George Ho (talk) 07:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Almost forgot to ask you: are you and JG66 the same person? George Ho (talk) 07:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
File:The Groove Line - Heatwave.jpg listed for discussionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Groove Line - Heatwave.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 19:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Grass (The Grass Roots album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let's Live For Today. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC) 2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community SurveyThe Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Got to Be Real - Cheryl Lynn.gifThanks for uploading File:Got to Be Real - Cheryl Lynn.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC) borked commentsYou edited several articles today (special:Diff/723644608) and messed up with the comment tag. You didn't add a closing tag, which caused the categories, navboxes, succession boxes and external links to "vanish". I've fixed nine articles, but could you check if there are more? Bgwhite (talk) 08:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC) I noticed that happening on Hall & Oates song articles but was unsure what had caused it. I apologize, will review my edits, and thanks for your assistance! - JGabbard (talk) 18:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 10Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walk Away Renée, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page If I Were a Carpenter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:New World Coming - Mama Cass Elliot.jpgThanks for uploading File:New World Coming - Mama Cass Elliot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC) Kent Music Report year-end chartsHi, I just have a quick question about the year-end charts compiled by David Kent in the 1970s and 1980s: the copy of his Australian Chart Book in the British Library only has Top 25 singles and albums for each year, but I notice for some articles you've added year-end chart positions below 25... where do you get these from? I've seen top 100s listed on the forums on australian-charts.com, but I don't know where they get their positions 26 to 100 either... Thanks. Richard3120 (talk) 14:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Front covers of Shake Your Groove ThingI see that you added the Belgian and Dutch front covers of the single. Allow me to replace them with the US side label if you don't mind? --George Ho (talk) 10:03, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 17Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jungle Love (Steve Miller Band song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jet Airliner (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 27 JuneHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC) Quarterly rankingsQuarterly song article pageview rankings are now posted on my userpage! - JGabbard (talk) 04:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC) July 2016Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, I Want You Back, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 16:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC) Adding "singles" to chart headings for songsI've recently noticed that when adding chart information to song articles, you add the heading "Weekly singles charts". It's not necessary to specify this; it's quite clear what chart singles chart on and the cases where this would be confusing would be few and far between. It is also at odds with the naming scheme of "Year-end charts", as you don't usually specify these are "Year-end singles charts". Please consider dropping the "singles" part and just write "Weekly charts" to be consistent with other naming standards, like for album articles. Albums are overwhelmingly not specified as charting on "Weekly albums charts" on their articles. Thank you. Ss112 18:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Ss112: I'm OK with leaving out the word "singles", although I prefer that it remain. Apparently this is a trend. However, if omitted above the box, then to be consistent it should also be excluded inside the box as well, from names of individual chart entries. I am otherwise opposed to its omission in the column header.
Disambiguation link notification for July 21Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fortunes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storm in a Teacup (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Love's Grown Deep - Kenny Nolan.jpgThank you for uploading File:Love's Grown Deep - Kenny Nolan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC) Adding false chart informationHello, I'm Nqr9. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rio (song) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I noticed that you added a false Australian end of year chart position for for Duran Duran's "Rio" for 1982 of #134, on 26 October 2015, citing ARIA's top 50 singles of 1988 page as the reference. Firstly, the end of year charts are not calculated below #100 (or, at least only a top 100 is published). Secondly, the single peaked at #60 in Australia; it would be extremely unlikely for a single peaking that low to make the end of year chart. Thirdly, the reference you cited in no way supports the information you added to the page. Your edit appears to either have been a bizarre, careless mistake, or an act of vandalism.Nqr9 (talk) 02:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Ronnie SessionsPlease don't add redlinks to articles unless you plan to make that article right away. See WP:REDNOT. Also, please don't assume that all of my edits are just means to inflate my edit count. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
For future referenceWhen you comment on an "Articles for deletion" page, your opinion will almost certainly be disregarded if you sound like a conspiracy theorist, or make claims unrelated to Wikipedia policies. :-)Anythingyouwant (talk) 16:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
JGabbard, your insertion of personal opinions into the AfD may be going too far beyond the scope of the AfD, and I'd suggest removing them or striking them out. You can read why at WP:SOAPBOX and WP:BLP. Better move fast before the roof caves in.Anythingyouwant (talk) 22:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Alert regarding American politics topic areaThis message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 04:08, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 19Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC) Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 16:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Here is a list of the talk page contributors. I count 19, so you should be able to check if they have all been notified and list them in the DRN. TFD (talk) 16:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC) DRN(Note: although I am a dispute resolution volunteer, I have removed myself from the list of volunteers for the duration of this case, and should be treated like any other editor who is party to a dispute) JGabbard, would you be so kind as to edit your "Dispute overview", "Have you tried to resolve this previously?" and "How do you think we can help?" sections to contain a neutral description of the dispute? Phrases such as "minority obstructionist group of editors", "irrational approach" and "obstructionist tactics" do not make your case stronger. In fact, they make it weaker. A strong case focuses on what the sources say and whether the article accurately reflects what is in the sources.
Furthermore, "They have secured a lockdown on the article for the duration of the week" is demonstrably false. I am the editor who secured a lockdown on the article. See Talk:Murder of Seth Rich#Page protection. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:57, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
DR StatementJGabbard: You wrote that I am "edit warring" at the Seth Rich article. Please review my edit history there. Your statement is false, it's a false aspersion, it's a personal attack, and I ask you to strike it through or delete it. Let's stick to clear and accurate communication as we collaborate on this article. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 18:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
AE NoticeI have opened an AE case on your conduct here [4]. Geogene (talk) 21:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One Way Ticket (Stephen Lawrence song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Hart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC) Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanctionThe following sanction now applies to you:
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request. This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 23:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rocky (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for September 22Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Move in a Little Closer, Baby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Andrews. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Green Tambourine - Lemon Pipers.jpgThanks for uploading File:Green Tambourine - Lemon Pipers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 8 October 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Bad Case of Loving You (Doctor, Doctor) - Robert Palmer.jpgThanks for uploading File:Bad Case of Loving You (Doctor, Doctor) - Robert Palmer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC) Cover arts of Bad Case of Loving You (Doctor, Doctor)I don't know why you insist that a "good-looking" cover serves readers better than the UK cover. The song was British, the singer was British-born, and the release was... sparse. If you insist, the French release has a title and was more successful in France. Also the same as the UK one with an addition. --George Ho (talk) 08:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lovin' Things - The Grass Roots.jpgThanks for uploading File:Lovin' Things - The Grass Roots.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC) Europe 10,000 Challenge inviteHi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 09:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC) ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, JGabbard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) Interview invitation from a Wikipedia researcher in the University of MinnesotaI am Weiwen Leung, a student at the University of Minnesota. I am currently conducting a study on how people on the LGBT+ Wikipedians group use and contribute to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short 5 minute survey? If so, please email me at leung085@umn.edu. It would be helpful if you could include your Wikipedia username when emailing. Thank you, Weiwen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 09:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Consistent addition of IP address-hosted sourceI've written several edit summaries that I'm sure you've seen by now, but any more additions of an IP address-hosted source (http://50.- whatever it is), which fails WP:Reliable sources, and you will be reported. You've been doing this for years, it seems to have escaped popular notice and it's gone on long enough. Half your contributions to this site aren't even sourced, and the sources you do add are poor (namely forums and links to sites that sell a book but do not display the actual information itself) or sites anybody could have set up and that you expect other users to trust the validity of because you added it. You do realise users have been blocked on this site for less, right? I had a discussion with you earlier this year about similar content issues, and I'm not discussing this time because it is policy that users reliably source information they add to this site, the onus is on them to do that, and you continue to disregard that fundamental bit of Wikipedia. Having userboxes on your page that essentially amount to "people need to trust what Wikipedia says", as if this is an honour system, is not the way this site works, I'm afraid. Ss112 08:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Could It Be I'm Falling In Love - Spinners.jpgThanks for uploading File:Could It Be I'm Falling In Love - Spinners.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC) Chart boxesHi JG. Do you think you could add some chart boxes for Linda Ronstadt over at "The Tracks of My Tears" and at "Ooo Baby Baby"? I know you are good at this sort of thing. Caden cool 18:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Misty Blue - Dorothy Moore.jpgThank you for uploading File:Misty Blue - Dorothy Moore.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 04:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Misty Blue - Dorothy Moore.jpgThanks for uploading File:Misty Blue - Dorothy Moore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC) Kent Music ReportHi, can you please point me to where the Kent Music Report is referred to as KMR in common usage? Things like ARIA, BMI, RPM, RIAA, etc. are all referred to by the acronym and are known by these names, but I have never seen or heard KMR used in place of the Kent Music Report. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Cliff Richard editsHi there, thanks for your work on the numerous Cliff Richard pages! Just wondering if on the "Dreamin'" page you can please correct the reference for the Australian year-end chart? (I'm also interested to know where you found it.) I'll have a look at the other pages you edited too, if I see anythings else missing I may get back to you. Thanks again! AusChartMan (talk) 13:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 20 DecemberHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 24 DecemberHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Ain't That a Shame - Fats Domino.jpgThanks for uploading File:Ain't That a Shame - Fats Domino.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC) Reference errors on 22 JanuaryHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Reference errors on 7 FebruaryHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Thank youThanks for the kitten, Brother. It made my whole evening! BroWCarey (talk) 03:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 19Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reelin' and Rockin', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Like It Like That. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Donnas discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keep on Loving You. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 11Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC) DisambigutationWhile I can appreciate your enthusiasm for creating new articles, it's generally preferred that the articles exist before the disambiguation pages are created. Also, we generally don't use a DAB for two pages - a hatnote such as {{for}} or {{about}} is sufficient. In these situations, the primary article (usually the first page) is kept at the main name, and the secondary name is parenthetically disambiguated. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 18Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited P. F. Sloan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Let's Live for Today. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
That Thing With Rich AppelAn editor with your experience should be beyond creating articles in mainspace which are supported by only one primary source (generally a prime target for G11 speedy deletion as an advert), no categories, and no projects on the talk page. At 137 articles created I should be asking "Why doesn't this editor have Autopatrolled already?" rather than "How do I clean this up?". I'll move it to draftspace where you can add sources that show its notability before you move it back to mainspace again. Cabayi (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of That thing with Rich Appel for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article That thing with Rich Appel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That thing with Rich Appel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 14:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC) April 2017Hello, JGabbard, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Richappel (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 14:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:I.R.S. ("It Really Shoulda") Been a Top 10 hit.jpgThanks for uploading File:I.R.S. ("It Really Shoulda") Been a Top 10 hit.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 26 April 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:That Thing With Rich Appel.pngThanks for uploading File:That Thing With Rich Appel.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC) Files listed for discussionSome of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 May 1 if you are interested in preserving their usage.
Thank you. --George Ho (talk) 21:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC) Murder of Seth RichLooks like there might of been an edit conflict and your edit to the talk page delete several comments of others. I reverted but just a heads up. PackMecEng (talk) 03:27, 18 May 2017 (UTC) Hello again. At Heaven Must Be Missing an Angel, I replaced File:Heaven Must Be Missing an Angel - Tavares.jpg, which I realize is of a 1987 Belgian re-release, with one of vinyl side labels and French one uploaded in Commons. I wonder whether you are fine with that. --George Ho (talk) 18:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ariel - Dean Friedman.jpgThanks for uploading File:Ariel - Dean Friedman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Another Sleepless Night - Anne Murray.jpgThanks for uploading File:Another Sleepless Night - Anne Murray.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:1, 2, 3, Red Light - 1910 Fruitgum Company.jpgThanks for uploading File:1, 2, 3, Red Light - 1910 Fruitgum Company.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC) AE noticePlease see AE report at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Sagecandor (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC) Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanctionThe following sanction now applies to you:
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request. This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. NeilN talk to me 19:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC) WikiprojectsHi JGabbard. Thanks for expanding Playground in My Mind into an article. I've added {{WP Songs}} to its talk page -- would you please include appropriate WP:Wikiprojects for future articles. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 05:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Touch Tones in "Don't Call Us, We'll Call You"I have performed an analysis of the song "Don't Call Us, We'll Call You" by Sugarloaf. The first set of Touch Tones (time 0:16 - 0:20) represents a telephone number of 212-765-4321. While your article states that this an unlisted number at CBS records, it seems very unlikely that this would be the case. The area code of 212 is correct for Manhattan (and consistent with the song), but the rest of the number appears to be someone simply walking down the keypad: 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. The chances of this being a real phone number are very slim (but not impossible). It should also be noted that the touch tones are about 1.6% lower than the standard DTMF frequencies, which suggests that the recording of the tones was slowed down by that amount (1.6%) when it was mixed into the song. The second set of Touch Tones (time 2:52 - 2:56) are consistent with your article. The number being dialed is 202-456-1414, which is in fact the White House switchboard. Again, the tones are slightly lower than the standard DTMF frequencies, but in this case, the difference is about 1.0% (instead of 1.6%). If you would like to see the details of my analysis, please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arteelx (talk • contribs) 14:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:"Lucky ips - Cliff Richard.jpgThanks for uploading File:"Lucky ips - Cliff Richard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Jim StaffordTemplate:Jim Stafford has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC) The article Blake Babies discography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing "Track list"Hi, going forward, please label any track listings as "Track listing", per the WP:MOSALBUM (album style guidelines). Thanks --Jennica✿ / talk 15:29, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Shoot for the Moon) has been reviewed!Thanks for creating Shoot for the Moon, JGabbard! Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page. Learn more about page curation. Boleyn (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC) Category:Gospel pop hits has been nominated for discussionCategory:Gospel pop hits, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 17:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Fool in Love with You - Jim Photoglo.jpgThanks for uploading File:Fool in Love with You - Jim Photoglo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Chords - Sh-Boom.jpgThanks for uploading File:Chords - Sh-Boom.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Kind of a Drag - Buckinghams.jpgThanks for uploading File:Kind of a Drag - Buckinghams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC) Kent Music Report annual chart positions beyond #100Another editor brought a recent edit of yours https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Here_Comes_the_Rain_Again&type=revision&diff=799926674&oldid=799162371 to my attention. I'm curious to know where you sourced the Australian Kent Music Report end of year chart placing of #108 from. Despite citing David Kent's chart book, it does not appear in there (this book only lists top 25 annual charts for 1970-1992 inclusive; although this chart was superseded by the ARIA chart in mid-1988). I have scans of the Kent Music Report weekly charts from the 80s, and while they do list albums/singles with "significant sales reports beyond the top 100" in them from late 1982, these are not numbered, and the annual charts do not extend beyond #100. The position you've added could be correct, even if the citation isn't, but I'm curious to know where you sourced it from.Nqr9 (talk) 06:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Drowning in the Sea of Love - Joe Simon.jpgThanks for uploading File:Drowning in the Sea of Love - Joe Simon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, JGabbard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia