User talk:JDavid

Welcome!

Hello, JDavid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 16:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Port of

After looking into more examples, I withdraw my previous statements: it seems that "port of x" construction is more often used than "x port". Feel free to revert me; one recommendation I'd have is to ensure that there are redirects from "x port" to "port of x", as such term is still used in English works relatively often (if, perhaps, not as often as "port of x"). Examples: [1], [2]. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome JDavid! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jezioro Białe

The article Jezioro Białe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Consists of a list of places named 'Jezioro Białe', in the fashion of a disambiguation page, but all of those places are redlinks. Therefore, this page seems unnecessary, and features next to no content. See also Białe Jezioro

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cnilep (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Białe Jezioro

The article Białe Jezioro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Consists of a list of places named 'Białe Jezioro', in the fashion of a disambiguation page, but all of those places are redlinks. Therefore, this page seems unnecessary, and features next to no content. See also Jezioro Białe.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cnilep (talk) 22:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bronislaw Komorowski Image

Hi JDavid. I noticed that this image is marked with an OTRS pending template, however, I am a tad bit confused with your recent reversion and edit summary. Have you contacted the person/orginization that holds rights to this image, and have they agreed to license the image under CC, and send an email to OTRS, or are you awaiting an initial response? I await a reply. Thanks. Connormah (talk | contribs) 20:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ad. 2 Silesian Voivodeship

Jestem ustępliwy, jeśli chodzi o nazwę "Autonomous Silesian Voivodeship", więc nie przesadzaj. Zaproponowałem rozwiązanie, które jest zgodne ze wszystkim: źródłami, POV oraz zasadami Wikipedii czyli "Silesian Voivodeship (autonomy)" lub "Silesian Voivodeship (autonomous)". Możesz się dziwić, ale bardzo ważne jest aby napisać wprost że nie chodzi o typowe województwo. Jednolite nazwy województw mogą być w przypadku tych wszystkich zwykłych województw. Jak podobno nie zaprzeczasz, śląskie było zupełnie inne. Było fenomenem nie tylko na skalę Polski (czytałem nawet że na skalę światową). Zmieszanie śląskiego ze zwykłymi województwami można właśnie uznać za "tuszowanie" prawdy. LUCPOL (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ale ty się napaliłeś na te POV, ciągle mnie o to oskarżasz. Starasz się (ciągle mnie oczerniając) zatuszować status autonomii, wmówić mi że status autonomii województwa śląskiego to mój POV :p Poza tym już ci napisałem wcześniej, jednolite nazwy województw mogą być w przypadku tych wszystkich "zwykłych" województw. Śląskie jako jedyne miało status autonomii zatem można to opisać w nazwie artykułu. Ciągle tylko upodabniasz autonomię do zwykłego województwa, chcesz aby autonomia była traktowana tak samo jak zwykłe województwa ale autonomia nigdy nie będzie zwykłym województwem jak inne i tego nie zmienisz. Swój POV zostaw gdzie indziej. LUCPOL (talk) 20:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Napisałeś "Ty natomiast wyolbrzymiasz autonomię do miary osobnego państwa" - jesteś zwykłym kłamcą, nigdy nie wyolbrzymiałem autonomii do miary osobnego państwa. Autonomia to autonomia. Ma odrębność, ale nie jest państwem. Mało tego: od razu zarzucasz komuś POV i złe intencje, tylko dlatego że ma inne zdanie i kibicuje "innej partii politycznej". To jest zachowanie skandaliczne. Ponoć jesteś administratorem na pl.wiki, administrator nie powinien się tak zachowywać na jakiejkolwiek Wikipedii. LUCPOL (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

It says clearly in the description of the image ") (Upload of original artwork by artist.) " so I don't know what you're talking about...

"Original upload by artist" means exactly that. The artist is the one that uploaded it. Permission is implied.Michael Dorosh^Talk 15:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

tb

You have new messages

Hello, JDavid. You have new messages at Skäpperöd's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:Polish Football Association logo old.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Polish Football Association logo old.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:44, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Toporzel Axeagle.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Toporzel Axeagle.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Toporzel Axeagle.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toporzel Axeagle.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Polish Football Association logo old.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Polish Football Association logo old.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]